Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Even after 2300 years of warfare, Western Civ. failed to grasp Semitic Civ. is a

    Even after 2300 years of warfare, Western Civ. failed to grasp Semitic Civ. is as deeply feminine as the West is deeply masculine.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-06 22:28:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1114656253903421440

  • The Indo European Expansion was the most important event in human history. It is

    The Indo European Expansion was the most important event in human history. It is exceeded only by our development of speech.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-04 16:09:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1113836049082527744

  • Strategy boils down to: “We become civilized and therefore normalized, and we no

    Strategy boils down to: “We become civilized and therefore normalized, and we no longer intuit the means of conducting war.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-03 15:07:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1113458012071636994

  • In other words. the Aryan History thing turns out to be true…… Damn

    In other words. the Aryan History thing turns out to be true…… Damn….

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-02 23:14:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1113218186508480513

  • Um. Sorry. Cyrus the Great was Iranian (Persian), and therefore Caucasian. We sc

    Um. Sorry. Cyrus the Great was Iranian (Persian), and therefore Caucasian.

    We screw this up with our optimism all the time, don’t we… lol 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-02 20:19:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1113174153027215360

  • Americans distrust authority.Which is why They worked to destroy our civilizatio

    Americans distrust authority.Which is why They worked to destroy our civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-01 12:53:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1112699574135721984

  • “From the beginning of agriculture right up into the late 18th century, large ci

    —“From the beginning of agriculture right up into the late 18th century, large cities tended to be net population sinks, with a higher local death rate than a local birth rate.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-31 13:07:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1112340698332827650

  • Tolkien Was Showing Us the Middle Way

    November 6th, 2018 8:48 AM

    –ADAM VOIGHT: “TOLKIEN WAS SHOWING US THE MIDDLE WAY”– —“Sauron is the sort of thing both Christians and Aryans can agree on and the Lord of the Rings is meant to show that. This is also the theme of CS Lewis’ “Abolition of Man”, where he speaks of the Tao instead of God. It is meant to be a Law of nature.”— Adam Voight

    [O]ur ancestral method is not us good vs them evil, but us ORDER and the universe CHAOS and unpredictable. This is the correct understanding of our relationship to our gods. They were undependable. Fickle. Hence we were SUPERIOR GODS ASCENDANT. When we mastered fire it put us equal to the gods. When we mastered metal it put us superior to the gods. That one lesson is THE lesson.

    [S]o I think that Tolkien’s narrative, and Adam’s argument is best understood as the problem of a homogenous people against nature (our western way) and heterogeneous peoples against each other (the zoroastrian middle-eastern way). I mean we have evidence in our mythology of the pre-metal europeans and their religion, then the metal europeans and their religion, and that is the origin of the Vanir-Aesir divide. We have the western ascendance of the prophet figure of odin over the indo european ancestral gods, to create what we think of as nordic-germanic- pagan religion. And then we have the nordic-germanic-pagan of the Etru being overtaken by the Itals. And we have the southern adoption of the greek pantheon into the etru-italic thereby obscuring the ancient religion except for it’s ‘naturalism’ which the romans persisted. Then we had the imposition (by force) of a semitic And we have been trying desperately to restore our Natural Religion, and almost did so prior to the world wars. But after the world wars the Semites (marxism-feminism) and their co-conspirators the Parisians (postmodernism-feminism) and the Anglo Puritans (social democracy-feminism) worked desperately to destroy that restoration of our Natural Religion. All religion is political in nature, we just have so many layers of allegory and fraud and deception that it’s extremely difficult to untangle. REligion produces a group competitive strategy so that our many micro-decisions support that strategy, at very near zero cost, because many, many of our decisions are otherwise undecidable. As such religion teaches us that whenever possible, given any set of choices, among those that are in your self interest, then chose the decision that is ALSO in the common interest. This is the means by which the ‘decision economy of religion’ functions to advance – many times per day per person – the group: many micro payments into the commons. We can be an homogenous people against the vicissitudes of nature and transcend man into the stars and eternity or fall again victim to the heterogeneous people against the attempt at transformation, and the sedation of the many into a long sleep and hyper consumption decline by continuous regression of man into the abrahamic stupor of dysgenia, superstition, and ignorance. Ancestor Worship is an enrichment. Hinduism a subsistence. Buddhism is an illness. Abrahamism is a cancer. It is not that complicated. You just have to understand if you’re an addict. Some of us are not addicts. But those who are addicts are just as lost as those on opiates. Cheers

  • Tolkien Was Showing Us the Middle Way

    November 6th, 2018 8:48 AM

    –ADAM VOIGHT: “TOLKIEN WAS SHOWING US THE MIDDLE WAY”– —“Sauron is the sort of thing both Christians and Aryans can agree on and the Lord of the Rings is meant to show that. This is also the theme of CS Lewis’ “Abolition of Man”, where he speaks of the Tao instead of God. It is meant to be a Law of nature.”— Adam Voight

    [O]ur ancestral method is not us good vs them evil, but us ORDER and the universe CHAOS and unpredictable. This is the correct understanding of our relationship to our gods. They were undependable. Fickle. Hence we were SUPERIOR GODS ASCENDANT. When we mastered fire it put us equal to the gods. When we mastered metal it put us superior to the gods. That one lesson is THE lesson.

    [S]o I think that Tolkien’s narrative, and Adam’s argument is best understood as the problem of a homogenous people against nature (our western way) and heterogeneous peoples against each other (the zoroastrian middle-eastern way). I mean we have evidence in our mythology of the pre-metal europeans and their religion, then the metal europeans and their religion, and that is the origin of the Vanir-Aesir divide. We have the western ascendance of the prophet figure of odin over the indo european ancestral gods, to create what we think of as nordic-germanic- pagan religion. And then we have the nordic-germanic-pagan of the Etru being overtaken by the Itals. And we have the southern adoption of the greek pantheon into the etru-italic thereby obscuring the ancient religion except for it’s ‘naturalism’ which the romans persisted. Then we had the imposition (by force) of a semitic And we have been trying desperately to restore our Natural Religion, and almost did so prior to the world wars. But after the world wars the Semites (marxism-feminism) and their co-conspirators the Parisians (postmodernism-feminism) and the Anglo Puritans (social democracy-feminism) worked desperately to destroy that restoration of our Natural Religion. All religion is political in nature, we just have so many layers of allegory and fraud and deception that it’s extremely difficult to untangle. REligion produces a group competitive strategy so that our many micro-decisions support that strategy, at very near zero cost, because many, many of our decisions are otherwise undecidable. As such religion teaches us that whenever possible, given any set of choices, among those that are in your self interest, then chose the decision that is ALSO in the common interest. This is the means by which the ‘decision economy of religion’ functions to advance – many times per day per person – the group: many micro payments into the commons. We can be an homogenous people against the vicissitudes of nature and transcend man into the stars and eternity or fall again victim to the heterogeneous people against the attempt at transformation, and the sedation of the many into a long sleep and hyper consumption decline by continuous regression of man into the abrahamic stupor of dysgenia, superstition, and ignorance. Ancestor Worship is an enrichment. Hinduism a subsistence. Buddhism is an illness. Abrahamism is a cancer. It is not that complicated. You just have to understand if you’re an addict. Some of us are not addicts. But those who are addicts are just as lost as those on opiates. Cheers

  • The Vulnerability Created Within Our Civilization – Twice

    THE VULNERABILITY CREATED WITHIN OUR CIVILIZATION – TWICE by Marra McKinney November 6th, 2018 2:55 PM [W]hen lower IQ people move to more feminised countries, they find an already existing parasitic environment (created by women) that is particularly well suited for people like them. Women there already complain that they are victims, that they are oppressed, that men are privileged, that they deserve special quotas and affirmative action, that they should be given stuff via the welfare system, via special (without competitive bidding) government contracts and loans, via special grants and scholarships for women and minorities, or via alimony and divorce. Obviously that environment will be great for low IQ “Give me, Give me, I’m Victim” people as well and they too will join the party and start behaving that way (until there are too many takers and the whole redistribution system collapses). In contrast, low IQ migrants won’t find a parasitic environment like that in Turkey, Israel or Japan. No one there feels guilty, could be made to feel guilty, or is going to give them anything. Men evolved to protect the perimeter against males from other (mainly patriarchal) tribes (chimps do the same). Having women involved in decisions about the perimeter (think of Merkel or Swedish feminists) results in what we see – open borders, multiculture, diversity, “tolerance”, border chaos. In nature, when you weaken the local males, then other males move in and replace them. You can observe this among lions, among primates, or among europeans. After feminist women (with the encouragement of jewish thought leadership) weakened their own men, then other men (muslims) started moving in. Males are the immune system of society. The nationalism that they create is the wall. Without them, there is no nationalism or resistance to foreigners. Weaken them, and then other foreigners, often males, start moving in. Thus, we can expect any ethnic group with large female influence and female leadership to self destroy, as the female leadership will not care about preserving their own ethnicity or group cohesion, leading to the feminised group opening their borders, trying to help anyone in need, accepting anyone in, and eventually becoming a minority in their own country. Women, for the most part, care about resources and smoothing conflict over. They evolved to fill that role. Women are less likely to support military action even against ISIS, a group known for enslaving women and using them as sex slaves, and are less likely to support ban on muslim immigration. Stockholm Syndrome is more pronounced in females . Women were frequently taken captive by (or in some cases traded to) other groups, and so they evolved to smooth things over with distant groups (whereas their male kinfolk were simply killed). The survival of their genes, unless they were exceptionally ugly, was more or less guaranteed – whichever tribe they end up being with. That is why they are more accepting of foreigners and foreign rule. Men form tribes. Women join tribes. So, women tend to vote for resource redistribution (from men) and being nice to everybody (including those who aren’t in their group), and for helping anyone in need, regardless of their group. Theory is that if you want to destroy an ethnic group, simply increase female influence in that group. Increase it a lot. And voila. Since females don’t care about ethnicity that much, and are less xenophobic, the country will open it’s borders, will try to help anyone in need, and will welcome everyone. As a bonus, you will also get a negative birth rate for the feminized host group. All kinds of other ethnic, religious and racial groups will move in, and will start vying for dominance; as for the feminized host group, its fate is to become a minority in its own country, to mix with the foreigners, and then to ultimately disappear.”