Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and

    CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM

    I am, first, and foremost:
    1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism),
    2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d
    3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature).

    I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt.

    I can however, be:
    4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity:
    i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
    ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
    iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
    iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I:
    a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason;
    b) claim belief in a falsehood;
    c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin.

    Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks
    (a) abandon reason,
    (b) claim belief in falsehood, and
    (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin.

    The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is:
    (a) False promise(lying),
    (b) Sophism(lying),
    (c) Straw Manning(lying),
    (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth),
    (e) Denial(lying),
    (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial.

    There is no difference between:
    (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and;
    (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression)

    The First wave of Abrahamists created
    (a) Judaism to undermine,
    (b) Christianity to undermine further, and
    (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened.
    … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason.

    The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts:
    (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism.
    (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness.
    … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!).

    (continued…)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:47:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947

  • THE PHILISTINES WERE AGEANS ie: the minoan relocation theory is true. —“The an

    THE PHILISTINES WERE AGEANS
    ie: the minoan relocation theory is true.

    —“The ancient Mediterranean port city of Ashkelon, identified as “Philistine” during the Iron Age, underwent a marked cultural change between the Late Bronze and the early Iron Age. It has been long debated whether this change was driven by a substantial movement of people, possibly linked to a larger migration of the so-called “Sea Peoples.” Here, we report genome-wide data of 10 Bronze and Iron Age individuals from Ashkelon. We find that the early Iron Age population was genetically distinct due to a European-related admixture. This genetic signal is no longer detectible in the later Iron Age population. Our results support that a migration event occurred during the Bronze to Iron Age transition in Ashkelon but did not leave a long-lasting genetic signature.

    The most likely scenario has long been that the Biblical Philistines were a composition population, made of Aegean folk who mixed with the local Canaanite substrate. These results confirm that.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 23:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425508775576115

  • “And yet the greatest art and music and philosophy in history all came from a ch

    —“And yet the greatest art and music and philosophy in history all came from a christian faith based european culture”—

    Or did it come from a european germanic culture where the church was parasitic and extractive bureaucracy and could afford to spend on propaganda?

    Because it’s pretty hard to argue that until the renaissance in italy and the greco-roman restoration, that europe slowly restored it’s ability to produce arts – partly to compete with the restoration of classical civilization.

    Correlation vs causation. Again. I do cause and systems, you do correlation and cherrypicking (Abrahamism). 😉

    You can’t win this. The evidence is overwhelming – abrahamism produced nothing but dark ages and poverty and the destruction of the great civilizations of the ancient world, and it took us until the 19th century to recover from it and we’re still in the process of extracting ourselves from it. Except now folks like YOU also use marxism postmodernism and feminism instead of judaism, christianity and islam.

    I do math, science, technology, economics, law and history and full accounting 😉 You do lies and cherrypicking. 😉

    The masculine world of competition and adaptation vs the feminine world of non-competition and stagnation.

    We survived judaism, christianity, islam and their lies.

    But we are under assault by abrahamism version two. marxism postmodernism and feminism instead of judaism, christianity and islam.

    There is nothing good in Christianity that was not there before it. The evils of Christianity were not in western thought.

    What is good there is european. It is not christian.

    So develop a new european christian church free of abrahamic deceit, free of worshipping a god of civilizational destruction and dysgenia.

    There is only one god for all people: their ancestors – because they are the only entities to exist to whom they owe debt. There is only one planet upon which we depend, and one universe for us to reach out and grasp for our taking.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:32:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424716235638410

  • A SHARP DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN AND LEVANTINE TRADITIONS by Tim Beckley

    A SHARP DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN AND LEVANTINE TRADITIONS
    by Tim Beckley-Spillane

    (“The next levantine tide on the rise: [Islamism, Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism”: every form of lie possible.)

    I always turn back to Joseph Campbell on the topic of Abrahamism and the West. He draws a sharp distinction between the European and Levantine traditions in “Occidental Mythology” (1964), summarizing their 2.5 thousand year-long antagonism thus:

    —“By and large, the recent history of Occidental mythology can be described in terms of a grandiose interplay of these two contrary pieties; specifically a violent tidal seesaw of exchanges, East to West, West to East, East to West, West to East again, commencing with the first serious Persian attempt against Greece in 490 B.C. Alexander’s conquest of the Levant turned the Levantine tide and was followed by the victories of Rome… Christianity followed, after which the European empire fell, and Levantine Byzantium assumed both its name and its role as the New or Second Rome. Next, Mohammed’s revelation burst upon the world, in 622 A.D., and through the following millennium bade fair to become the ultimate religion of mankind- until, once again, the tide turned. For as Persia had been stopped at Marathon (490 B.C.), so at Pontiers (732 A.D.) was Islam; and thereafter the stirring desert cry of the muezzin to communal prayer was year by year forced back. Within Christianized Europe itself, furthermore, the absolute authority of One Church was dissolved through the irresistible return to force of the native European principles of individual judgement and the worth of rational man. The Reformation, Renaissance, Enlightenment, and present Age of Science followed, culminating, as of now, in the European spiritual conquest of world- with, however, the next Levantine tide already on the rise [Marxism/Feminism/Postmodernism].”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:27:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424696184226696

  • Sure, the Italians and germans were trying to save western civilization – and th

    Sure, the Italians and germans were trying to save western civilization – and they were right. Because the core of western civilization is Lotharingia and the north and baltic seas.

    France in her despotic feminine monopoly ambitions to rule all of europe, has always been the enemy of all. She gave birth to, protection to, and support of rousseu and the anti-aristocratic movement that culminated in marxism and communism.

    Russian ambitions imposed on german territorial and cultural expansion. The powers sought to maintain the balance of powers and continue corporatism of the atlantics rather than the aristocracy of the central europeans.

    The jews were successful in defeating the weakest government in europe – the Russians, by rallying the most backward people in europe, by false promise of worker’s utopia.

    Then europe resisted the Lotharingian attempt to defend europe from the communists.

    Sorry but you know, people do what they can with the knowledge and recourses they have arguing in the traditional moral grammar they have.

    That’s what was different in the movements.

    However al movements were doing similar things

    Advancing their group strategies.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:23:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424681123476053

  • FLOOD!!! Its 5,000,000bc. Central mediterranean. You and the other hominids are

    FLOOD!!!

    Its 5,000,000bc. Central mediterranean. You and the other hominids are playing grab-ass and shit-slinging under the trees, trying to impress the red bottomed chicks, when you hear this thundering sound in the distance…

    It’s 77,000 bc, Red Sea. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut, and while you’ve noticed something’s wrong with the rivers, you suddenly hear this horrible thundering sound in the distance….

    It’s 13000 bc, northwest america. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut, and while you’ve noticed something’s wrong with the rivers, you suddenly hear this horrible thundering sound in the distance….

    It’s 12000bc, Persian Gulf. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut, and while you’ve noticed something’s wrong with the rivers, you suddenly hear this horrible thundering sound in the distance….

    It’s 6400bc. Doggerland. You and the misses and the munchkins are sitting around the hut and, while you’ve noticed that the marshes have gotten wetter since you were a kid, this horrible thundering sound in the distance….

    It’s 5600bc. The Black Sea. You and the Missus and the munchkins are sitting around the hut and this horrible thundering sound in the distance and the flood starts….

    The gods love to seriously f*k with us, using plagues, droughts, floods, volcanos, and asteroids. I mean. It’s like a dungeons and dragons game ‘cept we never get a turn….


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:15:33 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424650233164498

  • (…continued) The debates that are open as far as I know, are: (a) whether anat

    (…continued)

    The debates that are open as far as I know, are:

    (a) whether anatolians came counter-clockwise around the black sea, or clockwise. I have assumed that it’s counter-clockwise until evidence otherwise – the reason being their arts.

    (b) And whether the Iranic people went south of the caspian sea, or north into central Asia and then down and back eastward into today’s Iranic lands.

    (c) I don’t think anyone disputes that the turkic people were far eastern edge, and moved southwest under pressure from the east asians. (I generally ignore the central asians because they have’t produced a ‘civilization’ per se.)

    (d) Whether the Mesopotamians, and whether they are indigenous “marsh arabs”, or a mixture of everyone in the region. It sure looks like they are north semites (marsh arabs). And it sure looks like the south west eurasians and northeast africans merged in what is today’s somalia-yemen-red sea -persian gulf basins, and split between river(north semitic) and sea (south semitic) groups.

    (d) whether anatolians or caucasians or arabs (afro-asiatics) occupied the eastern mediterranean but that over time we’ve seen admixture between groups.

    (e) whether the berber (north african) peoples emerged from the north of africa (top of the red sea, egypt, or the east (horn) of africa. I operate under the assumption that they migrated north and the were relatively insulated (they were on and off insulated).

    (f) the timing and mode of the competition between modern east asians, central eurasians, and the same for modern east asians (mongolids) and their fork from broader souther-route negroids (austronesians).

    There are others but they don’t affect my pursuit f the problem of truth and institutions.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:10:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424630975094590

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    CRITICISM OF MY INTERPRETATION OF POPULATION GENETICS I got another supposed criticism last night without explaining what, from fans of population genetics. However, I can’t separate out their bias from anyone else’s. I have three people I can ask, but they have stopped participating, apparently because I won’t conform to their bias. That bias is to limit discussion to pop gen, and not further disambiguate by language, and further disambiguate by group competitive (evolutionary) strategy. In other words, I’m solving for the big questions of (a) where did technological competitiveness, paternalism, heroism and maneuver, truth and duty, sovereignty, reciprocity(property), commons, tort and jury, come from, (b) why, (c) how was it purified(west) or polluted (semitism), hinduism, buddhism. I use the same research everyone else does. I just am solving for ‘the western group evolutionary strategy that produced sovereignty, law, reason, logic, empiricism, science, technology. So I am interested in the civilizations, their technology, means of production, cooperation, and organization, and fighting. Those groups that we think of as caucasian (really: west eurasian) are spread along the lower boundary of the ice from Spain to Mongolia (or even further?) (So does Caucasian mean west eurasian? the people of the caucuses today? the people that spread into the levant? the people north and west of the black sea? I try to avoid the term because it’s useless.) The black sea is fresh water at that point and seems to be where the rapid evolution of west eurasians peaks, beaks into the IE expansion, and that in to north and west (european), south west (old european), from old european to Anatolian. And from caucuses east to the Tocharian, and south to the coastal middle east, and southeast into the Iranic peoples, then further east into the old indus river peoples (india). Where did truth come from and why did we do it, and why didn’t anyone else? A coincidence: tech, animals, territory, economics, strategy (ooda-loop/maneuver), entrepreneurialism, law, debate, argument, reason, contract. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424627484718540

  • GENETIC SPREAD BY TRADE ROUTES

    GENETIC SPREAD BY TRADE ROUTES


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 17:22:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148643682410729473

  • subhumans , humans, transhumans. what’s the difference between then and now? non

    subhumans , humans, transhumans. what’s the difference between then and now?

    none. we just demarcate by civilizational and genetic development.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 15:44:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148618847873896449

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148341325366013953


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148341325366013953

  • EUPEDIA ONE WORLD PROJECT This is is very close to my mental map of the world. I

    EUPEDIA ONE WORLD PROJECT
    This is is very close to my mental map of the world. It is currently missing Germany and the British Isles.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-08 16:15:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148264395681779712