YOU CAN’T UNSEE IT
Their rapid verbal facility with gossip, pilpul, and critique, is not matched by intellectual achievement in arts, writing, innovation, or productivity. And, upon investigation, in all but the hardest of sciences, it still consists of false promise, baiting into hazard, rewards from undermining achieved, pilpul and critique.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 15:33:00 UTC
(contemplating the biases of indians who participate in our debates.)
I think I understand the frustrations I have with indian’s who try to participate in these conversations, whether educated in india or the states. First of all, i do appreciate the rather odd optimism free of evidence endemic in indian culture. it’s what i admire. But, in india, or in an iimmigrant indian family, or in an indian immigrant community, those with first generation educations have the “doctor problem”, or the ’60’s kid problem’ meaning that when you are surrounded by generations people drastically different in educational knowledge and subsequent ability you overestimate your knowledge and ability, and when you come to America you are ‘educated’ in our academy that markets to that demographic, and sells sociological psychological nonsense in order to preserve income from that demographic – by not ‘correcting’ you and ‘insulting’ you by doing so. This is why our academy is ridiculous now. At least European Americans are educated by habituation in the long history, culture, and information flow of eastern civlization, and our optimism is in our ability to work hard and not be blamed if we fail for our heroic efforts. Or we are optimistic (badly) in our estimations of people from other cultures because we do not realize how Aristotelianism, rule of law, truthful speech, responsibility for the commons, But it’s not some naive optimism that ‘everything is gonna be alright’.
Regardless of what civilization or culture you are from, I’m not one of those professors paid to coddle you with comforting falsehoods, or pretense of respect, in exchange for preserving the income stream for the university, or my job. I know my job. My job is jurisprudence. I’m a prosecutor.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 15:17:00 UTC
TRIPARTISM TO QUADRIPARTISM
—“Those who Fight, Those who Pray, Those who Work What’s the fourth class?”— Richard Hall
^Burghers (the middle class). “Those who Trade”
The middle class emerged only once production was able to scale. And production could only scale once productivity was high enough to produce sufficient surpluses to scale.
We can modernize Tripartism and simply call them The Defensive, Military, Judicial classes, The Administrative, Clerical, Educational classes, and Productive Financial Entrepreneurial, Professional, Managerial, Craftsman and Labor classes. None of us mention the underclasses, because until recently that meant ‘slave’ because they lacked agency, family, resources, and knowledge to be allowed to ‘roam free’ without an ‘owner’ to take responsibility for them – meaning defend the population from them.
But since we develop elites in each of the Military, Administrative, and Productive classes, leaving the majority of the population managing only personal capital, especially the family, and making use of whatever elites that most serve their needs, we tend to separate the economic (Financial, Entrepreneurial,) from the Professional, Managerial, craftsmanly, and laboring classes.
The middle east and far east, because of flood river valleys, and irrigation in them, combined the organization of production into the priesthood, and into the state, and the merchant class, even wealthy, traded specialty goods more than organized commodity capital goods in production. Preserving the trading, craftsman, and workman classes, and maintaining what we consider the capitalist class into the state. The problem is of course, state inefficiency and parasitism.
The big economic shift occurred when the middle class Germanic Europe, was able to accumulate enough capital to develop the Hanseatic league on the continent – thanks to the lack of a strong central state – and create its own rule of law, own defense, own outposts, and trade networks. It ruled for three hundred years dragging northern Europe into post medieval wealth.
The British people able to do the same in the colonies by the same reason: a military state, but an entrepreneurial middle class, capable of funding it’s own adventure. The colonies ended up being a better long term investment, which is why germany, after fighting off napoleon, needed to unify to prevent another despotic french catastrophe, sought to expand her influences (rightly so in my understanding) into territories it had economically domesticated, putting her into competition with Russia and England by unbalancing the world distribution of powers england found (like the usa wrongly does today) the optimum for commercial gains.
The British Americans took this to the ultimate test, and created a purely middle class civilization – escaping both church and state – preserving the germanic rule of law, and individual sovereignty.
And while england created empire, germany created science, we created opportunity and productivity, and the rest is history.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 12:19:00 UTC
by Predmetsky Rosenborg
When properly disambiguated, the idea that we are all “equal” is a meaningless, conflationary, poetic sleight of hand, the headache of a Judeo-Christian hangover…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=494878911109004&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-29 00:17:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188973089264148481
by Predmetsky Rosenborg
When properly disambiguated, the idea that we are all “equal” is a meaningless, conflationary, poetic sleight of hand, the headache of a Judeo-Christian hangover. What does it mean for people to be “equal”? That we are mathematically identical? That we are logically equivalent? That we move at the same speed or travel at the same velocity, or possess the same weight, mass or momentum?
The idea is a product of an abstract, theological equality of dignity by virtue of investiture with the image of God, and an equality of moral accountability before God on the Day of Judgment regardless of our social status or station in our temporal lives.
“15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains;
16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:
17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?” (Rev. 6:15-17).
“12 And I saw the dead, SMALL AND GREAT, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire” (Revelation 20:12-15).
“Rome found in the Jew the incarnation of the unnatural, as though it were its diametrically opposed monstrosity, and in Rome the Jew was held to be convicted of hatred of the whole human race: and rightly so, in so far as it is right to link the well-being and the future of the human race to the unconditional mastery of the aristocratic values, of the Roman values. What, conversely, did the Jews feel against Rome? One can surmise it from a thousand symptoms, but it is sufficient to carry one’s mind back to the Johannian Apocalypse, that most obscene of all the written outbursts, which has revenge on its conscience.
(One should also appraise at its full value the profound logic of the Christian instinct, when over this very book of hate it wrote the name of the Disciple of Love, that self-same disciple to whom it attributed that impassioned and ecstatic Gospel—therein lurks a portion of truth, however much literary forging may have been necessary for this purpose.)
The Romans were the strong and aristocratic; a nation stronger and more aristocratic has never existed in the world, has never even been dreamed of; every relic of them, every inscription enraptures, granted that one can divine what it is that writes the inscription.[Pg 55] The Jews, conversely, were that priestly nation of resentment par excellence, possessed by a unique genius for popular morals: just compare with the Jews the nations with analogous gifts, such as the Chinese or the Germans, so as to realise afterwards what is first rate, and what is fifth rate” (Friedrich Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morality).
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 20:17:00 UTC
Christianiy was used to subdue the european peoples and drive them into ignorance instead of roman literacy and prosperity. We survived christianity, and we only survived it by converting it into a folk religion.
We only survived it. Nothing more.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 18:32:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188886173911007232
Reply addressees: @natrolleon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188885864425746439
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188885864425746439
TRUTH IN HUMOR: THE HISTORY OF ENTREPRENEURIAL WAFARE
The Templars started out as ‘the poor knights’ as shown by two men on horseback. The Hospitaliers were not poor. They had money, arms, fleets of ships, and took territory. The Vikings were entrepreneurial warriors. The romans were entrepreneurial conquerors. The Greeks were entrepreneurial warriors. The indo europeans were entrepreneurial conquerors. Why do you think we live under the long tradition of Severity, Reciprocity, Jury, Truth, Duty, and Contract? Because we have descended from entrepreneurial warfare.
Now if I could just get my fellow western MEN to understand that we are historically entrepreneurial warriors – colonialists, pirates, vikings, in every age, and that it was only the Peace of Westphalia under which our ancestors prohibited us from ‘entrepreneurial war’, and limited warfare to the states.
Russia, Iran, and the Muslims and the Jews have broken the Peace of Westphalia, and returned us to a war of all against all, which is the reason for our continuous defeat in central asia and the middle east.
To restore our people we must return to our long tradition in the industrialization of ‘entrepreneurial warfare’. Meaning “war for adventure, fun, and profit”. It’s the civic nationalists and the christians so cuckolded that they can’t comprehend this – and those of us who are ‘aryans’, ‘pagans’, ‘raiders’, ‘pirates’ and ‘conquerors and colonizers’ and natural entrepreneurial warriors that are willing to return to ‘revolution as a for profit industry”.
This is why you want leaders. You’re still ‘Cucks’ to the state and the ‘church’. You need permission.
But European Men don’t need leaders to hoist the jolly roger, pillage, plunder, and burn the house down. To engage in conquest for fun and profit? Only cowards do. 😉
Happy to ‘knight’ you if it’ll make you feel better. 😉
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 17:00:00 UTC
So what is ‘moral’ when we have through pretense of morality, reduced the developed world to south america, india, and africa – except for the east asians who are not so ‘affected’ by ‘feminine’ preoccupation in political matters.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 15:07:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188834784576978944
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188834547233894401
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays And it is no longer possible to organize majority genetic middle class polities, because the rates of reproduction of the underclasses have reversed our eugenic selection, and ‘economic growth’ making that reversal, is no longer possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188834547233894401
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays And it is no longer possible to organize majority genetic middle class polities, because the rates of reproduction of the underclasses have reversed our eugenic selection, and ‘economic growth’ making that reversal, is no longer possible.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188834547233894401
Next look to a world where the genetic inventory of western civilization and east asian civilization that we both produced over thousands of years of ‘soft’ eugenics under agrarianism, and capital punishment for anti-social behavior, has been reversed by dysgenic reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 15:05:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188834103212281857
Reply addressees: @thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188833432304005120
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays Now flip it around. Your family has a record of self sufficiency, achievement, pro-social behavior, and not only mental health, but mental achievement. It’s not-reproducing a loss? No. But it is lowering the talent pool of the polity. Is failing to reproduce an irreciprocity?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188833432304005120
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@thanos_pope @JohnMarkSays Now flip it around. Your family has a record of self sufficiency, achievement, pro-social behavior, and not only mental health, but mental achievement. It’s not-reproducing a loss? No. But it is lowering the talent pool of the polity. Is failing to reproduce an irreciprocity?
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188833432304005120
Hmm.. our denial of natural classes and the western tradition of tripartism (now quadripartism) and the differences in ability between those classes has been created by the marxist(class), feminist (gender) postmodernist (identity, race) project to undermine class cooperation that allows for at least some class rotation, rather than preventing it with castes.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-28 14:14:00 UTC