Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • The vast majority of literature in the ancient world was commentary on the Iliad

    The vast majority of literature in the ancient world was commentary on the Iliad just as the vast majority of literature in the medieval world was on the bible. In fact, the fragments of the library at Alexandria – regardless of how that library was physically constructed – were mostly commentary on the Iliad. (The trials of Achilles)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 08:11:00 UTC

  • 3) Our irregulars raiding, the muslim raiders, the mongol raiders,are effective

    3) Our irregulars raiding, the muslim raiders, the mongol raiders,are effective against organized european militaries. But organized european militaries with prof. warriors seizing initiative to exploit opportunities regardless of plan are what defeat non-european militaries.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 15:54:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220374352870486017

    Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220374037643374592


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HliosX @Ozpin_88 2) If you read any military historian, Keegan, VD Hanson, etc, they attribute western victory to a class of professional warriors, and our pushing down of initiative and adaptability into the lowest officers or NCO.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220374037643374592


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HliosX @Ozpin_88 2) If you read any military historian, Keegan, VD Hanson, etc, they attribute western victory to a class of professional warriors, and our pushing down of initiative and adaptability into the lowest officers or NCO.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220374037643374592

  • 2) If you read any military historian, Keegan, VD Hanson, etc, they attribute we

    2) If you read any military historian, Keegan, VD Hanson, etc, they attribute western victory to a class of professional warriors, and our pushing down of initiative and adaptability into the lowest officers or NCO.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 15:53:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220374037643374592

    Reply addressees: @HliosX @Ozpin_88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220373196857389057


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @HliosX @Ozpin_88 1) I am not assuming anything. I’m saying evidence is counter to it. For example, washington had left, right, and reserve wings in the army (my xth great grandfather commanded the 1775 left). The problem was that the non-professional army of riflemen was ineffective.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220373196857389057


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @HliosX @Ozpin_88 1) I am not assuming anything. I’m saying evidence is counter to it. For example, washington had left, right, and reserve wings in the army (my xth great grandfather commanded the 1775 left). The problem was that the non-professional army of riflemen was ineffective.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1220373196857389057

  • CONSTANTINE’S DESTRUCTION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The first episodes of persecu

    CONSTANTINE’S DESTRUCTION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION

    The first episodes of persecution of paganism in the history of the Roman Empire started late in Constantine’s reign, with his orders for the pillaging and the tearing down of pagan temples.[1][2][3] The anti-paganism policy of Constantine the Great evolved from the initial prohibition on the construction of new temples[14] and the toleration of pagan sacrifices,[15] to orders for the looting and the tearing down of the temples by the end of his reign.[1][2][3] Earlier in his reign he had prohibited the construction of new temples[14] but tolerated the practice of pagan sacrifices.[15]

    According to Church historians writing after his death, Constantine converted to Christianity and was baptised on his deathbed, thus making him the first Christian emperor.

    Constantine, though he made his allegiance clear, did not outlaw paganism; in the words of an early edict, he decreed that polytheists could “celebrate the rites of an outmoded illusion,” so long as they did not force Christians to join them.[18][19] In a letter to the King of Persia, Constantine wrote how he shunned the “abominable blood and hateful odors” of pagan sacrifices, and instead worshiped the High God “on bended knee”,[15][20] and in the new capital city he built, Constantine made sure that there were no pagan temples built.[14] Constantine would sporadically prohibit public sacrifice and close pagan temples; very little pressure, however, was put on individual pagans, and there were no pagan martyrs.

    When Constantine dedicated Constantinople, two Neoplatonist friends – Sopater and Praetextus – were present. A year and a half later, on Monday 11 May 330, when the festival of Saint Mocius was celebrated, the city was finally dedicated. The goddess Tyche was invited to come and live in the city, and her statue was placed in the hand of the statue of the emperor that was on top of the Column of Constantine, on the Forum with the same name. Although by now Constantine openly supported Christianity, the city still offered room to pagan religions: there were shrines for the Dioscuri and Tyche. The Acropolis, with its ancient pagan temples, was left as it was. As for worshipping the emperor, Constantine’s mausoleum gave him a Christ-like status: his tomb was set amid 12 monuments, each containing relics of one of the Apostles. Constantine had continued to engage in pagan rituals. The emperor still claimed to be a supernatural being, although the outward form of this personality cult had become Christian.[21]

    According to some authors, the issuing of the Edict of Milan,[22] showed that Constantine continued the policy of toleration which Galerius had established.[citation needed] He “continued to pay his public honors to the Sun”, until 325, on coins that showed him jointly with Sol Invictus, whereas his later coins showed the Chi-Rho sign.[23] In that year he had the Christian Bishops convene at the First Council of Nicaea, and from then on continued to take an active interest in the affairs of the Church.

    Many historians, including MacMullen, have seen the seeds of future persecution by the state in Constantine’s more belligerent utterances regarding the old religion.[1] Other historians[who?] emphasize that de facto paganism “was tolerated in the period from Constantine to Gratian. Emperors were tolerant in deed, if not always in word.”[24]

    Church restrictions opposing the pillaging of pagan temples by Christians were in place even while the Christians were being persecuted by the pagans. Spanish bishops in AD 305 decreed that anyone who broke idols and was killed while doing so was not formally to be counted as a martyr, as the provocation was too blatant.[25]

    Constantine became the first Emperor in the Christian era to persecute specific groups of Christians, the Donatists, in order to enforce religious unity.[26]

    Legislation against magic and private divination

    Constantine legislated against magic and private divination, but this may have been motivated by a fear that others could gain power through those means.[27] Despite enacting such legislation, he also enacted contradictory legislation that called for the consultation of augurs after an amphitheater had been struck by lightning in the year 320.[28] Constantine explicitly allowed public divination as well as public pagan practices to continue.[29] Constantine also issued laws confirming the rights of flamens, priests and duumvirs.[30] In 321, he legislated that the “venerable day of the sun” should be a day of rest for all citizens. This ambiguous wording is capable of being interpreted as referring to the Christian day of rest or to Sol Invictus. However, in the year 323, he issued a decree banning Christians from participating in state sacrifices.[31]

    He destroyed the Temple of Aphrodite in Lebanon.[32] He ordered the execution of eunuch priests in Egypt[1] because they transgressed his moral norms. According to the historian Ramsay MacMullen, Constantine desired to obliterate non-Christians but lacking the means he had to be content with robbing their temples towards the end of his reign.[33] He resorted to derogatory and contemptuous comments relating to the old religion; writing of the “true obstinacy” of the pagans, of their “misguided rites and ceremonial”, and of their “temples of lying” contrasted with “the splendours of the home of truth”.[2]


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 11:54:00 UTC

  • MUST READ by Luke Weinhagen Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity In much the same way co

    MUST READ

    by Luke Weinhagen

    Race + Aesthetic = Ethnicity

    In much the same way common biological markers are a shortcut to trust (represent a reduction in costs) common aesthetic markers as a shortcut to trust. Shared aesthetic signals “I am one of you” like shared biology does. Aesthetic, in this context, is the projection of or our kinship onto our environment and behavior.

    Consumption of the aesthetic produces an externalization of costs onto the development of common trust.

    Globalist Capitalism discounts the aesthetic.

    – It tears down the historic church to put up an Amazon distribution center.

    – It sends the work to India instead of Indiana.

    – It ignores full-accounting to limit trade to material value.

    – It denies the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic.

    – It dissolves the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports.

    Globalist Capitalism consumes our trust, and it does so at a deep discount.

    (because the aesthetic is not common between parties under globalism, aesthetic can not be valued into trade – globalist capitalism has to deny/prevent/ignore full-accounting)

    Kinship Capitalism includes the demand for full-accounting that includes the value of the aesthetic.

    – It prevents the destruction of our history and demands restitution when that history is damaged.

    – It puts the burden of extra costs on the outsider bring business into the kinship.

    – It demands the value of a resource be measured by the cost of its loss to the community as well as any material value

    – It promotes and preserves the commonality, the community, value embodied by the aesthetic.

    – Is secures the bonds that aesthetic creates and supports.

    Kinship Capitalism preserves our trust, and insures our interactions to continue to increase that trust.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 11:45:00 UTC

  • “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”

    “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 18:22:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220049133752504320

  • “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”

    “Behold Europa, maker of heavens. Behold Semitia, maker of hells.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 13:22:00 UTC

  • It came from us 5000 years ago, and 3500 years ago when we combined horse, bronz

    It came from us 5000 years ago, and 3500 years ago when we combined horse, bronze, wheel, maneuver, and entrepreneurial warfare by raiding – and martial epistemology: Sovereignty. Results? Rule of law of tort. Jury. Truthful testimony, Markets in everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-21 22:05:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219742805536444422

    Reply addressees: @scprsp @WorMartiN @textortexxel

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219740253314895872


    IN REPLY TO:

    @scprsp

    @WorMartiN @curtdoolittle @textortexxel Haha righto. So there was a secret sauce inside European genetics (wtf is European? Vandal? Goth? Anglo? Saxon? Aryan?) that didn’t come out until after 1600 years of Christianity which came from Jews. Case closed!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1219740253314895872

  • READING FOR THE INFORMED by Göran Dahl (I fking love this man 😉 ) A great docum

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LPWAEC3dbAEDu8aBAAcxIOa5CQjuflt0f0cvhCpZ_ME/htmlview?fbclid=IwAR0wwf4GP8kyLLr52pU98ik-tisbsqJlwXWFi3JE1ozg6sDneKADdGGpNd0NECESSARY READING FOR THE INFORMED

    by Göran Dahl (I fking love this man 😉 )

    A great document with lots of information regarding admixture events, ancestry proportions, what modern people are made up of etc.

    The Modern sections with “Yamnaya” proportions are somewhat misleading, because they don’t use actual Yamnaya people as proxies for Yamnaya ancestry, but rather two of the three components that Yamnaya people are made up of: CHG (Caucasian Hunter-Gatherer) and EHG (Eastern Hunter-Gatherer). There is also a third component that has been left out: EEF (Early European Farmer), which is why Yamnaya proportions in modern Europeans and even ancient post-Yamnaya populations seem lower across the board.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LPWAEC3dbAEDu8aBAAcxIOa5CQjuflt0f0cvhCpZ_ME/htmlviewUpdated Jan 19, 2020, 3:43 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:43:00 UTC

  • WELL THAT FITS BUT IT’S A BIG SURPRISE!!! by Göran Dahl Up until very recently,

    WELL THAT FITS BUT IT’S A BIG SURPRISE!!!

    by Göran Dahl

    Up until very recently, it was thought that Eastern Europeans (in the form of Poles, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Russians and Balts) were the genetically closest to Proto-Indo-Iranians and, indeed, to Proto-Indo-Europeans. However, it appears that these ethnic groups had ever so slightly inflated Steppe ancestry percentages due to having higher levels of so-called Narva_HG admixture. Narva_HG belongs to the Mesolithic Narva culture, whose members were a mixture of EHG (Eastern Hunter-Gatherer) and WHG (Western Hunter-Gatherer).

    Today, we can say that the people closest to Proto-Indo-Iranians and Proto-Indo-Europeans in terms of genetic distance (and Steppe ancestry) are Norwegians, Irishmen and Icelanders; the latter due to being a composite of the two former. Irishmen tend to be the closest fit for typical Proto-Indo-Iranian cultures such as Srubnaya and Sintashta, whereas Norwegians are the closest to Yamnaya_Kalmykia (a subset of Yamnaya) and Potapovka, which is thought to be ancestral to the forementioned Srubnaya.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-19 15:33:00 UTC