Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Well, it’s certainly about preserving 3500 years of european civilization’s foun

    Well, it’s certainly about preserving 3500 years of european civilization’s foundation under individual Sovereignty, the reciprocity and rule of law, jury, and markets that are possible under it. And if you can’t integrate into that then yes you’re inferior regardless of race.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:34:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223796848005189632

    Reply addressees: @pulmyears

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223731517039378432

    IN REPLY TO:

    @pulmyears

    Any claims to this being about the Second Amendment or freedom go out the window when you imagine any person of color doing this very stunt. The NRA isn’t about safety or freedom, it’s about arming the Confederacy, enforcing white supremacy. https://t.co/V6HihcfFrx

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223731517039378432

  • The Jewish Century: a second attempt at undermining western civlization and dupl

    The Jewish Century: a second attempt at undermining western civlization and duplicating the fall of Rome, this time with pseudoscience and pilpul instead of supernaturalism and pilpul: Marx, Mises, Lenin, Trotsky, Boaz, Freud, Marcuse, Derrida, Bohr, Cantor, and the list goes on.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:16:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223792283646152704

  • The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the Ger

    The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the German century was over. Like the french century was over. Each of the ‘enlightenments’ were costly rebellions against Anglos for dragging humanity into science, medicine, rule of law, and markets.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-02 02:11:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223791018392391686

  • He is comfortable with anti-white criticisms. He’s toned them down. But he clear

    He is comfortable with anti-white criticisms. He’s toned them down. But he cleary, like is ancestors, does not understand why we out-competed china in the ancient and modern worlds. And he doesn’t really grasp economics well enough to speak about it … damn.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 22:38:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223737307188158468

    Reply addressees: @JoeRossNoDakNat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223729449545412608

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223729449545412608

  • The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the Ger

    The Jewish century is over. Like the Russian century was over. Like like the German century was over. Like the french century was over. Each of the ‘enlightenments’ were costly rebellions against Anglos for dragging humanity into science, medicine, rule of law, and markets.

    Every civilization has resisted modernity.

    We have paid the cost of dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and early morality.

    But we are bad for ‘colonizing’ them and policing their ability to conduct predation on each other.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 21:26:00 UTC

  • THIS IS WHY THE WEST JUST WORKS – NEGATIVA JURIDICAL MATERIAL PRIESTHOOD AND POS

    THIS IS WHY THE WEST JUST WORKS – NEGATIVA JURIDICAL MATERIAL PRIESTHOOD AND POSITIVA SUPERNATURAL PRIESTHOODS.

    Proto-Indo-European society comprised three main groups corresponding to three distinct functions:

    1. Sovereignty, which fell into two distinct and complementary sub-parts:

    … 1.1 one formal, juridical and priestly but worldly;

    … 1.2 the other powerful, unpredictable, and also priestly but rooted in the supernatural world.

    2. Military, connected with force, the military and war.

    3. Productivity, herding, farming and crafts; ruled by the other two.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:03:00 UTC

  • ANF EXPOSURE WAS LIMITED IN THE MIDDLE EAST DESPITE THEIR RELATIVE PROXIMITY —

    ANF EXPOSURE WAS LIMITED IN THE MIDDLE EAST DESPITE THEIR RELATIVE PROXIMITY

    —“Early European Farmers did come from Anatolia originally. But their population, Barcin_N or ANF, was basal to both Europeans and certain Mesopotamians, the latter receiving the gene flow much later than the former. This means that the “Neolithic toolkit” that entered Europe was independent of Mesopotamian influence (Mesos had their own source). Modern Assyrians, who are probably closest to ancient Akkadians, have around 30% ANF, and most North Europeans (North mind you) score even higher than that. It just comes to show how limited the ANF exposure was in the Middle East despite their relative proximity.”—Göran Dahl

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 17:32:00 UTC

  • Brachycephalization on the western steppe after the Mesolithic Interesting stuff

    Brachycephalization on the western steppe after the Mesolithic

    Interesting stuff from the ADNABIOARC team at Scientific Reports today:

    Abstract: The Neolithic transition brought about fundamental social, dietary and behavioural changes in human populations, which, in turn, impacted skeletal morphology. Crania are shaped through diverse genetic, ontogenetic and environmental factors, reflecting various elements of an individual’s life. To determine the transition’s effect on cranial morphology, we investigated its potential impact on the face and vault, two elements potentially responding to different influences. Three datasets from geographically distant regions (Ukraine, Iberia, and the Levant plus Anatolia) were analysed. Craniometric measurements were used to compare the morphology of pre-transition populations with that of agricultural populations. The Neolithic transition corresponds to a statistically significant increase only in cranial breadth of the Ukrainian vaults, while facial morphology shows no consistent transformations, despite expected changes related to the modification of masticatory behaviour. The broadening of Ukrainian vaults may be attributable to dietary and/or social changes. However, the lack of change observed in the other geographical regions and the lack of consistent change in facial morphology are surprising. Although the transition from foraging to farming is a process that took place repeatedly across the globe, different characteristics of transitions seem responsible for idiosyncratic responses in cranial morphology.

    Cheronet et al., Morphological change in cranial shape following the transition to agriculture across western Eurasia, Scientific Reports, Published online: 13 September 2016, doi:10.1038/srep33316

    See also..

    Modeling Steppe_EMBA

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 15:02:00 UTC

  • PRE AND POSTWAR EUROPE – AND THE WORLD ORDER THAT IS COMING BACK INTO NATURAL ST

    PRE AND POSTWAR EUROPE – AND THE WORLD ORDER THAT IS COMING BACK INTO NATURAL STATE

    –“Anglos were against germans”–

    I disagree entirely. America prewar was 50% ethnically german and the heartland still is. America was on the german side in both wars until it couldn’t afford to be. Before 1914, Germany (manufacturing) and England (navy, market) had the same economic interdependency as china(manufacturing) and America (navy, market).

    The British empire wanted, as America until Trump has wanted, to restore the balance of powers – including the Russians and the ottomans. Otherwise they would not have prohibited the Russian reconquest of Istanbul, or the restoration of the german empire post napoleonic conquest. This is the problem with ‘overdoing’ capitalism (middle class government): we seek profits and stability of profits because of the expansion of economic risk under middle class government, when we should always seek the natural self interest of the great powers, and only interfere once the outcome is far enough along that we can choose sides – as we did by going after the communists.

    I would argue that yes, the British were swayed to jewish extractive financialism instead of Christian profiting from domestication under white mans burden, after ending the prohibition on jews in the state, and the rise of Disraeli’s government. The British problem with Germany was that in response to napoleon’s terrors in Europe, Germany unified, and began to defend her (huge) continental interests.

    Had we sided with Germany the empires would all still exist and the world would not have experienced communism, the failure to Complete the colonial program of world-modernization, loss of european confidence in the european program post war, jewish undermining of european, British, and american civilization post war, the immigration crisis that has almost achieved jewish cosmopolitan ends, and the coming civil war – and islam could have been transformed, because tribal boundaries would have been possible to install.

    The mistake was our misunderstanding of the heart of german civilization being in the north and particularly Prussian – but the french post-war wanted to ‘de-Prussify’ Germany by manipulating american morality (we’re wrong), and making it possible for France to conquer and rule the continent (as they are trying to do with the EU).

    Unfortunately, France chose more socialism and agrarianism than Germany, and Germany chose her traditional excellence in manufacturing, so between the german mark and german industry and german education and german culture, Germany economically rules by demonstrated superiority …. until …. there is a decline in auto sales … and germans revolt at a loss of (everything) and she re-asserts herself in defense, and they are stuck with France having confidence and the will to rule Europe, and Germans needing to restore their will to rule themselves and Europe.

    Yet it is France that maintains colonies in Africa, and is the origin of Jewish intellectual influence, and Muslim immigration and invasion into Europe.

    France has always been the enemy of Europe since she was more latinized and retained imperial ambitions and catholic church dominance, including her long standing attempt to relocate the papacy to France.

    It’s the Germanics that have tried to complete the transition back to SOVEREIGNTY while France continues the jewish christian (catholic) pursuit of monopoly authority.

    The countryside may be germanic. but France is Paris, and Paris might as well be Constantinople trying to conquer the western empire.

    Russia is, as I had hoped, taking over her natural position as the leader in the middle eastern sphere of influence.

    France is, as I had warned, still attempting her conquest of Europe and the destruction of germanic civilization – out of overconfidence and arrogance (both unwarranted).

    Germany is still indoctrinated by what they call their (special history) except they were in the right and need a generation to unlearn blaming themselves for what was a french, anglo, and Russian attack on their attempt to unify the germanic peoples and the lands which germanic excellence had influenced.

    If Germany gains independence and restores herself, then the slavic and baltic peoples will strategically, economically, align with them.

    The Anglosphere has time to unify again, draw ‘the rest’ of Canada into it’s sphere, and prevent the conquest of Australia by Chinese interests, thereby creating *enough* of a population to not be the victim of a hostile china, a powerful Russia-Islam, an islam, and a hostile french conquest of Europe.

    The balkans are screwed until the Russians or united eastern european Intermarium can save them by completing the removal of islam from old europe as thoroughly as the spanish have from iberia.

    These are not simple moral choices. They are choices necessary for western survival.

    All of this is made possible (a) by Brexit and (b) by american Red-Exit … or re-conquest. The latter I hope we will begin this year.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:23:00 UTC

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY Its easy to be a European Supremacist on

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERNCES IN SUPREMACY

    Its easy to be a European Supremacist on the evidence – but european supremacy is due to thousands of years of the european group strategy of entrepreneurial warfare, heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and the commons of markets, reason, empiricism, science, medicine, technology, history, literature, and arts that results from it. But Superiority among europeans has taught us that trying to domesticate others directly doesn’t work. We can only do it by export. Our cost of conquest and rule is too high. (Even if conquest and eradication isn’t)

    Superiority among Ashkenazi hasn’t taught them much at all – hence the lack of heroism, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, rule of law, jury, tripartism, and all the commons that result from it. Instead we have the Abrahamic method of false promise, baiting into hazard, justified by pilpul defended by critique and GSRRM, unwarrantied, and obfuscated by claims of plausible deniability under the claim of the victim’s volition, and the worlds most harmful lies created using that Abrahamic method of deceit: judaism, christianity, and islam in the ancient world, and marxism, cultural marxism, feminism, postmodernism, political correctness, propaganda, and financialism and denialism in the modern world.

    However, history has a long record of Chinese supremacy in no small part because of the luxury of their fertile river valleys and geographic isolation, by mountains, desert, arctic, and oceans, and relatively homogeneous genetics prohibiting the conflicts of un-isolated fertile crescent peoples. They were able to organize and create a bureaucracy early, and continuously progress – albeit much more slowly that the west. And they are demonstrating once again that national and civilizational self interest will defeat semitic religious monopoly universalism, and european market universalism.

    The future is determined by whether the anglosphere can re-unite, and the indians, chinese, are successful in reversing islamic conquest, and the europeans, north and south americans and africans prevent it.

    China is a fascist (nationalist) state and it has set the tempo for the 21st and 22nd centuries because it is the most competitive strategy a political order can adopt – and none can defeat that strategy over time.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 08:33:00 UTC