Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Second, Semitic is a language group. The genetic group is west eurasian > Levant

    Second, Semitic is a language group. The genetic group is west eurasian > Levantine > Afro-Asiatic. As far as I know origins are today’s Yemen or south gulf, with limited differentiation from Arabs (see above chart).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 15:16:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225800397715054592

    Reply addressees: @HSubspecies @JeldenMishou @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225790957163028485

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225790957163028485

  • Ethnicity includes Political, Religious, Cultural, and Genetic requirements. You

    Ethnicity includes Political, Religious, Cultural, and Genetic requirements. You aren’t white if you’re Jewish. We follow the one drop rule, because we tolerated jews as free riders on our culture yet you continuously undermine every aspect of it. You’re not white. You are a Jew.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 13:59:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225781233466200064

    Reply addressees: @HSubspecies @ClownBa73413423 @JeldenMishou

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225776248389066753

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225776248389066753

  • That’s false. Jews, palestinians, and jordanians are the same subrace. Ashkenazi

    That’s false. Jews, palestinians, and jordanians are the same subrace. Ashkenazi Jews descend from Jewish males that migrated to Rome, married local women, and spread thru europe, maintaining separatism, and specializing in signal goods and baiting into hazard – just like today. https://t.co/e2FCshKxsL

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 13:05:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225767606864486419

    Reply addressees: @HSubspecies @JeldenMishou

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225766056310005760

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225766056310005760

  • Diversity + Proximity = Conflict —“There is not a single example throughout hu

    Diversity + Proximity = Conflict

    —“There is not a single example throughout human history that you can point to to prove that formula wrong over any extended period of time.

    It’s been tried, it always fails.” —JC Trott

    —“Multiculturalism is a euphemism for multiracialism.

    Multiculturalism doesn’t work and will never work.

    Countries have been organized on the basis of race since the dawn of civilization. A nation is a group of people living in a region who share a common race, language, and religion.

    Most of the world’s countries are ethnostates: Japan, China, Israel, multiple black countries in Africa, and multiple Arab Muslim countries in the ME.

    Only in white countries is “diversity” or “multiculturalism” being pushed, and that is because non-whites want to enjoy the safety and prosperity of white society. But they will necessarily destroy it if they come en masse. Therefore, whites are in the unique position of having to forcibly stop third-world invaders and remove those already here. If they do not, their white societies will be lost. And Jewish people are leading the propaganda campaign against whites from doing so, both by demonizing those who already advocate this as “racists” and by stupefying those who haven’t awakened with their “diversity is our strength” brainwashing.

    People aren’t flooding into Vietnam, El Salvador, Somalia, or Egypt en masse from other parts of the world. They are only doing this into the West (white countries). “—John Morrison

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 07:52:00 UTC

  • “YOU FRAME EVERYTHING AS ….” (important)(very choice words below) —“You stic

    “YOU FRAME EVERYTHING AS ….”

    (important)(very choice words below)

    —“You stick all issues into a narrow narrative of,, destroying western civilization” and, in my opinion, this makes you overlook any other motivations of movements such as marxism and pomo”—Vlad Popescu

    How long have you been following me? What’s the difference between (a) Judaism > Christianity > Islam and (b) Fundamentalism > Marxism > Feminism > Postmodernism?

    The only difference is the use of the abrahamic method of deceit in the ancient world using sophism and the supernatural, and the abrahamic method of deceit in the modern world, using sophism and pseudoscience.

    Otherwise it’s the same technique: False promise, baiting into hazard.

    Whether you promise the impossible and unwarrantable after death or after revolution is immaterial. They are impossible and unwarrantable.

    I mean, that’s why i’m so hostile to christanity’s use of the abrahamic method – it teaches people not only to be vulnerable to lies, but to apply the technique of lying to their own speech.

    —“Just as I said, you appoint every movement that you dislike(or so it seems) the goal of deceiving. Remember Descartes when he said he often ridiculed other countries’ social norms, but then he thought that his social norms may be seen as ridicule from the outside? Point is, you cannot claim to understand marxism and poststructuralism if you do not dive deep into them, leaving all the prejudices aside. And that s what i love about so called,, western culture “, the tradition of doubting the soundness of your own beliefs. And I agree that Marxism-Leninism(not marxism în general) is mistaking by pretending that a voluntary, somewhat forced revolution will bring progress towards a new stage of the economy, surpassing capitalism even though the material conditions of our age cannot allow for that”—Vlad Popescu

    I don’t like them because they’re deceptions – it’s not that I label them as deceptions because I don’t like them.

    You must be new. I don’t opine on whether statements are reciprocal(truthful) or not. statements are truthful (reciprocal) regardless of what opinion I hold.

    Do you know when you’re lying? How much agency do you have? Your children? The women you know? How much agency do they really have? How much are they just imitation machines doing what they have learned to imitate?

    The fact that the abrahamic method of deceit is as advanced a method of deception as the Aristotelian method of testimony, is simply a technical fact.

    The fact that the monotheistic religions’ attacks on market religion and norms (paganism), and the monopoly pseudoscientific attacks on market philosophy and laws, use the same technique of attempting to reverse voluntary markets with involuntary monopoly authority using false promise of life after death or false promise of economic, status, and power rewards after revolution, is a trivial distinction that varies only a subtle alteration of the lie.

    Western civ developed math, reason, science, technology, engineering, medicine, and dragged mankind out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, suffering, and disease in just a few centuries in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds.

    And it’s rather obviously due to the degree of correspondence of our metaphysics (realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity) and our group strategy (sovereignty), and the social order of markets in everything, including jury, tripartism, trifunctionalism, and meritocracy.

    So because people vote with their feet, the evidence is pretty clear that they want the result of the western method even if they don’ want to bear the cost of persisting it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 15:41:00 UTC

  • THE CONSTANCY OF THE WESTERN TRADITION OVER 3500 YEARS – REGARDLESS OF PROPAGAND

    THE CONSTANCY OF THE WESTERN TRADITION OVER 3500 YEARS – REGARDLESS OF PROPAGANDA

    —“Your reified medieval “associations” are products of anarcho-social — not state — covenants”—(((Gamhard McCoy)))

    Bronze age, mediterranean age, continental age, north sea age, atlantic age institutions are continuous products of customary law made necessary by military strategy, given geography, technology, numbers, and have been consistent for at least 3500 years.

    A sovereign man requires the self, a holding requires family, a manor adds employees, a princedom adds counsellors, a state adds bureaucracy, and empire unites states. But they are just names for the same process at increasing scales producing a homogenous hierarchy organized by the same simple rule: sovereignty.

    (I know what you are paraphrasing, but quoting others words says nothing about demonstrated behavior – which is the difference between myth/literature/propaganda and law/science/records. Notice how I only mention literary works in order to illustrate that they are almost universally wrong – which is why the history of thought is either a set of lies by the bottom(theology and mythology) or a set of lies by the middle ( philosophy and literature). Those in power just rule and leave evidence. They have no one to convince.)

    There were only three degrees available to our ancestors, reflecting the two priesthoods: Theology(Social), and Law(Political), and the practical: medicine(Physical).

    Tripartism in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 12:03:00 UTC

  • WESTERN INSTITUTIONS AROUSE OUT OF DISTRIBUTED POWER —“all these [european] in

    WESTERN INSTITUTIONS AROUSE OUT OF DISTRIBUTED POWER

    —“all these [european] institutions arose out of the progressive rationalization of fear and terror — the true bases of the liberalistic *reciprocol state (which actually has no right of resistance, as herr Schmitt knew well)”— (((Gamhard McCoy)))

    THE INSTITUTIONS:

    Sovereignty, Duel, Court, Government, Monarchy.

    1. Constrain one another’s words with the duel.

    2. Constrain one another’s action with the court, having failed to constrain them with threat of the duel.

    3. Constrain a group, or industry with the court of commons for having failed to constrain one another with the court.

    4. Constrain a government with an election for having failed to constrain individuals, groups, or industries.

    5. Constrain a monarchy with a revolution for having failed to constrain the government.

    They did? Conquerors thought in terms of fear and terror when their gods and mythos put them equal to gods, and they conquered everything from Spain to the edge of china?

    Those institutions arose out of the necessity of a small number of professional warriors dependent upon expensive technology (horse, bronze, chariot) that could not pay for a standing army and were dependent upon raising voluntary militia due to the inability of western peoples (horses, cattle, grasslands) to concentrate capital as was possible in the flood river valley civilizations (grains) and pastoralist early neolithic farmers (sheep, grain).

    I don’t make errors. Because I don’t read literature (lies). I study Archaeology, Technology, Economics, Military and Legal records are evidence – literature is fiction and deceit. 😉

    You can’t do that because it would falsify your entire mythology, network of lies, and method of excuses making by lies.

    I know. It’s OK. You can’t help it. It’s genetic.

    ON SCHMITT(GERMANY) IN CONTEXT

    Schimtt btw was following the natural human bias expressed in intellectual tradition of trying to solve the problem of a stable state in a period of necessity of rapid adaptation, when the deliberative (adversarial) model of political (middle class) compromise was insufficiently responsive, and required extraordinary impositions on the investments of stakeholders.

    As is usual for continentals, who cannot manage to escape the dependence upon obedience as a means of avoiding interpersonal conflict, competition, and compromise, it never occurred to Schmidt that the anglo-saxon pre-napoleonic method of political decidability, or it’s roman and it’s greek predecessors, nor its proto-germanic predecessors, nor its western indo-european predecessors placed decisions with the family, the jury/thang, the warriors/nobles, or the chieftain/king depending upon the category of the question at hand. In times of war we give unto generals (dictators), in times of peace we give over to the middle class (republics) in times of windfall we give over to the people (democracy).

    So that the problem is that the pursuit of power by people, middle, nobility, and monarchy were unable to discover (as had the anglos) the means of transferring power dependent upon the condition – and that as warfare transitioned from purely territorial agrarian to trade and industrial economic and ideological warfare, that having failed to articulate their customs as formal law prohibited them from discovering rules for the distribution and concentration of power as context required.

    Schmidtt like all continentals since the french revolution, was another idiot trying to restore the hierarchy of church(political judiciary), judiciary(material judiciary), monarchy(military) burgher(middle class) and labor, without realizing that they were still trying to escape the church and restore traditional rule – but instead were still stuck on countering anglo empiricism and its continuous competition and trying to recreate secular theological harmony.

    The continent is a catastrophe with the french trying to recreate latin church authoritarianism, the germans lost in trying to work away guilt that they should not have for resisting russian jews and french authority with wishful thinking instead of monarchical and traditional restoration, with the slavs understanding completely, and the Russians waiting for revenge.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-05 11:44:00 UTC

  • DEFINE CAUCASIAN (FROM QUORA) Caucasian is like many terms – as they evolve, we

    DEFINE CAUCASIAN (FROM QUORA)

    Caucasian is like many terms – as they evolve, we attribute different definitions to them. The term Caucasian was used in the census and was synonymous with white european christian. This evolved into the conventional term for european peoples: latin, germanic, slavic, finnic.

    Man is a self-domesticated animal. Domestication is achieved by neoteny and suppression of underclass (genetic load) reproduction by sexual selection and environmental selection.

    The primary difference between races (or subspecies depending upon your tolerance for the truth), is that we vary largely by the degree of neoteny (suppression of maturity) vs increase in rate and depth of matureity, and in adaptation to local climates and more importantly – disease gradients.

    There are many others including rates of identical twins, variations in cranial size, minor skull and muscle difference, large differences in body scent, variations in the distribution of spatial verbal abilities, succeptibility to certain diseases, and mental illnesses.

    However, almost all the meaningful(consequential) differences are variations in one trait: neoteny (domestication) – with east asians the least sexually developed, caucasians in the middle, and then Africans the most and fastest sexually developed. Almost all group differences in social cultural, and political order are caused by this variation. The other significant dimension is the size of our genetic loads (lower and underclasses).

    There is little difference in our global elites across the races. But our conflicts come from proximity to one another given the vastly different sizes of our workingl, lower, and underclasses. For example, when we compare IQ differences between races and subraces, we are comparing differences in the size of the classes. In warm climates genetic load survives, and sexual maturity and rates of reproduction increase – and in cold climates where people live indoors in close quarters for many months of the year, and must organize to maintain animals and food over winters, sexual and natural selection reduce the lower classes rapidly.

    So given our differences in the rate and depth of sexual maturity, and the difference in the size of our underclasses, this creates groups that display different behavior, and conflict over what acceptable behavior is, and conflict over the commons and institutions we desire.

    There are three or four surviving races (subspecies): West Eurasian, African, and Asian – and the fourth is the austronesian remainder of early african migrations.

    West eurasians include everyone who isn’t african, (iranic-dravidian), east asian, or austronesian.

    Genetically, morphologically/phenotypically, civilizationally, culturally we separate the west eurasian people into post-glacial proto-peoples: the southern branch of north african, semitic (marsh arab, afro-asiatic), the eastern branch: turkic, and the indo-european branch: european, iranic, anatolian (lost), and the iranic branch integrated (lost) in admixture in india.

    We use ‘Caucasian’ as a synonym for europeans from spain to the urals, an south to the caucuses mountains.

    However, in practice we use it as synonymous for european christendom, and ‘white’ synonymous with european christendom -excluding the people of the caucuses.

    Since the greeks, southern italians, and Sardianins are remnants of the anatolian migration we include them as europeans and caucasians.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 22:18:00 UTC

  • Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet go

    Europeans are the gods among men, and first among men. Not because we are yet gods ourselves. But because we think, speak, write, work, create, and spread the evidence of God’s words, his hands, and his will.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 18:59:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224769483266494466

    Reply addressees: @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224768754518777863

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays Jesus asks us to work to drag those with false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies, out of longing, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death. But if they resist, they must continue to suffer for their false gods failed translations and men’s lies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224768754518777863

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays Jesus asks us to work to drag those with false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies, out of longing, ignorance, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death. But if they resist, they must continue to suffer for their false gods failed translations and men’s lies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224768754518777863

  • And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty,

    And if European man did not drag a people out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, diseases, suffering and early death using god’s words, then those people are suffering because god punishes them for their false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-04 18:53:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224767935815786502

    Reply addressees: @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1224767567950176263

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224767567950176263

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Sov3r3ignSoul @JohnMarkSays And that’s why European man has almost exclusively dragged mankind out of ignorance, poverty, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death by mastery of god’s word, written in god’s hand – against other’s false gods, failed translations, and men’s lies.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1224767567950176263