COLONIZATION WAS A STRATEGY TO ESCAPE ISLAM
by Scott De Warren
Actually, exploration & colonisation was our best alternative to conquest and enslavement by the Ottoman Empire.
Development of the New World was, in part, a fallback plan in case Europe fell to Islam (I know the Hapsburgs thought of it in those terms).
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 11:38:00 UTC
CIVILIZATIONS
it’s not really logical to criticize people who have yet had the opportunity to choose, than it is to criticize people who had the opportunity to choose and chose badly. the bad choices were abrahamism, with each iteration getting worse, with the final iteration of islam just tipping over the threshold.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 11:07:00 UTC
GOOD AND EVIL IS A MIDDLE EASTERN NOT EUROPEAN CONCEPT
—-“Good and evil were invented in the middle east to facilitate cultural warfare between the middle east and the indians. European religion used chaos and mischief vs order, and our gods were ‘real people’ with real frailties.” – Curt Doolittle
—“The concepts “good” and “evil” are actually Indo-European in origin. Etymology dictionaries are useful. Better perhaps to say that our misconceptions about what exactly those terms mean are influenced by Middle Eastern philosophy…”—AunMarie Grooms
Indo european a language and cultural family of genetically west eurasians of the proto-European, proto-Caucasian, proto-Iranic but NOT proto-turkic post glacial maximum peoples. The proto-caucasians and anatolians appear to have been lost to us.
As far as I know, good and evil are indo-iranic not indo european. It’s unlikely that I err. The division between European, iranic, indo-iranic results in European (aristocratic egalitarian and martial), Persian(aristocratic authoritarian and martial), and Hindu( caste, duty-role, and ‘priestly’) pantheons.
The argument put forth by others which I got from Karen Armstrong, was that it appears that the north and west europeans developed more so in the corded ware culture(material), and the iranics more in the vedas (spiritual), and that this is largely because etherial religion as we understand it evolved in what we call Mesopotamia-Anatolia or, more precisely, along the euphrates.
It’s most likely that religious pantheons developed differently due to differences in indo european ethnicities, and strategies. The west pretty much killed everyone they came in contact with (or at least the males) because the neolithic farmers were not developed enough to resist them. But as the iranic people migrated east to india, then south of the caspian, then west back into Mesopotamia they encountered developed peoples that they had to conquer.
So, iranics and indo iranics used hierarchy to rule an compete with others like the indus valley people and the Mesopotamians while europeans maintained aristocratic egalitarianism and didn’t develop authoritarianism until the late roman empire – and even then – they would have been more successful if they’d been much more authoritarian and much less tolerant.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 10:06:00 UTC
INDIA’S ELLORA CAVES
the largest carving project in the world.
Contrary to common perception, It is very easy to achieve this level of stone carved construction in that form of stone, with a large workforce. A team that splits the rock. A team of people that clear rubble – mostly dust. A team of people that manage the forge, tool making, and chisel pointing. A team of designers. The designers draw sketches of each element, others transfer it to the rock, others rough it out, and others finish it off. The rate at which a young man develops skill at carving this consistently is no more than it is today – a few years, so by the time he works through each phase of preparing the rock, you have trained the workforce to produce each stage of it.
While this scale of detail is impressive – the detail compensates for a lack of precision – compare with pre-islamic, and then hellenic sculpture – each of which takes the opposite approach, of increasing precision. A greek or roman or egyptian sculptor is a more precise craftsman than the indian or buddhist, and the opposite in organic detail and variation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-22 09:22:00 UTC
RT @Sean__Last: Pew finds that the black-white income gap hasn’t changed since 1970. Yet, since that time interpersonal racism has declined…
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 01:06:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1230660074709946371
—“The West had two chances to save Russia, and ultimately the West (not counting Crimean war). Simply roll in and back the White Army during the first and second Bolshevik revolutions and elminate all of them, and their families.”—James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 22:40:00 UTC
The only greater tragedy than the fall of the soviet union is the west’s crime of not saving the russian people from suffering because of it. The restoration of eastern europe was great, yes, but it was offset by the collapse of everything east of it was and remains a terrible horror. The russian colonial program failed like the european colonial programs failed. The lesson is that we cannot colonize other peoples – nor let them colonize us.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 22:12:00 UTC
Who discovered rule of law by the natural right of reciprocity
Who discovered the republic democracy and rule of law
Who discovered reason, logic, natural philosophy and science
Who discovered natural rights philosophy
Who discovered the common law and napoleonic code?
Who discovered the Peace of Westphalia domesticating war?
Who discovered the Geneva conventions?
Who discovered the international charter of human rights?
Who discovered science technology medicine and dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, and early death?
Yeah. I know. White people.
Yeah, colonialism wasn’t so good.
Yeah, it was just better than everyone else’s alternative..
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 20:18:00 UTC
WHY REQUEST EXCHANGE OF TRIBAL LOYALTY BETWEEN EUROPEAN RELIGIOUS FACTIONS?
—“Upon what foundation then did the progenitors of civilisation, Greece then Rome, build itself?”—
We evolve a means of production, and a means of military competition under that means of production, an organization to manage both, and a narrative to justify both, so that we can reduce the cost and opportunity for conflict in order to maintain those strategies. Every civilization’s strategy is fairly easy to express in those terms.
European civilization in mediterranean, continental, north sea, and Atlantic eras continue the aristocratic egalitarian tripartite trifunctional organization, and the old military strategy, old law (legal), old myths (social), philosophical, and theological (political) varying little other than the replacement of the ancient warrior-hunter-farmer heroic religion with the medieval farmer-peasant submissive religion of christianity. But given tripartism and trifunctionalism the law and the military remains constant and the church rise and fell. Today the new church is again semitic, with islam, judaism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, in competition with our traditional masculine hierarchical markets and law.
—“Are not their successes constituted of the virtues they upheld?”–
Virtues are excuses for the group competitive strategy we rarely if ever know. Values persist because they persist the competitive strategy. values can be undermined. Judiasm, christianity, marxism, postmodernism, and feminism sought to undermine european values and succeeded because women are vulnerable to the false promise and men are vulnerable to satisfying the demands of women unless in continuous competition with other males.
Our natural ancestral religion upon which our civilization is founded is one of chaotic gods we compete, cooperate, and trade with – not one we are submissive to. These gods of warriors, whether the greek, roman, germanic pantheons. The church sought to supplant them with submissive gods of slaves who were docile in their fear and ignorance – and who the church could extract revenue from by rent seeking.
Submission to gods so that one is devoid of responsibility is a christian innovation, achieving its zenith in islam. This is why it is seductive. Devotion to gods so that one is free of status pressure is not a christian innovation. It is even more seductive. Submission to scripture so that one is free of continuous calculation for which one may fail or be subject to blame is semitic innovation. It is seductive as well. These seductions are successful and they are the opposite of the aryan demand for non submission and non-alienation of rights and responsibilities, including pursuit of status, achievement, and innovative reason.
The church failed the aristocracy succeeded, and we have not yet found a means of accommodating christianity in its decline, while producing a non-false religion. We are in a time of transition. Either the second dark age of the jews will succeed, the second dark age of the muslims, or we will discover a means of combining our three religions chistian(feminine), heathen-nature(familial), pagan-hero(masculine), and aristotelian(judicial), or at least exchanging loyalty between the three, so that we are not subject to a second semitic dark age.
So we are still and will always be a triparite people: Scientific and Legal and heroic (agency), Philosophical and practical for the able, theological and submissive for the less able or more sensitive to conflict and social pressure (or the dysfunctional who confuse their spiritual accommodation of reality with reality itself.
—“What Christianity was there here?”–
What “here” are you referring to?
—“When you come to Christians asking not the renunciation of their faith but merely loyalty, remember that this is all the Romans first asked of the Christians too.”—
Our ancestors came to jews. Who we were too tolerant of, just as we are too tolerant of islamists, jews, marxists, postmodernists, feminists and science denialists. And because of our tolerance the jews used false promise, to bait our people into hazard, causing a dark age of ignorance and poverty and disease and suffering only aristotelian thought reversed, and ended the centuries of corruption by the church. Corruption not seen by americans until the prosecution of the deviancy of catholic churches, because protestants have forgotten the corruption of the church prior to the reformation, and the personalization of the relationship between the individual and god first, and the individual and jesus second – due largely to american evangelical protestants.
—“Remember, it wasn’t the strange and foreign beliefs of the Christians that first caught the attention of the Romans, but rather their abstention from community.”—
It was the use of christianity to undermine greco roman civlization just as islam, judaism, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and their science denialism is used to undermine european civilzation for the past century and a half.
Sol invictus was the migration of roman religion from zeus-jupiter. Mithras was the migration of the persian version of Mithra – the perfect man. Christianity was invented by using the victim-narrative and the promise of life after death, in stead of the Zeus-Sol-Mithra character we should aspire to be, and the jesus narrative invented so that it could replace the Epic Cycle (Homer) which had conquered and was about to erase the semitic world.
Judaism, christianity, ad islam were invented by the poor ignorant desert peasantry as a means of using the female group strategy of undermining by gossip, to overthrow the invention of markets, law, reason, merit, and transcendence of man into gods.
And I am, like my predecessors, trying once again to prevent another semitic dark age – by accommodating christians.
Christians who have not yet converted christianity into a hearth religion. But are very close to having done so.
If not for the invasion by jews, muslims, and the underclasses – because of christian tolerance – we would have had the time for christianity to evolve, and science to falsify the marxists, postmodernists feminists and difference-denialists.
So we are in a position where I must, or at least, someone of ability must, try to discover a vehicle for unity at faster pace than would naturally evolve.
If not for immigration I would not need to do this work. Because science has solved the lies.
But false promise to the vulnerable is seductive and spreads more quickly than we can stop it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 12:38:00 UTC
Robert Sephr is writing a fictional account of history from the pagan european’s point of view. This is not a bad thing. But it is still a historical fiction. What you want to get from people like him is that it is possible to reinterpret history from our point of view. And that the *sentiment* he gets across to the audience is about right. And that’s a good thing. You can’t approach his reading of the history itself any more accurately than the pseudo history he’s countering. It’s emotionally rewarding historical fiction. And he weaves together absolute nonsense – obvious falsehoods, myths, and fantasies – with the evidence. If he stuck to the hard material and was a little more accurate then I’d regard it differently.
Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 09:12:00 UTC