Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • ANONYMOUS BOOK LIST FROM 2011 (Found it interesting then and now) The internet h

    ANONYMOUS BOOK LIST FROM 2011
    (Found it interesting then and now)
    The internet has had a serious anti-intellectual effect on the conservatives history of thought even though its innovations in technique, pessimism, and intersexual relations and race have been fruitful.

    Reading List: (Books):
    Larry Arnhart: Darwinian Conservatism
    Aristotle: Politics, Nicomachean Ethics
    The Bible (King James, Vulgate)
    M.E. Bradford: Founding Fathers: Brief Lives of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution
    Peter Brimelow: Alien Nation
    Burke: Reflections on the Revolution in France
    Patrick J. Buchanan: The Great Betrayal, State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America; and Death of the West
    John C. Calhoun: The Conservative Mind, and the Papers of John C. Calhoun)
    Cicero: The Republic
    Cochran & Harpending: The 10,000 Year Explosion
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge: On the Constitution of Church & State
    T.S. Eliot: “Notes Towards a Definition of Culture”
    Steven Farron: The Affirmative Action Hoax
    Thomas Fleming: The Morality of Everyday Life: Rediscovering an Ancient Alternative to the Liberal Tradition; The Politics of Human Nature; Immigration and American Identity
    Ian Fletcher: Free Trade Doesn’t Work
    Sam Francis: Revolution from the Middle; Shots Fired; America Extinguished; Essential Writings on Race
    Paul Gottfried: After Liberalism; Multiculturalism and the Politics of Guilt; Strange Death of Marxism; Encounters; Conservatism in America
    James Kalb: The Tyranny of Liberalism
    Russell Kirk: The Conservative Mind, Roots of American Order
    Donald W. Livingston: Philosophical Melancholy and Delirium
    Thomas DiLorenzo: The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War
    Richard Lynn: The Global Bell Curve; IQ and the Wealth of Nations
    Joseph de Maistre: Considerations on France
    Michael O’Meara: Anti-Liberalism in Postmodern Europe
    Friedrich Nietzsche: On the Genealogy of Morality; Beyond Good and Evil
    Robert Nisbet: The Quest for Community
    Joseph Pearce: Small Is Still Beautiful
    Josef Pieper: Leisure: The Basis of Culture; Tradition: Concept and Claim
    Claude Polin: La Cite Denaturee
    John Randolph: (See notes for Ch. V, The Conservative Mind)
    Jean Raspail: Camp of the Saints
    Willhelm Roepke: A Humane Economy
    Byron M. Roth: The Perils of Diversity: Immigration and Human Nature
    J. Philippe Rushton: Race, Evolution and Behavior
    James C. Russell: The Germanization of Early Medieval Christianity
    Claes G. Ryn: America the Virtuous
    Frank Salter: Risky Transactions: Trust, Kinship and Ethnicity; On Genetic Interests
    Joseph Scotchie: Revolt from the Heartland
    Roger Scruton: Conservative Texts
    Oswald Spengler:Decline of the West
    Paul Streitz: America First
    Tomislav Sunic: Against Democracy and Equality
    Twelve Southerners: I’ll Take My Stand
    Srdja Trifkovic: The Sword and the Prophet
    Robert Weissberg: Bad Students, Not Bad Schools
    Chilton Williamson, Jr.: The Conservative Bookshelf; Immigration and the American Future (editor); The Immigration Mystique
    Clyde N. Wilson: From Union to Empire

    Reading List: (Articles):
    Lawrence Auster: “The Politically Incorrect Truth About Rape in the United States”
    M.E. Bradford: “A Fire Bell in the Night: The Southern Conservative View,” “The Heresy of Equality,” “The Lincoln Legacy,” “On Rembering Who We Are,” “Rhetoric and Respectability,” “Dividing The House: The Gnosticism of Lincoln’s Political Rhetoric”
    Peter Brimelow: “Time to Rethink Immigration?,” “The Economic Impact of Immigration”
    Patrick J. Buchanan: “Nation or Notion?”; “Fruits of NAFTA”; “Dismantling America”
    John Derbyshire: “Why the Government Should and Can Not Make Us Equal”; “What’s So Scary about Evolution?”
    Marcus Epstein: “Myths of Martin Luther King”
    Thomas Fleming: “Counting People and People Who Count”
    Sam Francis: “The Germanization of Christianity,” “Race and the American Prospect,” Statement of Principles, “The Origins of ‘Racism’,” “The Return of the Repressed,” VDare Archives
    David Glasner: “Science and the Idea of Progress”
    Paul Gottfried: “Oswald Spengler and the Inspiration of the Classical Age”; “Strauss and the Straussians”; “Conservatives, NeoConservatives…What Next?”
    Samuel Huntington, “Migration Flows: The Central Issue of our Time”
    Thomas Howard: “The ‘Moral Mythology’ of C.S. Lewis”
    James Kalb: “Toward an Anti-Inclusivist Right [I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX]”; “Anti-Racism”
    George Kennan: “U.S. Overpopulation Deprives Planet of Helpful Civilization”
    Russell Kirk: “The Necessity of Dogmas in Schooling”
    E. Christian Kopff: “The Classics and the Traditional Liberal Arts Curriculum,” “A Return to Sources,” “Julius Evola on Tradition and the Right,” “History and Science in Tenney Frank’s Scholarship” (Original Frank article: “Race Mixture in the Roman Empire”) ; “The Fear of God”
    Kevin Lamb: “The Open-Borders Network”; “Whitewash”
    Wayne Lutton: โ€œThe Southern Poverty Law Center – A Special Reportโ€
    John O. McGinnis: “A Defense of Darwinian Conservatism”
    Ilana Mercer: “War on white South Africa”
    George A. Panichas: “T.S. Eliot and the Critique of Liberalism”
    Aurthur Pendleton: “Lew Rockwell and the Strange Death of Paleolibertarianism”
    Tom Piatak: “America First, Of Course”; “Bringing Back the Old Economy”
    J Enoch Powell: “Rivers of Blood”
    Jean Raspail: “The Fatherland Betrayed by the Republic”; “On Camp of the Saints”
    Scott Richert: “Are Conversions to Islam Likely to Increase? “
    Michael Rienzi: “Ethno-States, Kin Preservation, and the End of Politics”
    Paul Craig Roberts: “The Missing Case for Free Trade,” “An Economist Rethinks Free Trade,” “The Decline and Fall of the American Economy”
    Edwin S. Rubenstein: “Legal Immigration – The Bigger Problem”; “The Economic Case for [an Immigration] Moratorium”
    Philippe Rushton: “Indians Aren’t That Intelligent,” Ethnic Nationalism, Evolutionary Psychology, and Genetic Similarity Theory,” “Shared Genes: The Evolution of Ethnonationalism”
    Claeas G. Ryn: “Universality or Uniformity? [or why Allan Bloom is left-wing],” “Political Philosophy and the Unwitten Constitution,” “How Conservatives Failed ‘The Culture’,” “Where in the World are We Going,” “Jacobin in Chief”; “Strauss and History”; “Universality and History”
    Steve Sailer: “The Reality of Race”; “Race is an Extremely Extended Family”;”Race and Its Proper Perspective” (NY Times Article); “Fragmented Future”; “Ethnic Nepotism and the Reality of Race”; “Question for feminists”; “The Left Doesn’t Like Darwin”; “On Dawkins on Race”; “How White Are Hispanics?”; “James Watson & Francis Crick on Race & IQ”
    Frank Salter: “Estimating Ethnic Genetic Interests: Is it Adaptive to Resist Replacement Migration?”; “Misunderstandings of Kin Selection….”; “The Misguided Advocates of Open Borders”
    Rob Sanchez: “Pledge of Allegiance — to India”; “Pledge of Allegiance — to India, Pt. II”
    Richard Spencer: “Is Christianity Western?”; “Darwinism is Right-Wing”
    Tim Stephanini: “Indian H-1B Workers Incompetent Cheats and Frauds”
    John Tanton: “The Durable Rev. Malthus”
    Taki Theodoracopulos: “Bush Pardons Carly Simon’s Little Drug Pusher”
    Srdja Trifkovic: “The North Worth Saving”
    Derek Turner: “Dark Continent”
    Eric Voegelin “On Classical Studies”
    Clyde Wilson: “The Jeffersonian Conservative Tradition,” “The Lincoln Fable”
    Jerry Woodruff: “The Use and Abuse of Friedrich Nietzsche,” “Samuel Francis on Immigration and the Ruling Class””


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 23:40:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777481566886723584

  • Primitives are what they are. The question is, once the country completes it’s c

    Primitives are what they are. The question is, once the country completes it’s conversion to modernity (which is a slow but increasingly successful process) how the religion and the people adapt – or like islam are they prisoners of their IQ and ignorance problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:32:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777464511215079854

    Reply addressees: @HeiligeHare

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777463316719571103

  • “Q: What is the purpose of our civilization? Is it an end in itself or merely a

    –“Q: What is the purpose of our civilization? Is it an end in itself or merely a means to something greater?”–

    Great Question. Great topic for a long article, but the short version:
    (a) Surviving Competition (from lesser peoples)
    (b) Self Determination by Self Determined Means – together.
    (c) “The Proto-Indo-Europeans and their gods were heroic, militaristic, expansionist, and sky-worshipping, and – not peaceful, earth-worshipping, and agrarian.” And aristocratic egalitarianism (“make the people better so there are more of us”) It’s heroic.
    (d) Innovative, adaptive, Evolutionary Velocity.
    (e) Condition of prosperity while doing so.
    (f) Aryanism: Transcendence into, and defeat of, the gods we imagine (which are specious).

    The answer to your question: The purpose of our civilization is our Transcendence into gods by use of our dominance over ourselves, others, nature, and the universe

    Reply addressees: @ProphetOfHelios


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 22:22:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777461945509007360

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777444784094822538

  • The Duality of the West

    The Duality of the West

    The Duality of the West https://t.co/RSXqiam93W


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 20:59:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777441168663408925

  • Keep trying. ๐Ÿ™‚ Pythagoras learned mathematics from egypt. Egypt was a much more

    Keep trying. ๐Ÿ™‚ Pythagoras learned mathematics from egypt. Egypt was a much more advanced society than persia and it’s predecessors.

    The pathway from zoroastrianism to europeanism is through judaism to christianity.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 20:39:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777436141530096100

    Reply addressees: @RealSocred @hoose8026 @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777432512513347869

  • I never criticize the French for their autarky or military. The few masculine ex

    I never criticize the French for their autarky or military. The few masculine expressions in french culture are the good ones. ๐Ÿ˜‰ I criticize the people for the effeminacy, the state for the continental law, the government for their immigration and tolerance of islam, the academy for its fountain of bad ideas, and the general fantasy of Elites’ superiority giving it the right to rule Europe. ๐Ÿ˜‰
    I’m anglo-norman and French. Talking smack about the french is a family tradition – because we know we are also laughing at ourselves. ;). Why? There is no genetic difference between northern france and southern England. Which is why Ancestry doesn’t include northern France – at the french govt’s insistence.

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 19:49:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777423440036691968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777421635672322441

  • The Melting Pot Lie

    The Melting Pot Lie

    The Melting Pot Lie https://t.co/K9f0qZy7Gw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 19:38:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777420850599223681

  • The Melting Pot Lie

    The Melting Pot Lie


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 19:38:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777420850532126721

  • The difference between races and ethnicities is largely: (a) Neoteny: morphology

    The difference between races and ethnicities is largely:
    (a) Neoteny: morphology, behavior (Domestication)
    (b) Average IQ (Intelligence)
    (c) Verbal-Spacial Bias in IQ (ex: Ashkenazi vs Eas Asian)
    (d) Religion, Tradition, and Culture (fixable with time)
    (e) Utility of ingroup bias (ethnocentrism) in when politically intermixed. ( Unfixable )
    Almost everything else is irrelevant.
    But each of those is very relevant.

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 16:00:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777365965874798592

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777362363907195160

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @VelliMach Protestantism is the result of Bipartite Manoriali

    RT @curtdoolittle: @VelliMach Protestantism is the result of Bipartite Manorialism and the resulting eugenics within the Hajnal line, beginโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-08 03:51:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1777182357805469951