Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

Yes it was. It began in the late 18th century – largely in response to the French and American civil wars – which caused nationalism to rise, and people to re-migrate back to their places of origin. It’s postwar unification of progressivism with the marxist sequence that created their movement.

Again, enduring problem of the source of the bias that is demonstrated. In the case of germany the problem was their ancestral fragmentation (similar to the slavic problem remaining today – tho poland is trying to change that.) England had unified. Germany had not yet. This is another version of the difference between sea and land powers. So england didn’t need to solve the problem germans did. They had the opportunity (privilege) of unification and therefore could emphasize law instead of ‘religion or theo-philosophy’.
So germans took the feminine bonding strategy, where anglos had already developed it systematically.

OMG. I know this is a joke. But just to counter it. The oldest remaining population group alive today are the SAN. They bear a very likely look of eve. And if you look at australian aboriginal women thats an even more likely morphology. The bantu majority in africa is a more recent development. You don’t have to go back that far in history to see asiatic (left photo direction) or coastal dispersal morphology (right photo direction).