photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/93795925_261247458606748_3241060253743185920_n_261247455273415.jpg I’M A PRACTITIONER OF CYCLES
—“Curt, What do you think of Peter Turchin’s Work”—
Well I’m a practitioner, right? So I don’t know how to make a higher endorsement than that.
Turchin, Kondratiev, Strauss and Howe, Caroll, Toynbee, Spenger, Durant … I mean, my model is a little lower level, meaning military, economic, and demographic, rather than statistical, so I tend to think in supply demand curves rather than statistical correlations, but I’m not just a follower but a practitioner.I’M A PRACTITIONER OF CYCLES
—“Curt, What do you think of Peter Turchin’s Work”—
Well I’m a practitioner, right? So I don’t know how to make a higher endorsement than that.
Turchin, Kondratiev, Strauss and Howe, Caroll, Toynbee, Spenger, Durant … I mean, my model is a little lower level, meaning military, economic, and demographic, rather than statistical, so I tend to think in supply demand curves rather than statistical correlations, but I’m not just a follower but a practitioner.
There are a small number of optimum houses: the longhouse (cold rural family), the manor-house(porches, large farm, multi-generation), the courtyard house(suburban multi-generation), the townhouse with shared courtyard (mult-generation), the paris-house (apartments) with shared courtyard and boulevards.
I find the whole open-concept return to longhouses interesting and obvious. It’s the optimum.
It wasn’t europeans that developed global religion, global marxism, global socialism, global cosmopolitanism, global postmodernism, global hbd-denialism, or europeans that undermined rule of law.
It was feminine intuition, and people of it, that cannot scale.
@JonHaidt @berggruenInst Consensus, getting heads together, leadership, these are all village-thinking. The female intuition doesn’t scale. We have institutions and rule of law of tort for a reason – it scales, at the cost of suppressing the reproduction of the underclasses, keeping natural selection.
Judaism, Christianity, Islam in the old world, Marxism, Socialism, Postmodernism, Denialism in the Modern world – the revolt by the cognitively feminine underclass dysgenic against the cognitively masculine middle and upper class eugenic civilizations of east and west. 2k yr War.
—“I actually think Johannesburg represents the future. My version of what I think the world is going to become looks like Johannesburg.”— Neil Blomkamp
And did precisely nothing with it. Why? We know why China failed. (a)harmony over competitiveness (b)face over truth (c) monopoly bureaucracy (d) abandonment of empirical management, (e)failure to develop rule of law. This prevented the transformation to a majority middle class.
Just as french write informal universalist secular theology of the feminine, and germans write formal universalist philosophy that is secular theology of harmony, the russians write masculine very informal nationalist propaganda as a secular theology of the masculine. These are the result of geographic location and cultural history.
While yes my implementation of rule of law is pretty intolerant, and I jokingly refer to my work as either rule of law fascism or market fascism, and while I advocate for nationalism, and restoration of the anglosphere – remains of the british empire – to create the scale necessary for preservation of the defense of the sea trade between our continents – my work is also in large part dispassionate.
So where duggin has his ambitions, writes, speaks, and argues passionately and romantically in what I consider nonsense-propaganda, I write in pretty rigorous analytic argument dispassionately and unromantically. And this lack of romance and passion – my anglo empiricism – is not what the passionate market wants me wo write. What the young passionate male mind wants is an heroic and often esoteric secular-religious vision. Yet I’m just updating the founding fathers, with their formality and martial reserve.
So in that sense whether french feminine passive aggressive essay, german rational inspirational harmony, russian low trust machismo, and anglo high trust empirical, and chinese face-before-truth authoritarian, or jewish feminine undermining using magical thinking to bait into hazard, we are all arguing for our futures in a world returning to normal after a century of jewish intellectual pseudoscience and sophistry in marxism, syndicalism, postmodernism, feminism, libertarianism, neoconservatism – a sequence of attempts by the jewish counter-revolution against the empirical revolution and it’s darwinian consequences. They sought to capture europa for their ends just as the french, germans, and russians sought to capture it for their ends. They have failed. Or it will be evident shortly that they failed.
So I see the world differently, that we are all turning to the masculine defense of our peoples and cultures after the undermining and destruction of the leftist feminine attempts to use european wealth, and christian tolerance, to turn the world into another middle eastern equalitarian desert under totalitarian feminine presumption that knitting-circle consensus and harmony is possible, or that continued knitting circle gossip and undermining among usurers of our civilization is possible. It isn’t. It’s Magical thinking.Updated Apr 17, 2020, 7:54 AM
We didn’t conquer you because we were Christian. We ended your poverty by letting you steal our technology because we are Christian. We had Christian faith that once you failed at Communism you would no longer be barbarians.
@Djww5 @healingbyhenry @sunkiisss That is communist chinese propaganda. Does that mean your ancestors who kept the secret recipe for porcelain should not have?
A thing belongs to those who use violence to maintain their ownership. We don’t use violence – Because we wanted to end your primitive chinese barbarism.
So, what is the lesson we learn from our study of history? That european peoples are able to evolve genetically, culturally, economically, technologically, faster than all other peoples because of our traditions of sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, excellence, heroism, rule of law and jury, and markets in all aspects of life, where the market for suppression of parasitism we call the law, and the market for reciprocity in the production of goods, services, and information, evolve as rapidly as possible, thereby advancing productive innovations in each others interests, and suppression innovations in parasitism against others interests, in exchange for softly suppresses the rates of reproduction of the underclasses, thereby allowing us to divert proceeds of our production to the commons and the higher returns for all from those commons, the most important of which are truth before face, trust, economic and innovative velocity, and the prosperity, joy, and peace of mind that results from it.