Feb 28, 2020, 6:18 PM Why the wealth of western civilization? Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Why the wealth of western civilization?
Feb 28, 2020, 6:18 PM Why the wealth of western civilization? Greater success at reproductive juvenilization. we are not sure why other than that slowing the rate of maturity is possible in colder climates, whereas accelerating the rate of maturity in warmer clients is necessary for no other reason than to survive the higher incidence of disease, parasites, and predators. Greater success at aggressive culling the size of the underclasses. While it is impolitic to say so, the wealth or poverty of a people is more dependent upon the reduction and elimination of the underclasses than it is upon the production of exceptional people and education. A good rule of thumb is that every person at the bottom is six times as costly as every person at the top is productive. Greater success at eliminating the clannishness impulse. Again, we are not sure if this is an artifact of low population density and cold climates, or purely one of cultural forces influence reproductive choice. In either event, white people (to their detriment) are less tribal and clannish. For reasons we are just beginning to understand, the west made very different cultural choices (a) telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth as highest virtue, despite any impact it would ahve on the dominance hierarchy. (b) Sovereignty and Markets in Everything creating a market for polities, and polities led by markets, rather than monopolistic hierarchies. As a consequence a division of the state into different institutions that competed with one another. This led to deflationary literature where the rest of the world relied on conflationary literature. (c) that the gods, like men, are subject to the laws of the natural universe, and that man can defeat the folly of these gods with cunning and effort. So white people are more trusting, more trustworthy, and have institutions that depend upon more trusting, more trustworthy people, and together these reduce the frictions that constrain non white peoples to lesser conditions. The only people close to whites are the Japanese and south koreans. And even among whites, these rules apply only to whites from above the Hajnal Line (protestants and their descendants) who practiced Bipartite Manorialism. TRUST=COOPERATIVE VELOCITY=RATE OF ECONOMY
-
The Group Strategies: Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism>buddhi
The Group Strategies: Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism>buddhism https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/the-group-strategies-confucianism-aristotelianism-abrahamism-hinduismbuddhism/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:12:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266477506875531266
-
The Group Strategies: Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism>buddhism
Mar 2, 2020, 3:45 PM THE GROUP STRATEGIES: CONFUCIANISM, ARISTOTELIANISM, ABRAHAMISM, HINDUISM>BUDDHISM Burial … Animism …. … Sun Tzu Realism ( martial realism) … … Confucianism (harmony) … … … Daoism (Tolerance) … Proto IE Religion … … Proto Vedic … … … Hinduism … … … Zoroastrianism … … European Sky Father (martial realism) … … … European Common Law (legal realism) … … … … Platonism (idealism) … … … … … Aristotelianism (realism naturalism) … Proto Semitic … … Proto Judaism … … … … Abrahamism <- Zoroastrianism (Authoritarianism) … … … … … Rabbinical Judaism (Justificationism) … … … … … Christianity (resistance) … … … … … … The Augustinian Conflation (compromise) … … … … … … … Orthodoxy – Catholicism, (settlement) … … … … … … … … Protestantism, (reformation) … … … … … … … … … Evangelicalism (folk-religion restoration) … … … … … … Islam (7th c+) … … … … … … … Fundamentalist Islam (11-12th c+)
-
The Group Strategies: Confucianism, Aristotelianism, Abrahamism, Hinduism>buddhism
Mar 2, 2020, 3:45 PM THE GROUP STRATEGIES: CONFUCIANISM, ARISTOTELIANISM, ABRAHAMISM, HINDUISM>BUDDHISM Burial … Animism …. … Sun Tzu Realism ( martial realism) … … Confucianism (harmony) … … … Daoism (Tolerance) … Proto IE Religion … … Proto Vedic … … … Hinduism … … … Zoroastrianism … … European Sky Father (martial realism) … … … European Common Law (legal realism) … … … … Platonism (idealism) … … … … … Aristotelianism (realism naturalism) … Proto Semitic … … Proto Judaism … … … … Abrahamism <- Zoroastrianism (Authoritarianism) … … … … … Rabbinical Judaism (Justificationism) … … … … … Christianity (resistance) … … … … … … The Augustinian Conflation (compromise) … … … … … … … Orthodoxy – Catholicism, (settlement) … … … … … … … … Protestantism, (reformation) … … … … … … … … … Evangelicalism (folk-religion restoration) … … … … … … Islam (7th c+) … … … … … … … Fundamentalist Islam (11-12th c+)
-
What World-Intellectual Elites Exist?
What World-Intellectual Elites Exist? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/what-world-intellectual-elites-exist/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 21:11:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266477276306300929
-
What World-Intellectual Elites Exist?
Mar 2, 2020, 3:55 PM
1. European Aristotelian Masculine 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic Feminine 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)
-
What World-Intellectual Elites Exist?
Mar 2, 2020, 3:55 PM
1. European Aristotelian Masculine 2. Ashkenazi Jewish Abrahamic Feminine 3. The Chinese Act rather than Talk, they don’t create universals, the run their civilization out of self interest. Confucianism isn’t argumentative or combative like scientific truth or abrahamic undermining. 4. If India has intellectual elites they’re invisible to us primarily because they are concentrating as are the Chinese on their own. 5. There are no islamic intellectual elites because it’s an anti intellectual civilization in the sense we meant it as innovative. (open to criticism on this)
-
The meaning of Civilized
Mar 5, 2020, 5:19 PM CIVILIZED LIKE VELOCITY IS A THRESHOLD AND SPECTRUM NOT A STATE
—“Curt, how do we consider the Chinese a civilized nation when they do not engage in reciprocity with anyone, and they hack the whole world with false promises and sh—y, toxic goods?”— Ahmed Reda
Civilized means ‘urbanized’, meaning ‘markets’, with ‘market ethics’, which we think of as middle class or ‘civilized’ ethics, combined with producing high culture (arts) as monuments (achievements), the ultimate luxury. Chinese civilization has been ‘advanced’ in the sense of (a) urbanized, and (b) producing high culture, since the ancient world. However, Chinese culture has never valued human life as we do in all of its history and the communists made it far worse. A quick perusal of the history of chinese art compared to european will illustrate the self loathing of the chinese toward human beings. A quick read of how many of their own people they have killed in modern, medieval, and ancient worlds, tells the rest. They are a low trust society still trying to emerge out of endemic poverty. We think they are an old people and they claim to be but they are not. The communists did to china what the (((current leftists))) are trying to do to ours, so the chinese lost all their high culture and traditions and ethics and suffered through the communist experience. Their priority in value is harmony over human life. Why this is the case is rather obvious if you understand their history.
-
The meaning of Civilized
Mar 5, 2020, 5:19 PM CIVILIZED LIKE VELOCITY IS A THRESHOLD AND SPECTRUM NOT A STATE
—“Curt, how do we consider the Chinese a civilized nation when they do not engage in reciprocity with anyone, and they hack the whole world with false promises and sh—y, toxic goods?”— Ahmed Reda
Civilized means ‘urbanized’, meaning ‘markets’, with ‘market ethics’, which we think of as middle class or ‘civilized’ ethics, combined with producing high culture (arts) as monuments (achievements), the ultimate luxury. Chinese civilization has been ‘advanced’ in the sense of (a) urbanized, and (b) producing high culture, since the ancient world. However, Chinese culture has never valued human life as we do in all of its history and the communists made it far worse. A quick perusal of the history of chinese art compared to european will illustrate the self loathing of the chinese toward human beings. A quick read of how many of their own people they have killed in modern, medieval, and ancient worlds, tells the rest. They are a low trust society still trying to emerge out of endemic poverty. We think they are an old people and they claim to be but they are not. The communists did to china what the (((current leftists))) are trying to do to ours, so the chinese lost all their high culture and traditions and ethics and suffered through the communist experience. Their priority in value is harmony over human life. Why this is the case is rather obvious if you understand their history.