Well, I don’t want to go thru that site and try to figure out what claim you’re making but we do know the IE expansion and the Alexandrian Expansion, and we know (rather recently) that the alexandrian and roman expansion was broader than we thought. AFAIK we know the lost IE’s.
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @JohnMarkSays
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Well, I don’t want to go thru that site and try to figure out what claim you’re
-
There was a library. The debate is over it’s scale and whether there was more th
There was a library. The debate is over it’s scale and whether there was more than one location (the docks for example)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 22:06:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270839763344424960
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270838113238220801
-
There was a library. The debate is over it’s scale and whether there was more th
There was a library. The debate is over it’s scale and whether there was more than one location (the docks for example)
Reply addressees: @UBKFrantisek @JohnMarkSays -
Between overextension, christianity, immigration, and the byzantine defeat of Ro
Between overextension, christianity, immigration, and the byzantine defeat of Rome, they prevented the aristocracy from restoring roman Civilization by replacing it with a far worse bureaucracy. that destroyed the civilization from within.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 21:17:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270827409764466689
Reply addressees: @bestern_west
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270820494724468736
-
Between overextension, christianity, immigration, and the byzantine defeat of Ro
Between overextension, christianity, immigration, and the byzantine defeat of Rome, they prevented the aristocracy from restoring roman Civilization by replacing it with a far worse bureaucracy. that destroyed the civilization from within.
Reply addressees: @bestern_west -
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of t
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of the NARRATIVE of history, with the EVIDENCE of history, what the romans wrote, what the germanic wrote, the legal acts, the wills and documents, economic and trade history.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 21:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270826750679961601
Reply addressees: @Cimbrian400 @AshaLogos
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270826021726683142
-
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of t
You can’t convince the faithful who have a poetic or literary understanding of the NARRATIVE of history, with the EVIDENCE of history, what the romans wrote, what the germanic wrote, the legal acts, the wills and documents, economic and trade history.
Reply addressees: @Cimbrian400 @AshaLogos -
We should have had the industrial revolution before 300. (Alexander shouldn’t ha
We should have had the industrial revolution before 300. (Alexander shouldn’t have crossed the Bosphorus, Rome shouldn’t into the Levant. Rome should have exterminated the Christians. Europe completed the Crusades. The Russians, Constantinople. Trade greed suppresses innovation.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 20:01:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270808201232027652
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270806624085725185
-
We should have had the industrial revolution before 300. (Alexander shouldn’t ha
We should have had the industrial revolution before 300. (Alexander shouldn’t have crossed the Bosphorus, Rome shouldn’t into the Levant. Rome should have exterminated the Christians. Europe completed the Crusades. The Russians, Constantinople. Trade greed suppresses innovation.)
Reply addressees: @JayMan471 -
The reason for east asian and european success is winters, late marriage, manori
The reason for east asian and european success is winters, late marriage, manorialism, and suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses by limiting access to land, starvation, disease, crime, and war.Positive eugenics aren’t necessary. One child or paying for no child is.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 18:03:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270778568440721409
Reply addressees: @AndBeyond_N @diffrinse @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270778131968860160
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@AndBeyond_N @diffrinse @Outsideness Darwin wasn’t a prophet. He wasn’t a theologian. He wasn’t a philosopher. He didn’t make excuses. He was a scientist. And he correctly explained the reason for European (and east asian) success – and the failure of every other civilization to avoid stagnation or decline.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1270778131968860160