Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • TLDR impatient version; The muslim conquest was only possible because europe and

    TLDR impatient version; The muslim conquest was only possible because europe and Persia had exhausted each other with war. The subsequent raiding of trade and piracy on the seas destroyed the capacity of europe and persia to conduct trade. Islam was spread because one had to pay a 30% tax NOT to practice islam. Each generation of middle eastern conquerors took control by the same means – joining the military and administration then taking it over by force. So islam succeeds by destroying teh trade of more advanced civilizations, destroying it’s institutions, reducing people to muslim levels of ignorance, and then parasitically living off the silk road which was the only means of trade across the ‘world island’.
    When the turks took Constantinople and closed the ports toe Europe in order to do the same thing to europe, the Europeans invented the age of sail, destroyed the market for overland trade, ended the silk road as viable, and without the ability to parasitically live off that trade, the middle east have consistently fallen behind.

    Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 19:51:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795905796909228033

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795901328260059204

  • RT @Plinz: It is very difficult for a nation to go into the future if it does no

    RT @Plinz: It is very difficult for a nation to go into the future if it does not believe in itself. It is hard to want and raise children…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 18:14:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795881305189519597

  • “Q: Curt: What’s your explanation for why white people are (typically) terrible

    –“Q: Curt: What’s your explanation for why white people are (typically) terrible dancers?”–

    Historically, European dance was an extremely sophisticated ‘pseudo-sport’ that combined the potential for association, bonding, and romance between the sexes and couples with formal public ritual that limited vulgar expressions.
    If you look at gymnastics and it’s ballet or circus forms, its europeans who invented everything of sophistication.
    So the observation that ‘white people can’t dance’ is only true in the sense of impulse dancing.
    White people have developed extraordinary impulse control – especially the males. The innate capacity for impulse dancing is the inverse of impulse regulation. This is obvious in the sexes, and often the classes, but it’s just as obvious with races that reflect our varying degrees of neotenic evolution.
    Which probably has something to do with a combination of factors, from neoteny to five thousand years of the only reason for capital punishment being cowardice – which usually means some version of ‘breaking ranks’.
    I’m reaching here for possible origins other than our combination of neoteny and self regulation. But at least the example gets the idea across.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper @Lughedd


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 15:46:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795844124819505152

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795792837595836775

  • Hindsight is always 20/20. And while the anglo/french betrayal of the Munich Agr

    Hindsight is always 20/20. And while the anglo/french betrayal of the Munich Agreement, in an effort to appease hitler because they were tired of war was against the interests of the Czech people, a people who cannot and never could defend themselves, the Czech people and the government in exile didn’t exactly ask the Allies to stay away – just the opposite.

    At the time, everyone was more afraid of germany than russia. That reversed only after the Soviets obtained the tech for nuclear weapons from a jewish spies in the USA.

    So I mean, yeah. Hindsight.

    Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS @antigg860413 @evansrc717 @SteveSchmidtSES @IHeartUkraine


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-28 03:42:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795299507757813760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795214391115161787

  • GENERATION JONES SAW THE END OF THE BOOMER PERIOD OF PROSPERITY COME CRASHING DO

    GENERATION JONES SAW THE END OF THE BOOMER PERIOD OF PROSPERITY COME CRASHING DOWN AS THEY CAME OF AGE IN THE 70s. (AND SOME ADVICE)
    (FYI: A generation is produced by the social, economic, and political events that occur during the period at which you come of age)

    Generation Jones (Born 1954 to 1965, coming of age from 1972 to 1979 .. and some to the early 1980s) is the worldwide social cohort coming after (or is the latter half) of the baby boomer generation and before the first year of Generation X (1965 to 1980). The baby boomer generation longer than a generation, and is a demographic term, NOT a generational term – as we use the term generation.

    The term Generation Jones was first coined by the American cultural commentator Jonathan Pontell, who identified the cohort as those born from 1954 to 1965 in the U.S., who were children during Watergate, the oil crisis, and stagflation rather than during the 1950s, but slightly before Gen X.
    Generation Jones did not grow up with World War II veterans as fathers, and, as they reached adulthood, there was no compulsory military service and no defining political cause.

    They have never lived in a world without television—similar to how many members of Generation Z (1997–2012), have never lived in a world without personal computers or the internet ,or mobile phones.

    The name “Generation Jones” has several connotations, including a large anonymous generation, a “keeping up with the Joneses” competitiveness, the ‘Yuppie Generation, and the Wall Street Generation”.

    They inherited an optimistic outlook as children in the 1960s (I dunno, I remember the 60s as the Vietnam war, the cold war nuclear scare, assassinations, race riots, constant left wing bombing, students advocating communism in constant protests, the downfall of our civilization, and the rise of perceivable crime in the middle class).

    But yes, the beginning of end of the postwar American economic advantage had ended before Generation Jones’ coming of age, and in the 70’s we would begin offshoring because of the power of unions and the use of unions by the left to advance communism – and yes it was deliberate. Because we understood by then that all socialism and communism were failing, and that the ‘great society project’ of Lyndon Johnson’s imitation of the soviets, had been a catastrophe. (And perhaps so was the civil rights movement – a cover for marxist undermining.)

    But they were then confronted with a different reality as they entered the workforce during Reaganomics and the shift from a manufacturing to a service economy, which ushered in a long period of mass unemployment. (When I graduated high school, only 40% of college graduates were finding jobs. Hence why I originally chose engineering rather than philosophy or fine art).

    Mortgage interest rates increased to above 12 percent in the mid-eighties, making it virtually impossible to buy a house on a single income. De-industrialization arrived in full force in the mid-late 1970s and 1980s; wages would be stagnant for decades, and 401Ks replaced pensions, leaving them with a certain yearning or “jonesing” quality for the more prosperous days of the past.

    There was a scarcity of resources and privileges available to them that were seemingly abundant to older Boomers. Therefore, there is a certain level of bitterness and “jonesing” for the level of doting and affluence granted to older Boomers but denied to them.

    So the Key characteristics assigned to members of Generation Jones are pessimism, distrust of government, and general cynicism. (OMG Yes. And then some. Hence the libertarian movement through 2010)

    (And FWIW, I experienced just what the present generation is experiencing in the past decade, and the only difference I can see is social media, dating sites, porn, immigration, and a total failure of the education sector, destroying the social cohesion and intersexual cohesion we had in my Jones Generation.

    But economically, I don’t have a lot of sympathy. Because we already went through it. And we fought and by some miracle the tech revolution saved us.

    Perhaps the AI revolution will save you economically.

    But socially and politically, you will need a threat of bloody revolution more intense than that the marxists used to bring about any chance of any quality of life for you and the generations that might follow you if you manage to reproduce at all.)

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @JamesMJohnson4 @keithinSimi


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 21:44:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794484646006149120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794474945679880346

  • PS. Technically I’m generation Jones (the first tech generation) and I have ever

    PS. Technically I’m generation Jones (the first tech generation) and I have everything in common with GenX except more competitiveness, and nothing in common with boomers other than ambition.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 20:23:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794464262938898490

    Reply addressees: @keithinSimi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794463955517145587


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    IS BLAMING THE BOOMERS BLAMING THE DOG FOR IT’S TRAINER?
    True. Boomers ruined everything that we can sense and perceive. But we can’t sense and perceive causality unless it’s in front of us.

    So blaming the boomers is blaming the dog for being trained to behave that way, when we should look at who did what training and why.

    Because it was a confluence of a tragedy (world war one) that destroyed the foundations of our western worldview (metaphysics, strategy), along with the left’s attempt to facilitate it, the financial sector’s attempt to facilitate it, and then the credentialist (academic) sector, and then the takeover of the institutions by the credentialists, the leftists, and the financial sector.

    None of which would have been possible without the introduction of women in to the voting pool, under the special pleading that women innately demonstrate at all times.

    We need to fix not only the left’s attempt to destroy our history, culture, institutions, and families, but to recapture the government, our education, our finance sector, and our group strategy, from these parasites.

    I’ve done the work of how – although I’m sort of running behind due to a couple years of illness. But the power to restore our civilization is going to take a few million people in DC (at least) for at least 90 days, presenting the state as our ancestors did, with a suit against the state for the redress of grievances, and the threat that we will forcibly do so if they don’t voluntarily do so.

    Otherwise we have a bloody civil war, or collapse and when either of those happens the world will fall into another world war on the scale we haven’t seen in a century, because the world wars were the unfinished job of ending empires in favor of nation states and free trade. And there is every very good chance that the three remaining attempts at empire will bring about a restoration of empires – and the poverty and wr that results.

    I think we can convince two million or more Americans to show up and prevent all that from happening, and to restore the quality of life we had and still desire by doing so.

    And then we can take it to Europe and save the entirety of our civilization from this alien sedition.

    Cheers
    CD

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1794463955517145587

  • IS BLAMING THE BOOMERS BLAMING THE DOG FOR IT’S TRAINER? True. Boomers ruined ev

    IS BLAMING THE BOOMERS BLAMING THE DOG FOR IT’S TRAINER?
    True. Boomers ruined everything that we can sense and perceive. But we can’t sense and perceive causality unless it’s in front of us.

    So blaming the boomers is blaming the dog for being trained to behave that way, when we should look at who did what training and why.

    Because it was a confluence of a tragedy (world war one) that destroyed the foundations of our western worldview (metaphysics, strategy), along with the left’s attempt to facilitate it, the financial sector’s attempt to facilitate it, and then the credentialist (academic) sector, and then the takeover of the institutions by the credentialists, the leftists, and the financial sector.

    None of which would have been possible without the introduction of women in to the voting pool, under the special pleading that women innately demonstrate at all times.

    We need to fix not only the left’s attempt to destroy our history, culture, institutions, and families, but to recapture the government, our education, our finance sector, and our group strategy, from these parasites.

    I’ve done the work of how – although I’m sort of running behind due to a couple years of illness. But the power to restore our civilization is going to take a few million people in DC (at least) for at least 90 days, presenting the state as our ancestors did, with a suit against the state for the redress of grievances, and the threat that we will forcibly do so if they don’t voluntarily do so.

    Otherwise we have a bloody civil war, or collapse and when either of those happens the world will fall into another world war on the scale we haven’t seen in a century, because the world wars were the unfinished job of ending empires in favor of nation states and free trade. And there is every very good chance that the three remaining attempts at empire will bring about a restoration of empires – and the poverty and wr that results.

    I think we can convince two million or more Americans to show up and prevent all that from happening, and to restore the quality of life we had and still desire by doing so.

    And then we can take it to Europe and save the entirety of our civilization from this alien sedition.

    Cheers
    CD

    Reply addressees: @keithinSimi


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 20:22:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794463955303186433

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794461151520309499

  • The Cause and Consequence of the Manipulation of the Boomer Generation – (Back t

    The Cause and Consequence of the Manipulation of the Boomer Generation – (Back to the 1870s).

    You really should watch this if you want to understand ‘what went wrong’ – because it’s been snowballing for a long time…. A Gradually Increasing Pyramid of Degeneracy.

    I don’t promote my videos very often but this is one you should consider.

    Cheers
    CD

    https://t.co/K4lOaU0e0S


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-25 19:56:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1794457535329533952

  • C’est une question intelligente. Bien que la géographie ait une influence et que

    C’est une question intelligente. Bien que la géographie ait une influence et que la démographie (essentiellement le QI) ait beaucoup plus d’influence, ce sont les institutions qui ont le plus d’influence sur la condition d’un peuple. Ainsi, compte tenu de la géographie, des ressources et de la démographie de la Russie, par exemple, la seule raison pour laquelle ils sont pauvres est la médiocrité des institutions. Alors oui, c’est la faute du gouvernement et la faute du peuple s’il n’exige pas un meilleur gouvernement.

    Je connais la plupart des principales langues européennes. Ainsi, avec l’aide de la traduction, je peux facilement comprendre le sens et répondre.

    Reply addressees: @Rsurrection7 @Fixitguy8 @elonmuskADO


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 19:36:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793365317630193664

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793363987955916971

  • SO THE ANSWER TO WHO IS THE FIRST KING OF ENGLAND IS? (and the history of what p

    SO THE ANSWER TO WHO IS THE FIRST KING OF ENGLAND IS?
    (and the history of what people called themselves)

    Favoring Alfred as the first is understandable, although you know, it’s gradual process, and we should remember at least two if not three names:

    Alfred (AEL-freyd) is only the king of Wessex, but he does set the foundations for the future by defending against the viking invasions.

    Athelstan (Æthelstan) unified the Anglo Saxon kingdoms, and it was the first time the regions now known as England were unified under a single monarch, creating a centralized and unified political entity. Historical records from Athelstan’s time refer to him as “Rex Anglorum” (King of the English) and “Rex totius Britanniae” (King of the whole of Britain), highlighting his recognized authority over a unified realm.

    Canute (Knut) brought stability and prosperity integrating the anglo saxon and danish people and regions. He also ruled over a north sea empire that included denmark and norway as well.

    So that’s anglo-saxon-viking england.

    William the Conqueror arrives and he brings mounded knights rather than just footsoldiers – because we’re all talking about the same rought gene pool from northern france to at least denmark. And he brought french, latin, roman administration to england, and converted anglo saxon england to norman england, the way anglo saxons converted the Celtic Britons speaking Common Brittonic – who did not have a unified identity, to anglo saxon england.

    WHAT DID THESE PEOPLE CALL THEMSELVES?

    Britain, Briton, are derived from the latin Britanni, and which is a latin derivation of greek Pretanoi or Priteni, but begins with the self identification of the people of the south of Britain as The *Pritani, (which I was taught was Pritanni, or Pretanni).

    While the Celtic Britons were divided into various tribes and kingdoms, such as Iceni, Trinovantes, Catuvellauni, and Brigantes, they did share common cultural and linguistic roots, which would have provided a basis for a shared sense of identity, even if it wasn’t as strongly unified as the later English identity.

    In Common Brittonic, the language spoken by these Celtic Britons, the word for “people” or “tribe” was likely similar to the Welsh word “gwerin,” which comes from the proto-Celtic “*weryom” or “*weryon-.” This term could have been used to refer to one’s own tribe or people. Today these terms survive as gwerin (folk, people) and “foirinn” (troop, band, company, crew, staff, team).

    Another term that might have been used is the proto-Celtic “*toutā,” which is related to the Irish “tuath” and the Welsh “tud,” meaning “people,” “tribe,” or “nation.”

    Which many of us recognize today as “Teuton” an “Teutonic” from german.

    The term is also related to the Old English “þeod” (THEE-odd) and the Old High German “diot,” (DEE-oht) both meaning “people.”

    Reply addressees: @MaxwellMianecki @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-22 15:53:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793309204318416896

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1793297400766877886