Is social darwinism a pseudoscience, or is it simply a complaint? And is it fals that europeans and east asians used credit, manorialism, aggressive genetic pacification, to all but eliminate the lower classes, spread the middle, and create demographic advantage others couldn’t?
Reply addressees: @AsaZernik @johnnywalkerle2 @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Is social darwinism a pseudoscience, or is it simply a complaint? And is it fals
-
I find it fascinating that nothing I’m saying is scientifically controversial. I
I find it fascinating that nothing I’m saying is scientifically controversial. It’s just that I’m saying it without prevarication.
The difference between cultures is our laws.
European law is second to none.
At the cost of market eugenics.
And that is why it’s intolerable.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 01:41:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276329607524999169
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276226807331729410
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
There is a very interesting relationship between the failure of the jews to achieve anything of note other than masking an organized crime family as a religion – no arts, no science, no technology, nothing – despite their literacy. Yet europeans lifted mankind out of primitivism.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276226807331729410
-
I find it fascinating that nothing I’m saying is scientifically controversial. I
I find it fascinating that nothing I’m saying is scientifically controversial. It’s just that I’m saying it without prevarication.
The difference between cultures is our laws.
European law is second to none.
At the cost of market eugenics.
And that is why it’s intolerable. -
But why? Why nothing at all until integrated into our civilization. NOTHING. B/c
But why? Why nothing at all until integrated into our civilization. NOTHING. B/c those fields cant lie. But then we get the pseudosciences where you can lie: boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, gramsci, adorno-fromm, derrida,friedan? Why the lies? The technique is the same in each.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 01:14:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276322808738562048
Reply addressees: @cia_swapmeet @koshersemite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276321537566445568
-
But why? Why nothing at all until integrated into our civilization. NOTHING. B/c
But why? Why nothing at all until integrated into our civilization. NOTHING. B/c those fields cant lie. But then we get the pseudosciences where you can lie: boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, gramsci, adorno-fromm, derrida,friedan? Why the lies? The technique is the same in each.
Reply addressees: @cia_swapmeet @koshersemite -
The question is, despite literacy, why achieve nothing? But then upon introducti
The question is, despite literacy, why achieve nothing? But then upon introduction into our Aristotelianism did you start to contribute? But reject it. And return to deceit, only swapping superstition for pseudoscience: boaz, freud, cantor, marx, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan?
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 01:08:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276321472466882562
Reply addressees: @koshersemite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276319945274593280
-
The question is, despite literacy, why achieve nothing? But then upon introducti
The question is, despite literacy, why achieve nothing? But then upon introduction into our Aristotelianism did you start to contribute? But reject it. And return to deceit, only swapping superstition for pseudoscience: boaz, freud, cantor, marx, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan?
Reply addressees: @koshersemite -
Well why did we, upon restoring Aristotle, develop the printing press and produc
Well why did we, upon restoring Aristotle, develop the printing press and produced the second great flowering of human knowledge and achievement equalled only by our greco-roman predecessors in the ancient world, and the indo european expansion?
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 01:06:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276320805983522816
Reply addressees: @koshersemite
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276319945274593280
-
Well why did we, upon restoring Aristotle, develop the printing press and produc
Well why did we, upon restoring Aristotle, develop the printing press and produced the second great flowering of human knowledge and achievement equalled only by our greco-roman predecessors in the ancient world, and the indo european expansion?
Reply addressees: @koshersemite -
The truth is so horribly unbearable, that every one of those thinkers is trying
The truth is so horribly unbearable, that every one of those thinkers is trying to reject Darwin and Darwin’s explanation for the outrageous success of western civlization. Why is the truth so terrifying to the jewish intellectual tradition of dialectic pilpul and critique? 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-26 01:00:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276319448463540226
Reply addressees: @johnnywalkerle2 @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1276318973865398278
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@johnnywalkerle2 @AsaZernik @ashleyblair21 @InvisibleTL @littlebirdll So it took until descartes to restore mathematical realism, and it took cantor and bohr to set it backward. What’s interesting is that this failure: boaz, freud, cantor, bohr, marx, mises, adorno-fromm, derrida, friedan are the reason for the collapse of thought in the 20th.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1276318973865398278