Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

THE OVERLAPPING INTERESTS OF THE FINANCIERS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION AND THE FIRST WORLD WAR
The question of overlap between those who financed the Bolsheviks during the Russian Revolution and those who financed the Allies during World War I is complex and somewhat controversial.

(CD: the point here is the ambition to destroy the european monarchies which are the primary means of defense against the globalists and you know who.)

Wall Street and International Financiers:
Connections to Both Sides: Some prominent financiers and financial institutions, particularly those based on Wall Street, had interests and involvement in both the Allied war effort and the Russian Revolution. For example, firms like J.P. Morgan and individuals like William Boyce Thompson had substantial influence and connections that spanned different geopolitical interests.
Bolshevik Funding: There are claims and documented instances suggesting that certain Wall Street bankers and firms provided financial support to the Bolsheviks. This support was often framed as part of broader strategies to influence or control post-revolutionary Russia for economic or political gain. Antony Sutton’s work, “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution,” explores this in detail, although his conclusions are subject to debate and scrutiny​ (modernhistoryproject)​​ (modernhistoryproject)​.

Strategic and Economic Motives:Financial Opportunism: The motivations for financing both the Allies and the Bolsheviks can often be traced back to strategic and economic opportunism. For financiers, supporting various sides in a conflict could ensure influence and favorable conditions for future business dealings, regardless of the outcome.
Centralized Control: Some historians argue that international financiers saw potential in centralized political systems, like that of the Bolsheviks, because these systems could offer stable and predictable environments for business, contrary to the chaos of decentralized, laissez-faire economies​ (modernhistoryproject)​​ (Foreign Policy Research Institute)​.

Sisson Documents and German Involvement:
German Facilitation: The Sisson Documents, although largely discredited as forgeries, did highlight real aspects of German involvement in facilitating the Bolshevik Revolution, particularly in aiding Lenin’s return to Russia. This support was part of Germany’s strategy to destabilize Russia and remove it from the war, which indirectly benefited the Allies by diverting German resources and attention​ (modernhistoryproject).

Conclusion

The overlap in financiers supporting both the Bolsheviks and the Allies highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of international finance during times of upheaval. While direct evidence of coordinated efforts is contentious, the involvement of major financial institutions and prominent financiers on multiple fronts reflects broader strategic interests that transcended individual conflicts.

THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT
“The Anglo-American Establishment” by Carroll Quigley provides an in-depth look at the secretive group of influential individuals in Britain and the United States who sought to shape global politics and maintain British imperial power through a network of elite institutions and influential figures.

–“the british empire had ‘lost it’s steam’ in world war one and the british felt that the german ascent would displace the british empire in global influence if the british did not compete against it.”–Dr Brad

The Secret Society:
Origins: Quigley discusses the formation of a secret society by Cecil Rhodes, an influential British imperialist, aimed at preserving and expanding the British Empire. Rhodes’s vision included creating a global network to exert influence over world affairs.
Structure: This society, often referred to as the “Round Table Group,” consisted of key figures from British politics, banking, and academia. It operated through semi-secret organizations and sought to wield significant influence over British and international policy.

Notable Members:
Alfred Milner: Quigley highlights the role of Alfred Milner, a prominent British statesman, who became a leading figure in the Round Table movement after Rhodes’s death. Milner’s efforts were pivotal in promoting British imperial interests.
Lord Esher, Lord Lothian, Lionel Curtis, and Others: The book profiles various members who contributed to the group’s activities and spread its influence through various institutions, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in the United States.

Institutions and Influence:
Educational and Policy Influence: The group used institutions like Oxford and Cambridge to groom future leaders aligned with their vision. They also influenced policy-making bodies and international relations through think tanks and advisory roles.
International Relations: Quigley details how this network influenced British and American foreign policies, particularly in the early 20th century, including during World War I and the interwar period.

World War I and Aftermath:
War Strategy: The Round Table’s influence on British war strategy and post-war reconstruction efforts is examined. Their vision for a post-war world included establishing the League of Nations to promote global governance and prevent future conflicts.
Anglo-American Cooperation: A significant part of the group’s strategy involved fostering close ties between Britain and the United States to ensure mutual dominance in global affairs.

Critique and Legacy:
Criticism of Methods: Quigley is critical of the group’s secretive methods and the lack of transparency in their efforts to manipulate political outcomes. He argues that their undemocratic approach undermined genuine democratic processes.
Enduring Impact: Despite his critique, Quigley acknowledges the significant impact this network had on shaping 20th-century international relations and their lasting influence on contemporary global politics.

Conclusion
Carroll Quigley’s “The Anglo-American Establishment” provides a thorough examination of a secretive and influential network that sought to shape global affairs through strategic alliances and institutional control. The book uncovers the ambitions, methods, and enduring legacy of this elite group, offering a critical perspective on their role in world history.