Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • A Concatenation of Micro Posts

     
     
    1 – My take on history is slightly different, which you’ll see as I publish the next few sets of pieces. That take is correct: European civilization consisted of the holy roman empire of greater Germania, and the innovations that occurred on the fringes of it in Italy, France, England, Scandinavia, and poland. European civilization is taught backward. Just as the world is the victim of the heartland of the steppe, europe is the product of the hearland of germany. Just why this is the case is very interesting. France is second in despotism only to Rome, who she imitated enviously and still tries to. Meanwhile, it was germany that created europe in a thousand tiny nations constantly competing. It was lotharyngian core as a trade route to the north sea, and the north sea after 1000 ad that spread outward. And the age of the atlantic only mattered to EUROPE after the muslim blockade caused the europeans to open world trade in the age of exploration.
     
    2 – Europeanism is the philosophy of fathers, warriors, headmen, kings, emperors and yes, gods, seeking to transform their family, band, tribe, nation, and race into peerage: gods as well. Christianity made it tolerable for the 85% = the peasantry, to survive the ride. But without agrarianism to rule, or manorialism to domesticate, we are reverting rapidly to dysgenia, and reversing five thousand years of evolutionary rapidity to justify democracy. When we should only justify rule of law, by the laws of this universe: physical, cooperative (natural), and evolutionary – as we all seek to defeat the red queen at all stages: local, civilization all, global, solar, galactic, and universal.
     
    3 – Like Hegel in Continental (German) secular theology, all roads of anglo scientific rationalism will end with Propertarianism. Deal with it. I did. I don’t even like it. I don’t want the responsibility. It is what it is.
     
    4 – There isn’t anyone else proposing anything else.
    And there won’t be.
     
    5 – —“I read Kevin Macdonald – haven’t been the same since.”—
     
    Says everyone who’s ever read Kevin MacDonald.
     
    Read Victor Davis Hanson (classical history), Read Buchanan (recent history), MacDonald (Jewish intellectuals, european uniqueness), Duchesne(The History of Thought, european uniqueness), Hicks (Postmodernism), and Doolittle (logic, law, economics, eugenics). And at least DTGTF from Hoppe so you understand why ‘monarchy’, and reduce my workload at convincing you.
     

  • the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe

    the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe https://t.co/wYU5ZWfOuU

  • the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe

    the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/the-words-fair-and-fairness-appear-only-in-the-languages-of-northwest-europe/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 15:06:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307335188070961152

  • the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe

    —“despite their roots in Proto-Indo-European, the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe where they originally referred only to behavior within the tribe. This is clearly a marker for the importance of moral reputation within the group, and it suggests selection for these traits in the northwest of Europe but not elsewhere throughout the extensive areas conquered by the Indo-Europeans.”—

  • the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe

    —“despite their roots in Proto-Indo-European, the words ‘fair’ and ‘fairness’ appear only in the languages of northwest Europe where they originally referred only to behavior within the tribe. This is clearly a marker for the importance of moral reputation within the group, and it suggests selection for these traits in the northwest of Europe but not elsewhere throughout the extensive areas conquered by the Indo-Europeans.”—

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    Defining “White and Whiteness” https://t.co/ynr54U1qF6

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    Defining “White and Whiteness” https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/19/defining-white-and-whiteness/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 15:02:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307334202699010049

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) who during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

     

  • Defining “White and Whiteness”

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) who during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

     

  • —-“Curt: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    —-“CURT: Were The Hittites White?”—-

    Despite a century of controversy, there exist only three major surviving races (subspecies), with the proposed fourth: the Pacific islands consisting of a mixture of all three races, and Austronesians a mix of African and Caucasian.
    The term Caucasian was not a misnomer, but geneticists today refer to West Eurasians as a group separated into bands from Iberia (Spain) to Mongolia (the Turkic peoples).

    WHITE
    “White” refers to:

    (a) descendants of the Indo European conquest of Europe,
    (b) who speak the indo-european language family,
    (c) who practice the indo european metaphysical and legal traditions, and
    (d) during the dark ages, converted from indo european derived religion to its antithesis: the Semitic derived Christian religion.

    The outlier property is the metaphysical and legal tradition that is what causes european civilizational uniqueness and is the reason for european excellence in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – with a thousand years of a superstitious dark age in between. It’s this uniqueness that demarcates ‘whites’ from other peoples more so than any other, and unfortunately, it is the least understood (until now, which is the focus of my work).

    “WHITENESS”

    “Whiteness” as used pejoratively is a group strategy. It is a group strategy of northern Europeans (protestants). That group strategy is extremely costly. While we may be aware of the high cost of truth before face, the high cost of market meritocracy, and the high cost of high trust norms, it’s unspoken cost is that it is aggressively eugenic. This aggressive eugenics is as much or more important than any other cultural trait. Only the Chinese and the Europeans were able to institutionalize eugenic reproduction via manorialism, which accounts for the elevated intelligence of East Asians and Western Europeans: the underclasses were dramatically reduced through natural cold weather farming, reproductive suppression, and criminal prosecution.

    The world other than Korea japan and china who are equally the products of eugenic evolution (human self-domestication) despises western civilization because it is expensive, it is counter-intuitive, and it is antithetical to them – but most importantly – because they cannot compete because they cannot repeat the eugenic processes themselves. Islam is perhaps the ultimate anti-civilization in history and is not a primitive group strategy. It produces de-civilization and dysgenia by justifying the avoidance of all adaptive costs. The same is true for the current war by the left against western civilization – they seek to eliminate the payment of eugenic costs.

    THE SPECTRUM

    1 – Most narrowly: Germanic Northern Europeans above the Hajnal Line (North Sea Civ), who were not under catholicism long enough to lose their ancestral legal and traditional habits – especially those who escaped the long term corruption of the church. The north sea group began separating from the rest of the world rapidly and the great divergence of the greeks was repeated in the north sea beginning in 1000 ad (not 1400).

    2 – Commonly: Christian European whether Germanic Scandinavian, Baltic, Slavic, or Finnic. (Continental Civ). This includes the three groups of Christianized european people: orthodox(greek), catholic(Latin), and protestant (Germanic)

    3 – Less Commonly: Many be extended to include the descendants of early Neolithic farmers of the Balkans, Greece, Southern Italy, Sicily, and Sardinia because they are Christian and in the european territorial and cultural sphere of influence. (European Peninsular Civ)

    4 – Uncommonly: May be extended to include the Iranic people of the caucuses: Georgians, Armenians. (European Extant Civ thru the Urals )

    5 – Rarely: May be extended to include the south-central West Eurasians – the Iranic peoples – but generally not.

    6 – More rarely: May be extended to the Turkic peoples – but almost certainly not – because they don’t speak an IE language.

    7 – Not including outbred peoples of the Indian subcontinent (who are a mixture of negrito hunter-gatherer, middle eastern hunter-gatherer (Dravidian), and Indo european steppe herders.

    8 – Not including the Afro Asiatic Languages – Middle eastern Peoples.

    9 – Never including African or East Asian Peoples, or Siberian Peoples (Amerindians).

    10 – Never including admixture peoples (along the out-of-Africa route from Yemen, to India, to SE Asia, to Australia.

    HITTITES

    The Hittites were West Eurasians. They Were Indo Europeans (“Aryans”). And we do not know whether they traveled from the steppe (Ukraine, Russia) via the clockwise route across the caucuses mountains, or the counter-clockwise route through the Balkans, or whether they originated on the Anatolian shores of the Black Sea. Consensus favors counter-clockwise.

    This means that Hittites share common ancestors with today’s ‘Whites’, and are not of either East Asian (Mongoloid) or African (Negroid) races.

    Attempts to de-racialize human groups are part of the anti-Darwinian pseudoscience movement of the Marxist-postmodern program of science denial, which in turn is a continuation of the ancient middle eastern program of spreading Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, to reverse the unpleasant fact that east Asian and western civilizations are eugenic.