Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • SCIENCE: 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a

    SCIENCE: 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-28 12:56:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310564048732389376

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310564046769467392


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    SCIENCE: 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1310564046769467392

  • SCIENCE: 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homog

    SCIENCE: 3-The Agrarian revolution was a significant caloric advantage but homogenized populations. The cline in Asia was southward and beneficial, but in Eurasia was north and regressive. The Steppe revolution was a significant cultural advantage and homogenized populations(IE).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-28 12:56:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310564046769467392

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310564044584165376


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    SCIENCE: 2-The climate in Africa and the population distribution resisted neotenic evolution. The climate in west Eurasia and distribution accelerated neotenic evolution. The climate in east Asian and limited distribution acclerated neotenic evolution. Groups speciated further.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1310564044584165376

  • SCIENCE: 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a

    SCIENCE: 4-The manorial revolutions in northern Europe and northern China were a significant political revolution, restoring natural selection under agrarianism. The industrial revolution provided expansion but reversed natural (Neotenic) selection and was regressive.

  • IRONY: The peoples who first crossed into the Americas over the land bridge were

    IRONY: The peoples who first crossed into the Americas over the land bridge were the ethnic north Eurasians – ie: today’s Europeans. And the second group were ASIANS that exterminated the North Eurasians, leaving only about 13% of their genome.
    So does that mean we’re even?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-27 17:22:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1310268504445202433

  • IRONY: The peoples who first crossed into the Americas over the land bridge were

    IRONY: The peoples who first crossed into the Americas over the land bridge were the ethnic north Eurasians – ie: today’s Europeans. And the second group were ASIANS that exterminated the North Eurasians, leaving only about 13% of their genome.
    So does that mean we’re even?

  • Historical Judgement: Because it’s easy to confuse the LETHALITY (military excel

    Historical Judgement: Because it’s easy to confuse the LETHALITY (military excellence) of Europeans vs other cultures and the AGGRESSION(violence) of other cultures. Europeans are the least aggressive, but the most lethal. IQ 85’s win the aggression. Middle east does.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 23:13:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1309994456284901376

  • Historical Judgement: Because it’s easy to confuse the LETHALITY (military excel

    Historical Judgement: Because it’s easy to confuse the LETHALITY (military excellence) of Europeans vs other cultures and the AGGRESSION(violence) of other cultures. Europeans are the least aggressive, but the most lethal. IQ 85’s win the aggression. Middle east does.

  • “This study supports the notion that Arabs are divided into four groups. The fir

    —“This study supports the notion that Arabs are divided into four groups. The first consisting of North Africans (Algerians, Tunisians, Moroccans, and Libyans), Saudis, Kuwaitis, and Yemenis, with relatedness to Western Mediterraneans, including Iberians. The second includes Levantine Arabs (Palestinians, Jordanians, Lebanese, and Syrians), Iraqi, and Egyptians, who appear to be related to the Eastern Mediterranean and Iranians, who in turn belonged to ‘Great Levant’ historically described. The third consists of Sudanese and Comorians who associate with Sub-Saharan Africans. Finally, the fourth group of Arabs comprises Omanis, Emiratis, and Bahrainis. This group associates with heterogeneous populations (Mediterranean, Asian and sub-Saharan). Lastly, the two main indigenous minorities, Berbers and Kurds, are not genetically different from the ‘host’ and neighboring populations.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-26 23:05:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/104933723753868647

  • DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION: YOUNG AND DUMB The average party membe

    DEMOGRAPHICS OF THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION: YOUNG AND DUMB

    The average party member was very young: in 1907, 22% of Bolsheviks were under 20 years of age; 37% were 20–24 years of age; and 16% were 25–29 years of age. By 1905, 62% of the members were industrial workers (3% of the population in 1897).[19][20] Twenty-two percent of Bolsheviks were gentry (1.7% of the total population) and 38% were uprooted peasants; membership was 8,400 in 1905, 13,000 in 1906, and 46,100 by 1907;

    There were only 50k of them.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 10:20:00 UTC

  • Here is how to understand human evolution (if you don’t know already) Many follo

    Here is how to understand human evolution (if you don’t know already) Many followers do.

    0) Vision increases your range of awareness of threat AND opportunity.

    1) Access to standing and running gets you greater defense and greater range, and greater access to foods.

    2) Access to better foods lets you swap brain size for digestion size.

    3) Better food, smaller digestion and bigger brains, lets you narrow pelvis and run longer and faster at lower energy cost.

    4) Walking and Running are ‘cheap’ and free up your hands to carry tools, weapons, and resources increasing your range, safety, and food opportunity.

    5) Losing your fur lets you dissipate heat faster, so that you can run down rather than fight increasingly rewarding game.

    6) Having achieved physical imitations, Increasing your cognitive metabolism is all that can improve from there. The physical evolution of (skeletal) modern humans doesn’t appear in skeletal remains.

    7) METABOLISM depends a great deal on heat dissipation, and climate affects heat dissipation, as such IQ differences generally reflect ancestral cognitive metabolism in increasingly cold vs increasingly hot temperatures.

    8) Since we’re cooperative creatures, and cooperation is an unsubstitutable good, the only improvement you can make after cognitive metabolic improvement is decreasing in friction (increase in efficiency) meaning selective reproduction for ability and selective culling of lacking ability)

    10). Communication distributes computation decreasing demand for memory retention and increasing demand for adaptation.

    11). The only way to improve communication is a system of measurement.

    12) the only way to improve a system of measurement is parsimony, consistency, correspondence, and coherence. Ie: “P”.

    All of those show up in the archeological record in skeletal remains. But that doesn’t explain the difference between the three waves out of Africa, or Africa itself.

    What doesn’t show up on the record?

    Great apes have an average IQ of 25, and corresponds to a 2.5 year old european – although visual memory in apes and social cognition in humans excel in opposite directions. Humans at this level have an extreme intellectual disability and are unable to self-care.

    The average IQ of bushmen is estimated at 55, and corresponds to the mental age of a European of about 8 years. The average cranial capacity of Bushmen is 1250 cubic centimeters. This is at the bottom end of mild intellectual disability. These people can self-care and learn very basic skills.

    The average IQ of Australian aborigines is the low 60s and they’re the oldest surviving isolated anatomically modern humans. This corresponds to the mental age of an 11-year-old European. it’s possible to learn basic life and survival skills and live independently.

    Average African IQ (if we throw out the extreme bottom) is in the low seventies ~71. 70 is the beginning of ‘intellectual disability’. So there is ‘nothing wrong’ with africans.

    There is a gap here in the 75-85 range. It’s important to understand that people in this range cannot serve in the military as there are absolutely no functions that they can perform without greater risk to materials, self, and others. Why this gap exists is something I’d like to understand.

    The band across North Africa, the Levant, Iran, Pakistan (which is the group I don’t know how to name, and call ‘iranics’, but others call south eurasians has an IQ of about 85. Same for native Americans. This appears to be the ‘normal’ basal eurasian human IQ, absent climate ‘selection pressure’. This is also the ‘problematic’ spectrum where people are both aware of their limitations, frustrated by them, and able to plan and execute crimes. I use the term the ‘evil 80’s’.

    SE Asia (which should include part of southern india) comes in at around 90. (same with turkey but it’s due to european admixture).

    Next is Europe outside of the southeast at 100, and east Asia at 105. But both Europe and east Asia have undergone political ‘natural selection’ under various forms of manorialism (and aristocracy).

    I can and others have, think of explanations for northern IQ advantages other than political selection, but I don’t think any are necessary.

    Examples of cranial capacity

    East Asians ~1416/105 (very high variability in the data)

    Europeans ~1369/100 (low variability in the data)

    Africans ~1282/71 (low variability in the data)

    Aborigines ~1199/62

    Bushmen: ~1250/55

    Early Hominids

    Neanderthals: 1,500–1,740 cm3 (92–106 cu in) (bigger brains)

    Homo erectus; 850 – 1100 cm3

    Australopithecus anamensis; 365-370 cm3

    Australopithecus afarensis; 438 cm3

    Australopithecus africanus 452 cm3

    Paranthropus boisei 521 cm3

    Paranthropus robustus 530 cm3

    Apes

    Gorillas: 340–752 cm3 (20.7–45.9 cu in)

    Orangutans: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.5 cu in)

    Chimpanzees: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.5 cu in)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-25 00:53:00 UTC