1) Genetic Superiority (Behavioral Neoteny), Demographic Superiority (Market Eugenics), and Institutional Superiority (developing rule of law first, not religion or state), and Cultural/Intellectual Superiority (Least variation from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws). https://t.co/q7TG93BN9r
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-16 19:13:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1317181881046192131
Could you rephrase that question without using Semitic GSRRM?
Ethnic (genetic, orthodox) Russians consider their territory an empire over multiple peoples, yet ethnocentrism is recently added to their constitution. The muslim problem affects russia because at present she’s weak.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-16 16:57:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1317147678866698240
Reply addressees: @RealityRelate @MarcusDirusso @melizzabelle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1317130112165359617
—“So that I fully understand your contextual meaning, how do you define serf and Freeman?”—
Western Civilization organized unlike all others, to produce individual agency sufficient for individual self-determination.
The evolution was: prisoner, slave, serf, freeman, citizen, and sovereign – with the ancient meaning of slave, as an indentured ward (not chattel slavery).
Slave – involuntarily retained, owner full responsibility for actions, room, board. No Court.
Serf – involuntarily retained, share of his production in exchange for self responsibility for actions, room, board. Manor Court.
Freeman – Unretained, Self Everything and Common Court
Citizen – unretained, self everything, common court, political participation, world wide protection by the state (military).
Sovereign – unretained, self everything, common court, political participation, political court (senate etc), participation in rule or access to rule, worldwide protection of the state.
The failure to convey that slave > serf > freeman, were expanding layers of self-responsibility, and expanding layers of juridical defense by the polity has been, as have many things, ‘not taught’ (obscured) in order to paint a false picture of history.
It was DEFENSIVE.
There are too few people today who have direct experience with uneducated farm labor prior to mass media. If you think the left is crazy today …
—“So that I fully understand your contextual meaning, how do you define serf and Freeman?”—
Western Civilization organized unlike all others, to produce individual agency sufficient for individual self-determination.
The evolution was: prisoner, slave, serf, freeman, citizen, and sovereign – with the ancient meaning of slave, as an indentured ward (not chattel slavery).
Slave – involuntarily retained, owner full responsibility for actions, room, board. No Court.
Serf – involuntarily retained, share of his production in exchange for self responsibility for actions, room, board. Manor Court.
Freeman – Unretained, Self Everything and Common Court
Citizen – unretained, self everything, common court, political participation, world wide protection by the state (military).
Sovereign – unretained, self everything, common court, political participation, political court (senate etc), participation in rule or access to rule, worldwide protection of the state.
The failure to convey that slave > serf > freeman, were expanding layers of self-responsibility, and expanding layers of juridical defense by the polity has been, as have many things, ‘not taught’ (obscured) in order to paint a false picture of history.
It was DEFENSIVE.
There are too few people today who have direct experience with uneducated farm labor prior to mass media. If you think the left is crazy today …
—“So that I fully understand your contextual meaning, how do you define surf and Freeman?”—
Western Civilization organized unlike all others, to produce individual agency sufficient for individual self-determination.
The evolution was: prisoner, slave, serf, freeman, citizen, and sovereign – with the ancient meaning of slave, as an indentured ward (not chattel slavery).
Slave – involuntarily retained, owner full responsibility for actions, room, board. No Court.
Serf – involuntarily retained, share of his production in exchange for self responsibility for actions, room, board. Manor Court.
Freeman – Unretained, Self Everything and Common Court
The failure to convey that slave > serf > freeman, were expanding layers of self-responsibility, and expanding layers of juridical defense by the polity has been, as have many things, ‘not taught’ (obscured) in order to paint a false picture of history.
It was DEFENSIVE.
There are too few people today who have direct experience with uneducated farm labor prior to mass media. If you think the left is crazy today …
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 20:43:07 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105029421452588663
There are too few people today who have direct experience with uneducated farm labor prior to mass media. If you think the left is crazy today ….
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 20:30:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316114130588364801
Reply addressees: @dragon8u
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316112536035491841
Hindu civilization is absolutely fascinating and the hardest one to understand, because of its lack of formalism, yet it’s success, endemic ‘kindness’ and ‘civility’. If I were to ‘science’ hinduism like I have the others, it would take me two or three years I would guess.
Reply addressees: @add_onis1
Hindu civilization is absolutely fascinating and the hardest one to understand, because of its lack of formalism, yet it’s success, endemic ‘kindness’ and ‘civility’. If I were to ‘science’ hinduism like I have the others, it would take me two or three years I would guess.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 20:20:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316111515720863749
Reply addressees: @add_onis1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316091054848978944
Because the wets developed law first, state second, and philosophy instead of religion. The Chinese developed state first, philosophy second, and not religion. The Hindus religion, not the state, nor law. The Semites developed religion, failed at law and failed at the state.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 20:17:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316110920255504384
Reply addressees: @add_onis1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316091054848978944
Because the wets developed law first, state second, and philosophy instead of religion. The Chinese developed state first, philosophy second, and not religion. The Hindus religion, not the state, nor law. The Semites developed religion, failed at law and failed at the state.
Reply addressees: @add_onis1