RT @ThruTheHayes: WANT A CIVILIZATION?
You must behave in a civilized fashion. https://t.co/1B2nzN71zl

Source date (UTC): 2024-06-30 00:02:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807203051041608168

RT @ThruTheHayes: WANT A CIVILIZATION?
You must behave in a civilized fashion. https://t.co/1B2nzN71zl

Source date (UTC): 2024-06-30 00:02:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1807203051041608168
Spectrum not binary. Technically given the arc beween the nile and mesopotamia, there is local neotenic variation on predictable grades from the afroasiatic (arabian peninsula) to the egyptian to the levantine to the syrian to the anatolian to the caucuses to the iranics and down into the mesopotamians and back down to the afro asiatics. (When I worked on speciation among amerindians and the pattern was obviously a repetition of the middle east.)
The agrarian revolution led to massive migratory recombination and the bronze age accelerated it.
The late bronze age collapse in the eastern mediterranean was a result of the western and southern expansion of indo europeans – mostly counter-clockwise around the black sea – mostly around 4000 bc. By 3000 BC the corded ware (what we think of european) culture had formed and this was the origin of the major pressure point as they moved graduallya cross europe, and by 2400-2300 or so their conquest of europe was complete. So, by the bronze age collapse (1200bc) “The expansion of WSHs resulted in the virtual disappearance of the Y-DNA of Early European Farmers (EEFs) from the European gene pool, significantly altering the cultural and genetic landscape of Europe.”
Reply addressees: @dissidentwrath
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-25 22:41:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805733102410678272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805713234122416385
–Q: Curt: “When did light coloring develop? Was it agrarian diet?”–
1. White skin evolved around 19,000 years ago likely in the ancestral north eurasians (lost population). 2. Counter clockwise migration pressure across eurasia caused westward distribution.
3. Cheddar man was ‘ruddy’ not dark as shown in the model – repeatedly falsified but persists in the discourse.
4. Neotenic Adaptation is not just diet, and it’s not just melanin but it is natal biochemistry.
5. Light Skin, Light hair, Light Eyes are highly neotenous.
6. Neoteny is the principle direction of all human evolution – domestication syndrome trading agency for impulse and calm for aggression, by delay of and reduction of the depth of sexual maturity (still visible in race differences in gestation, maturation, and dept of maturation).
7. So lightness in general, just like gracility, spread by selection pressure in favor of neoteny particularly in women, and particularly given the asymmetric reproduction of women vs men.
8. Agrarians (anatolian farmers) are darker in color than europeans. So the migration of light coloring was westward from the north of the caucuses, and especially from the northeastern ancestral north eurasians and northeastern europeans – not westward from the south of the caucuses.
9. So most neotenous to least: east asians, west europeans > caucasians > south eurasians (north african, levantine, iranic, hindustani people) > afro-asiatics (arabs) > modern africans > old africans (San people)
10. Coloring is determined by a complex interaction (polygenetic) but we do know the primary genes:
– Eyes: OCA2 (pigment) and HERC2(lighter)
– Skin: MC1R (melanocortin 1) as well as LSC245 and SLC45A2, in europeans.
– Hair: MC1R (again) and TYRP1 (both skin and hair). Ergo: agrarian impact on skin color was minor and late.
This is the correct answer.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-25 19:16:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805681370230145025
I’m not sure what you’re asking me to consider. In general, dowries and equivalents exist for (a) contributing to the establishment of a household (b) ensuring the financial security of the daughter in the case the marriage failed for some reason. In the ancient world a woman would return to her father (parents). In the bronze age, she would also retain her children under a certain age (usually twelve or so), and the father the older children (esp boys). I don’t see any religious influence other than codification of this behavior since it’s largely universal and nearly a necessity. Also, say, you have a daughter that could marry a better man if she brought with her some assets (because people thought of these things in the past).
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @thaeus01
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-25 00:11:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805393327833202688
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805386512659628308
The nuclear family is not a product of the church – the traditional family is. Nuclear family is a product of northern european bipartite manorialism.
See:
https://naturallawinstitute.com/2014/08/how-do-family-relationships-differ-between-countries/
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-24 23:33:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805383801427968165
Reply addressees: @thaeus01 @patriciamdavis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805329969280860667
Because the french are the most avowed cheaters in europe, the french government was afraid that genetic testing would lead to broken families.
I don’t know about incest in the country so I can’t comment.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-24 16:16:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805273749882884132
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805269639045554242
RT @SRCHicks: Got some grief from saying British culture is 80% based on Greco-Roman values – in response to a line from Nigel Farage sayin…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-24 06:16:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1805122848425709828
—“British culture(vs Islamic) is 80% based on Greco-Roman values, about 20% on Abrahamic values (variations on Judeo-Christian-Islamic). Look at mainstream British movies, money-making, cosmopolitanism, open debate discourse, science, technology, individual choice in romance, etc.”– Stephen R. C. Hicks ( @SRCHicks )
I’ll add to that list:
– Self Determination, Individual Sovereignty, Rule of Law, The Natural Law (Reciprocity), The Common Law, and Concurrent Voting – all are empirical.
– Truth Before Face. (Asia uses Face Before Truth, MENA uses Facelessness (endemic lying))
– History (vs Mythicism)
– Trifuncationalism (vs Religious Monopoly)
If you understand evolution at all, you’ll recognize why Europeans, despite small numbers on the edge of the bronze age, evolved faster than all the rest – and why Islam after consolidation and turn to fundamentalism not only regressed but could not, and still cannot, suffer modernity because of the high trust required to organize people into governments, viable militaries, and capital into large scale organizations.
Reply addressees: @SRCHicks
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-21 00:08:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803943016991985665
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803912626843365631
RT @SRCHicks: No.
British culture is 80% based on Greco-Roman values, about 20% on Abrahamic values (variations on Judeo-Christian-Islamic)…
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-20 23:12:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803928941637570687
Turkey is also genetically majority greek, not caucasian, not turkic, and not arab (afro-asiatic). Though they appear to disapprove of this fact.
Source date (UTC): 2024-06-20 20:32:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803888748981301366
Reply addressees: @J58039716 @KayraKhan0 @Unknown_Parinda
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1803853669106094509