Can we please stop the social construction of false promise of freedom from physical(scarcity), natural(amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection) laws by virtue signaling to appeal to female magical-thinking?
The Han have mastered local hybridization but at high cost. The Koreans and Japanese have resisted it successfully and maintained the gains. The Iranics failed in both India, and to resist the Arabs in Persia. The Indian upper caste and the european upper ‘caste’ succeeded.
@LCuliberg @JayMan471 @EverydayFinance @timkmak The Lies: IQ equality died in 2000, Sex equality died in 2012, Race Equality Died in 2018. There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory.
@LCuliberg @JayMan471 @EverydayFinance @timkmak The Lies: IQ equality died in 2000, Sex equality died in 2012, Race Equality Died in 2018. There are material biological differences between the races, that are due to increasing rates of self domestication as each geographic race isolated, evolved, and expanded in the territory.
As such ‘race’ accurately describes the evolutionary stages of humans as we once again speciated by geography, with later hybrids ‘replacing’ earlier versions.
Evolutionary Hierarchy: East Asian < Europeans < South Eurasians (Semitic, Iranic, Indian) < Africans
@LCuliberg @JayMan471 @EverydayFinance @timkmak Evolutionary speciation occurred in four Urheimats: 1) East African Rift Valley 2) Pre-flood Persian Gulf 3) North East-Asia 4) North Eurasia (Russia). All groups were speciating. And as different as Euro and Asians. The Agrarian, then IE (horse) Expansions created hybrids today.
Evolutionary speciation occurred in four Urheimats: 1) East African Rift Valley 2) Pre-flood Persian Gulf 3) North East-Asia 4) North Eurasia (Russia). All groups were speciating. And as different as Euro and Asians. The Agrarian, then IE (horse) Expansions created hybrids today.
@LCuliberg @JayMan471 @EverydayFinance @timkmak “Race” was and is, the observation that present humans (sapiens) were speciating by geography as all animals speciate by geography. Except in human case, distance from Rift Valley Urheimat led to decrease in aggression and increase in domestication: intelligence, agency, neoteny.
“Race” was and is, the observation that present humans (sapiens) were speciating by geography as all animals speciate by geography. Except in human case, distance from Rift Valley Urheimat led to decrease in aggression and increase in domestication: intelligence, agency, neoteny.
Schmitt didn’t himself realize how influenced by the French ‘counter-enlightenment’ against British Empirical, Sovereign, Legal, and Prussian Miltary and Tripartist restoration of europe.
—“Schmitt contends that from 1890 the old Westphalian order of the jus publicum europaeum, born at the end of the Thirty Years’ War (1648), began to dissolve into a ‘universalism without territories’ and into the ’empty’ and abstract normativism of an international legality”— Alain de Benoist @Daily_Benoist
We should call it what it is:
1) European civ was and remains the Common Law of self determination by sovereignty reciprocity we call Tort, the Holy Roman Empire (HRE), and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt – the optimum form of ALL government.
2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response – to resist another French aggression.
3) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State.
4) The USA, a power that Europe seeks to replicate, is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that rule of law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty.
The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not.
So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been.
That is the cause of the failure of european coherence.
Humility, recognition of her role in destroying europe, would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.
Schmitt didn’t himself realize how influenced by the French ‘counter-enlightenment’ against British Empirical, Sovereign, Legal, and Prussian Miltary and Tripartist restoration of europe.
—“Schmitt contends that from 1890 the old Westphalian order of the jus publicum europaeum, born at the end of the Thirty Years’ War (1648), began to dissolve into a ‘universalism without territories’ and into the ’empty’ and abstract normativism of an international legality”— Alain de Benoist @Daily_Benoist
We should call it what it is:
1) European civ was and remains the Common Law of self determination by sovereignty reciprocity we call Tort, the Holy Roman Empire (HRE), and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt – the optimum form of ALL government.
2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response – to resist another French aggression.
3) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State.
4) The USA, a power that Europe seeks to replicate, is very close to a second civil war that will result most likely in a restoration of her original design as a mirror of the HRE with traditional Germanic law as that rule of law. Was preserved in England and never subject to the corrupting influence of Napoleonic law that deprived the people and the law of sovereignty.
The rest of Europe should fear a unified Europe that contains Paris more than it should fear a unified Europe that contains Moscow. At least Moscow works in Russian people’s interests. Paris does not.
So perhaps the French should look more objectively at the problem. It’s not that Europe fears integration. it’s that the French history of undermining european peoples, and the French authoritarian model rather than the Holy Roman Empire, British, and American model, is a threat to european civilization – as it always has been.
That is the cause of the failure of european coherence.
Humility, recognition of her role in destroying europe, would serve Paris better than ambitions to rule.
4) The european conflict was, is, and remains, the Roman, Catholic, and French Feminine, Semitic, Monopoly, Authoritarian, Arrogant State against the Greek, Aryan(Protestant), Germanic, Masculine, European, Rule of Law, Market, Skeptical State.
@Daily_Benoist We should call it what it is:
1) European civ was and remains the Common Law, the HRE, and the federation of states under a weak monarchy the optimum form of european govt.
2) France warred against the HRE and Germania organized in response to resist and other French aggression.