Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • IMO france, spain, southern italy (catholic traditional) vs north italy, germani

    IMO france, spain, southern italy (catholic traditional) vs north italy, germanic peoples (protestant martial), vs intermarium (catholic traditional slavic) vs russian (Orthodox martial traditional slavic) works fine.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 17:56:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352314206666829826

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352310462994472960

  • France is cognitively and strategically feminine, a secular version of the catho

    France is cognitively and strategically feminine, a secular version of the catholic church uses and the closest to the Abrahamic method, is the least honest and most hostile negotiating partner, the source of as many bad ideas as the Jews, and the enemy of germanic-Prussian civ.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 17:52:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352313111081058306

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352310462994472960

  • Why The Present Conflict, and What We Can Do About It

    1. The pressures of Geographic, economic, organizing strategy (steppe herding) led proto Europeans to develop a universal, entrepreneurial (voluntary) militia (militarized society), and military reporting’. (See political economy of Sparta, Vikings and Pirates. 2. In such a political system, status was available by merit in empirical adversarial competition at high risk (raiding cattle). 3. And Europeans (uniquely) normatively institutionalized testimonial (empirical) speech (military reporting), and the resulting high ingroup trust. 4. There exist only three means of human coercion:force(military-state), reumuneration(commerce-law), and ostracization-undermining(normative society-religion): State+Law+Religion 5. The order of the development of those institutions causes all macro civilizational differences. 6. The rate of civilizational adaptation and innovation depends on the order of these institutions. 7. Europeans(uniquely) developed empirical Law of Tort(strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail). 8. It’s the fastest evolutionary model for organizing humans that is possible, and produces the least divergence from the formal(logical), physical and logical laws of the universe. 9. This is why Fukuyama erred. And what frustrates Statists. European civ’s radical rate of evolution in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages, is due to continuous demand for status by discovering opportunity and by forcing the people to adapt to change. All others stagnate. 10. Tort Law continues natural selection, domestication, evolution without design or intention. European law(martial order) limited competition to cooperative market and conflict in court with judicially sanctioned Duel, Laws against Defamation, Gossips, and Shrills. 11. Political competition between many states creates a Pareto optimum of political organization (power). 12. Law (natural law of reciprocity by tort) creates a Pareto optimum of economic production. 13. Marriage creates a nash optimum between sexes in a (military) polity. 14. Males are physical superpredators(fast) and females social superpredators(slow). Limiting conflict to positive commercial market, and negative court(law) markets, was a compromise equally suppressing(domesticating) both male (violence) and female(undermining) strategies. 15. Ergo, women and men were EQUALLY domesticated by suppression of EACH of their evolutionary conflict strategies – if they affected the peace (economy, society, polity) – “Ordnung” – and especially retaliation cycles (feuds) and even more so, taxation. 16. All of these policies force behavioral adaptation (domestication) into the polity, norms, traditions, institutions, by directing dominance expression into voluntary markets (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, and war.) 17. Domestication (evolutionary adaptation) under these (ancient) rules occurred by physical ostracization (a death sentence), land use ostracization (manorial), credit ostracization (socio-economic), harsh winters, and ‘genetic pacification’ by hanging (political and judicial). 18. Free speech was a controversial because they couldn’t demarcate(in court) Truth b/c of Faith(Church). They enacted under these traditions. 19. Traditions like group strategy and metaphysics are presumptions – they may not be known, articulated – and certainly not codified. 20. The evolutionary history of man consists of maximizing bodily, social, cognitive, and extended phenotype (tech) adaptation in time. That’s it. For example, IQ (g) is just a measure of cognitive adaptation in time. 21. So the extraordinary success of the European peoples in bronze, iron, coal-steel, and silicon-oil ages, is due to continuing maximization of human adaptation by minimization the difference between human behavior and the laws of the universe. 22. And Europeans disproportionately and overwhelmingly – aside from the conquest by supernatural religion in the dark ages – dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality and early death. 23. But this rapidity and its rewards for a small population on the edge of the agrarian & bronze age, comes at the cost of (a) adaptive stress. (b) market suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrably by failing in markets. (c) Christian love for masses to tolerate it. 24. Until 1950s mainstream reporters maintained military experience, discipline, duty, and testimonial speech, and full integration into what’s today called ‘Whiteness’. 25. “Whiteness” Ironically, means ‘Science”, which means not violating Tort against the Commons by warranty of ‘due diligence necessary for producing testimonial speech – free of ignorance, error, bias, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit.” 26. Then the Frankfurt School moved into Columbia University and took advantage of (a) free speech (b) Christian tolerance, (c) the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, (d) the first gen. off the farm (e)a windfall economy (f)ignorance of our group strategy 27. The frankfurt school and the postmodernists, anti-male feminists, PC/Woke, anti-whiteness that followed, used the female group strategy of undermining and reputation destruction against the entirety of the western strategy, metaphysics, institutions, traditions, and norms. 28. Destroying from within what had taken five thousand years of evolution producing the proto-European, Hellenic, Roman, Germanic(HRE-Prussian), Anglo(Scandinavian)-American institutions from within just as they had undermined the roman empire, Spanish, Germans, and Russians. 29. How? By the false promise of freedom from the formal(truth), physical (scarcity), behavioral(self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), and evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, eugenic vs dysgenic) laws of the universe. 30. They cast Europeans as oppressors, not those that freed them from those laws by adapting to those laws – the only group that didn’t fail to pass through the Great Filter of the limits of cooperation in the division of labor: continuing natural selection by markets in all life. 31. Contrary to globalist(anti-nationalist) ambitions of the females, and those who fight for the female (dysgenic, devolutionary, non-adaptive) strategy -the wealthier we become the more genetically biased the least conformity and lowest-demand for it.(Scandinavian divergence). 32/33. To restore the equilibrium between male and female strategies; to reverse demographic degeneration; and to have an honest conversation about whether we continue our conflict or return to the European and founder tradition of small competing states under a weak federation we would need to:

    a) Restore defamation – and under untestifiabilty and falsehood rather than harm. b) Require all commercial speech to the public in matters public meet requirements for testimony (Testifiability). c) Grant protection to political identity and political speech (as with religion). 34. And end the age of industrialized lying that consists in the postwar pseudoscientific religion of freedom from the formal, phsyical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws and the promise that there is any alternative to rule of law, and markets – especially markets for the production of commons: what we call republican, democratic, or participatory government. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities – the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities … 36. Because government serves as the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 37. And without that market, and truthful reciprocal exchanges within it, all we do is resort to lies, false promises, gossiping and undermining – until we must eventually resort to violence. And, while there are many who fear it, there are enough who revel in the opportunity. 38. I should perhaps mention, that all mass media distributes mythos. Myths train the subconscious by suggestion(involuntary) – not declaration (voluntary), not open to self-audit. A mythos contains a narrative. That narrative contains a strategy. That strategy implies a paradigm. 39. That paradigm either is consistent with the laws of the universe – or it is not. As such, there are seditious myths and supportive myths. There are criminal myths and virtuous myths. 39.Without knowing the laws of the universe we can not regulate and reform a group’s strategy. Without knowing the European group’s strategy as a system of weights and measures for myths, one cannot regulate myths. Without knowing the system of weights and measures for truthful testimonial speech we cannot regulate speech. But we know each of them. 40 . There is only one condition under which the laws of the universe, the strategy and mythos, and truthful testifiable speech are consistent and coherent.  And that’s called the germanic languages, the formal logics (math-identity, verbal-sets, operational-sequences), the physical laws (determinism, scarcity, entropy), … 41. … behavioral “natural” laws, and evolutionary laws (mutation, recombination, genetic load, regression to the mean, neotenic evolution, reproductive sortition, limited rotation, natural selection, and success or failure in the defeat of the red queen) … 41. … given our vast differences in distributions in sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, within and without of clans, classes, and races, given our demonstrated physical, social, cognitive, and extended phenotypical differences in appearance, behavior, and consequences. 41. 43. And given our different rates and depths of maturity (neoteny), distribution of sex differences in evaluation and cognition, distribution of consciousness, and distribution of intelligence. And perhaps importantly, the distribution of those talents within any group in which we can obtain an identity (membership) and the advantages and disadvantages therefrom. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine    

  • Why The Present Conflict, and What We Can Do About It

    1. The pressures of Geographic, economic, organizing strategy (steppe herding) led proto Europeans to develop a universal, entrepreneurial (voluntary) militia (militarized society), and military reporting’. (See political economy of Sparta, Vikings and Pirates. 2. In such a political system, status was available by merit in empirical adversarial competition at high risk (raiding cattle). 3. And Europeans (uniquely) normatively institutionalized testimonial (empirical) speech (military reporting), and the resulting high ingroup trust. 4. There exist only three means of human coercion:force(military-state), reumuneration(commerce-law), and ostracization-undermining(normative society-religion): State+Law+Religion 5. The order of the development of those institutions causes all macro civilizational differences. 6. The rate of civilizational adaptation and innovation depends on the order of these institutions. 7. Europeans(uniquely) developed empirical Law of Tort(strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail). 8. It’s the fastest evolutionary model for organizing humans that is possible, and produces the least divergence from the formal(logical), physical and logical laws of the universe. 9. This is why Fukuyama erred. And what frustrates Statists. European civ’s radical rate of evolution in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages, is due to continuous demand for status by discovering opportunity and by forcing the people to adapt to change. All others stagnate. 10. Tort Law continues natural selection, domestication, evolution without design or intention. European law(martial order) limited competition to cooperative market and conflict in court with judicially sanctioned Duel, Laws against Defamation, Gossips, and Shrills. 11. Political competition between many states creates a Pareto optimum of political organization (power). 12. Law (natural law of reciprocity by tort) creates a Pareto optimum of economic production. 13. Marriage creates a nash optimum between sexes in a (military) polity. 14. Males are physical superpredators(fast) and females social superpredators(slow). Limiting conflict to positive commercial market, and negative court(law) markets, was a compromise equally suppressing(domesticating) both male (violence) and female(undermining) strategies. 15. Ergo, women and men were EQUALLY domesticated by suppression of EACH of their evolutionary conflict strategies – if they affected the peace (economy, society, polity) – “Ordnung” – and especially retaliation cycles (feuds) and even more so, taxation. 16. All of these policies force behavioral adaptation (domestication) into the polity, norms, traditions, institutions, by directing dominance expression into voluntary markets (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, and war.) 17. Domestication (evolutionary adaptation) under these (ancient) rules occurred by physical ostracization (a death sentence), land use ostracization (manorial), credit ostracization (socio-economic), harsh winters, and ‘genetic pacification’ by hanging (political and judicial). 18. Free speech was a controversial because they couldn’t demarcate(in court) Truth b/c of Faith(Church). They enacted under these traditions. 19. Traditions like group strategy and metaphysics are presumptions – they may not be known, articulated – and certainly not codified. 20. The evolutionary history of man consists of maximizing bodily, social, cognitive, and extended phenotype (tech) adaptation in time. That’s it. For example, IQ (g) is just a measure of cognitive adaptation in time. 21. So the extraordinary success of the European peoples in bronze, iron, coal-steel, and silicon-oil ages, is due to continuing maximization of human adaptation by minimization the difference between human behavior and the laws of the universe. 22. And Europeans disproportionately and overwhelmingly – aside from the conquest by supernatural religion in the dark ages – dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality and early death. 23. But this rapidity and its rewards for a small population on the edge of the agrarian & bronze age, comes at the cost of (a) adaptive stress. (b) market suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrably by failing in markets. (c) Christian love for masses to tolerate it. 24. Until 1950s mainstream reporters maintained military experience, discipline, duty, and testimonial speech, and full integration into what’s today called ‘Whiteness’. 25. “Whiteness” Ironically, means ‘Science”, which means not violating Tort against the Commons by warranty of ‘due diligence necessary for producing testimonial speech – free of ignorance, error, bias, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit.” 26. Then the Frankfurt School moved into Columbia University and took advantage of (a) free speech (b) Christian tolerance, (c) the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, (d) the first gen. off the farm (e)a windfall economy (f)ignorance of our group strategy 27. The frankfurt school and the postmodernists, anti-male feminists, PC/Woke, anti-whiteness that followed, used the female group strategy of undermining and reputation destruction against the entirety of the western strategy, metaphysics, institutions, traditions, and norms. 28. Destroying from within what had taken five thousand years of evolution producing the proto-European, Hellenic, Roman, Germanic(HRE-Prussian), Anglo(Scandinavian)-American institutions from within just as they had undermined the roman empire, Spanish, Germans, and Russians. 29. How? By the false promise of freedom from the formal(truth), physical (scarcity), behavioral(self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), and evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, eugenic vs dysgenic) laws of the universe. 30. They cast Europeans as oppressors, not those that freed them from those laws by adapting to those laws – the only group that didn’t fail to pass through the Great Filter of the limits of cooperation in the division of labor: continuing natural selection by markets in all life. 31. Contrary to globalist(anti-nationalist) ambitions of the females, and those who fight for the female (dysgenic, devolutionary, non-adaptive) strategy -the wealthier we become the more genetically biased the least conformity and lowest-demand for it.(Scandinavian divergence). 32/33. To restore the equilibrium between male and female strategies; to reverse demographic degeneration; and to have an honest conversation about whether we continue our conflict or return to the European and founder tradition of small competing states under a weak federation we would need to:

    a) Restore defamation – and under untestifiabilty and falsehood rather than harm. b) Require all commercial speech to the public in matters public meet requirements for testimony (Testifiability). c) Grant protection to political identity and political speech (as with religion). 34. And end the age of industrialized lying that consists in the postwar pseudoscientific religion of freedom from the formal, phsyical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws and the promise that there is any alternative to rule of law, and markets – especially markets for the production of commons: what we call republican, democratic, or participatory government. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities – the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities … 36. Because government serves as the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 37. And without that market, and truthful reciprocal exchanges within it, all we do is resort to lies, false promises, gossiping and undermining – until we must eventually resort to violence. And, while there are many who fear it, there are enough who revel in the opportunity. 38. I should perhaps mention, that all mass media distributes mythos. Myths train the subconscious by suggestion(involuntary) – not declaration (voluntary), not open to self-audit. A mythos contains a narrative. That narrative contains a strategy. That strategy implies a paradigm. 39. That paradigm either is consistent with the laws of the universe – or it is not. As such, there are seditious myths and supportive myths. There are criminal myths and virtuous myths. 39.Without knowing the laws of the universe we can not regulate and reform a group’s strategy. Without knowing the European group’s strategy as a system of weights and measures for myths, one cannot regulate myths. Without knowing the system of weights and measures for truthful testimonial speech we cannot regulate speech. But we know each of them. 40 . There is only one condition under which the laws of the universe, the strategy and mythos, and truthful testifiable speech are consistent and coherent.  And that’s called the germanic languages, the formal logics (math-identity, verbal-sets, operational-sequences), the physical laws (determinism, scarcity, entropy), … 41. … behavioral “natural” laws, and evolutionary laws (mutation, recombination, genetic load, regression to the mean, neotenic evolution, reproductive sortition, limited rotation, natural selection, and success or failure in the defeat of the red queen) … 41. … given our vast differences in distributions in sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, within and without of clans, classes, and races, given our demonstrated physical, social, cognitive, and extended phenotypical differences in appearance, behavior, and consequences. 41. 43. And given our different rates and depths of maturity (neoteny), distribution of sex differences in evaluation and cognition, distribution of consciousness, and distribution of intelligence. And perhaps importantly, the distribution of those talents within any group in which we can obtain an identity (membership) and the advantages and disadvantages therefrom. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine    

  • HOST POPULATION ADMIXTURE “Israelis have a weighted average IQ of about 95, with

    HOST POPULATION ADMIXTURE
    “Israelis have a weighted average IQ of about 95, with figures of 103 for Ashkenazim, 91 for Sephardim, and 86 for Arabs. With Ashkenazim in the United States and Britain tending to score in the 107 to 115 range, considerably higher than Israeli Jews.”


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 04:25:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352110043269894144

  • Prussia was the alternative but was cut down by napoleon before she could mature

    Prussia was the alternative but was cut down by napoleon before she could mature.The entire Jewish-French war age project was to ‘deprussianize’ europe. We would have been better with both: Naval Britain (Athens), and Continental Army (Sparta). Instead we ended up with USA (Rome)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 00:25:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352049625604255746

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352045106568679425

  • The highest point of western civ since the peak of Athens, the peak of Rome. Eng

    The highest point of western civ since the peak of Athens, the peak of Rome. England created the legal, agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial revolutions. Germany the second industrial. And America the technological. But we built it on Italian translators and English crown.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 00:23:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352049245268963332

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352045106568679425

  • Jefferson was supporting the rise of the meritocratic middle class, and existing

    Jefferson was supporting the rise of the meritocratic middle class, and existing the parasitic church and state. And he wanted to escape what we would call today peasants, but he called people of low character.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 03:52:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351739334270005248

    Reply addressees: @worthy248 @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351738640846741513

  • You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless o

    You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless of Truth”.
    ie: west, asia, islam

    Lawyering is a good vernacular term for “the rhetorical pretense of knowledge not demonstrated” Fraud by Suggestion not yet fraud by omission or declaration.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-20 02:46:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351722779217952768

    Reply addressees: @BillCor26578964

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1351713742862622733

  • The Choice: The Indefensibility of the War Against Western Civilization

    Some argue that cultural Marxism is a silly term, but I think it works well. It describes a leveling desire that is no longer primarily interested in class, but it demographic groups. It sees society as a battle between races, sexes, and sexualities for power. – Bo Weingard

    The Correct (And Only) Answer Cultural Marxists(the Jews in the Frankfurt School), repeated their transformation of Judaism’s cultural institutionalization of the strategy of drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks, faith healers, and priesthoods: the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, in exchange for membership in a non-violent army, that together cooperates, under the plausible denial of physical non-aggression and plausible deniability of a divine religion, in mass organization of sedition, and fomenting sedition through evangelism, against informational, logical, habitual, normative, traditional, and institutional tools of organization, in a slow incremental battle against those that discover, adapt to, and apply those institutional rules. They then transformed the Jewish Group strategy from an ethnic means of warfare against the productive peoples, into Christianity, which institutionalized their method of warfare against the Roman empire and European Reason, Law, Markets, and Tolerance. And accomplished nothing but a thousand-year dark age of ignorance and parasitism by the Jews themselves and the Organized Church that they invented. Then, immediately upon their liberation from justified historical containment from and prosecution of their crimes by Europeans, they proceeded by transforming Judaism into Marxism, repeating the method of Christian sedition, by again transforming Marxism from fomenting an in-group economic battle between the GENETIC classes in a homogenous society falsely promising an alternative organization to merit (natural selection) Then, immediately upon the failure of Marxism, and the horrors it produced, they transformed marxism into the cultural marxism of the Frankfurt School to foment an ingroup-outgroup battle between races, sexes, sexualities AGAINST homogenous societies, by again falsely promising an alternative to merit (natural selection). Then upon the success of Cultural Marxism, Then they invented postmodernism .. power … lying   because truth results in the natural laws of the universe. pc, woke, explicity white political disempowerment by minority status, explicit anti-whiteness, explicit  white replacement, white genocide And just as drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks … they found a customer base to turn into clientelle (clientellism), a pulpit to preach from in university, media, and entertainment, and credit expansion to obscure the consequences, and that was to use the academy, media, advertising, … to remove the feedback loop, and to indoctrinate the first generation of the laboring class off the farm, and the first generation of women out of the household – both made possible by european discovery adaptation to and application of those laws… of the laws of the universe The entire history of jewish thought from boaz, marx, freud … onward is a revolt against the industrial revolution that dilute their powers of localw persuasion and parasitism, against their regional poewrs of financial parasitism upon the poor, … Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival. -vs- Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All. The Jewish group strategy has been consistent for all of their recorded history, both pre-egyptian, egyptian, mosopotamian, levantine, roman, and during the diaspora: The whole of the (Jewish) Left’s Postwar Program (Reverse Pogrom) is a revolt against Darwin and Malthus’ explanation of the success of the Western Tradition, using false-promise of freedom from scarcity, self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, and genetic load, regression-2-mean, as a means of warfare against western civilization, that would deprive them of specialization in parasitism on the private and common by false promises of freedom from laws of nature. So it’s not cultural marxism alone, it’s Islam Judaism, Marxism, Socialism, Cultural marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, science denial, pc/woke, anti-white, anti-west. Why? It’s not possible to compete given their <95 medians. It’s not possible to prey upon 105+ medians. It’s not possible to argue against this framework. You can try. You must lie, and conspire to engage in sedition, treason, warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnic genocide to even try. Even trying to argue against it merely licenses warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnocide in response. This is war. It’s total war. War against every market in western civilization: association, cooperation, production of goods, services, and information, reproduction, commons, trifunctional elites, trifunctionalism itself, polities, and warfare. It is a war against our first principle of self-determination, self-determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, and the rapid adaptivity … And we are the only fully market civilization, with the only rule of law, with the only trifunctional market between elites, with the only demand for truth-before-face, reciprocity and warranty, and the high trust innovative and adaptive prosperity and resulting harmony that results – at the cost of the preservation of natural selection by the constraint of the reproduction of the unproductive, and the Christian ethic of sacrificial care for those who natural markets, nature, and nature’s god have determined unfit to burden the rest of us by replication of their genes. Only the west practices trifunctionalism in a competition between elites mediated by our natural law of self-determination, by sovereignty reciprocity, truth, and duty. With the failure of the catholic church to … ….. While there are four visions competing in the West: The Russian Martial Masculine Paternal Orthodox Authoritarian, The French State-Church Feminine Maternal Latin Authoritarian, The Anglo-Germanic Protestant Militial Paternal Rule of Law of Markets, and the Jewish Semitic Feminine Monopoly Authoritarian. All four of these visions persist in their group strategies that are thousands of years old. The Germans have abandoned their attempts at thought leadership and the formation of elites. And the Intermarium Slavic peoples have been unable to form elites without the Poles, who have been set back seventy years by the Soviets, and infantilized by EU membership, who must finish their maturity and take that leadership for it to succeed. The Russians have group strategy, but they are lying in wait, and don’t actively compete in the discourse, because they are justifiably untrustful of the jews for their crimes against the Russian and Ukrainian people, the germans for historical reasons – despite their natural interests in a cultural and economic alliance, and even more untrustful of Americans for our ‘nativity’, spreading of decadency, and suicide that they managed to painfully escape at the cost of a century and millions of dead. As a contrast, the Chinese have chosen fascism – the ethnocentric military-industrial state, printing rather than borrowing money, markets and eugenics, not communism and the Jewish globalist financial or industrial state-run for peasants and the resulting dysgenia. The Indians maintain their ‘we are many, and kill we will them with kindness’ strategy but against China and Islam it will fail. So we will see India increasingly moving to decreased territorial, religious, and cultural, tolerance. So there are only three sets of these elites in the west vying for power: The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it. The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam. Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure. We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter, or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god. I have, and my organization has provided a peaceful means of settling this war between the masculine eugenic evolutionary and adaptive European elites that have been a boon to mankind, and the dysgenic devolutionary and maladaptive Semitic elites that have undermined roman elites, culture, rule of law, administration, destroyed its statues, monuments, temples, arts, letters, and knowledge, closed its schools of philosophy, exiled, or killed its teachers and philosophers, and doomed us to a dark age of superstition, ignorance, starvation, and decline. It’s principle features is to require truthful, meaning testifiable, warrantable, restitutable speech in public to the public, in matters public, and to criminalize false promise in the political sphere as we have only lightly criminalized false promise in the personal sphere – by defamation, and in the commercial sphere – by fraud. We provide analytic criteria for passing those tests that will survive in court. This will economically destroy sedition by politicians, bureaucrats, the academy, education, commentariat, media, entertainment, advertising, and marketing – and even more so in the underground sedition and parasitism of the financial sector, including the federal reserve, the ‘big banks’, Yes, western civilization is the most demanding civilization to live in, but also the one with most freedom of opportunity because of those demands. The choice is easy for those willing to pay the cost of adapting to ‘whiteness’ by full integration: our institutions merely reflect universal laws. Those that cannot are welcome to return, or separate, but may not govern or rule or engage in sedition. And those that choose to persist in the Semitic war against western civilization are the enemies of our people, of mankind, of nature, and nature’s god. And in this judgment for their crimes, neither nature or nature’s god will reserve judgment. The only choice is left to man. I choose, we choose, the laws of nature and nature’s god, the laws of Western Civilization that the enemy disparages as “whiteness”.