Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

@RadioFreeNorthwest No TSZ is a criticism. From Kant’s reaction to Rouseau onward the germans were trying to reacreate a secular rationalist theology, without falling into latin superstition, french sophistry, english empiricism, and instead, maintaining the german empahsis on experience (phenomenalism) and psychology, especially piety and duty (responsibility) to the commons. I’ve generally criticized german philosophy as a nonsense dead end. But that’s because it hasn’t found a solution to the second abrahamic re-conquest of the west by relying on science to defeat it. That said, once we use science to defeat the left, we still need a secular theological means of persisting the germanic civilizational ethic (half lost in the english speaking world, and the other half lost in the german speaking world). So what I suspect we need is rework of continental (german) philosopihy in response to my anglo empirical work of science, and it’s that unification that provides the combination of empirical and experiential. Dunno. I’d need to live in germany for a couple of years to be sure I got it right.