Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Keep trying. What makes or prevents societies from being highly organized? (cent

    Keep trying. What makes or prevents societies from being highly organized? (centralized)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 18:16:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628821169754279936

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719 @TheAutistocrat @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628818120508063745

  • Next level down. What did china have (or lack) that other civilizations didn’t?

    Next level down. What did china have (or lack) that other civilizations didn’t?
    Thought experiment:
    Organize CIVILIZATIONS by the degree of slavery they made use of.
    What is the cause of that series, spectrum?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 17:46:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628813486733008897

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719 @TheAutistocrat @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628812668638494720

  • Untitled


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 16:06:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628788481953497089

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719 @TheAutistocrat @whatifalthist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628785401182707714

  • (Just curious why you think that given strategic, economic, and technological pr

    (Just curious why you think that given strategic, economic, and technological proximity to northern industry, vast agrarian resources of the western expansion, extraordinary sea trade revenue because of it, and absent the capacity to oust Europe (Spain) from the hemisphere or enter the world wars, would lead to a South that – instead of being sent a century backward – would have emerged in parallel or better?)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-23 00:48:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628557386351878149

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628544585319464962

  • REFRAMING Only 26 countries have not had the benefit of being domesticated, mode

    REFRAMING
    Only 26 countries have not had the benefit of being domesticated, modernized, dragged into prosperity, and out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, corruption, authoritarianism, and the vicissitudes of nature, kicking and screaming against their will, all the while, by Britain.

    That’s the correct answer.
    Never confused doing something wonderous badly with not doing something wonderous at all.

    -Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 23:05:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628531446771064834

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628387999036874754

  • Yes, well, same for Portugal. Agreed. But then we are stuck with the reality tha

    Yes, well, same for Portugal. Agreed. But then we are stuck with the reality that “someone has to do the hard competitive work for the rest of mankind to benefit”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 16:39:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628434384247218184

    Reply addressees: @shermanklumpp

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628433485580091394

  • (repost in long form) Q: “IS THERE A SOLUTION TO FEMINISM’S CAUSE OF CIVILIZATIO

    (repost in long form)
    Q: “IS THERE A SOLUTION TO FEMINISM’S CAUSE OF CIVILIZATIONAL COLLAPSE?”

    RE: Sex and Culture by J. D. Unwin (1934)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_Culture
    (Before the postwar boom in pseudoscience.)
    Please note that I’m not advocating for “barefoot and pregnant”, but the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 16:31:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628432425222131719

  • (repost in long form) Q: “IS THERE A SOLUTION TO FEMINISM’S CAUSE OF CIVILIZATIO

    (repost in long form)
    Q: “IS THERE A SOLUTION TO FEMINISM’S CAUSE OF CIVILIZATIONAL COLLAPSE?”

    RE: Sex and Culture by J. D. Unwin (1934)
    https://t.co/hMkxtNpamf
    (Before the postwar boom in pseudoscience.)
    Please note that I’m not advocating for “barefoot and pregnant”, but the current decline caused by entry of women into franchise and workforce combined with the pill and promiscuity is more serious threat to civilization than climate change, possible plagues, war, and for certain the rise of AI. So, I’ve proposed a number of possible solutions, but the clock is ticking and we only have a few years to solve this problem.

    CONTENTS:
    by Knowland Knows @KnowlandKnows
    Unwin studied 80 societies and found that ‘any human society is free to choose’:

    – It can ‘display great energy’.
    – Or it can ‘enjoy sexual freedom.’
    – But ‘it cannot do both for more than one generation.’

    The sexual behavior of women before marriage is the decisive factor in cultural success.

    WHY:
    – Men are mainly motivated by sex.
    – If they can get it without marriage, they contribute less to society.
    – Pre-nuptial chastity coupled with absolute monogamy energizes cultures most.
    – Cultures that sustained this for three generations exceeded all other cultures in every area.

    Only the world’s greatest empires managed it:
    – The Athenians
    – The Romans
    – The British

    OTHERWISE
    – Embracing total sexual freedom produces an “inert” culture.
    – People focus only on their own wants and needs.
    – Such cultures are conquered by others with greater social energy.

    – Unwin’s study shows sexual freedom ‘cannot have its full cultural effect for a hundred years’.
    – A generation can live off the energy generated by the previous monogamous one.
    – But it won’t pass energy on to the third generation.
    – The Sexual Revolution of 1960 gives us until 2060.

    Before Rome fell,
    – women were emancipated
    – marriage fell out of fashion
    – Roman gravitas disappeared
    – sexual opportunity was extended
    – marital and parental authorities were qualified

    And then absolutely monogamous Teutons conquered Rome.

    EMERGENT IRRATIONALITY
    If a rationalistic society loosens its sexual restrictions, it regresses to superstition and irrationality.

    As Unwin predicted, we are seeing
    – irrationality
    – nature worship
    – women identifying as “witches” (meaning, various forms of female woo woo, magical thinking, anti-sociality, criticizing, undermining, canceling.)

    LIMITS TO “PROGRESSION”
    Unwin explodes the ‘quaint and comfortable doctrine’ that the cultural process is a progressive development’.
    – Sexual constraints mean flourishing; sexual freedom means collapse.
    – Without this truth, ‘we shall understand neither our own culture nor that of any other society.’

    ‘Sometimes a man has been heard to declare that he wishes both to enjoy the advantages of high culture and to abolish compulsory continence…The reformer may be likened to the foolish boy who desires both to keep his cake and to consume it.’ – J. D. Unwin, ‘Sex and Culture’

    I have written a full breakdown of this crucial book here:
    https://t.co/30zcl2Zlwl

    Why Monogamy Matters
    The book that predicts cultural collapse in 2060

    —-

    Curt Doolittle @curtdoolittle
    Dec 4, 2022
    Replying to
    @KnowlandKnows
    Unwin isn’t ‘wrong’ he’s just ‘early’. It took Hayek (behavioral capital) and Becker (economics of human behavior) and many others in between, to explain the problem of knowledge, incentives, and producing humans that willingly (and irrationally) produce COMMONS using incentives.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-22 16:31:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628432424886566917

  • (Re-Sharing) PIRACY ON THE STEPPE AND SEA AS THE ORIGIN OF DEMOCRACY AND RULE OF

    (Re-Sharing)
    PIRACY ON THE STEPPE AND SEA AS THE ORIGIN OF DEMOCRACY AND RULE OF LAW https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1593987349834305543

  • FIRST AND LONGEST VS FASTEST AND MOST : CIVS (comparison and explanation) This i

    FIRST AND LONGEST VS FASTEST AND MOST : CIVS
    (comparison and explanation)

    This is largely correct. China has the geographic advanteage of multiple river systems for irrigation, a wet season, and even greater territorial isolation than Europe from ‘the bad people in the middle’, but less isolation than Africa. So china had access to trade, but, limited genetic and cultural conflict compared to Europe, and almost nothing compared to the continuous conflict of the middle east because of its intersection of the four continents.

    However, that’s like saying egypt was a durable civilization because it’s a long river (highway) with constant irrigation, surrounded by nearly impenetrable deserts, and was one of the most defensible positions in the world. however they all but stagnated for effectively 3000 years.

    The same is true of china. They had better conditions, a better crop (rice), and more time to develop than all other civs. And they had a large enough population (like india) that it was all but impossible to conquer them, and instead, everyone who tried was merely integrated and bred out of existence.

    To claim that china was more developed that Greece and Rome is a questionable argument since they focused their energy on the administration of a huge population and Europeans on commerce and innovation with a small population.

    The question is why did every civilization other than Europe fail to progress, exhausting knowledge and industry by 800ad. Every single one. Whereas Europe experienced a pretty bad time from 400-800 but after 800 restored rather quickly, and progressed faster than the rest, in every aspect of life.

    And this leads to my primary criticism of the frame of reference that is common, and that you’ve just demonstrated: confusing first-and-longest with fastests-and-most. Europeans are the fastest-and-most. But we burn out by overexpansion. Others aren’t fast or most, but they endure even if they stagnate and decline.

    So the bronze age expansion, the Mediterranean expansion, and the Atlantic-pacific expansion are three waves that are ended by over-expansion and the exhaustion of the founding European population – which is always smaller.

    Why? 😉

    -FIN-


    Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 19:29:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628114721776799761

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628108195695677440