Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • WHY IS INDIA THE MOST RACIST? BECAUSE OF MULTICULTURALISM. –“I believe many Ind

    WHY IS INDIA THE MOST RACIST? BECAUSE OF MULTICULTURALISM.
    –“I believe many Indians get opportunities to show overt racism because the country is the most multicultural on the planet. When you have 1.3 billion people of a dozen different cultures packed into a small space, what you get is more chances to show such attitudes.”–

    Just as an intellectual alone, I love India and India because the complexity is incomprehensible compared to every other civilization. And calls into question everything we presume about civilizational formation. But the truth is that they’ve been invaded but never truly conquered over and over again. While the gene pool is a gradient from NW to SE it covers so many different racial and ethnic groups, that gradient is a vast oversimplification. India and China are almost certain to be eternal if for no other reason than geography climate, scale, and population.

    Meanwhile, a tiny population of Europeans united the world, dragged it out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, and suffering, and are being displaced from our homelands. By creating the multiculturalism that is the cause of racism and conflict, low social and political trust, corruption, stagnation, and absence of innovation, that ended the progress of the age of agriculture and caused a dark age of a thousand years.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 00:46:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631093546571685888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    It’s not just 4k years or the cast system, but the complexity of the gene pool, number of invaders, and legacy of ‘white conquest’. Like most ‘brown’ people lighter skin is a higher status symbol internally. So people INSIDE the country are exposed to as much or more racism than people from OUTSIDE of india.

    I love that crazy country, culture, and people, because they’re the exception to every rule, and because of that they help us analyze ourselves and other cultures with greater depth, curiosity, and uncertainty.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592

  • It’s not just 4k years or the cast system, but the complexity of the gene pool,

    It’s not just 4k years or the cast system, but the complexity of the gene pool, number of invaders, and legacy of ‘white conquest’. Like most ‘brown’ people lighter skin is a higher status symbol internally. So people INSIDE the country are exposed to as much or more racism than people from OUTSIDE of india.

    I love that crazy country, culture, and people, because they’re the exception to every rule, and because of that they help us analyze ourselves and other cultures with greater depth, curiosity, and uncertainty.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-02 00:38:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631091566344302592

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631089911754358786

  • AFAIK (a) It’s from interbreeding. (b) It wasn’t always rape. Sometimes it was r

    AFAIK
    (a) It’s from interbreeding.
    (b) It wasn’t always rape. Sometimes it was rape (assuming often), sometimes it was romantic, sometimes it was voluntary, sometimes it was ‘for something’, and sometimes it was prostitution, and sometimes prostitution was a business. And it was ‘taken for granted’ at the time. Which we find repulsive but historically was a norm. Example: The reason Muslim women wear veils originated in demonstrating they weren’t prostitutes, given that prostitution via slavery was a mainstay of the Islamic world. That demonstration became universal in the culture.
    (c) just for humor: for all. Intents and purposes the races are species: phenotypical adaptation to local environments. The requirement for speciation is a bias in selection – not reproduction. However, humans’ evolutionary niche is adaptation itself, and humans (at least human males) are hyper-adaptive (meaning will have sex with things, animals, people, or anything at all). So human species (races) intermixed more often than other species, producing more hybridization, both with peers (sapiens sapiens) and will ancestors (Neanderthals, Denisovans, and possibly others.).
    (d) While we know the single primary direction of human evolution (Neotenenic evolution, trading aggression and impulse, for extended childhood cooperation and self-regulation), contrary to postwar anti-Darwinian dogma, the differences between the races are substantial and meaningful, and we are only now learning of some of the goods and bads that come from hybridization. (See Reich’s lab’s research.)
    (e) The evidence I’m carefully watching as it rolls out, is how much of this difference, most of which is a very minor variation that results in cognitive differences, results in increases in neuroticism or other cognitive or emotional errors.
    (f) Yet it’s obvious that any intermixing between two races (neotenic generations of mankind, benefits the less neotenic class producing the results that are an admixture (average) of the two (somewhat).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 20:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631022851733028865

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1631018055001313280

  • ETYMOLOGY OF RACE, RACIST, RACISM (“People of a common ancestor”) Simple version

    ETYMOLOGY OF RACE, RACIST, RACISM
    (“People of a common ancestor”)
    Simple version. The concept and origin is ancient. Aristotle uses it.

    The meaning of RACE developed via the sense of “tribe, nation, or people regarded as of common stock” to “an ethnical stock, one of the great divisions of mankind having in common certain physical peculiarities” by 1774.

    The Modern Usage originates in the Fascist-and-Counter-Fascist propaganda of the 30’s. But appears largely in the 1950s as it was popularized by the Race Marxists.

    OUR DEFINITION (BEHAVIORAL ECON)
    –“Racism consists in assessing the cost of a group stereotype attribute against an individual of that group AFTER that individual has paid the cost to demonstrate their personal positive deviation away from that specific group stereotype attribute to you.” –Luke Weinhagen

    RACE
    race (n.2)
    [people of common descent] 1560s, “people descended from a common ancestor, class of persons allied by common ancestry,” from French race, earlier razza “race, breed, lineage, family” (16c.), possibly from Italian razza, which is of unknown origin (cognate with Spanish raza, Portuguese raça). Etymologists say it has no connection with Latin radix “root,” though they admit this might have influenced the “tribe, nation” sense, and race was a 15c. form of radix in Middle English (via Old French räiz, räis). Klein suggests the words derive from Arabic ra’s “head, beginning, origin” (compare Hebrew rosh).

    Original senses in English included “wines with characteristic flavor” (1520), “group of people with common occupation” (c. 1500), and “generation” (1540s).

    RACISM
    racism (n.)
    by 1928, in common use from 1935, originally in a European context, “racial supremacy as a doctrine, the theory that human characteristics and abilities are determined by race;” see racist, and compare the various senses in race (n.2) and racialism. Applied to American social systems from late 1930s.

    RACIST
    racist (n.)
    1932 (as an adjective from 1938), from race (n.2) + -ist. Racism (q.v.) is in use by 1928, originally in the context of fascist theories, and common from 1936. These words replaced earlier racialism (1882) and racialist (1910), both often used early 20c. in a British or South African context. There are isolated uses of racism from c. 1900.

    Earlier, race hatred (1852 of the Balkans, 1858 of British India, 1861 of white and black in America), race prejudice (1867 of English in India, 1869 of white and black in America, 1870 of the English toward Irish) were used, and, especially in 19c. U.S. political contexts, negrophobia. Anglo-Saxonism as “belief in the superiority of the English race” had been used (disparagingly) from 1860. Anti-Negro (adj.) is attested in British and American English from 1819.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 16:27:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630968101515698176

  • That’s correct. (It’s also fascinating for that reason. They converted the class

    That’s correct.
    (It’s also fascinating for that reason. They converted the classes and occupations to what elsewhere would be expressed (as in the west) as a military hierarchy with attendant duties and responsibilities. And while it’s not been adaptive or innovative (a least since 100ad) it’s functioned almost flawlessly otherwise.)
    I came to understand one of the reasons for class conflict is the failure to retain rules for, expectations for, and respect for the classes, by the pretense there no longer were classes. And this created negative feedback for the lower classes, because instead of doing moral duty and gaining respect for it, they are somehow ‘less or left behind’. (Which isn’t good for anyone.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 13:34:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630924572525576200

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630923148320456712

  • Least to Most Racist Countries. (note that racial inequality is different from r

    Least to Most Racist Countries. (note that racial inequality is different from r

    Least to Most Racist Countries.
    (note that racial inequality is different from racism) https://t.co/aec71QbV8o


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 05:49:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630807398515343360

  • “India is the most complicated country in the world. … the exception to every

    –“India is the most complicated country in the world. … the exception to every rule.”– @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 04:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630787974123122688

  • An aggrieved peasant. 😉 The conflict between french and english speaking canada

    An aggrieved peasant. 😉
    The conflict between french and english speaking canada is between english middle class and french underclass settlers.
    The conflict between english speaking canada is likewise a class matter.
    When you have no demonstrated virtues, you must work to produce undemonstrated virtue signals. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 03:19:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630769611325992960

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630767008072474626

  • WESTERN “IMPERSONAL” VS EASTERN PERSONAL (unpredictable consequences) Interestin

    WESTERN “IMPERSONAL” VS EASTERN PERSONAL
    (unpredictable consequences)
    Interesting statistic: the female murder rate in what we would consider otherwise equal or superior societies. This is one of those consequences of western organization as a vast militia, and east Asian organization of a vast family. It leads to impersonalization and face before truth, vs personalization and truth before face. It changes what we ‘fight’ over. Western commons matters, and eastern family matters.

    (I find this subject fascinating.)
    See:
    1) Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress
    by Lawrence E Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington
    2) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order by Samuel P. Huntington
    3) Trust by Francis Fukuyama (a student of Huntington)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 02:57:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630764058906443783

  • THE CHINESE STRATEGY: LIE DENY, DELAY, AND DECIEVE Lying, by “Delay and deceive

    THE CHINESE STRATEGY: LIE DENY, DELAY, AND DECIEVE
    Lying, by “Delay and deceive until you possess overwhelming power” is the CORE civilizational strategy of Chinese civilization. And there are any number of theorists right up thru Kissinger who have made this observation: that the premise of Sun Tzu is the premise of the Chinese state, and the means of Chinese warfare, from their means of governance to their means of forcible integration into ‘the Han’, and, their means of warfare against those they wish to conquer, and against those they wish to destroy.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-01 02:33:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630758146397413379

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630756055905972225