Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • FWIW: If you read Nietzsche you may or may not grasp that he failed to achieve h

    FWIW: If you read Nietzsche you may or may not grasp that he failed to achieve his ends. If you read Duchesne you will gain the understanding he failed to. He brings the understanding of our origins into modern historical prose.

    (if you follow my work, I ‘science’ it, and create… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1634933915340230656


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 15:10:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634935001094430720

  • RICARDO DUCHESNE Ricardo Duchesne is brilliant, acerbic, and often, funny. 😉 —

    RICARDO DUCHESNE
    Ricardo Duchesne is brilliant, acerbic, and often, funny. 😉

    –“Whites invented prose writing and logic”–

    We don’t ever list that combination as one of our technologies, and it’s one of the most important ever. The relationship between european languages and… https://twitter.com/dr_duchesne/status/1607079326520078336


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 15:06:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634933915340230656

  • Well, not so much. because the ethnic, civilizational, and racial difference bet

    Well, not so much. because the ethnic, civilizational, and racial difference between the ‘four folkways’ in America is less than the ethnic, civilizational, and racial difference between the Han (Chinese) and those they have conquered, colonized and integrated. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 21:50:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634673259407966208

    Reply addressees: @unbannnableman @aldafa_ir @kanukistani

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634669020770357248

  • RAND IN CONTEXT – NO SHE WASN’T ANTI JEWISH (Or at least, like me, she’s a ‘clas

    RAND IN CONTEXT – NO SHE WASN’T ANTI JEWISH
    (Or at least, like me, she’s a ‘classist’ instead of a racist.)

    Rand was an anti-communist – for good reason: what they did to her family. But I don’t agree she was anti-jewish. She’s advocating for traditional middle class jewish… https://twitter.com/Sheilag2024/status/1634375075595177986


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 17:35:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634609087198420992

  • RT @kontherad1: This should be a part of every school curriculum. You can frame

    RT @kontherad1: This should be a part of every school curriculum. You can frame entire civilizations with this. And you can pick the winner…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 16:29:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634592317033021442

  • (from elsewhere) –“The higher in social class, the more agreeableness upon comm

    (from elsewhere)
    –“The higher in social class, the more agreeableness upon commerce. The more central contact is situated upon commerce, the greater the buffer between Individualism and Proximity pathogen. The more dependency on Reciprocity in commerce, the more likely the Sustainability of Productivity. The higher the social class, the greater the Retention Buffer.”–Aisle Two (alias)

    This is a good example what we are trying to teach:
    Enumeration, Serialization, Equilibria, Summarization.
    “Pathogen” is an analogy and should be operationalized. But otherwise, you can see how The Method (P-Method) is working through the followers (students).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 16:10:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634587504106958848

  • (from elsewhere) –“The higher in social class, the more agreeableness upon comm

    (from elsewhere)
    –“The higher in social class, the more agreeableness upon commerce. The more central contact is situated upon commerce, the greater the buffer between Individualism and Proximity pathogen. The more dependency on Reciprocity in commerce, the more likely the Sustainability of Productivity. The higher the social class, the greater the Retention Buffer.”–Aisle Two (alias)

    This is a good example what we are trying to teach:
    Enumeration, Serialization, Equilibria, Summarization.
    “Pathogen” is an analogy and should be operationalized. But otherwise, you can see how The Method (P-Method) is working through the followers (students).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-11 16:10:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634587504178352128

  • (western civ) WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH 1) Western civ has always been trifu

    (western civ)
    WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH

    1) Western civ has always been trifunctional, in that we preserve competition between religion(feminine, familial), law (political, commercial) and aristocracy (war). This forms a market competition between social, economic, and military elites, that promotes competitive innovation, and prevents corruption and stagnation through a balance of powers.

    2) Western civ whose origins are best understood by study of the Spartans, then maturing thru trade into the Athenians, as an upper class of horse-riding warriors (aristocracy) financed by their extended families (oligarchy), over some number of footsoldiers (citizens) and a conquered set of farm workers and laborers (slaves).

    3) Christian religion was an innovation because it provided the underclasses (women, serfs, slaves) a means of obtaining status by simply doing no wrong, rather than possessing wealth and power – and it was made possible by the wealth increase generated by the roman empire, roman roads, roman administration, and roman trade. Thus reducing alienation between the classes, and lowering the cost of administering increasingly larger polities. While the church was successful in undermining roman institutions of cultural production – just as woke is doing today, the military and the law and trifunctionalism remained.

    4) The germanic aristocracy captured the Church as a holding company for land under primogeniture, and so the aristocracy (military and land), traders and transporters (law), and nobility(church and peasantry), maintained the trifunctional equilibrium. (There is no means of concentrating capital as in the flood river valley civs, so it means federations of aristocracy were necessary – especially in Germany.)

    5) As such the church failed to fully reform into the acquinian and scholastic model of natural law, uniting Christianity and science, in response to darwin. The French left in response to the french revolution, and the Jewish left in response to the world wars, were successful in disintermediating the aristocracy and the military ending trifunctionalism and driving to Jewish and french authoritarianism (positive law) – replacing the church, by merging it with the secular state.

    6) The Jewish left then captured the institutions, and converted them from vehicles for training the aristocracy, nobility, and upper middle class into responsibility for the administration of the state, economy, and polity, into CREDENTIALISM which allowed Jewish intellectuals to be pseudo-intellectuals whose purpose was to destroy the institutions of cultural production in Europe,m replacing trifunctionalism with authoritarian clerisy.

    So the correct answer is that Christianity ALONE is too weak to resist the authoritarian religion of the left, and requires military aristocracy, and rule of law, and demonstrated competency in real life instead of certification by credentialism (academies).

    My work attempts to fix this problem and reverse the process of destruction of our civilization. Because we must both repair our law, restore meritocracy over credentialism, restore our military aristocracy, and complete the unification of Christianity and science started by Aquinas, nearly completed by Blackstone, Smith, Hobbes-Locke, and Hume: the natural law (as I define it): “the law of man, of nature, and nature’s god.”

    There is no other solution.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:48:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634325501249568770

  • (western civ) WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH 1) Western civ has always been trifu

    (western civ)
    WHY CHRISTIANITY ISN’T ENOUGH

    1) Western civ has always been trifunctional, in that we preserve competition between religion(feminine, familial), law (political, commercial) and aristocracy (war). This forms a market competition between social, economic, and military elites, that promotes competitive innovation, and prevents corruption and stagnation through a balance of powers.

    2) Western civ whose origins are best understood by study of the Spartans, then maturing thru trade into the Athenians, as an upper class of horse-riding warriors (aristocracy) financed by their extended families (oligarchy), over some number of footsoldiers (citizens) and a conquered set of farm workers and laborers (slaves).

    3) Christian religion was an innovation because it provided the underclasses (women, serfs, slaves) a means of obtaining status by simply doing no wrong, rather than possessing wealth and power – and it was made possible by the wealth increase generated by the roman empire, roman roads, roman administration, and roman trade. Thus reducing alienation between the classes, and lowering the cost of administering increasingly larger polities. While the church was successful in undermining roman institutions of cultural production – just as woke is doing today, the military and the law and trifunctionalism remained.

    4) The germanic aristocracy captured the Church as a holding company for land under primogeniture, and so the aristocracy (military and land), traders and transporters (law), and nobility(church and peasantry), maintained the trifunctional equilibrium. (There is no means of concentrating capital as in the flood river valley civs, so it means federations of aristocracy were necessary – especially in Germany.)

    5) As such the church failed to fully reform into the acquinian and scholastic model of natural law, uniting Christianity and science, in response to darwin. The French left in response to the french revolution, and the Jewish left in response to the world wars, were successful in disintermediating the aristocracy and the military ending trifunctionalism and driving to Jewish and french authoritarianism (positive law) – replacing the church, by merging it with the secular state.

    6) The Jewish left then captured the institutions, and converted them from vehicles for training the aristocracy, nobility, and upper middle class into responsibility for the administration of the state, economy, and polity, into CREDENTIALISM which allowed Jewish intellectuals to be pseudo-intellectuals whose purpose was to destroy the institutions of cultural production in Europe,m replacing trifunctionalism with authoritarian clerisy.

    So the correct answer is that Christianity ALONE is too weak to resist the authoritarian religion of the left, and requires military aristocracy, and rule of law, and demonstrated competency in real life instead of certification by credentialism (academies).

    My work attempts to fix this problem and reverse the process of destruction of our civilization. Because we must both repair our law, restore meritocracy over credentialism, restore our military aristocracy, and complete the unification of Christianity and science started by Aquinas, nearly completed by Blackstone, Smith, Hobbes-Locke, and Hume: the natural law (as I define it): “the law of man, of nature, and nature’s god.”

    There is no other solution.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:48:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634325501631234054

  • WHY THE WORLD ABANDONS THE WEST? Does the world hate the west (natural law, rule

    WHY THE WORLD ABANDONS THE WEST?

    Does the world hate the west (natural law, rule of law, republican government, democratic elections, global trade, and the prosperity that results)? Or does the world hate the degeneracy of neoMarxism, Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Hedonism, and Woke?

    OK, let’s make the question even worse? What culture (civ) did natural law, rule of law, republican government et al arise from? (Western), and what culture (civ) did Marxism, neoMarxism, Multiculturalism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Hedonism, and Woke et al arise from? (Jewish)

    And if the Western people, or at least, Western women, are vulnerable to the revolution against Western civ by Jewish influence; and if the West is providing the vehicle for the propagation of this influence, then it’s rational for the ‘moral’ world to resist “the whole package”.

    So is the world against western culture and its institutions? Or is it against Jewish culture and its war against western institutions, and the moral institutions of the rest of the world, via western institutions? It’s obvious. It’s also fixable: Outlaw immoral cultural sedition.

    So disambiguate between the west and western high-trust institutions that continue traditional morals that maintain the primacy of the intergenerational family as the purpose of policy, and restore the prohibition of ‘hazarding’ our young from the commons.

    We are not criminals until we are aware we’re committing a crime. The rule of law states “no law no crime”. However this doesn’t apply to torts. If damage is don’t then restitution is due.

    How do we collect restitution from the Marxist, pomo, woke, cult?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-10 22:42:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634323800283136000