Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496557584388

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civiliz

    I’m not quite sure why we should object to the return to the conflict of civilizations. Our attempts at universalism by universalizing a single class modely of cooperation whether authoritarian socialism(upper), liberalism(upper middle), communism(working) or islamismI(underclass) are all failures. We can spread technology of production but not of governance.

    And if the west should learn one thing it’s that western civ’s group strategy is the most emotionally, psychologically, and intellectually burdensome, and that the rest of the world is unfit for it. And that the only reason we fail, is Aryanism even when cloaked with Christianity, or liberalism, drives us to overextension. We can replace other peoples (europe, americas) but we cannot domesticate, administer, govern, or rule people unfit for our civilizational model that requries maximization of individual rsponsibility for the commons and maximization of truth before face in the commons, and maximization of trust necessary under both. People need temperament and iQ for it, and only eruopeans, the japanese, and koreans are demonstrably fit for it.

    As for Ukraine, Russia. As a ‘resident’ ukrainians are Ruthenians (closer to Poles) not Russians. The russians are closer to muslims and asians in their scope of responsiiblity (family and fence-line), and they are a low trust people who fail the lie-responsibility test.

    America isn’t a civilization. It’s the other side of the river from european civilzation. And neither of us survive without the other over the long term.

    IMO the right favors russia only because they hate their own and are two cowardly and timid to solve the problem of the left at home. While russians are right on culture, they are wrong on politics and economics. And they are so becuase they are a low trust people, who have never built a majority middle class, and have been free of serfdom only for a short window in the late 1800s prior the the bolsheviks, and a short window between 1990 and 2010.

    The family is the priority, not the individual.
    That’s an easy codification to put in place.
    If y’all aren’t too cowardly to show up in numbers and force it.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635673496058580997

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635649197230927872

  • Doesn’t appear so. Appears it’s all across the european distribution

    Doesn’t appear so. Appears it’s all across the european distribution.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 02:09:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635463094729076739

    Reply addressees: @BlakeAn77455669

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635462275556429824

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES AREN’T ARBITRARY Civilizations originated and expande

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES AREN’T ARBITRARY
    Civilizations originated and expanded to reflect the geography, climate, resources, and race, distribution, technology, of the population. And when each civilization formed it was ‘frozen’ by the order they developed their institutions. So it’s very hard to change large numbers of people with multiple generations that have been raised with the same metaphysics, myths, traditions, institutions and such.
    So when you ask “why didn’t X civilization do Y” or some variation, it’s really caused by ancient reasons that are lost to memory, and almost impossible to change without really horrific harm to people. The result is some civilizations evolve and adapt more easily than others.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 21:44:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635396448350093314

  • CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES AREN’T ARBITRARY Civilizations originated and expande

    CIVILIZATIONAL DIFFERENCES AREN’T ARBITRARY
    Civilizations originated and expanded to reflect the geography, climate, resources, and race, distribution, technology, of the population. And when each civilization formed it was ‘frozen’ by the order they developed their institutions. So it’s very hard to change large numbers of people with multiple generations that have been raised with the same metaphysics, myths, traditions, institutions and such.
    So when you ask “why didn’t X civilization do Y” or some variation, it’s really caused by ancient reasons that are lost to memory, and almost impossible to change without really horrific harm to people. The result is some civilizations evolve and adapt more easily than others.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 21:44:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635396448253628416

  • Correct. Semitia and the underclasses and women against roman aristocracy. Same

    Correct. Semitia and the underclasses and women against roman aristocracy. Same today.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 21:11:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635388047176130560

    Reply addressees: @CleanDeeply01

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635387363294842880

  • (It hurt watching it because when it came out, the programmers and engineers and

    (It hurt watching it because when it came out, the programmers and engineers and such that were dense in new england, were cast out in vast numbers, as the pc revolution exploded on the west coast (because east coast idiots couldn’t imagine why anyone’d want a computer at home.)…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 19:30:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635362620306780169

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635361714979094528

  • That’s obviously not true. Here, in this map, is where those enormous ships, far

    That’s obviously not true. Here, in this map, is where those enormous ships, far

    That’s obviously not true. Here, in this map, is where those enormous ships, far larger than european ships, went before discovering enough of the world that they decided exploration wasn’t worth it. There was nothing good to be found.

    Their ships were VERY slow compared to… https://t.co/3DmrNdwkUT


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 19:28:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635362099772682244

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635360202659880960

  • No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless soci

    No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless society – low trust – where family clan and tribe take prescendnce over comons and state. In fact our intelligence services, our military, and our commercial training organizations have to teach westerners that you can’t trust anything said in the middle east, a contract isn’t binding and won’t be respected or observed and a hundred other thigns. The result is that there are no successful governments, an no large scale international corporations, because for all intents and purposes MENA culture is ‘polite’ but untruthful, dishonest, familial, and pervasively corrupt. Islam teaches politeness, and mindfulness, and ‘feelings over reason’. Yet, when the hyper intolerant conformity is broken the muslims resort to violence. And this demand for conformity and feeling, and non-adaptation is the reason muslims are outcast in more advanced civilizations – and prohibited from many especially in theeast, wehre they lack an abrahamic religion. This problem is extensively studied by a range of economists and behaviorists.

    Reply addressees: @ForTheLifeofTr1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 16:58:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635324475347542033

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635321215295578112

  • No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless soci

    No. MENA is a not a truth before face, or face before truth, but a faceless society – low trust – where family clan and tribe take prescendnce over comons and state. In fact our intelligence services, our military, and our commercial training organizations have to teach westerners that you can’t trust anything said in the middle east, a contract isn’t binding and won’t be respected or observed and a hundred other thigns. The result is that there are no successful governments, an no large scale international corporations, because for all intents and purposes MENA culture is ‘polite’ but untruthful, dishonest, familial, and pervasively corrupt. Islam teaches politeness, and mindfulness, and ‘feelings over reason’. Yet, when the hyper intolerant conformity is broken the muslims resort to violence. And this demand for conformity and feeling, and non-adaptation is the reason muslims are outcast in more advanced civilizations – and prohibited from many especially in theeast, wehre they lack an abrahamic religion. This problem is extensively studied by a range of economists and behaviorists.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 16:58:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635324475485876225

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635321215295578112