Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

It’s just because you don’t have the knowledge base. So it’s rational you’d take that position.

1) Agrarian revolution -> Steppe Revolution -> Bronze Age collapse -> Indo-european Revolution -> Semitic counter-revolution.

2) Italian-anglo restoration of europeanism > anglo invention of the modern rule of law state, industry, trade, federations (replacing agrarian empires territory) > french counter-revolution > German counter-revolution > Jewish counter-revolution(mendolsohn, then the Marxist sequence) > Islamist counter-revolution > Western Trade/Federalism Exhaustion > Imperial Reassertion (Iran, China, Russia and those countries that failed the transformation)

3) All human differences originate in sex differences, from empathizing(prey)-systematizing(predator), to the four personality clusters, to the moral bias clusters, and especially the IQ vs Neoteny distribution, and you see a rather obvious means of explaining all human behavior. We are all some admixture of sex differences, and the population shows a pretty normal distribution of abut 1/3, 1/3, and 1/3 sex bias in perception, cognition, valuation, want, advocacy, and negotiation. What’s difficult for most of us, is that while we acknowledge the spectrum of means of ‘calculating’ from math to recipes, to rigorous arguments, we are less willing to ‘science’ our methods of lying. And how the sex differences in anti-natural law behavior, anti-social behavior, are facilitated by sex differences in methods of lying.

4) All civilizational differences originate in agrarian founding institutions and their path-dependent sequence of development. There are only three means of human coercion (Religion/Verbal: seduction/ostracization, State/Force: Order/Defense, and Trade/Boycott: law/commerce. With Religion(strong) > State(weak) > Law(fail) the worst (MENA) and Law(strong) > State (weak) > Religion(fail) the best (Europe), and State(strong) > Law (weak) > Religion (fail) the compromise (China). Combine the institutional sequence, with the geography, means of production, your homogeneity or heterogeneity, number of competitors, the technological difference between you and the competitors, the relationship between your aristocracy (military) and peasantry(producers), and you get all human civilizations as relatively obvious survivors of what’s possible in geographic, racial, and ethnic circumstances.

Now I’ve done all that work and more. So where you see moral conflict I see a bunch of bots – barely conscious children really – running around with flashcards of lies taped to their heads – trying to get attention so that they obtain some sort of status so that they can find allies, to maybe, possibly, feel less alienated in modernity, and somehow change their condition.

So I see a very childish world. Why? Because while what I do (what our institute staff do) is basically a mathematics – a formal logic. Now it’s ordinal and operational math (like computation and actions) and not cardinal math (like statistics and language) but it’s till math. And it’s rational for all you normals out there with your emotions alienation and flashcards on your foreheads to think we’re like you.

We aren’t. It’s just math to us.
We don’t often like what we find either.
And we know how Darwin and Galileo were treated.
And we don’t expect any differently.
Because the entire postwar pseudoscientific war against western civilization’s ‘science’, is a war against the Darwinian explanation of all existence. Not just biology – but everything. Including everything we intuit, feel, think, say and do.
So no I don’t expect people to accept or like that the postwar intersection of Jewish thought, women in the workforce and politics, the television-cable-internet-social media revolution, hyperconsumption, debt capacity, and downregulation of education is just an expression of the lag institutional suppression of female antisocial behavior as it propagates through the civilization.

But it’s true. 🙁

Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @thenewMJG @whatifalthist

It’s just because you don’t have the knowledge base. So it’s rational you’d take that position.

1) Agrarian revolution -> Steppe Revolution -> Bronze Age collapse -> Indo-european Revolution -> Semitic counter-revolution.

2) Italian-anglo restoration of europeanism > anglo invention of the modern rule of law state, industry, trade, federations (replacing agrarian empires territory) > french counter-revolution > German counter-revolution > Jewish counter-revolution(mendolsohn, then the Marxist sequence) > Islamist counter-revolution > Western Trade/Federalism Exhaustion > Imperial Reassertion (Iran, China, Russia and those countries that failed the transformation)

3) All human differences originate in sex differences, from empathizing(prey)-systematizing(predator), to the four personality clusters, to the moral bias clusters, and especially the IQ vs Neoteny distribution, and you see a rather obvious means of explaining all human behavior. We are all some admixture of sex differences, and the population shows a pretty normal distribution of abut 1/3, 1/3, and 1/3 sex bias in perception, cognition, valuation, want, advocacy, and negotiation. What’s difficult for most of us, is that while we acknowledge the spectrum of means of ‘calculating’ from math to recipes, to rigorous arguments, we are less willing to ‘science’ our methods of lying. And how the sex differences in anti-natural law behavior, anti-social behavior, are facilitated by sex differences in methods of lying.

4) All civilizational differences originate in agrarian founding institutions and their path-dependent sequence of development. There are only three means of human coercion (Religion/Verbal: seduction/ostracization, State/Force: Order/Defense, and Trade/Boycott: law/commerce. With Religion(strong) > State(weak) > Law(fail) the worst (MENA) and Law(strong) > State (weak) > Religion(fail) the best (Europe), and State(strong) > Law (weak) > Religion (fail) the compromise (China). Combine the institutional sequence, with the geography, means of production, your homogeneity or heterogeneity, number of competitors, the technological difference between you and the competitors, the relationship between your aristocracy (military) and peasantry(producers), and you get all human civilizations as relatively obvious survivors of what’s possible in geographic, racial, and ethnic circumstances.

Now I’ve done all that work and more. So where you see moral conflict I see a bunch of bots – barely conscious children really – running around with flashcards of lies taped to their heads – trying to get attention so that they obtain some sort of status so that they can find allies, to maybe, possibly, feel less alienated in modernity, and somehow change their condition.

So I see a very childish world. Why? Because while what I do (what our institute staff do) is basically a mathematics – a formal logic. Now it’s ordinal and operational math (like computation and actions) and not cardinal math (like statistics and language) but it’s till math. And it’s rational for all you normals out there with your emotions alienation and flashcards on your foreheads to think we’re like you.

We aren’t. It’s just math to us.
We don’t often like what we find either.
And we know how Darwin and Galileo were treated.
And we don’t expect any differently.
Because the entire postwar pseudoscientific war against western civilization’s ‘science’, is a war against the Darwinian explanation of all existence. Not just biology – but everything. Including everything we intuit, feel, think, say and do.
So no I don’t expect people to accept or like that the postwar intersection of Jewish thought, women in the workforce and politics, the television-cable-internet-social media revolution, hyperconsumption, debt capacity, and downregulation of education is just an expression of the lag institutional suppression of female antisocial behavior as it propagates through the civilization.

But it’s true. 🙁