Correct. The difference is that only ashkenazi and europeans produce world thought leadership especially in ethics and politics.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 23:05:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653173846508294146
Reply addressees: @Slezkinite @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1653152328294322177
CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
Especially for women.
So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).
(Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962155040260096
CAUSALITY OF JEWISH VS WESTERN THOUGHT
Jewish vs Western thought manifests in the sciences as pragmatism vs truth. And Pragatism in ethics as selfishness vs contribution to commons.
The pragmatism begins with the jewish seeking agreement regardless of truth (via positiva justification ignoring political consequences at scale) and westerners seeking truth in order to determine agreement (via negativa falsification b/c of political consequences of scale)
This is why Cantor Bohr Einstein and Feynman relied on pictures not operations, verbalisms rather than operations, and pragmatism rather than truth – and killed progress in physics.
And it’s why Marx, Boaz, Freud, destroyed behavioral science, the frankfurt school destroyed high culture, the postmodernists destroyed truth, Lysenko, Gould, destroyed evolution, and why Rez, Kelsen, Dworkin destroyed law. From this perspective, like the abrahamic religions, it’s the most destructive force in civilizational history.
It’s also why jewish and western ethics are incompatible opposite.
And it’s unfortunate that easy pragmatism is more attractive than difficult truth.
Especially for women.
So, oddly enough, it’s correct that the prewar criticism that jewish and western science differs was true.
And it’s most visible in jewish behavioral sciences.
And I discovered it in jewish vs western economics and law.
So (a) Pragmatism (b) evasion of responsibility for the commons (c) mythicism (magical thinking) (d) conflating good/true bad/false, (e) face before truth (f) asymmetric returns as heroic (f) resulting in the female strategy. And that is the mirror image of western ethics that’s been brought to us by christianity, marxism, woke with women and immigrants resisting western truth before face, and maximization of responsibility for private and common(duty).
(Note: The number of insights I gain by studying philosophers and detecting their lies, excuses, and errors is endless….)
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 09:04:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652962154872545281
No. There are no contradictions. The only things we’ve discovered are the back and forth gene flow out of and into africa. And we have slightly more clarity on human migration, isolation, speciation, and hybridization events.
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 02:19:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652860362658664450
Reply addressees: @DeliaCore @KurtosisEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652856223908102146
RT @Rushxx2: @curtdoolittle @KirkegaardEmil Since the 1950 UNESCO statement on race, written with WW2 trauma still palpable, the entire pla…
Source date (UTC): 2023-05-01 00:45:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652836725792620544
TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
(Another Toy)
. . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
. . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
. . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
. . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
. . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
. . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
. . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
. . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
. . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
. . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
. . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
. . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
. . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
. . . . . . . . . . . . Ternary First Principles
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
. . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652765469567340549
TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
(Another Toy)
. . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
. . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
. . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
. . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
. . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
. . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
. . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
. . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
. . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
. . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
. . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
. . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
. . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
. . . . . . . . . . . . Ternary First Principles
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
. . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652765469735022592
TERNARY LOGIC AND TRIFUNCTIONALISM
(Another Toy)
. . . . . . . . . . . Differences in Prosperity
. . . . . . . .Differences in Energy Per Capita
. . . . . . . .Rates of Civilizational Evolution
. . . . . . . . . . . Civilizational Differences
. . . .Trifunctional Institutional Path Dependence
. . . . . . . . .Trifunctional Formal Institutions
. . . . . . . . Trifunctional Elites by Influence
. . . . . . Three Means of Influence-Coercion
. . . . . . . .Talking, Working Fighting Classes
. . . . . . . . . . Family, Clan, Tribe, Nation
. . . . . . . . . . . . Informal Institutions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Organization
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reproduction
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reciprocity
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Cooperation
. . . . . . . . . . .(F-) Sex Differences (M+)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Acquisition
. . . . . . . . . . . Demonstrated Interests
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Before . . . . . . . . . . . . During . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . After
Physical Laws …. Behavioral Laws …. Evolutionary Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Logical Laws
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Ternary Logic
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Science (Testimony)
. . . . . . . . . . .The Grammars (Language)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Disciplines
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outliers
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 20:02:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652764332701147137
–“Miller closes by suggesting how history textbooks could correct the narrative, arguing that they should emphasize three points:
(1) that suffrage was never desired by a majority of women before 1920; (2) that more women were organized against suffrage than in favor of it until 1916; and (3) that for many years, men were on the whole more progressive on the issue than women were.”–
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:57:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652688658955108355
–“Miller closes by suggesting how history textbooks could correct the narrative, arguing that they should emphasize three points:
(1) that suffrage was never desired by a majority of women before 1920; (2) that more women were organized against suffrage than in favor of it until 1916; and (3) that for many years, men were on the whole more progressive on the issue than women were.”–
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-30 14:57:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1652688659022315521