Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • Nietzche undestood the problem. He failed to solve it. So when discussing neitzc

    Nietzche undestood the problem. He failed to solve it. So when discussing neitzche we see an intuition to heroism and the restoration of ancient civilization and tradition, overcoming the evolutionar decadence of the christian, but he couldn’t solve it.
    Unfortunately, the Scholastics understood but they couldn’t merge with the Romantics and bring about the full restoration of european civilization.
    Germans tried. Almost did it.

    Reply addressees: @zmb_bllbry_mffn


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 15:03:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661387479176413189

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661386386958700550

  • The use of war, sport, feast, festival and finally the participatory play, with

    The use of war, sport, feast, festival and finally the participatory play, with the audience as chorus, as ‘church’ and the use of competitive awards for the best play from the best authors, indoctinating everyone into the heroic tradition of overcoming human failty and nature’s…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 14:37:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661380789798334465

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661374230863179777

  • Nietzche was only half right, but the half he was right about was hella right ab

    Nietzche was only half right, but the half he was right about was hella right about – and at a depth that most humans can’t imagine is possible.

    Too bad he was German. They have to spiritualize, rationalize, psychologize and romanticize everything. I’ll stick with my rigouous Anglo scientific and legal empiricism. 😉 Anglos just need to know it’s true, reciprocal, and capitalizing to feel good about it. We don’t need other ‘feelz’. And americans are even more ‘western’ in that sense than the brits. The founders were trying to recreate rome and they did a surprisingly good job of it until the 1960s.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 13:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661370028539740162

  • “~Q: How did pre-Christian europe deal with alienation before the monotheistic r

    “~Q: How did pre-Christian europe deal with alienation before the monotheistic religions provided it?”

    They dealt with it through state(government), nation, religion, and identity, myth, oath, ritual, and festival. Just like the monotheistic religions do. It was just local, regional, and civilizational, before the abrhamic attempt at cross-civilizational religion by the jewish unification in jewish christianity of (a) semitic supernatural mythicsm of good and evil representing the relationship between slaves, their fear, lack of agency, and rulers, and (b) european supernormal mythos and reason of order and chaos representing the relationship between man, his reason, his agency, and the chaos of irresponsible nature. The result is Semitic Slave morality vs European Aristocratic morality.

    EVOLUTION OF SPIRITUALISM (SATING THE INTUITION VS NATURE) AND RELIGION (SATING THE INTUITION VS MANKIND)
    All religious motive evolves from the pack spectrum of the being-left-behind (alienation) response, the liability (guilt) and the the debt (reciprocity) response, causing the submission response, and the submission response is a remnant of the submission to the pack response, particularly when running or moving as a group. That’s why submission ‘feels good’: provoking the feeling of elation and safety in running with the pack.

    All religious intuition evolves from the sedating the feast (positive) and death (negative) response, that suppresses anxiety and inalienation by internal submission to the pack, in the face of either windfall (feast) or loss (death). Grave goods are a debt payment, and a demonstration of loyalty and care. They also serve to warrant to others that one is not responsible for the death, or apologizes for anything to do with it. And more, it serves to bind the group together given their shared risk of mortality – “don’t leave me behind”.

    All formal religious ritual (AFAWK) evolved from the initiatic brotherhood of warriors who risked hunt and war together at great risk – where ‘unit cohesion’ (reciprocal insurance) was necessary for both victory and survival.

    PAYMENT OF DEBTS
    Sacrifice is the means of relieving debt instincts. So in families and tribes we share; with leadership we ‘thank’ with gifts, and with gods we ‘thank or ask’ with sacrifices. For example The word ‘god’ in the west indo european languages is the word for ‘pour’. Meaning the ritual sacrifice of beer to the gods.

    LEADERSHIP
    All religous leadership evolves from specialization in those myths, oaths, rituals, feasts and festivals, and all religious nuance evolves over the pretense of knowledge and compentency demonstrated by these priesthoods.

    CLASS RELATIONS
    In european natural religion (vs abrahamic sythetic religions) aristocracy demonstrated loyalty to the people by the performance of rituals, and the priesthoods were responsible for knowing and arranging those rituals. In the semitic religions, the priesthood demonstrated and reinforced loyalty to and among the people against the ruling aristocracy.

    ANCHORING BY RELIGION
    Abrahamic religions, were created by and spread by the lower classes who were increasingly left behind by rise of trade and in particular imperial trade, just like the lower classes were left behind (or felt it) by the industrial revolution – despite that both greco-roman trade, roman administration, roman peace, and the industrial revolution primarily benefitted the lower classes at the expense of the power of the upperclasses.

    GROUP STRATEGY
    ( … )

    UNIVERSAL ANTHROPOMORPHIC SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT.
    ( … )

    SUMMARY
    ( … )

    (More as this sequence on the evolution of religion continues … gotta exit the cafe now. 😉 )

    Reply addressees: @RealLouisPrince


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 12:52:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661354542498304000

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660982346034606088

  • Jews != Phoenicians. Not sure where you’re getting confused. Pre-Bronze Age Coll

    Jews != Phoenicians.
    Not sure where you’re getting confused.
    Pre-Bronze Age Collapse
    … All Caananites
    After-Bronze Age Collapse (Age of Transformation)
    … Phoenicians = Naval (Think England)
    … vs
    … Jews = Landed (Think Germany)

    -“In terms of culture, language and customs, they were almost completely the same. Before the Bronze dark ages, neither identity existed. Everybody from Tyre to Jericho was a Canaanite, spoke dialects of Canaanite language, and worshipped Canaanite gods.

    We don’t really know what happened during the Bronze Age Collapse but afterwards we see that the Northern Canaanites developed a sea-ward looking identity and started calling themselves Phoenician, while the southern canaanites started developing a new religion, putting their warrior god, Yahweh, at the top of the pantheon (still not monotheistic), organized themselves into comparatively larger kingdoms as opposed to city-states (which the Phoenicians still retained despite having a larger national identity) and calling themselves Israelites.

    Even then, they were more similar than different. They still spoke the same language, though now their dialects were more distinct, had similar lifestyles, had a sense of solidarity with each other often uniting to fight foreign enemies and rarely fighting each other, and had similar pottery and architectural styles. In fact Solomon’s famous temple was largely constructed by hired Phoenician craftsmen, which shows the close cooperation that occurred between the two groups. The northern and coastal Israelite tribes also had the same maritime culture of the Phoenicians. While they were clearly different nationalities by this point, it is quite clear that they still belonged to the same Canaanite civilization, something that they themselves seemed to recognize.”-

    Reply addressees: @LiamAgain7000 @AmazonEve @WerrellBradley @Texan_Jack @4mergangsta @WinstonCraig7 @Kimarielennon


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 20:52:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661112855343628288

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661109968404201472

  • The Genetic Origins of Ashkenazim. (And no, that silly turkic nonsense is just t

    The Genetic Origins of Ashkenazim.
    (And no, that silly turkic nonsense is just that)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 20:30:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661107259622014976

  • after the roman conquest of judea, and during the first stage of the resulting d

    after the roman conquest of judea, and during the first stage of the resulting diaspora.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 19:42:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661095344254464000

    Reply addressees: @AmazonEve @WerrellBradley @Texan_Jack @4mergangsta @WinstonCraig7 @Kimarielennon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661086510349975552

  • @PleaseDebunk The church was a major proponent of education and literacy in scie

    @PleaseDebunk
    The church was a major proponent of education and literacy in science and technology, and many pre-modern Islamic centers of learning had taught science and technology, and pre-modern Judaism produced theoretical works of general scientific and technolgical literacy, and Europeans did not disproportionately innovate in science and technology in the classical, medieval, and modern eras.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 14:25:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661015574196162562

  • Argh. Making me work this morning? Simple version: genetic studies (lots of them

    Argh. Making me work this morning?
    Simple version: genetic studies (lots of them) have provided the origin of the Askhenazim as male jews who moved to italy, married local italian women, then returned to inbreeding, and spread to the urban centers of europe, where they specialized originally in trade and money-changing. Yes jewish diasporic traders and money changers developed communities within many ethnic groups within reach of the empires. However, Jews are otherwise indistinguishable from palestinians, other north semites (afro-asiatics).

    Thankfully Wiki covers the topic.
    https://t.co/MGXTD59CHI

    Reply addressees: @WerrellBradley @Texan_Jack @4mergangsta @WinstonCraig7 @Kimarielennon


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 13:49:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661006339517337602

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660998903590961153

  • You need to read a bit of history apparently. Suggest Fukuyama’s a) Trust, and b

    You need to read a bit of history apparently.
    Suggest Fukuyama’s a) Trust, and b) his two volumes of political history. Might start with his mentor Huntington, with a) plagues and peoples, b) political order, and c) clash of civilizations. Also recommend for the most negative take: Nixey’s Darkening Age: The Christian Destruction of the Classical World.

    Why did each new ‘subrace’ conquer and take over islamic civ. Why was political order impossible in the middle east? Why did persia try to recover three times and fail. Why were the Ottoman’s unable to modernize?

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules @realNachawati


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-23 06:08:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660890413308293120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660884361984499713