Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

Some of that genome is dominant. 😉
By the time the yamna culture made it to india there was almost nothing of europe left in it.
But non all of this makes no difference.
you didn’t evolve the culture.
despite a head start in indus, and despite the aryan invastino, you failed by 100ad just like the middle east.
China made it to almost 800 before failing.
Why did we leave you in the dust?
You’re dragging a low IQ majority population and europeans aren’t.
So you were overrun repeatedly and continue to be.
And since you are stuck with that population distributino you are, quite predictably, reverting to hindu fundamentalism and hindu nationalism to maintain political power under pseudodemocdratic system and rule of law.
Why is modi in india and erdogan in turkey reverring to religion?
the vast population cannot manage modernithy without an average IQ above 97 in the population.
We have tried to move industry from china to india and we are pulling out because the people literally can’t do the work – and are so undisciplined they don’t appear to care to.
Fix the man in the mirror.

Reply addressees: @skladviip @whatifalthist

कुछ नहीं। अफ़्रीका से बाहर प्रवासन भारत के समुद्र तट के साथ-साथ उत्तर में पूर्वी एशिया और दक्षिण में द्वीपों और ऑस्ट्रेलिया तक फैल गया। लेकिन लोग विकसित होते रहे। आश्चर्यजनक रूप से ऑस्ट्रियाई लोगों ने कुछ कारणों से प्रौद्योगिकी का एक बड़ा हिस्सा खो दिया जो हमें समझ में नहीं आया। और कुछ लोगों के बीच स्थानीय फेनोटाइप बहुत मजबूत ढांचे में विकसित हुए, या तो रोग प्रतिरोधक क्षमता या किसी अन्य कठिनाई के कारण, या यहां तक ​​कि यादृच्छिक कारणों से – जिसे ये महिलाएं चित्रित करती हैं।

Nothing. The out-of-africa migration followed india’s coastline, where some stayed in the region, and others spread both north into east asia and south into the islands and australia. But people kept evolving. Surprisingly austrailians lost a great deal of technology for some reason we don’t understand. And local phenotypes among some people evolved into very hardy frames, either because of disease resistance or some other hardship, or even randome causes – which these women illustrate.

Reply addressees: @skladviip @whatifalthist

Yes, well we have the genetics.
Sorry. Y’all got aryan culture but not aryan genetics.
Why? the yamna were largely an admixture of europeans and caucasions (iranics).
India consists of three waves, the out of africa, the first migation from what’s iran, and the second migratino from what was the steppe. But the eastern steppe, while culturally the same (a group strategy) contained a more iranic admixture.
You’re largely south eurasian (persian gulf),and we’re largley west eurasian (european). Even our farmers are anatolian not mespotamian east south eurasians (marsh arabs), afro-asiatic (arabs proper), west south eurasians (levantines), or iranics (persian gulf to india to central asia before the turkic migration out of norhtern china.)
It is correct to say you have PRESERVED the aryan culture more so than the west has. We have merely evolved their institutions and replaced the culture because the west was able to dominate and rule the people preservin those institutinos, while the east (you) were not able to given the huge population of india upon the arrival of the steppe people.
This is obvious in the difference in uniformity of the west between the hunter-gatherers, anatolian farmers, and steppe herders, in a cline east to west, vs the north south cline of india from 70/30 to 30/70 proportions, and the remaining problem of the difference in natural intelligence of the steppe peoples in the north and the out of africa peoples in the south.

Reply addressees: @Arian80460 @whatifalthist

The irony is that the Yamna – corded ware relationship and the westward and southward expansion, mean this map isn’t that far off. Add the origin region north of the Black Sea to caspian as an opaque overlay and its close. ;). India has everything backward. 😉