Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • FAMILY HISTORY: AMERICA, ENGLAND, BUT IS IT NORMANDY, ENGLAND OR GERMANY? I’ve w

    FAMILY HISTORY: AMERICA, ENGLAND, BUT IS IT NORMANDY, ENGLAND OR GERMANY?

    I’ve written a bit about this before. But our small family came to the states in the 1630’s. But we know everyone’s name back to the 1400’s. The family historians have made claims that we’re Normans. But that’s entirely specious. And the argument they used to prove it only serves to disprove it. We know, I think, no more than 25 names of people who participated in the Norman invasion. And our family was from central England. So, I’m fairly sure that like most english people’s we’re largely germanic. Mostly celtic. Although, given their Puritanism, and their location, it’s just as likely that they were part of the wave of German immigrants who left for greater freedom in England, or even more likely part of the Danish gene pool that dominated that area. But until we have genetic samples from enough members of the family to create some semblance of a pattern – at least on the male side, we will have a hard time being sure.

    In the large, we have retained the protestant english behavior of small business, martial devotion, and did not substantially outbreed, at least in New England, until the second world war. Although we must keep in mind that the prices of land were driven up in new England in the 1700’s, partly because it was some of the best land on earth at the time, and many families moved to the ohio river valley to take advantage of the lower cost of land. And it is more likely that that wing of the family has retained its homogeneity. The southern wing of the family is fairly large but harder to isolate.

    Some day I’ll spend some time on this. Some day. Maybe….


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-23 06:40:00 UTC

  • STATES ARE NOT PEOPLES I’ve changed my identity. My country has left me. I’m not

    STATES ARE NOT PEOPLES

    I’ve changed my identity. My country has left me. I’m not an American. I’m an Englishman. A member of the English race. A race with both genetic and written history. I will be a member of that race no matter what state chooses to deprive me of my property, and by my property, my freedom. A modern passport is a slave-brand. It’s a title. It’s ownership of your body, actions and property. Its a claim on your production. If that is not slavery, then there is no other kind. As such, I need not stand and fight for political commands, or a constitution that has failed me and my people, nor for a state that has branded me a slave, relegated me to second class legal status as a white male, and intentionally demonized me, my race and our history. I will fight for my rights as an Englishman. The right of property. The right of the common law for the adjudication of differences over property. And therefore the right of freedom from arbitrary commands by an arbitrary state.

    Some Things Are Worth Repeating


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-23 06:21:00 UTC

  • IS DEPENDENT UPON RACE MIXTURE. “It turns out that after adjusting for the major

    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2011/03/who-kills-who.htmlVIOLENCE IS DEPENDENT UPON RACE MIXTURE.

    “It turns out that after adjusting for the major demographic differences between the two nations, Canada is a much more violent place than is the U.S. (Ed. At least Canadians are polite, eh? Just don’t cross them….)”

    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2011/03/who-kills-who.html?m=1

    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2011/03/us-vs-canada-comparing-oranges-and.html?m=1

    http://politicalcalculations.blogspot.com/2011/03/us-vs-canada-comparing-apples-to-apples.html?m=1


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-20 08:26:00 UTC

  • WESTERN CIV: IT’S THE CHURCH. THE CONTENT OF CHRISTIANITY LOOKS IRRELEVANT. The

    WESTERN CIV: IT’S THE CHURCH. THE CONTENT OF CHRISTIANITY LOOKS IRRELEVANT.

    The west is unique for reasons that appear to be entirely the product of aristocracy.

    The church was weak. The tribes were strong. It is the administrative relationship between them that created western culture’s unique attributes: a responsible monarchy.

    The actual content of the bible is pretty much a set of analogies that could be applied to circumstance. But it reflected rather than created the west.

    Aristocracy is more important than Christianity.

    Never imagined that would be the case.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-17 13:35:00 UTC

  • UKRAINE IS THE BEST THING TO HAPPEN TO ME IN MY ADULT LIFE if there is a heaven.

    UKRAINE IS THE BEST THING TO HAPPEN TO ME IN MY ADULT LIFE

    if there is a heaven. It looks like Ukraine.

    These are the most wonderful people on earth.

    White people in their natural habitat. With a government that has abandoned them.

    It’s beautiful.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-09 19:40:00 UTC

  • FASHION: LONG LEATHER COATS In the states, wearing a long leather coat makes you

    FASHION: LONG LEATHER COATS

    In the states, wearing a long leather coat makes you a member of the lower classes.

    And if you aren’t at least six-two and have a thirty eight inch chest, they make you look like a cow.

    But these really tall skinny Slavic men can pull It off without looking like dorks.

    Lots of good looking (straight) men in Kiev. And downtown shops cater to them.

    So far I’m spending money almost exclusively with Karl Lagerfeld. Which I wouldn’t normally wear in the states. But is perfect here.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-09 13:14:00 UTC

  • ENGLISH SUPERIORITY “Relative to other groups from Britain, Puritans were not ou

    ENGLISH SUPERIORITY

    “Relative to other groups from Britain, Puritans were not outbred. Yet they are more idealistic and altruistic. That may have something to do with them being from the most Danish part of Britain. It certainly is to do with them being economically advanced. A market economy only works where there can be basic trust between unrelated people. And the British are the descendants of the economically successful. -(Clark)”


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-08 06:59:00 UTC

  • CAN YOU HAVE CHIVALRY WITHOUT ARISTOCRACY? The west is synonymous with Christend

    CAN YOU HAVE CHIVALRY WITHOUT ARISTOCRACY?

    The west is synonymous with Christendom. Christendom is synonymous with Aristocracy. Aristocracy with chivalry. Chivalry with the means by which males seek status by service. Aristocracy is synonymous with property ownership. Because aristocracy is private government. The unstated property of the western high trust society is the break with paternalistic familial-ism: universal-ism by outlawing cousin marriages and therefore outlawing tribal property, tribal inheritance, and tribal political power. Status in this environment can only be obtained by actions.

    The high trust society is a product of chivalry, aristocracy, property, without which males have no means of status seeking.

    (I’m still working on this. But the basic problem is that Ferguson’s six killer apps aren’t enough of the story.)


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-07 08:09:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : MASCULINE FEMININE RELATIONS Ukrainian woman are probabl

    CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : MASCULINE FEMININE RELATIONS

    Ukrainian woman are probably the most prized in the world. Part of it’s genetics, and part of it’s culture, but the most important part is the female self image.

    They see being feminine is power. Pretty much all of them. I won’t go into depth on the topic right now. I’m still working at understanding the behavior here. But it has a lot to do with the fact that women do not perceive themselves as weak. And because of this, there isn’t the same stratification by appearance and class that exists in the states and canada. It’s fascinating.

    In mating rituals, I’ve had a few interesting observations so far.

    1) In the states a marriage is a business partnership that hopefully has some sentimental content. This is partly an effect of our high trust society. We have been dating outside the family in northern europe for a thousand years. And the transient society and the melting pot, as well as the sexual liberation have changed the ritual into one that filters relationships over time, while preserving the option to exit easily.

    Here, Men court women they don’t date them. It’s a pursuit. The depth of this isn’t really something I understood. Men chase women here and women decide. But men don’t sort of idly date a bunch of women. I mean, I’m exaggerating this a bit for effect but it’s the only way I can articulate it right now. Over time I’ll get better at it. Subtlety isn’t appreciated. It’s weakness. I guess that’s the best way I can manage to describe it. (I know that there is a book somewhere on how people think in the east. I have to find it. I’ve heard it mentioned but not it’s title or author yet.)

    2) Women are much more mature at a much earlier age. (perhaps that’s true for both genders) But it’s much more obvious that women are at least ten years ahead of their western counterparts.

    4) there is a shortage of men, and a shortage of economically productive men. But unlike in the states where a) you have a state that can be used to expropriate money from a man if you’re a woman and b) where there is a shortage of unproductive men in the lower classes, but lower class women can still earn enough to support themselves, women are still accountable for their mating decisions here. Which is something I don’t like about the western way of doing things. And the shortage of men increases the natural problem of fewer desirable men than desirable women in any given population. So the women work harder at it because a) they see it as power and b) they have greater competition.

    3) The ‘Crazy’ factor that seems so prevalent in the west doesn’t see to exist here in anywhere near the same proportions. This is the part I find really fascinating. I want to understand it. It has something to do with the feeling of individual power instead of externally recognized status, and something to do with the fact that it is absolutely acceptable for a woman to vent emotions here ‘so that she can have a rational conversation’. And this is only possible because there is an agreement between men and women that this is how the world SHOULD operate and MUST operate.

    4) I didn’t see it at first but the culture of white lies is absolutely insane. You literally cannot believe anything anyone says. Asia has the same problem. It prevents a high trust society from forming. And when you lived under governments that force you to lie, and force you into black markets, then of course you get certain norms. And these people have those norms.

    Anyway. This is probably too amateurish a bit of opining. But I’d rather form my own opinions and then read the opinion of an authority. That way I can understand myself and my misjudgments better, than I would read an authority and see everything through that person’s lens, assuming that I possessed the same level of insight.

    That would be unscientific. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-06 10:34:00 UTC

  • NEW ENGLANDERS AND SOUTHERNERS ARE MORE FAMILIAL THAN NEW YORKERS AND WEST COAST

    http://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/12/04/familism-in-the-u-s-whites-by-region/YES, NEW ENGLANDERS AND SOUTHERNERS ARE MORE FAMILIAL THAN NEW YORKERS AND WEST COASTERS.

    As if any of us from the east needed confirmation.


    Source date (UTC): 2012-12-05 11:51:00 UTC