Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • MARRIAGE STRUCTURES AMONG NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES (Note: basically what we get ou

    MARRIAGE STRUCTURES AMONG NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES

    (Note: basically what we get out of history is that women are in greater control when we combine both property rights and high male morality due to warfare. You’d think if the feminists figure this out they’ll renew the draft and vote to send us off to war in large numbers. lol )

    “Exclusive monogamy was the rule among the Iroquois and a few of their neighbors. This is to be expected in cultures in which matrilineal descent and matrilocal residence were coupled with female ownership and control of agricultural land and houses, not to mention the unusual authority of women in political affairs. Here the men literally moved in with their wives, who could divorce them merely by tossing their personal effects out of the door of the longhouse….”

    “The only other area where female dominance approached this level was that of the western Pueblos in the Southwest. Here the picture was similar, and exclusive monogamy prevailed. The other instances of exclusive monogamy were scattered and occurred in both bilateral and patrilineal societies. They do not lend themselves to any ready explanation.”

    “Sororal polygyny — that is, the marriage of a man to two wives who were sisters — probably occurred wherever polygyny was to be found. A number of Plains tribes had no other form. A man in this society was especially anxious to acquire an eldest sister as a first mate, with an eye on acquiring her younger sister if and when he could afford them…. [I]t is easy to see that polygyny had more utility in societies where male mortality in hunting and warfare was high. The Plains was one of these areas. Among the Eskimos, where a man had more difficulty in supporting multiple wives, the extremely high male mortality was offset by female infanticide. This partially explains the more modest amount of polygyny present in the Arctic.”

    (Note: Equilibria in everything)

    -HBD CHICK


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-05 17:03:00 UTC

  • “WHY ARE 6M UKRAINIANS LESS IMPORTANT THAN 6M JEWS?” (from peter meyers) Alexand

    “WHY ARE 6M UKRAINIANS LESS IMPORTANT THAN 6M JEWS?”

    (from peter meyers)

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn on the 6 million Ukranians:

    {p. 15} This was a system which, in time of peace, artificially created a famine causing six million persons to die in the Ukraine between 1932 and 1933. They died on the very threshold of Europe.

    {p. 16} And Europe didn’t even notice it. The world didn’t even notice it. Six million persons!”

    – Alexander Solzhenitsyn, speech delivered in Washington on 30 June 1975. In Alexander Solzhenitsyn Speaks to the West (London: Bodley Head, 1978), pp. 15-16.

    Here are some scans of that book:

    1. the cover: http://mailstar.net/Solz-Speaks-cover.JPG

    2. p. 15 (gives 6 million figure): http://mailstar.net/Solz-Speaks-6m-Ukra-p15.JPG

    3. p. 16 (repeats 6 million figure): http://mailstar.net/Solz-Speaks-6m-Ukra-p16.JPG


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-04 02:08:00 UTC

  • ON ARISTOCRACY Strange day today. But I have put silver bullet in rhetoric that

    ON ARISTOCRACY

    Strange day today. But I have put silver bullet in rhetoric that will at least keep the evil demon of babylonian, jewish and christian magian obscurantism in the tomb for a short while.

    Although I expect that this is a problem of containing the living dead’s desire for constant resurrection.

    ARISTOCRACY IS A PHILOSOPHY, NOT A SOCIAL CLASS


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-03 12:25:00 UTC

  • Vladimir. They are a tribal and feudal people. Kill every relative out to three

    Vladimir.

    They are a tribal and feudal people.

    Kill every relative out to three generations.

    Use the family to control the family.

    Surprise if you guess where I got this idea from….


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-31 15:32:00 UTC

  • CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS : I love how men and women are portrayed in the media here

    CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS :

    I love how men and women are portrayed in the media here versus in the states. Men are, frankly manly, mature, and women are elegant and beautiful, and the sexuality is not crass like hollywood videos, but beautiful.

    We celebrate the hedonism of peasantry as a vehicle for marketing with baser instincts. They celebrate their aspirations.

    It makes me realize how ‘cheap’ americanism is. Another packaged good for the proles.

    Aristocracy died with the first world war. It just took this long for the proles to tear down the castles and use the stones to build their hovels.

    Just like it always has been.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-31 07:02:00 UTC

  • 1) WARRIOR – VIOLENCE – ORDER (soldier, sportsman, duty) 2) CRAFTSMAN – EXCHANGE

    1) WARRIOR – VIOLENCE – ORDER

    (soldier, sportsman, duty)

    2) CRAFTSMAN – EXCHANGE – WEALTH

    (merchant, scientist, engineer, professional, wealth)

    3) PHILOSOPHER – ARGUMENT – WISDOM

    (priest, advisor, mentor, teacher, judge, wisdom)


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-31 04:49:00 UTC

  • “LET THE PEOPLE DIVIDE. LET OUR PEOPLE GO” (1. The error of the monotheism – equ

    “LET THE PEOPLE DIVIDE. LET OUR PEOPLE GO”

    (1. The error of the monotheism – equality and unity)

    (2. The error of the enlightenment: equality and universal aristocracy)

    (3. The truth of property, contract, and prices)

    LET THE PEOPLE DIVIDE. LET OUR PEOPLE GO.

    Rather than prosecute the false argument that ‘We’ have much in common: LET THE PEOPLE DIVIDE.

    Rulers take advantage of the false argument of the RELIGIOUS ERA: if we make claims of group interest, we can fool people into acting as if they are extended family.

    I should work on this argument a bit, because the enlightenment error of universalism, equality, and an aristocracy of everyone, is also dependent upon the monotheistic error of ‘a family of everyone’.

    Neither of these are true.

    Polytheism is superior to monotheism.

    Micro Polystatism is super to Macro-Monostatism.

    The problem of human cooperation is not moral or ethical or any other form of emotionally misleading, and intellectually false group membership.We do not need to create conceptual or moral homogeneity and equality in order to live happily and peacefully and prosperously together.

    The problem of human cooperation is technical, not preferential: PROPERTY, MONEY, and VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE.

    One cannot reason without logic.

    One cannot describe cause and consequence without narrative.

    One cannot create record and transport knowledge without writing.

    One cannot count and compare units without numbers,

    One cannot measure and compare spaces without operations and units.

    One cannot cooperate without property

    One cannot plan production, without prices.

    The market allows us to cooperate on means despite diverse ends.

    Government is just an organization for the purpose of providing decision making where no other technology exists for the purpose of decision making (direct voting).

    Legitimate government creates contracts : rights and obligations,

    Illegitimate government creates commands, and fraudulently markets them as ‘laws’.

    Government can facilitate cooperation in the market, or it facilitate rents on the market.

    A government that does other than:

    1) enforce contracts, where contracts are not constructible, or enforceable without property rights.

    2) facilitate exchanges via trade policy between classes in cases impossible to construct in the market without such trade facilitation of trade policy.

    3) Provide a means of insurance

    …obtains legitimacy by:

    4) Violence for the self preservation of the privilege of te bureaucracy.

    5) Justification under the religious era’s error of unity of interest

    6) Justification under the enlightenment’s error of equality, universalism, and

    However, this is a continuation of the technique of using repetition, obscurantism, complexity, and our natural cognitive biases, to deny us our ability and desire, to function as families, extended families and tribes, all of whom cooperate via the market.

    but instead of micro-governemtns for families, extended families and tribes, pooling interests for trade policy, insurance, and enforceability of contracts, we are forced under macro government, to give up our opportunity to trade and instead, forced to seek rents and free riding and our own freedom from the state.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-24 04:53:00 UTC

  • BETWEEN US AND NEANDERTHALS: 96 Genes. Immunity and Brain (ie: more suggestion o

    http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/entire-neanderthal-genome-finally-mapped-amazing-results-001138DIFFERENCES BETWEEN US AND NEANDERTHALS:

    96 Genes. Immunity and Brain (ie: more suggestion of the Dopaninergenic theory has some legs)

    “Only 96 genes responsible for making proteins in cells are different between modern humans and Neanderthals. Intriguingly, some of the gene differences involve ones involved in both immune responses and the development of brain cells in people. Somewhere within these 96 genes may lay the answer to why Neanderthals and Denisovans became extinct.”

    I ALREADY KNOW WHY THEY WENT EXTINCT: WE ATE THEM.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-23 15:32:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3869117/General-George-S.-Patton-was-assassinated-to-silence-his-criticism-of-allied-war-leaders-claims-new-book.html


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-22 01:59:00 UTC

  • THE LEFT: “FOOD SHORTAGES, MOB VIOLENCE, ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS” “The French Revol

    THE LEFT: “FOOD SHORTAGES, MOB VIOLENCE, ARBITRARY EXECUTIONS”

    “The French Revolution was their chance to show what they could do when they got the power they sought. In contrast to what they promised — “liberty, equality, fraternity” — what they actually produced were food shortages, mob violence, and dictatorial powers that included arbitrary executions, extending even to their own leaders, such as Robespierre, who died under the guillotine.

    In the 20th century, the most sweeping vision of the Left — Communism — spread over vast regions of the world and encompassed well over a billion human beings. Of these, millions died of starvation in the Soviet Union under Stalin and tens of millions in China under Mao.” – Sowell


    Source date (UTC): 2013-12-21 06:25:00 UTC