Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

RUSSIAN TRANSITIONAL FAILURE TO ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM

(Anglo Saxon, Friesian Aristocratic Egalitarianism)

I KNOW democracy(political freedom) is just the path to communism and totalitarianism by slower means, and I know political freedom by definition is immoral. I know social democracy is just the secularization of jewish-christianity by empty verbalisms, at the further expense of propertarian aristocracy.

These are not value judgements they are logical necessities given the distribution of human interests and abilities, and the evolutionary strategies of different groups.

I am perfectly happy with a monarchical Russia that denies people access to political power. Just as I am perfectly happy that all other countries deny people political power under any form of private government. What I am not comfortable with is EXPANSION of CORRUPTION, and the expansion of the bureaucracy, and the SPREAD of corruption and bureaucracy.

Now the Russians might be right is that the southern and eastern peoples (the ‘middle world’) are incapable of universalism and high trust. (I believe this may be the case given behavior under immigration.) And that the only possible solution for Russia is to engage in hierarchical government to use their minority population to conquer and oppress the ‘middle people’ (Turkiks, Uralics, Altaics, Mongols, Arabs, and any indo-european muslims) who pose a risk to them. And I even ENCOURAGE that position.

But that does not apply to europeans(slavs, germans, nordics and celts), who have survived for four thousand years by denying the ‘middle people’ access to Europe, despite our smaller numbers.

Russia may yet keep the east at bay if Germany does not return to its traditional role in doing so. I want the USA out of Europe so that Germany has no CHOICE but to abandon the pacifist fallacy and return to its traditional role as keeping the east at bay.

We can see that any civilization touched by the Turkic and Islamic people suffers in ignorance, low trust and poverty. And cannot seem to escape it. It never occurs to us that advanced civilizations with low rates of reproduction do not SURVIVE against reproductive and aggressive civilizations – because he who breeds eventually wins. So the Islamic way of life, despite it’s low trust, violence, ignorance and mysticism, may in fact be the most effective way of conquest, even if it deprives humans of their reach for the stars. History tells us that the Chinese war machine is only bounded by the desert on one side and the ocean on the other. Western colonization was aristotelian, commercial, anglo saxon as well as military.

So a Russia that used violence to first create property rights at the expense of creating a rent seeking class of statists was simply a necessary step in the evolution of a polity towards liberty. Thats what government is FOR: suppressing high transaction costs of free riding in exchange for the low transaction costs of rent seeking. But that interim statism is only helpful if then one suppresses rent seeking in ADDITION to free riding (what libertarians have got wrong by the way).

And without the further transition away from statist brutality, the people are merely prey to be expropriated from.

That is the difference between Friesian-anglo-saxon, propertarian, aristocratic egalitarianism’s total suppression of free riding, and every other political order constructed by man.