Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • A More Equal World : Thank The Anglos For Capitalism And For Dragging Humanity Out Of Ignorance And Poverty.

    Regarding: China poised to pass US as world’s leading economic power – FT.com

    –“When looking at the actual consumption per head, the report found the new methodology as well as faster growth in poor countries have “greatly reduced” the gap between rich and poor, “suggesting that the world has become more equal”. The world’s rich countries still account for 50 per cent of global GDP while containing only 17 per cent of the world’s population.”–

    [O]f course, no man is felt a hero to his debtors. The only measure of equality is consumption – the rest is investment and taxes. If we look at consumption per capita, rich western countries are far more equal than their ‘egalitarian’ counterparts. Because all that extra ‘wealth’ is merely the means of influencing the voluntary organization of production. It is ‘pressure’ not consumption. It’s not ‘real’ money that can be consumed. But getting human beings to understand that it is not consumable without likewise losing the ability to voluntarily organize production, is just beyond their comprehension. Rich countries are rich because they voluntarily organize very complex, highly rewarding production with little corruption at low risk. One may not think of the US military as an organizer of production. But both the UK Navy and the US postwar military are the defacto-organizers of world production. The question remains, that if the west ceases organizing voluntary production by meritocratic means, then what form of involuntary production by unmeritocratic means will prevail. History is not terribly comforting in this regard.

  • A More Equal World : Thank The Anglos For Capitalism And For Dragging Humanity Out Of Ignorance And Poverty.

    Regarding: China poised to pass US as world’s leading economic power – FT.com

    –“When looking at the actual consumption per head, the report found the new methodology as well as faster growth in poor countries have “greatly reduced” the gap between rich and poor, “suggesting that the world has become more equal”. The world’s rich countries still account for 50 per cent of global GDP while containing only 17 per cent of the world’s population.”–

    [O]f course, no man is felt a hero to his debtors. The only measure of equality is consumption – the rest is investment and taxes. If we look at consumption per capita, rich western countries are far more equal than their ‘egalitarian’ counterparts. Because all that extra ‘wealth’ is merely the means of influencing the voluntary organization of production. It is ‘pressure’ not consumption. It’s not ‘real’ money that can be consumed. But getting human beings to understand that it is not consumable without likewise losing the ability to voluntarily organize production, is just beyond their comprehension. Rich countries are rich because they voluntarily organize very complex, highly rewarding production with little corruption at low risk. One may not think of the US military as an organizer of production. But both the UK Navy and the US postwar military are the defacto-organizers of world production. The question remains, that if the west ceases organizing voluntary production by meritocratic means, then what form of involuntary production by unmeritocratic means will prevail. History is not terribly comforting in this regard.

  • winters arent enough

    http://feedly.com/k/Tl0XUECold winters arent enough.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 04:31:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-27/where-americas-immigrants-come

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-06 01:47:00 UTC

  • “THE WHITE FALLACY: THE ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY” You know, most of my criticism

    “THE WHITE FALLACY: THE ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY”

    You know, most of my criticisms are directed at the ridiculous beliefs of white people. I don’t blame others for their evolutionary strategy nearly as much as I blame my tribe for it’s vulnerability to the evolutionary strategies of others. Particularly when all that’s being acquired in exchange is short term status signals – the most hedonistic form of conspicuous consumption, by those undeserving of them.

    ON GOVERNMENT

    If you have an aristocratic pagan monarchy and judiciary that denies access to political power, leaving everyone with the necessity of participation in the market, plus rigid property rights including prohibitions on inbreeding and near-breeding, mandatory language adoption, universal standing, and pay-to-enforce rather than redistribution, and the requirement for operationalism in public speech, then I am not sure it matters what religions you rely upon.

    ON RELIGION

    Problem with christianity is it’s anti-rational, anti-tribal, and politically weak because it’s pacifist in its current state. Without the aristocracy to cooperate with the church, it is powerless. The Problem with islam is static knowledge, mystical dogma, anti-rationalism, inbreeding, and un-earned, mandatory respect. Problem with hinduism is mysticism, abandonment of reality and inbreeding. Problem with Buddhism is prescriptive inaction, detachment and inbreeding. Problem with judaism, is institutionalized deception via obscurantism, and parasitism. But regardless of these various verbal means of forcible indoctrination into a system of arbitrary cooperation – monarchy, paganism, property rights and scientific speech (operationalism) limit the damage that can be done by each of ALL of them.

    ON ENFORCEMENT

    The same goes for levels of impulsivity and violence. I am not convinced that the more impulsive tribes would not be better off constraining their own with violence rather than by incarceration, and less impulsive tribes better off constraining their own with ostracization and incarceration. We are unequal in both ability and incentives.

    “THE WHITE FALLACY: THE ARISTOCRACY OF EVERYBODY”

    This enlightenment fallacy that everyone can join the aristocracy is the source of as much suffering in the world as is the combined mysticism of the scriptural religions.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy.

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-04 11:38:00 UTC

  • ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS (truth, optimistic, po

    ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS

    (truth, optimistic, politically incorrect)

    —“The backbone of the race denial movement was a specific radical Jewish subculture that had become entirely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community by the early twentieth century—the subject of Chapters 2and 3 of The Culture of Critique (see also here). There is excellent evidence for their strong Jewish identifications, their concern with specific Jewish issues such as anti-Semitism, and for their hostility and sense of moral and intellectual superiority toward the traditional people and culture of America.Jonathan Marks is a contemporary example of this long and dishonorable tradition.”—

    Eh… Well, on one hand its true, and there isn’t anything novel about the argument – it’s central to the jewish enlightenment: how to use secular arguments to justify retention of jewish group evolutionary strategy. On the other hand, if a people, white people in this case, are susceptible to self-hatred, excessive gullibility, and universalism, I tend to blame the gullible not those trying to justify fitting into society.

    Whites have an exceptional evolutionary strategy: high trust universalism, cult of the warrior, organized arms, technology, conquest and colonization. This is an evolutionary strategy for a minority that must compete against wealthier and more numerous peoples. Decentralization is a very powerful force for competing against centralized societies better able to concentrate force. Conversely, Jews have traditionally relied upon a more parasitic rather than competitive or colonial strategy. These two strategies actually help one another because each group basically needs the other, because it avoids the specializations of the other.

    But we can’t deny that christians are responsible for predatory colonialism and jews for the promulgation of, and absurd success at, creating pseudosciences and pseudo moral arguments justifying parasitism.

    Just how is is. We whites shouldn’t be exporting war and colonization even if it drags people out of ignorance and poverty. And jews shouldn’t be propagating pseudosciences to justify their inclusion in society while retaining their parasitism. But we do. ‘Cause its been an evolutionary success to do so. And evolutionary success matters. You can criticize someone’s evolutionary success. If it’s guns, germs and steel, or if its pseudoscience and parasitism the difference is irrelevant. They’re both means of predation upon others.

    I tend to not deny the truth of our past actions, but to ask what we can do going forward to take advantage of our natural superiorities without parasitism and predation.

    Curt Doolittle

    (edited and reposted for archival purposes)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-03 15:52:00 UTC

  • Compatibilism: The Compatible Predatory Strategies of Whites and Jews

    ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS (truth, optimistic, politically incorrect) —“The backbone of the race denial movement was a specific radical Jewish subculture that had become entirely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community by the early twentieth century—the subject of Chapters 2and 3 of The Culture of Critique (see also here). There is excellent evidence for their strong Jewish identifications, their concern with specific Jewish issues such as anti-Semitism, and for their hostility and sense of moral and intellectual superiority toward the traditional people and culture of America.Jonathan Marks is a contemporary example of this long and dishonorable tradition.”— Eh… [W]ell, on one hand its true, and there isn’t anything novel about the argument – it’s central to the jewish enlightenment: how to use secular arguments to justify retention of jewish group evolutionary strategy. On the other hand, if a people, white people in this case, are susceptible to self-hatred, excessive gullibility, and universalism, I tend to blame the gullible not those trying to justify fitting into society. Whites have an exceptional evolutionary strategy: high trust universalism, cult of the warrior, organized arms, technology, conquest and colonization. This is an evolutionary strategy for a minority that must compete against wealthier and more numerous peoples. Decentralization is a very powerful force for competing against centralized societies better able to concentrate force. Conversely, Jews have traditionally relied upon a more parasitic rather than competitive or colonial strategy. These two strategies actually help one another because each group basically needs the other, because it avoids the specializations of the other. But we can’t deny that christians are responsible for predatory colonialism and jews for the promulgation of, and absurd success at, creating pseudosciences and pseudo moral arguments justifying parasitism. Just how is is. We whites shouldn’t be exporting war and colonization even if it drags people out of ignorance and poverty. And jews shouldn’t be propagating pseudosciences to justify their inclusion in society while retaining their parasitism. But we do. ‘Cause its been an evolutionary success to do so. And evolutionary success matters. You can criticize someone’s evolutionary success. If it’s guns, germs and steel, or if its pseudoscience and parasitism the difference is irrelevant. They’re both means of predation upon others. I tend to not deny the truth of our past actions, but to ask what we can do going forward to take advantage of our natural superiorities without parasitism and predation. Curt Doolittle (edited and reposted for archival purposes)

  • Compatibilism: The Compatible Predatory Strategies of Whites and Jews

    ON THE COMPATIBLE PREDATORY STRATEGIES OF WHITES AND JEWS (truth, optimistic, politically incorrect) —“The backbone of the race denial movement was a specific radical Jewish subculture that had become entirely within the mainstream of the American Jewish community by the early twentieth century—the subject of Chapters 2and 3 of The Culture of Critique (see also here). There is excellent evidence for their strong Jewish identifications, their concern with specific Jewish issues such as anti-Semitism, and for their hostility and sense of moral and intellectual superiority toward the traditional people and culture of America.Jonathan Marks is a contemporary example of this long and dishonorable tradition.”— Eh… [W]ell, on one hand its true, and there isn’t anything novel about the argument – it’s central to the jewish enlightenment: how to use secular arguments to justify retention of jewish group evolutionary strategy. On the other hand, if a people, white people in this case, are susceptible to self-hatred, excessive gullibility, and universalism, I tend to blame the gullible not those trying to justify fitting into society. Whites have an exceptional evolutionary strategy: high trust universalism, cult of the warrior, organized arms, technology, conquest and colonization. This is an evolutionary strategy for a minority that must compete against wealthier and more numerous peoples. Decentralization is a very powerful force for competing against centralized societies better able to concentrate force. Conversely, Jews have traditionally relied upon a more parasitic rather than competitive or colonial strategy. These two strategies actually help one another because each group basically needs the other, because it avoids the specializations of the other. But we can’t deny that christians are responsible for predatory colonialism and jews for the promulgation of, and absurd success at, creating pseudosciences and pseudo moral arguments justifying parasitism. Just how is is. We whites shouldn’t be exporting war and colonization even if it drags people out of ignorance and poverty. And jews shouldn’t be propagating pseudosciences to justify their inclusion in society while retaining their parasitism. But we do. ‘Cause its been an evolutionary success to do so. And evolutionary success matters. You can criticize someone’s evolutionary success. If it’s guns, germs and steel, or if its pseudoscience and parasitism the difference is irrelevant. They’re both means of predation upon others. I tend to not deny the truth of our past actions, but to ask what we can do going forward to take advantage of our natural superiorities without parasitism and predation. Curt Doolittle (edited and reposted for archival purposes)

  • HOW URBANITES DESTROY SOCIETY –“The mobs of great cities add just so much to th

    HOW URBANITES DESTROY SOCIETY

    –“The mobs of great cities add just so much to the support of pure government, as sores do to the strength of the human body. .. . I consider the class of artificers as the panderers of vice, and the instruments by which the liberties of a country are generally overturned.”– Jefferson

    Prophetic. And so why did he not structure a defense against them?

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-02 12:58:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080126210810/http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/001871.html

    Source date (UTC): 2014-06-02 11:14:00 UTC