Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

STarting off with the arab orgins in yemen which is afroasiatic and an IQ in the 70s, and intermingling with the north semitics (south eurasians) in the low 80s, and maximizing underclass reproduction, then add inbreding and you have a nightmare.

The europeans are criticised for it but they practiced eugenics since 700ad. No cousin marriage. Ability to rent Land before marriage and children. Late marriage. And aggressive hanging. By ythe late middle ages most of europe above the hajnal line (gremanic civ) was downward reproduction from the middle class. This is why expansion into america was possible – a genetic reserve.

Reply addressees: @Namastigger

Not quite true. Byzantium was a bridge civilization or what in the literature is called a “torn country” that was majority balkan and slavic instead of greco-anatolian or italo-celtic, or germanic european. The muslims are blamed for capturing (turks) byzantium and closing the ports to european trade. This is what forced the europeans to use their superior technology to create the age of sail, unite the world, make the silk road irrelevant and expose the backtwardness of the middle east politically, culturally, and certainly technologically. By the age of the Crusades, europeans had to teach levantines how to plow they were so far behind. The only reason europeans didn’t conquer the entire place is that they saw no value in it, compared to the benefits back home. (They were wrong). What we did get out of it was the Templars and banking that if Evil France had not hunted them down, would have been the bank of europe and advanced europe back even faster than it did after 1200.

Reply addressees: @AlhayekMaher

Where in europe are we going to put 150M white people? The white population of the USA and Russia are equal.