Curt Doolittle

Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology

  • “Director of the Russian Institute for Strategic Research Leonid Reshetnikov bel

    —“Director of the Russian Institute for Strategic Research Leonid Reshetnikov believes there is an attempt to eliminate Orthodoxy in Ukraine.”Ukrainism from the very start was an anti-Orthodox concept: it was directed not only against Russians, against Moskals (Moscovites – IF), it was directed against Orthodoxy.”—

    Not quite true.

    Ukrainian people will not forgive Russians for their present or past crimes against them.

    Nor will Russians apologize for their crimes against the people of eastern Europe and lessen Ukrainian anger over their impoverishment, deception, starvation, and murder. It is not in the Russian character to apologize for Russian crimes against humanity.

    Ukrainian people understand that the orthodox church has intentionally evolved into a propaganda and intelligence service for Moscow.

    Ukrainian people are increasingly skeptical of their church – partly because many orthodox priests act like little more than beggars in robes – and partly because they know that the priests can be bought by Moscow.

    My adopted ‘family’ here was raised Orthodox and goes to the catholic church. For the simple reason that the mass is full of love and personal encouragement rather than authority and promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-16 02:29:00 UTC

  • HOW WILL THE CURRENT ERA BE REMEMBERED? I am almost positive that the current er

    HOW WILL THE CURRENT ERA BE REMEMBERED?

    I am almost positive that the current era will be interpreted as a century long failed experiment, and that cognitive scientists and legal philosophers and anthropologists will obtain the credit for repairing it.

    Not that Austrians are wrong, but that their program was incomplete, cut off by the wars, and the need for reconstruction.

    And that Mises fundamental insight was misunderstood – not only by others but himself: moral criticism.

    Hayek was likely right in that the twentieth century will be considered an era of mysticism in the future. Mysticism meaning ‘pseudoscience’ today, for having relied upon aggregates alone rather than testing them with actions.

    But explaining why this is true is difficult.

    What we have been exploring is not so much economics but the addition of credit to the inventory of weapons of influence that can be used to govern a people.

    I am almost certain now that this is correct.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-15 07:15:00 UTC

  • A Very New Cut On Intellectual History

    (draft) [S]o Zoroastrianism was constructed to divide the Persians and indians who were both southern indo european peoples. Then the Talmud was constructed as a lie to justify retention of property after the end of the babylonian conquest. THE REVOLUTION The greeks invent reason, truth, science, politics for the management of people at scale. The Romans, seeing the ‘verbalism’ (immorality) of the greeks, resist greek idealism and embrace practical and empirical means. THE RESISTANCE BY DECEIT Then judaism evolved as a means by which to justify parasitism upon host civilizations while maintaining group cohesion. Then christianity was constructed as a rebellion against the empire, that had deprived primitive people of their local status signals. Then the bible was constructed to manage the hordes through false promise now that production by slavery was no longer possible. Then the koran was constructed to unite the tribes and conquer the peninsula (and then the exhausted Byzantines and Sassanids, and North Africa, and then Spain. ) THE FAILURES AT RESTORATION The Carolingians failed to construct an economic and political order. although the trade routes from Italy to the Netherlands and then to the north sea peoples created incremental organic evolution. The Templars created the legal and credit system and were destroyed by the authoritarian church who was their debtor. The Hansa recreated the legal, credit, and trade system. But were out-competed by the territorial powers that largely adopted their methods. The development of the new world and colonies allowed the financing of the transition of the west to economic modernity. (despite that there was little long term benefit to western nations, and strangely enough quite a considerable benefit to colonies depending upon who colonized them.) THE RESTORATION OF TRUTH Then the anglos responded with the enlightenment, empiricism, and the restoration of truth (science). The french responded with … rousseuan pseudoscience and pseudo morality, as a means of creating the terror, and attempting to unify all of europe under their despotism. The germans respond with restating christian mysticism as kantian rationalism. And create a new vehicle for obscurantism. The Jews responded by converting the hansa/templar system to their advantage in the territorial wars between Britain and France (Napoleonic wars) creating the Rothschild and consequent systems of order creation by using our own capital stock and lending it back to us. Westerners responded with the nation-state, an attempt to construct professional bureaucracy, the gold standard, empire and the industrial revolution. Most importantly, american constitution and it’s somewhat failed attempt at natural law expressed as a formal logic of cooperation. Jews responded with an attack on the academy and polity by creating the great pseudosciences: Boazian Sociology, Marxist Economics and Politics, Freudian Psychology. All of which were constructed to universalize separatist judaism or justify hosting jewish separatism despite it’s parasitisms. This merely taking the argumentatitve innovations of the french and germans combining them with the same obscurantist ‘preaching’ technique used to distribute Christianity, except now using the power of the printing press. BRANCH : We branch now into various evolutions upon this new religion – faster innovation in the technologies of truth and falsehood. Branch 1 – Jewish Then the second wave: Popperian philsophy, Misesian Economics, Randian/Rothbardian Libertinism. (the half-failure/half-success) Then the third wave: straussian neo-conservativsm and expansionary militarism of the ‘new rome’. (the madness of power) Branch 2 – Neo Puritan Then the adoption of Keyneisan Economics as the new innumerate pseudoscience. and Rawlsian Ethics as the pseudo morality. Then the adoption of postmodern philosophy in academia. THE FAILED REACTION Mises in economics, Brouwer in Mathematics, Bridgman in Physics (science), Popper in philosophy, A HOST of authors in Law. And a total catastrophic absence in Politics since majoritarianism was still influential everywhere. RESTORATION: Science catches up with the deceit and starts to disprove it. The various cognitive scientists, and neurologists, are largely responsible for our reframing of jewish monopoly conformity to western distribution of talents and abilities. EO Wilson states that a synthesis of biology, morality, politics and economics – all the sciences – should be possible. Archaeologists and historians and evolutionary biologists in our social orders. Haidt, the empirical psychologists, and the anthropologists in the evolution of cooperation. SYNTHESIS Doolittle in Economics, Politics, Ethics, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology and Metaphysics. In retrospect this is my view of the evolution of history as a competition between the different european tribes, most of which practice morality and one of which practices immorality. And the reason being that if we hold land we can construct moral rules because we must in order to create the commons of land holding. A parasitic people that does not need or cannot hold land need not create commons because they can use the host’s. THE CENTRAL SUBJECT OF OUR DISCOURSE MUST BE THE COMMONS NOT THE INDIVIDUAL. Law is for individuals. Individuals must be able to act in their interests, limited by the prohibition on parasitism. But policy must exist for the production of commons that perpetuates the family, kin, tribe, and nation, or else it is just a lie to justify conquest. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • A Very New Cut On Intellectual History

    (draft) [S]o Zoroastrianism was constructed to divide the Persians and indians who were both southern indo european peoples. Then the Talmud was constructed as a lie to justify retention of property after the end of the babylonian conquest. THE REVOLUTION The greeks invent reason, truth, science, politics for the management of people at scale. The Romans, seeing the ‘verbalism’ (immorality) of the greeks, resist greek idealism and embrace practical and empirical means. THE RESISTANCE BY DECEIT Then judaism evolved as a means by which to justify parasitism upon host civilizations while maintaining group cohesion. Then christianity was constructed as a rebellion against the empire, that had deprived primitive people of their local status signals. Then the bible was constructed to manage the hordes through false promise now that production by slavery was no longer possible. Then the koran was constructed to unite the tribes and conquer the peninsula (and then the exhausted Byzantines and Sassanids, and North Africa, and then Spain. ) THE FAILURES AT RESTORATION The Carolingians failed to construct an economic and political order. although the trade routes from Italy to the Netherlands and then to the north sea peoples created incremental organic evolution. The Templars created the legal and credit system and were destroyed by the authoritarian church who was their debtor. The Hansa recreated the legal, credit, and trade system. But were out-competed by the territorial powers that largely adopted their methods. The development of the new world and colonies allowed the financing of the transition of the west to economic modernity. (despite that there was little long term benefit to western nations, and strangely enough quite a considerable benefit to colonies depending upon who colonized them.) THE RESTORATION OF TRUTH Then the anglos responded with the enlightenment, empiricism, and the restoration of truth (science). The french responded with … rousseuan pseudoscience and pseudo morality, as a means of creating the terror, and attempting to unify all of europe under their despotism. The germans respond with restating christian mysticism as kantian rationalism. And create a new vehicle for obscurantism. The Jews responded by converting the hansa/templar system to their advantage in the territorial wars between Britain and France (Napoleonic wars) creating the Rothschild and consequent systems of order creation by using our own capital stock and lending it back to us. Westerners responded with the nation-state, an attempt to construct professional bureaucracy, the gold standard, empire and the industrial revolution. Most importantly, american constitution and it’s somewhat failed attempt at natural law expressed as a formal logic of cooperation. Jews responded with an attack on the academy and polity by creating the great pseudosciences: Boazian Sociology, Marxist Economics and Politics, Freudian Psychology. All of which were constructed to universalize separatist judaism or justify hosting jewish separatism despite it’s parasitisms. This merely taking the argumentatitve innovations of the french and germans combining them with the same obscurantist ‘preaching’ technique used to distribute Christianity, except now using the power of the printing press. BRANCH : We branch now into various evolutions upon this new religion – faster innovation in the technologies of truth and falsehood. Branch 1 – Jewish Then the second wave: Popperian philsophy, Misesian Economics, Randian/Rothbardian Libertinism. (the half-failure/half-success) Then the third wave: straussian neo-conservativsm and expansionary militarism of the ‘new rome’. (the madness of power) Branch 2 – Neo Puritan Then the adoption of Keyneisan Economics as the new innumerate pseudoscience. and Rawlsian Ethics as the pseudo morality. Then the adoption of postmodern philosophy in academia. THE FAILED REACTION Mises in economics, Brouwer in Mathematics, Bridgman in Physics (science), Popper in philosophy, A HOST of authors in Law. And a total catastrophic absence in Politics since majoritarianism was still influential everywhere. RESTORATION: Science catches up with the deceit and starts to disprove it. The various cognitive scientists, and neurologists, are largely responsible for our reframing of jewish monopoly conformity to western distribution of talents and abilities. EO Wilson states that a synthesis of biology, morality, politics and economics – all the sciences – should be possible. Archaeologists and historians and evolutionary biologists in our social orders. Haidt, the empirical psychologists, and the anthropologists in the evolution of cooperation. SYNTHESIS Doolittle in Economics, Politics, Ethics, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology and Metaphysics. In retrospect this is my view of the evolution of history as a competition between the different european tribes, most of which practice morality and one of which practices immorality. And the reason being that if we hold land we can construct moral rules because we must in order to create the commons of land holding. A parasitic people that does not need or cannot hold land need not create commons because they can use the host’s. THE CENTRAL SUBJECT OF OUR DISCOURSE MUST BE THE COMMONS NOT THE INDIVIDUAL. Law is for individuals. Individuals must be able to act in their interests, limited by the prohibition on parasitism. But policy must exist for the production of commons that perpetuates the family, kin, tribe, and nation, or else it is just a lie to justify conquest. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • OK NEW CUT ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY (draft) So Zoroastrianism was constructed to

    OK NEW CUT ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY

    (draft)

    So Zoroastrianism was constructed to divide the Persians and indians who were both southern indo european peoples.

    Then the Talmud was constructed as a lie to justify retention of property after the end of the babylonian conquest.

    THE REVOLUTION

    The greeks invent reason, truth, science, politics for the management of people at scale.

    The Romans, seeing the ‘verbalism’ (immorality) of the greeks, resist greek idealism and embrace practical and empirical means.

    THE RESISTANCE BY DECEIT

    Then judaism evolved as a means by which to justify parasitism upon host civilizations while maintaining group cohesion.

    Then christianity was constructed as a rebellion against the empire, that had deprived primitive people of their local status signals.

    Then the bible was constructed to manage the hordes through false promise now that production by slavery was no longer possible.

    Then the koran was constructed to unite the tribes and conquer the peninsula (and then the exhausted Byzantines and Sassanids, and North Africa, and then Spain. )

    THE FAILURES AT RESTORATION

    The Carolingians failed to construct an economic and political order. although the trade routes from Italy to the Netherlands and then to the north sea peoples created incremental organic evolution.

    The Templars created the legal and credit system and were destroyed by the authoritarian church who was their debtor.

    The Hansa recreated the legal, credit, and trade system. But were out-competed by the territorial powers that largely adopted their methods.

    The development of the new world and colonies allowed the financing of the transition of the west to economic modernity. (despite that there was little long term benefit to western nations, and strangely enough quite a considerable benefit to colonies depending upon who colonized them.)

    THE RESTORATION OF TRUTH

    Then the anglos responded with the enlightenment, empiricism, and the restoration of truth (science).

    The french responded with … rousseuan pseudoscience and pseudo morality, as a means of creating the terror, and attempting to unify all of europe under their despotism.

    The germans respond with restating christian mysticism as kantian rationalism. And create a new vehicle for obscurantism.

    The Jews responded by converting the hansa/templar system to their advantage in the territorial wars between Britain and France (Napoleonic wars) creating the Rothschild and consequent systems of order creation by using our own capital stock and lending it back to us.

    Westerners responded with the nation-state, an attempt to construct professional bureaucracy, the gold standard, empire and the industrial revolution. Most importantly, american constitution and it’s somewhat failed attempt at natural law expressed as a formal logic of cooperation.

    Jews responded with an attack on the academy and polity by creating the great pseudosciences: Boazian Sociology, Marxist Economics and Politics, Freudian Psychology. All of which were constructed to universalize separatist judaism or justify hosting jewish separatism despite it’s parasitisms. This merely taking the argumentatitve innovations of the french and germans combining them with the same obscurantist ‘preaching’ technique used to distribute Christianity, except now using the power of the printing press.

    BRANCH : We branch now into various evolutions upon this new religion – faster innovation in the technologies of truth and falsehood.

    Branch 1 – Jewish

    Then the second wave: Popperian philsophy, Misesian Economics, Randian/Rothbardian Libertinism. (the half-failure/half-success)

    Then the third wave: straussian neo-conservativsm and expansionary militarism of the ‘new rome’. (the madness of power)

    Branch 2 – Neo Puritan

    Then the adoption of Keyneisan Economics as the new innumerate pseudoscience. and Rawlsian Ethics as the pseudo morality.

    Then the adoption of postmodern philosophy in academia.

    THE FAILED REACTION

    Mises in economics, Brouwer in Mathematics, Bridgman in Physics (science), Popper in philosophy, A HOST of authors in Law. And a total catastrophic absence in Politics since majoritarianism was still influential everywhere.

    RESTORATION: Science catches up with the deceit and starts to disprove it.

    The various cognitive scientists, and neurologists, are largely responsible for our reframing of jewish monopoly conformity to western distribution of talents and abilities.

    EO Wilson states that a synthesis of biology, morality, politics and economics – all the sciences – should be possible.

    Archaeologists and historians and evolutionary biologists in our social orders.

    Haidt, the empirical psychologists, and the anthropologists in the evolution of cooperation.

    SYNTHESIS

    Doolittle in Economics, Politics, Ethics, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology and Metaphysics.

    In retrospect this is my view of the evolution of history as a competition between the different european tribes, most of which practice morality and one of which practices immorality. And the reason being that if we hold land we can construct moral rules because we must in order to create the commons of land holding. A parasitic people that does not need or cannot hold land need not create commons because they can use the host’s.

    THE CENTRAL SUBJECT OF OUR DISCOURSE MUST BE THE COMMONS NOT THE INDIVIDUAL.

    Law is for individuals. Individuals must be able to act in their interests, limited by the prohibition on parasitism.

    But policy must exist for the production of commons that perpetuates the family, kin, tribe, and nation, or else it is just a lie to justiy conquest.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 05:48:00 UTC

  • ***NAP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retal

    ***NAP was employed by separatists to attempt to assert that out-group non-retaliation was a rule for in-group cooperation.*** Jewish law, culture, and religion attempt to preserve separatism so that they gain the benefits of the host’s commons production, without paying for the normative commons. Just as Gypsies do, but gypsies keep the cost low enough, and appeal to our altruism enough, that the cost of extermination is more than we are willing to pay. Jews do not limit their parasitism, and perform it largely through externality or deception, and this is why they are, over the centuries, repeatedly retaliated against: because the cost has become high enough that hosts must.****

    This is not unknown since jewish authors discuss this problem openly.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 01:30:00 UTC

  • VIOLENCE AS CULTURAL EXPRESSION Subtle cultural difference in cultural policing.

    VIOLENCE AS CULTURAL EXPRESSION

    Subtle cultural difference in cultural policing.

    – Muslims (arabs) tend to strike and run (anonymous)

    – Black Americans tend to sucker punch you then stomp you. (anonymous)

    – Russians tend to hit you fast and early and hard. (individual)

    – Americans tend to hit you after giving you every opportunity. (individual)

    – Ukrainians tend to remove you then hit you if its useful and necessary (group).

    – Chinese tend to accumulate vast forces and then do what they want (collective) knowing that you have no choice.

    I don’t know why I never noticed this before but it’s a wonderful way to examine cultural norms.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-12 06:00:00 UTC

  • Santagata: Love and Understanding

    [L]ove;

    I love my family… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my nation… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my DNA, my genes, my race… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. Love cannot create hate. But hate and haters can and always do blame love and lovers for problems of the world.

  • Santagata: Love and Understanding

    [L]ove;

    I love my family… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my nation… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. I love my DNA, my genes, my race… Which doesn’t mean I hate yours. It means I understand why you love yours. Love cannot create hate. But hate and haters can and always do blame love and lovers for problems of the world.

  • Eli Harman on Our (Women’s) Lack Of Ethno-Centrism

    —“And another feature of Western peoples is low ethnocentrism, because normative outbreeding and the prohibition on inbreeding mixed up the tribes and clans, creating homogenous outbred populations that can universalize kinship trust. This also was a competitive advanatage. White people form the largest ingroups. But we have a tendency to simply assume everyone is ingroup, and treat them accordingly, because in the past, that generally would have been the case. So those features have been hacked, by hostile aliens, who have convinced many of us we can gain status, and signal enlightenment and sophistication, by incessantly attacking our own, for the benefit of outgroup parasites who are unwilling or unable to reciprocate the kinship trust, or kinship altruism, that we extend them.”—-Eli Harman