The struggle against aristocracy is reducible, to the struggle against meritocracy, and the struggle against meritocracy is reducible, to the struggle against eugenics, and the struggle against eugenics is reducible, to the struggle against evolution.
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
Want to reiterate. That as far as I can tell white people discovered truth for e
Want to reiterate. That as far as I can tell white people discovered truth for environmental reasons. The were superior at warfare for the same reasons. And white people were more successful at eugenic reproduction because of environment warfare and truth.
In this sense we are just less bad as a group than most others. Primarily because we have eliminated more of our bad folk.
An achievement we have rapidly reversed.
As far as I know no race or tribe is prohibited from transcendence. If every group practiced eugenic reproduction for a few centuries they would progress as well.
Why? Be cause the best of us cannot compensate for the worst of us.
This is fairly obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-20 12:42:00 UTC
-
Notes Andrew Fraser – “The Wasp Question” Britan, Canada, America, Austrailia, N
Notes Andrew Fraser – “The Wasp Question”
Britan, Canada, America, Austrailia, New Zeland.
Anglo saxons from kinship to contractualism upon movement to england.
The cult of the constitution constitutes the american identity.
The contractual empirical people.
The First Federal Republic (the initial)
The Second Bourgeoise Republic (equality)
The Third Managerial Republic (fraternity)
The Fourth TransNational Republic (diversity)
CURT SAYS
The struggle against the aristocracy.
The struggle against aristocracy is reducible,
to the struggle against meritocracy,
and the struggle against meritocracy is reducible,
to the struggle against eugenics,
and the struggle against eugenics is reducible,
to the struggle against evolution.
Transcendence.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-19 16:37:00 UTC
-
WE’VE BEEN FOCUSED ON THE WRONG INSTITUTION (important piece) Group evolution is
WE’VE BEEN FOCUSED ON THE WRONG INSTITUTION
(important piece)
Group evolution is not a matter of specialization, of but the addition of layers of competency in increasingly abstract techniques.
One cannot abandon the militia for the state.
One cannot abandon rule of law for market expansion.
One cannot abandon land holding for the commercial universalism..
The milita must exist hold the territory and limit the law.
The Law must exist to hold the nation and limit commerce.
The Church must exist to hold the mythos and
The state- that which we call government – is a temporary organization for the purpose of producing temporal commons.
And that is all. it is a purely utilitarian entity with short term objectives.
We are focused on the wrong institutions. Government does not matter. Church, law, and militia do.
Church, and family.
Law and Nation.
Militia and Land
THUS ENDETH THE LESSON.
WE START WITH THE CHURCHES.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-19 08:35:00 UTC
-
(Important piece) The British on their isle and colonies, and the Jews in their
(Important piece)
The British on their isle and colonies, and the Jews in their ghettos and borderlands had the same incentives: protected from the east by the Teutons they could embrace the commercial and universal as ultimately decideable good rather than territory and nation as ultimately decideable good, and abandon inter temporality that is necessary for the retention of independence.
Disraeli transformed the emergent empire from Aryan territorial to Jewish commercial.
But the British made this change out of ignorance and greed – not knowing what consequence would arise from their overconfidence.
We see Spencer as his era’s Burke.
And the attempted restoration of the west and rescue from the commercial curse in the German rise.
Had not Germanic Americans misunderstood this conflict, Europa would have been saved.
We are always wrong you know.
The Anglos like the Jews are always wrong.
Always.
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-19 05:33:00 UTC
-
Islands and Ghettos
(Important piece) The British on their isle and colonies, and the Jews in their ghettos and borderlands had the same incentives: protected from the east by the Teutons they could embrace the commercial and universal as ultimately decideable good rather than territory and nation as ultimately decideable good, and abandon inter temporality that is necessary for the retention of independence. Disraeli transformed the emergent empire from Aryan territorial to Jewish commercial.
But the British made this change out of ignorance and greed – not knowing what consequence would arise from their overconfidence. We see Spencer as his era’s Burke. And the attempted restoration of the west and rescue from the commercial curse in the German rise. Had not Germanic Americans misunderstood this conflict, Europa would have been saved. We are always wrong you know. The Anglos like the Jews are always wrong. Always. -
Islands and Ghettos
(Important piece) The British on their isle and colonies, and the Jews in their ghettos and borderlands had the same incentives: protected from the east by the Teutons they could embrace the commercial and universal as ultimately decideable good rather than territory and nation as ultimately decideable good, and abandon inter temporality that is necessary for the retention of independence. Disraeli transformed the emergent empire from Aryan territorial to Jewish commercial.
But the British made this change out of ignorance and greed – not knowing what consequence would arise from their overconfidence. We see Spencer as his era’s Burke. And the attempted restoration of the west and rescue from the commercial curse in the German rise. Had not Germanic Americans misunderstood this conflict, Europa would have been saved. We are always wrong you know. The Anglos like the Jews are always wrong. Always. -
Clausewitz was wrong.Read Keegan’s History of war/Van Creveld’s Culture of war/L
Clausewitz was wrong.Read Keegan’s History of war/Van Creveld’s Culture of war/Lind’s 4th Gen-Warfare
Source date (UTC): 2016-06-11 07:27:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/741532198814289920
Reply addressees: @durblud @neon_shadows @areyousurebruv
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/741519701952593920
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/741519701952593920
-
Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races
Working theory: PROBLEM Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group. VALUE Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions. SPECIATION Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races. THEREFORE1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal. …a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism …b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) …c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) (Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher)) (jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity) …d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains. …e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits) 2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses. …a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad) …b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad). …c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad) …d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad) …e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage. …f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features. …g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses. 3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution. …a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive. …b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children …a) Sacrificing the undesirable. …b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal. …c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence) …b) War in all its historical versions. This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits. THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN? We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses. UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism. We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also). IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.
-
Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races
Working theory: PROBLEM Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group. VALUE Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions. SPECIATION Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races. THEREFORE1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal. …a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism …b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) …c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) (Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher)) (jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity) …d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains. …e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits) 2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses. …a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad) …b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad). …c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad) …d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad) …e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage. …f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features. …g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses. 3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution. …a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive. …b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children …a) Sacrificing the undesirable. …b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal. …c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence) …b) War in all its historical versions. This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits. THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN? We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses. UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism. We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also). IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.