RT @ianbremmer: map of the day:
50% of canadians live below this line https://t.co/L6JWgmmDuh

Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 11:19:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714602084694159603

RT @ianbremmer: map of the day:
50% of canadians live below this line https://t.co/L6JWgmmDuh

Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 11:19:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714602084694159603
SWISS/ENGLISH FLAG vs TEMPLAR CROSS
Technically it’s (a) the st george’s cross with straight arms (b) the templar cross has arms that flare out at the ends.
While the templar cross appeard first in the 1100s and the st George’s cross later in the 12-1300s, the presumption is (I haven’t really dug into the background) that they have a common origin or common inspiration.
They are however, fundamentally, catholic crusader sysmbols that maintain the symbolism of “warriors of christendom’.
In other words even though the two crosses have slightly different crusader origins, they originate with the same sentiment. Sort of the american flag vs the british flag.
Today the St George’s cross remains the flag of england, is used in one way or another by multiple countries, and remains a symbol of christendom.
Which is precisely why middle easterners don’t like it. It’s evidence of their previous greek, roman, continental (french), anglo, and now american conquests of their region on one hand, but finding nothing worth colonizing there are evidence of the failure of their civilization to do other than create a religoin that organizes a clannish, tribalistic, low trust, low average iq, superstitioius population with limited emotional regulation, that’s easily prone to barbaric violence.
Reply addressees: @MeinKapitan
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 17:57:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714339964979118080
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714323471646539824
RT @whatifalthist: There are two arguments I throw at people to see if they’re honest
1)If every major culture in history believes the same…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 01:54:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714097533151002917
–“Q: WHY THE ASHKENAZI NOBEL PRIZE NUMBERS?”–
Research has been done. Always comes out the same.
To begin with, a lot of prizes were contentious. Look up nobel prize controversies. These prizes are not ‘certifications’ we think they are. You will learn more from the list of controversies than you will from the list of prizes and prize winners.
As for jewish Nobel Prize winners.
1) Many are of obvious merit. Einstein even deserved more than he recieved but his work was later proven by others. Borh is have jewish and I have serious criticisms of some of the nonsense he has stated and the harm it’s done but his math is at least correct.
2) Most prizes in general are immatieral (seriously, in general.)
3) There is a ‘promoter’ effect in who gets the award and of course they are always and everywhere performing nepotism regardless of merit (once you see it its actually annoying). The technique is called ‘heaping undue praise’ and again it’s a female behavior applied to male domain which is why we aren’t good at suppressing it yet.
Even with these criticisms, it appears that at least in physics and possibly chemistry, many of the awards are deserved. And jewish culture has been using high investment parenting in education for non-manual careers for over two thousand years, so selection has done it’s job.
I’m not so interestedin jewish IQ claims, what I’m interested in is the distribution which appeas to have a wider SD, producing more outliers above 140 with the female ability to utilize verbal acuity and carry a verbal workload.
Unfortunately ashkenazim also dominate the production of pseudosciences in every singe field to the degree that it’s almost bizarre that it’s continued this long – precisely becaue of the pictoral-verbal bias of the cognitiely feminine.
How to Think About The Ashkenazim
So it’s better to think of the Ashkenazim like say, the Dutch, or Austrians (or Hungarians), as a small country that focuses heavily on education and produces a dispropotionate number of scholars, sciencde, tech, and industry per capita
Compare Israel to The Netherlands (apples to apples):
Netherlands
Compare with 18M people in the netherlands with 16,000 square miles of north sea coastal territory. producing a GDP of US$991 billion (about $1T) and it’s Per capita GDP US$72,973.
Israel
Israel only has 7.1M jews in 10,241 square miles (the other 25% are arabs and mixed races)
producing GDP of US$564 billion and
GDP per capita at US$58,270(astounding).
Making israel a wealthy country.
Jews In The USA
The number of jews in the states is about 11M of various degrees of observance. No way to separate out their per capita GDP.
Israeli + American Jews (over 80% of jews)
If American jews moved to israel, that would mean a total jewish population of 18M people, in 10,241 square miles of mediterranean coastal (trade port) territory. Even assuming the GDP per capita remained the same (it would go up becaues of the benefits of scale) it would be, on the order of $1T (about the same as the netherlands).
The difference is that the netherlands is competing with the other most advanced countries in the world, and israel is competing with neighbors whose GDP is an average of US$ 6,610 – absolute poverty.
Israel is already a “regional superpower” militarily, economically, politically, scientifically, technically. And the arab world needs what israel is bringing to it if it is ever to escape it’s ignorance and poverty.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @innnspace @madmikeross @FarajRashi93307 @TheAutistocrat
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:42:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714018998126325760
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714006311237734838
–“Q: Why does the feminine-jewish-muslim-marxist strategy work so effectively against the west vs the rest?”–
They’re exploiting a weakness in western civilization that is a byproduct of our mandate of individual sovereignty and responsibility. Meaning our civilization does not defend against baiting into hazard like all other civilizations do. In the end ‘its your choice, and you bear the responsibility”. The difference is our people don’t practice baiting into hazard because of ancient traditions and assumptions I won’t go into here for the sake of brevity.
No other civilization tolerates this – at least in terms of money and interest – and islam in particular is brutal about it precisely because it’s been a problem for them in the past.
So they have successfully exploited this vulnerability. All we would have to do is extend the definition of fraud to cover baitings into hazard, on one end, and rent seeking on the other. And while it’s technical it’s not difficult.
You don’t need to understand the tehcnicalities of the law or the criteria for those judgements you only need to undrsteand that we’ve done that work, it’s rock solid, and you would NOT BELIEVE how many of our problems today are the result of NOT suppressing baiting into hazard, and women’s claims of oppression as a means of evading responsibilty for the commons.
Reply addressees: @DanielB02277937 @billionsmustliv
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:49:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714005775343898624
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003748500963627
RT @curtdoolittle: @billionsmustliv –“Q: whats the difference between jews and euros at math”–
Excellences: Ashkenazi (not just jewish)…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:40:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714003340185452879
We have a wondrful want to be left alone – they have a disturbing want to not leave others alone. As most sophisticated conservative rabbis will tell you, if jews ‘did not intrefere with their hosts’ they would be fine.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:57:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713947183618142689
Reply addressees: @Agkistrodon14
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713944929729118715
–“Q: whats the difference between jews and euros at math”–
Excellences: Ashkenazi (not just jewish) verbal acuity, eastern systemic acuity, and european western equilibrium between them. The reasons for western inventiveness are something that’s been studied and I think we have a handle on it as genetics AND traditions.
CAUSALITY
Female empathic-verbal-pictoral(static),
vs
Male physical-systemic-modeling (over time)
In other words women and jews see math as language and european men see math as measurement of things.
It’s why we are still finding some very smart women, they are not innovative or as are men. Their insights are generally empirical(experiential) not theoretical (systems over time)
Yes that’s a simplification to first principles but you will find there are no exceptions.
Reply addressees: @billionsmustliv
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:48:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713944970246168577
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713942266916823148
For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality for The Prosecution of the Jews
Paul Johnson, from whom I took a great deal of early insight, does not go into the reasons the Jews were prosecuted, and it was always and everywhere with good reason.
They were the ‘undesirables’ when egypt conquered the region. Egypt acted as all empires do – either relocating peopl from different regions to help in administration, or by finding locals tribes who are outcast – neither of which is easily bribed by the locals. This is the origin of jewish accountancy and literacy.
While Jesus tried to illustrate the problem with his outrage, it requires an economist to explain why he was demanding an end to parasitism upon the people, baiting into hazard, at the top, and pettiness and selfishness from those. at the bottom.
The Romans allowed local law and custom as long as it did not contradict limited roman law – and a demonstration of loyalty by sacrifice (the ancient world’s form of symbolic taxation). The jews were a competent people by this time, and (rationally) resisted rome – but in the end, the countryside was depopulated, jews forbidden access to Jerusalem, and The Jewish sect we call Christian religion gained legitimacy.
Upon the diaspora jews used these same tools, and continued the same practice they’d learned from the Egyptians: (a) alliance with the state against the people paricularly in tax collection (b) usurious interst ‘bating into hazard” usually over 300%, (why they were prohibited property – so they couldn’t bait and seize it), (c) slaving (d) selling gambling, prositution, alcohol on credit (baiting into hazard) (e) using these gains to influence the state, or gain competitive advantage against the locals, (think how big box stores killed downtowns and local business), (f) always and everywhere undermining local morality by the above means, by profiting from baiting the locals (farmers) into hazards.
In other words they profited from immorality simply because ther was a shortage of hard currency. And while europe replaced them with the more moral version in the Templars, the french (always the enemy of europe) allied with the pope to kill off the templars (why we celebrate Friday the 13th – the killing of the templars), because the french king was so endebted to them, and the pope was a family member of the french king. Unfortunately, while the french king escaped paying his debt to the templars, and the Templars were replaced by the Jews again, the papacy and the monarchy both discovered that the money didn’ exist in a dragon’s horde, or great safe, because it was all lent out earning interset. Today Switzerland is what’s left of the Templars.
The solution to the behavior of the jews (contrary to the beliefs of libertarians and conservatives) was fiat money, and state banks, and state provision of consumer credit – and now requires only the extension of the criteria for fraud into baitings into hazard – which is (the consumers don’t understand) the reason for consumer dissatisfaction with business, industry, banking, credit, and advertising.
Can we also end Jewish supremacy, pseudoscience, an undermining by legal suppression of moral and monetary baiting into hazard, using ill gotten gains to scale it – into the prohibition on their invention of a series of new religions (the marxist sequence, libertarianism, leninism(hillary clinton) and neoconservatism) using the female method of seduction into the false promise of freedom from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection? Of course we can. It’s just an extension of fraud in commerce to fraud in politics and religion.
So it’s rather easy to end the conflict with the jews by ending the viability of the jewish group strategy (which is just the female stratgy against males) that’s thousands of years old, and forcing them into legitimate businesses, where they must engag ein production rather than parasitism, undermining, and political and religious fraud.
Do people know they do evil? No. We all justify what works. That’s what civilizations do. We all do it. But we can also all stop it.
If we know how.
And we do.
Curt Doolittle,
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:27:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713939631413059584
RL: This is why I love you man. 😉 I love your soul.
For Those Who Are Less Forgiving, Here’s The Causality.
Paul Johnson, from whom I took a great deal of early insight, does not go into the reasons the Jews were prosecuted, and it was always and everywhere with good reason.
They were the ‘undesirables’ when egypt conquered the region. Egypt acted as all empires do – either relocating peopl from different regions to help in administration, or by finding locals tribes who are outcast – neither of which is easily bribed by the locals. This is the origin of jewish accountancy and literacy.
While Jesus tried to illustrate the problem with his outrage, it requires an economist to explain why he was demanding an end to parasitism upon the people, baiting into hazard, at the top, and pettiness and selfishness from those. at the bottom.
The Romans allowed local law and custom as long as it did not contradict limited roman law – and a demonstration of loyalty by sacrifice (the ancient world’s form of symbolic taxation). The jews were a competent people by this time, and (rationally) resisted rome – but in the end, the countryside was depopulated, jews forbidden access to Jerusalem, and The Jewish sect we call Christian religion gained legitimacy.
Upon the diaspora jews used these same tools, and continued the same practice they’d learned from the Egyptians: (a) alliance with the state against the people paricularly in tax collection (b) usurious interst ‘bating into hazard” usually over 300%, (why they were prohibited property – so they couldn’t bait and seize it), (c) slaving (d) selling gambling, prositution, alcohol on credit (baiting into hazard) (e) using these gains to influence the state, or gain competitive advantage against the locals, (think how big box stores killed downtowns and local business), (f) always and everywhere undermining local morality by the above means, by profiting from baiting the locals (farmers) into hazards.
In other words they profited from immorality simply because ther was a shortage of hard currency. And while europe replaced them with the more moral version in the Templars, the french (always the enemy of europe) allied with the pope to kill off the templars (why we celebrate Friday the 13th – the killing of the templars), because the french king was so endebted to them, and the pope was a family member of the french king. Unfortunately, while the french king escaped paying his debt to the templars, and the Templars were replaced by the Jews again, the papacy and the monarchy both discovered that the money didn’ exist in a dragon’s horde, or great safe, because it was all lent out earning interset. Today Switzerland is what’s left of the Templars.
The solution to the behavior of the jews (contrary to the beliefs of libertarians and conservatives) was fiat money, and state banks, and state provision of consumer credit – and now requires only the extension of the criteria for fraud into baitings into hazard – which is (the consumers don’t understand) the reason for consumer dissatisfaction with business, industry, banking, credit, and advertising.
Can we also end Jewish supremacy, pseudoscience, an undermining by legal suppression of moral and monetary baiting into hazard, using ill gotten gains to scale it – into the prohibition on their invention of a series of new religions (the marxist sequence, libertarianism, leninism(hillary clinton) and neoconservatism) using the female method of seduction into the false promise of freedom from the laws of scarcity, human behavior, and natural selection? Of course we can. It’s just an extension of fraud in commerce to fraud in politics and religion.
So it’s rather easy to end the conflict with the jews by ending the viability of the jewish group strategy (which is just the female stratgy against males) that’s thousands of years old, and forcing them into legitimate businesses, where they must engag ein production rather than parasitism, undermining, and political and religious fraud.
Do people know they do evil? No. We all justify what works. That’s what civilizations do. We all do it. But we can also all stop it.
If we know how.
And we do.
Curt Doolittle,
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 15:26:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713939520381440000
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713763421206831325