america is, believe it or not, despite teh propaganda, the least racist country other than canada.
https://www.quora.com/Is-America-the-most-racist-western-country
america is, believe it or not, despite teh propaganda, the least racist country other than canada.
https://www.quora.com/Is-America-the-most-racist-western-country
If I told you the correct answer I’d probably be banned for ‘unpleasant but true speech’, but
1) it has a significant genetic component,
2) as well as demographic,
3) as well as cultural .
But let’s say it always has been this way.
If I ask you to look up IQ by country. And then ask you to look up literacy by country. And then look up the number of books translated in that country. And then look up academic publications by country. And then if I ask you to look up the IQ demographics for religious, moral, legal, western-philosophical, and scientific classes. And then ask you to look up the content of the language, laws, narratives, and marital structures.
What you can’t (readily) look up is the distribution of (psychotic)female-to-male(autistic) brain structures and therefore personality traits by IQ, Nation, Race, Subrace, and Class. What is harder to look up is the degree of neoteny or its reversal by race and subrace. And it’s somewhat difficult to look up how neoteny or its opposite, can work in both male and female directions. Because it will take you months to put together all the research from all the different sources.
And what you might find is that:
a) small things in large numbers make vast differences.
b) that IQ and industriousness pretty much produce deterministic distributions.
c) countries have to govern for the middle of the population and the further than number is below IQ105 the worse it gets.
d) The underclasses (below 105) are 5 to 6 times as costly as the upper classes are productive(above 120), and are an outright burden as the number decreases.
e) That the middle east has the worst of all conditions, which is high population density of many competing tribes with high genetic ‘clannishness’ through centuries of inbreeding, as well as pervasive poverty, as well as centuries of ignorance, a justification of ignorance, the habituation of impulsiveness, none to little concept of objective scientific truth as we understand it, a primitive poetic language lacking operational grammar and semantics.
Just how it is.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-middle-east-so-mystic
East Asians evolved from an earlier fork of Africans than Europeans. Africa still contains both almond eyed and round eyed genetic groups. And we can clearly trace east asian genetic development. (Unfortunately, the romans failed to build the wall the chinese built to keep out the steppe-desert people, and we continue to be the victims of their genetic strategy: low cost high reproduction.)
We are still trying to discover how pre-indo-europeans evolved before and during the ice age. We simply do not have good evidence for it. We understand how europeans (colder climate multi-colored haired and fairer whites) and west asians (warmer climate, black haired darker whites) coevolved. We know about when and how ‘whiteness’ evolved. But the ‘out of africa’ is only part of the story. Like the neandertal genetic discovery, there is still something we don’t quite know yet.
FWIW: the reason east asians and whites ‘differ’ is greater neoteny (pedomorphism). Which is why east asians have VERY low testosterone, and europeans (whites) have more than asians and less than all other races and subraces. And this is why east asians can have longer lifespans.
In fact, (this is both humorous and obvious) we can judge neoteny by both facial features and penis size – which makes for fascinating dinner table conversation. lol 😉
https://www.quora.com/White-people-look-different-from-Asians-Were-there-flat-faced-Neanderthals-in-the-Far-East
Um. Its pretty hard to argue with deflationary truth (western objective truth). It’s pretty hard to argue with early european sovereignty and heroism. It’s pretty hard to argue empirically with socrates->plato->aristotle->(Epicureanism/Stoicism). It’s pretty hard to argue against greek tragedy and art. It’s pretty hard to argue against Roman law, and administration. It’s pretty hard to argue against natural law. It’s pretty hard to argue against Empiricism (enlightenment). It’s pretty hard to argue against the aesthetic, agrarian, industrial, financial, and informational revolutions.
The only people who came close were the chinese. And despite a much longer history, and geographic isolation from ‘the tribal people of the desert and steppe’, and a much longer development cycle with a larger more homogenous population arguably more ‘pliable’ they didn’t. (And I am certain now that I can explain why.)
Yet in a few generations in the ancient world, and a few generations in the modern world, white people dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature.
If it were not for the Abrahamic Dark Age of Ignorance brought about by Judaism->Christianity->Islam, and especially the damage done to the western empire by christianity thanks to Paul of Tarsus and the eastern emperors, and more so the damage done to the great civilizations of the fertile crescent and north africa destroyed by the islam – the Roman and European peoples were very close to bringing about the first industrial revolution – the seeds of which were beginning by the time of Archimedes.
yes, white people’s great civil war (world wars 1 and 2) ended the colonialism project by which we forcibly and profitably dragged people out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, disease, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. And yes, had that project completed – at least in the British model of “raise and let them loose” as they did with america, india, and most of the other colonies. Then the world would be in a better condition today.
And yes, if Americans had continued to China and Russia after the second world war, then we would have been prevented of the disasters of socialism and communism that still plague the (foolish) peoples of the world.
That said. Europeans have committed suicide post war, and it has no sign of abating other than the possibility that the current stresses will lead to a single civil war that causes a chain reaction – out of envy of the consequences.
https://www.quora.com/White-supremacists-claim-that-if-it-werent-for-white-people-the-world-would-still-be-living-in-the-Stone-Age-They-also-claim-that-white-people-brought-enlightenment-and-the-modern-world-we-know-of-today-Is-this-true
If I told you the correct answer I’d probably be banned for ‘unpleasant but true speech’, but
1) it has a significant genetic component,
2) as well as demographic,
3) as well as cultural .
But let’s say it always has been this way.
If I ask you to look up IQ by country. And then ask you to look up literacy by country. And then look up the number of books translated in that country. And then look up academic publications by country. And then if I ask you to look up the IQ demographics for religious, moral, legal, western-philosophical, and scientific classes. And then ask you to look up the content of the language, laws, narratives, and marital structures.
What you can’t (readily) look up is the distribution of (psychotic)female-to-male(autistic) brain structures and therefore personality traits by IQ, Nation, Race, Subrace, and Class. What is harder to look up is the degree of neoteny or its reversal by race and subrace. And it’s somewhat difficult to look up how neoteny or its opposite, can work in both male and female directions. Because it will take you months to put together all the research from all the different sources.
And what you might find is that:
a) small things in large numbers make vast differences.
b) that IQ and industriousness pretty much produce deterministic distributions.
c) countries have to govern for the middle of the population and the further than number is below IQ105 the worse it gets.
d) The underclasses (below 105) are 5 to 6 times as costly as the upper classes are productive(above 120), and are an outright burden as the number decreases.
e) That the middle east has the worst of all conditions, which is high population density of many competing tribes with high genetic ‘clannishness’ through centuries of inbreeding, as well as pervasive poverty, as well as centuries of ignorance, a justification of ignorance, the habituation of impulsiveness, none to little concept of objective scientific truth as we understand it, a primitive poetic language lacking operational grammar and semantics.
Just how it is.
https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-middle-east-so-mystic
East Asians evolved from an earlier fork of Africans than Europeans. Africa still contains both almond eyed and round eyed genetic groups. And we can clearly trace east asian genetic development. (Unfortunately, the romans failed to build the wall the chinese built to keep out the steppe-desert people, and we continue to be the victims of their genetic strategy: low cost high reproduction.)
We are still trying to discover how pre-indo-europeans evolved before and during the ice age. We simply do not have good evidence for it. We understand how europeans (colder climate multi-colored haired and fairer whites) and west asians (warmer climate, black haired darker whites) coevolved. We know about when and how ‘whiteness’ evolved. But the ‘out of africa’ is only part of the story. Like the neandertal genetic discovery, there is still something we don’t quite know yet.
FWIW: the reason east asians and whites ‘differ’ is greater neoteny (pedomorphism). Which is why east asians have VERY low testosterone, and europeans (whites) have more than asians and less than all other races and subraces. And this is why east asians can have longer lifespans.
In fact, (this is both humorous and obvious) we can judge neoteny by both facial features and penis size – which makes for fascinating dinner table conversation. lol 😉
https://www.quora.com/White-people-look-different-from-Asians-Were-there-flat-faced-Neanderthals-in-the-Far-East
THE HISTORY OF THE ENDING OF THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGE MADE POSSIBLE BY THE EMPIRICAL ENLIGHTENMENT.
Of the English revolution,
The American revolution
The French Revolution
The The German Revolution
The Jewish Revolution
And the Russian Revolution …
And the Indian Revolution
And the Chinese Revolution….
And the South American Revolution….
And now the muslim revolution….
How long did the ‘change’ take?
What were the consequences both good and bad?
What ‘century’ have we just finished.
If you simply take a timeline, and stack those time periods, what you’ll see is that we endure from very short periods of peaceful change (German) to civil wars (English and American and Indian) to destructive but not bloody( south American) to bloody (Russian and French), to devastatingly bloody and persistent (Jewish), to extraordinarily bloody (Chinese and Muslim).
Source date (UTC): 2018-01-06 15:14:00 UTC