Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
Category: Civilization, History, and Anthropology
-
End (((Their))) Influence
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
-
We Are Not First, But Fastest, Because There Is No Faster Way Than Western
1) Geographic escape of the regression to the mean. 2) Duration of planning and voluntary organization required to preserve cooperation (see also inuit peoples and amerindians) 3) Utility of people in scarcity vs disutility of others in density, 4) Geographic (horizontal) range of trade (information transfer) on the eurasian continent. 5) Temperate gradients that can only be defeated by tools, vs disease and tribal gradients that are defeated by reproduction and early maturity. 6) Negative pressure on the less able (shorter term) in winter climes. I mean, winters are the best agents of darwin. 7) The difference between central management of irrigation and therefore centralization of capital (fertile crescent, indus river, yellow river), and the lack of such need (or utility) in both europe and the plain and the black and caspian seas. (Our farmland is bigger and better and more distributed meaning capital and defense had to be distributed). 8) Combining the european wheel, with the anatolian bronze, with the steppe horse, and therefore freeing man from his bodily limits and creating a civilization that mastered ‘ooda loops’ (maneuver, markets) at every level. 9) Hence we are rarely first, but we are always fastest, because there is no faster way to adapt a society to constant change than ‘markets in everything’ adjudicated by the common law of tort (property).
-
We Are Not First, But Fastest, Because There Is No Faster Way Than Western
1) Geographic escape of the regression to the mean. 2) Duration of planning and voluntary organization required to preserve cooperation (see also inuit peoples and amerindians) 3) Utility of people in scarcity vs disutility of others in density, 4) Geographic (horizontal) range of trade (information transfer) on the eurasian continent. 5) Temperate gradients that can only be defeated by tools, vs disease and tribal gradients that are defeated by reproduction and early maturity. 6) Negative pressure on the less able (shorter term) in winter climes. I mean, winters are the best agents of darwin. 7) The difference between central management of irrigation and therefore centralization of capital (fertile crescent, indus river, yellow river), and the lack of such need (or utility) in both europe and the plain and the black and caspian seas. (Our farmland is bigger and better and more distributed meaning capital and defense had to be distributed). 8) Combining the european wheel, with the anatolian bronze, with the steppe horse, and therefore freeing man from his bodily limits and creating a civilization that mastered ‘ooda loops’ (maneuver, markets) at every level. 9) Hence we are rarely first, but we are always fastest, because there is no faster way to adapt a society to constant change than ‘markets in everything’ adjudicated by the common law of tort (property).
-
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never su
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 10:28:00 UTC
-
Once you understand that our ‘bible’ was the works of Homer – the tragedy of ach
Once you understand that our ‘bible’ was the works of Homer – the tragedy of achilles – and the greek myths as parables, and finally aristotle as our equivalent of a prophet, it becomes very clear that the easterners who were not of our line and who invented the great lies of abrahamism did so with the same intuitionistic conspiracy as women undermine their males, and the (((opposition))) undermined the scientific, romantic, and economic revolution.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 09:37:00 UTC
-
The Chinese use Riddles like we use Aphorisms. The difference is due to the high
The Chinese use Riddles like we use Aphorisms. The difference is due to the high context low precision of their rather primitive language. Their poetry, our arguments.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 09:35:00 UTC
-
You don’t understand. Sovereignty is decidable. The first cause of western civ i
You don’t understand.
Sovereignty is decidable.
The first cause of western civ is this decidability – a feature that no other has.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-13 23:50:00 UTC
-
by Bill Joslin The optimum number of wolves for hunting is two. However, when fa
by Bill Joslin
The optimum number of wolves for hunting is two. However, when factoring in meat lost to scavenging crows and ravens, plus the time and effort in chasing these corvids off the kill, the optimum rises to six.
On the other hand, crows and ravens form bonds with wolves and wolves follow crow calls to find game. They have a symbiotic, cooperative relationship.
The corvids help the wolves find game and in turn the corvids gain carcasses to scanvenge. This relationship deepens to the point that crows and wolves form play bonds. And the population of wolves per square mile depends on the corvid population.
Crows created the wolf pack.
There exists a strong theory that wolves domesticated themselves. They did so by following human hunting parties and lingering on the edge of human settlements. The wolves who were less proximity sensitive (a proto-domestication trait) remained around humans for an easy meal, and those who were higher in proximity sensitivity returned to the crows.
Over time wolves which stayed near humans and shared the low proximity sensitivity trait mated and thus began the biological domestication of wolves.
Wolves demonstrating domestication traits (smaller teeth, floppy ears, shorter snouts, curly tails) dates back nearly 20,000 years prior to human and dogs living together.
With out the domestication of dogs, man most likely would not have domesticated other animals (all domestic animals : cows, goats etc are not likely candidates for domestication compared to other available choices). Without domestication of animals and then plants, man may not have evolved advanced social systems.
Wolves created man.
Crows, wolves, man – Odin with his crow and wolf companions.
It might seem like mythological nonsense but it is not based in metaphysical lies institutionalized as law like other religions
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-13 01:14:00 UTC
-
SEMITIC URHEIMAT IS NORTH AFRICA Africa-to-Levant hypothesis Map of Semitic lang
SEMITIC URHEIMAT IS NORTH AFRICA
Africa-to-Levant hypothesis
Map of Semitic languages and statistically inferred dispersals. One hyptothesized location of the divergence of ancestral Semitic from Afroasiatic between the African coast of the Red Sea and the Near East is also indicated.
Christopher Ehret has hypothesized that genetic analyses (specifically those of Y chromosome phylogeography and TaqI 49a,f haplotypes) shows populations of proto-Semitic speakers may have moved from the Horn of Africa or southeastern Sahara northwards to the Nile Valley, Northwest Africa, the Levant, and Aegean.[4]
Edward Lipiński supports a Northwest African origin due to the relationship between a Pre-Semitic Afroasiatic language and the Niger–Congo languages, whose urheimat probably lies in Nigeria–Cameroon.[5] In support of this hypothesis, Lipiński points out that Proto-Semitic:
– did not originate in Arabia, as previously hypothesized, since the region could not have supported massive waves of emigration before the domestication of camels in the second millennium BC.[3]
– did not originate in Mesopotamia (and adjoining areas of modern Syria), since there is evidence the original inhabitants were a non-Semitic population.
– shares more isoglosses and lexicostatistical convergences with the Berber languages than any other family, thereby;
– showing signs of a link with Berber long after other Afro-Asiatic language families, such as Egyptic and Chadic, and;
– was still spoken during the mid-Neolithic Subpluvial (i.e. 5th millennium BCE, when the Sahara was more humid).
A Neolithic culture in the Sahara possibly related to Proto-Semitic collapsed due to desertification and climate change around 3500 BC, according to Lipiński – a fact attested by evidence such as rock art.
This may have forced Proto-Semitic speakers to emigrate en masse through the Nile Delta to Western Asia. They were probably responsible for the collapse of the Ghassulian culture in Palestine around 3300 BC.[6] Another indication of the arrival of the proto-Semitic culture is the appearance of tumuli in 4th and 3rd millennium BC Palestine, which were typical characteristic of Neolithic North Africa.[6]
It is possible that at this point, the ancestors of the speakers of Elamite moved towards Iran, although the inclusion of Elamite in Afroasiatic is only contemplated by a tiny minority.[7]
The earliest wave of Semitic speakers entered the Fertile Crescent via Palestine and Syria and eventually founded the Akkadian Empire.
Their relatives, the Amorites, followed them and settled Syria before 2500 BC.[6] The collapse of the Bronze Age in Palestine led the southern Semites southwards, where they reached the highlands of Yemen after 20th century BC. Those crossed back to the Horn of Africa between 1500–500 BC.[6]
Recent Bayesian analysis suggests an origin for all known Semitic languages in the Levant around 3750 BCE, with a later single introduction from South Arabia into the Horn of Africa around 800 BCE.
This statistical analysis could not, however, estimate when or where the ancestor of all Semitic languages diverged from Afroasiatic.[1] It thus neither conflicts nor confirms the hypothesis that the divergence of ancestral Semitic from Afroasiatic occurred in Africa.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-10 15:37:00 UTC