Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • (NLI – Book Thoughts Part 1) Brad and I had decided to focus on the first four v

    (NLI – Book Thoughts Part 1)
    Brad and I had decided to focus on the first four volumes
    1. Crisis, 2. Measurement, 3. Logic, 4. Law
    But the fourth book in the series was originally:
    4. Science
    Followed by Law.
    The rest of the volumes:
    6. Prosecution, 7. Reformation, 8. History, 9. Religion

    However, as the books progress, I feel the Science is necessary if only because most of the behavioral science is in there and only briefly covered in the logic,

    My thoughts are changing partly due to the velocity with which we can work now that we can feed the drafts of the first four volumes AND so much of the past research work into GPT, which speeds the work so much by the simple virtue of producing the equivalent of a search engine capable of synthesizing topical requests from all those tomes rather than spending hours or days just collecting notes from our prior works.

    Our work consists largely of outlining a book, outlining each chapter, sketching each chapter, then creating a prompt for each section (few paragraphs) interrogating our vast body of work with an AI, composing the section, revising it a bit, and then passing through a set of reviews where we check for what’s missing what’s insufficiently covered and where we need transitions and summaries to assist the reader.

    The gradual refinement as we work through the drafts really has made a profound difference.

    Plus Brad gets to shine with his witticisms. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-31 01:31:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1928625276008935484

  • It’s not difficult. Its tedious and expensive. We are overloaded at the moment b

    It’s not difficult. Its tedious and expensive. We are overloaded at the moment but we could do it. And it’s worth doing. And there is a financial upside. And the political timing is right.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-08 04:20:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920332855097381197

    Reply addressees: @ItIsHoeMath @leonardaisfunE @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920329248843133380

  • (Runcible) (excerpt from a business letter) Different operational domains demand

    (Runcible)
    (excerpt from a business letter)

    Different operational domains demand different kinds of coordination. In say, creative (advertising) the only cost is brain cells and time. In law it’s more expensive but similar, and must survive adversarial market competition in court. In software there is a relatively high cost of production given it’s always R&D and the failure rate is rather high. In engineering there is a spectrum from the capital investment in the equipment and resources to the R&D necessary and the unpredictability of it given the functional requirements of real world environmental demands. When we get to military action it’s even more chaotic but with even greater risk and greater organizational demands. When we get to political action its utter chaos and almost unpredictable.

    So across the spectrum people require tools to organize human behavior in increasingly complexity just as we need money and accounting to scale trade, and law to scale investment to accelerate trade, and science to scale investigation into science and technology to advance production, distribution, trade, and the resulting human agency.

    And yes, our product (Runcible+Oversing) provides an ai-first operating system for cooperation on anything at any scale by any distribution of people.  

    We are presently training the AI. We are trying to get a demo so that investors can see it. We think it sells itself.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-05 18:14:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919455564855443456

  • (Runcible) (excerpt from a business letter) Different operational domains demand

    (Runcible)
    (excerpt from a business letter)

    Different operational domains demand different kinds of coordination. In say, creative (advertising) the only cost is brain cells and time. In law it’s more expensive but similar, and must survive adversarial market competition in court. In software there is a relatively high cost of production given it’s always R&D and the failure rate is rather high. In engineering there is a spectrum from the capital investment in the equipment and resources to the R&D necessary and the unpredictability of it given the functional requirements of real world environmental demands. When we get to military action it’s even more chaotic but with even greater risk and greater organizational demands. When we get to political action its utter chaos and almost unpredictable.

    So across the spectrum people require tools to organize human behavior in increasingly complexity just as we need money and accounting to scale trade, and law to scale investment to accelerate trade, and science to scale investigation into science and technology to advance production, distribution, trade, and the resulting human agency.

    And yes, our product (Runcible+Oversing) provides an ai-first operating system for cooperation on anything at any scale by any distribution of people.  

    We are presently training the AI. We are trying to get a demo so that investors can see it. We think it sells itself.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-05-05 18:14:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1919455565014827507

  • (NLI Humor) How come if I’m supposed to be the head honcho, that I have so many

    (NLI Humor)
    How come if I’m supposed to be the head honcho, that I have so many bosses in this organization?

    Response from everyone: “Because you need them”.

    Sigh…

    I love all these wonderful moral brilliant crazy people I work with. A pool of sanity in a world gone mad. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-23 02:59:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1914876658513007024

  • We have ‘promised’ the leadership team that we will have it done for september –

    We have ‘promised’ the leadership team that we will have it done for september – assuming we will have a september conference or the equivalent to launch it.
    It won’t be easy but as long as I can stay healthy I’m confident. Besides brad has a whip and cattle prod and is better at…


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-16 22:43:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1912637889563017723

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1912637340553716098

  • (NLI) Finished chapter 9 of volume 1 – Crisis of the Age. Brad and I finished 8

    (NLI)
    Finished chapter 9 of volume 1 – Crisis of the Age. Brad and I finished 8 last weekend. Chapter 7 was such a haul that I’d forgotten how much of the rest of the book was drafted already. It was a brutal chapter because it contains most of the logic that ties history and our work together.

    We have struggled over the layering of the argument a few times but I’m finally convinced the way we tell the story (make the argument) is the only way it can be done.

    That said, as usual, it’s DENSE.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-16 22:01:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1912627415966445571

  • That’s why we are trying to productive my work. There is no closure without it

    That’s why we are trying to productive my work. There is no closure without it.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-08 20:15:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909701759691550741

    Reply addressees: @bearcaught45 @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909697190353654244

  • All but one of us at the Institute are unpaid volunteers. And even a casual stud

    All but one of us at the Institute are unpaid volunteers. And even a casual study by those sophisticated enough to comprehend our work will result in recognition that our achievements in social science are on par with Darwin’s in biological science.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-08 17:58:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909667298262315442

    Reply addressees: @Donald_from_HI

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1909666290324979742

  • (NLI Positioning) Given the shift in the political landscape and the Natural Law

    (NLI Positioning)
    Given the shift in the political landscape and the Natural Law Institute’s (NLI) goal to transition from “edgy” focused on research to “mainstream,” focus on education and activism, your elevator pitch should reflect a blend of your core mission, intellectual rigor, and newfound relevance in a way that resonates broadly. Based on the work, here’s a refined elevator pitch that positions you as a mainstream yet distinctive force:

    “We’re a think tank dedicated to restoring cooperation in a divided age. Through rigorous science and practical solutions, we reform law, economics, and policy to solve today’s crises—because a society that works together thrives.”

    Why This Works:
    1. Mainstream Appeal: The emphasis on “restoring cooperation” taps into a widely felt desire for unity and functionality in a polarized world, making it relatable without sounding radical.

    2. Core Mission: It preserves your focus on solving “the crisis of our age” (division, distrust, institutional decay) while grounding it in actionable domains (law, economics, policy).

    3. Intellectual Credibility: “Rigorous science” nods to your deep, systematic approach (e.g., Curt’s work on epistemology and natural law, Luke’s applied science background) without alienating non-specialists.

    4. Practicality: “Practical solutions” highlights the real-world impact of your ideas (e.g., Brandon’s activism, Noah’s relationship strategies), signaling you’re not just theorists but doers.

    5. Optimistic Vision: Ending with “a society that works together thrives” offers a positive, forward-looking hook that aligns with mainstream aspirations.

    How It Ties to Your Work:
    – Curt Doolittle: Your philosophical and scientific contributions (e.g., completing the scientific method, natural law of cooperation) underpin the “rigorous science” and “reform” elements.

    – Brandon Hayes: His practical, hands-on efforts (e.g., consulting, activism, community-building) reflect the “practical solutions” and “cooperation” focus.

    – Luke Weinhagen: His expertise in risk assessment and self-sufficiency training supports the idea of solving crises with applied, cooperative frameworks.

    – Noah Revoy: His work on resilient families and organizations ties into building a thriving society through cooperation at the personal and institutional levels.

    Alternative Variations:
    If you want to tweak the tone or emphasis:

    – Concise: “We’re a think tank reforming law, economics, and policy with science-backed solutions to unite and strengthen society.”

    – Provocative: “We’re a think tank asking: why can’t we cooperate? Our solutions in law, economics, and policy show how we can.”

    – Vision-Driven: “We’re a think tank building a cooperative future through smarter laws, economics, and policies.”

    Positioning Strategy:
    To solidify this mainstream shift:

    – Highlight how your ideas (e.g., constitutional reform, truthful discourse) align with emerging public demands for transparency, fairness, and competence in governance.

    – Frame your work as a natural evolution of classical liberalism—timely yet timeless—rather than a fringe reaction.

    – Lean into your interdisciplinary team (philosophers, entrepreneurs, strategists) as proof you bridge theory and practice, appealing to both intellectuals and everyday citizens.

    – This pitch keeps your edge—your intellectual depth and systemic critique—while presenting it as a common-sense answer to today’s challenges, perfectly suited for a world ready to embrace your once-“edgy” ideas.


    Source date (UTC): 2025-04-03 15:59:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1907825369723674624