THE ARISTOCRATIC DOCTRINE OF CEO’S
“I don’t care who is in charge as long as they’re not even worse at it than I am.”
Source date (UTC): 2012-10-11 14:00:00 UTC
THE ARISTOCRATIC DOCTRINE OF CEO’S
“I don’t care who is in charge as long as they’re not even worse at it than I am.”
Source date (UTC): 2012-10-11 14:00:00 UTC
KIEV (KYIV) UKRAINE
Well, everyone who gave me advice was right, and the internet data was accurate. It is the wild west at a discount. Employees cost $400 (admin) – $2000 (dev lead) per month. An upper end apartment costs 2k per month. Dinner for four at the best restaurant in town is about $80 including alcohol. A 45 minute cab ride cost $25. Coffee and pastry at a good shop costs $8. The people seem intelligent, honest and capable, but risk averse – albiet less risk averse than your average working and lower class Brit. Overeducated but hopeful young people litter the streets. Everything is done by relationships. Micro entrepreneurship is everywhere, and trying to circumvent the corruption of the state. Yes, the government is openly corrupt, but it’s possible to circumvent it. Yes, the women really are beautiful, and they’re everywhere, but the careful eye will notice two things: they do not eat processed foods, and they believe women are women, men are men, and the femininity is beautiful. Of course, I am meeting my Fullbright friend’s circle, which is quite sophisticated, but it’s still a sampling none the less.
This week: trial ads for staff, office space.
Source date (UTC): 2012-10-07 10:18:00 UTC
https://www.quora.com/Startup-skills-vs-startup-ideas
https://www.quora.com/Startup-skills-vs-startup-ideas
ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Money itself gains one status. And money is made by providing others something that they desire, and will pay for. Too many aspiring entrepreneurs look for opportunities that are fashionable and from which they can obtain status directly from the association with the endeavor, rather than possession of wealth.
So while opportunities lay about on the ground ready for anyone to pick up, most people search endlessly for some opportunity that inspires them, but that the market does not need because its in low demand, or is in over supply.
I don’t care what business I am in as long as it’s not immoral in some way, and the people I would have to work with or employ are pleasant to spend time with. I literally tend to sieze what’s just in front of me, because I see the ground as absolutely littered with opportunities, all of which can be made into something with a little effort. And those opportunities either provide wealth in exchange for ones effort or they don’t. If they do, the wealth confers status, and freedom to do what one wants. And it is more likely that one will obtain wealth doing what others desire, than doing what one desires for its signaling benefits. It would not matter to me if I owned a commercial cleaning service, a garbage collection service, or any other common business, as long as it provided the returns that would allow me the freedom to enjoy what I wished.
The market serves to provide us with wealth by serving others out of our own self interest. Prices ensure that we do not live illusions about what others desire, and how much tehy desire it. And the opportunities for entrepreneurship are everywhere.
I’m not surprised at how many people who have worked for me have gone off to create new businesses. It’s the kind of person I’m attracted to hiring. But I’m always impressed with their ideas and achievements. And I’m more impressed with the fact that they seem to be successful.
Just in the last few years:
– Live Area Labs (Creative – and good work as well)
– Tier 3 (IT/Cloud)
– Salient 6 (Tech Services)
– A specialty legal services business (which is fascinating) that I won’t name.
– A financial sector startup (which is really fascinating) that I won’t name.
And that’s just off the top of my head. I should start collecting a list.
It’s a beautiful thing. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-09-18 10:29:00 UTC
DISCUSSING CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES TODAY
THis plan is just genius. A couple of additional ideas:
1) The master in this plan is elevated by three steps (that’s 3×8=24″). Now, I hate sleeping on the first floor. (No idea why.) But it doesn’t take much to raise a room above the ground level and avoid that feeling other than the windows have to be impossible to look into from the outside. So, with a little work it’s possible to expand the width of the MBR closet, as well as the stairs up to the MBR, as well as the stairs up to the Study, and raise the master up another two to three feet, for a total of maybe five feet above ground level. Be cautious with the windows and make the master doors open to a porch rather than the ground and that’s it. This would have the effect of increasing both the closet (which is too small), and reducing the space consumed in the upstairs loft/study by the stairs, which is also too small.
2) the house is easily oriented for different approaches by flipping the entry/powder and entering from the opposite side of the house. (The entry way is brilliant and inviting.) And I would make it possible to shut off the entry/sitting area from the rest of the house with something as simple as doors.
3) My friend Todd Colby, (who refuses to join FB), is a fan of the highly insulated and cheap to heat and cool house. So we discussed how to construct foot-thick (or more) highly insulated walls. This would allow the feeling of mass that comes from stone or timber work, without the thermal mass, but also, without the expense of heating and cooling the thermal mass. Todd is worried about construction of anything other than stick built homes given the problems with finding crews that can work on alternative technologies. Which I completely understand. Although I ‘m not quite sold on anything that I can’t believe will last two hundred years. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-09-16 20:01:00 UTC
“REALITY BY CHANTING”
What a great name for a company that produces marketing related software. lol
Done. .com, and .net. Trademark submitted. 🙂
Not divulging the product name yet. But it’s related. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-09-07 15:42:00 UTC
I LOVE DOING DEALS
Really. I live for it. The higher risk, the more zeros, the more variables, the better. I’m sure it means something. I’m also sure it means something bad. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2012-08-27 20:00:00 UTC
http://business.time.com/2012/08/02/10-ceos-who-are-new-on-the-job-and-trying-to-do-the-impossible/NOTHING MORE FUN FOR AN EXTERNAL CEO THAN TURNING AROUND A TROUBLED COMPANY
I don’t like to refer anyone to Time Magazine. It’s been the intellectual equivalent of a producer of hazardous waste for most of my life. But this article on the tough job of CEO’s whose job it is to turn around companies that the market has left behind, is not so much worth the read, but worth reminding us of how hard it is to solve some of these problems.
Source date (UTC): 2012-08-03 10:59:00 UTC
WANG DOODY SEATTLE
I just popped in to visit a friend. Great company. Good people. Creative work. Awesome offices with a view of the Sound.
I’m Envious of the work for Jaguar. I’m not sure I could be more envious of any brand. I’m a dedicated jaguar owner.
But, you know, I have a reputation for being either devious or cunning. So I tried to stay away from people who had moved on or spun off in order to avoid ill feelings.
But now that I’m not active in the business I’m free to catch up with people. And it’s really inspiring to see what everyone is up to.
The spin offs are something even more cautious about. I think people in spin offs tend to have the wrong impression of how I feel about them. And while I have to maintain a certain posture, and I have a responsibility to the current business, it’s how I started some of my own businesses. So I tend to look at spin offs as my offspring and inside I root for them at every opportunity.
I love entrepreneurship everywhere I find it.
Source date (UTC): 2012-08-02 19:10:00 UTC