Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • VERSION OF THE BUFFET RULE : MANAGERS MUST BE OWNERS. I’ve been saying this fore

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/03/01/solving-the-principal-agent-problem-apple-insists-that-executives-must-hold-company-stock/APPLE’S VERSION OF THE BUFFET RULE : MANAGERS MUST BE OWNERS.

    I’ve been saying this forever. The data is pretty clearly in favor of it. And attempts to circumvent it fail.

    The value of outside owners is to make sure you’re not privatizing capital in the business. The value of inside owners is to make sure you have the incentives to produce capital not privatize it. Outside non-owners, inside non-owners are I suppose fine for volunteer organizations. But otherwise Taleb’s argument holds: Skin in the game is the only insurance.

    Free riding is everywhere.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-18 15:19:00 UTC

  • DEAR UKRAINIANS: THE PROBLEM IS YOU. Another day dealing with pervasive ukrainia

    DEAR UKRAINIANS: THE PROBLEM IS YOU.

    Another day dealing with pervasive ukrainian incompetence. If any protocol is non trivial in that it crosses boundaries of responsibikity, then in true soviet fashion there is a near certsinty a ukrainian will fuck it up by not handling the exception and instead laziliy and incompetently following the rule.

    And they dont even understand that they fucked up, or that the primary reason they are poor is their failure to understand that they fucked up.

    Here is the rule: if you ate aware of it or can be aware of it, its your problem until you are aware it is fixed completely.

    Soviet version is that you are only responsible for that about which you do not have to think.

    Every time you do not take responsibility for everything not right of which you are aware, you are stealing from the possible prosperity of you and your people.

    There are no conditions – ever – under which you are not responsible for that of which you are aware.

    Ukraine is poor because no one takes responsibility for making it prosper. And what makes a people prosper is not a few big things by government but a million billion tiny things by each individual.

    So the next time you wonder why you are poor, look in the mirror at the person to blame.

    If you are aware of it, then you must fix it until someone else promises you that they will fix it faster and better than you will instead.

    Ukraine is poor for this single reason. People do not pay for the common things that make a people economically efficient and free of risk to compete with the rest of the world.

    Look in the mirror.

    The problem is YOU. Not your culture, not your government, but YOU.

    The culture and the government are made of people just like YOU.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-13 04:38:00 UTC

  • How To Rapidly Become A Billionaire

    (seriously) (worth reading) [I]t’s been done. Secret? Threaten a big company’s revenue stream or customer base, by providing a service better than they do. Why is that possible? Internal incompetence of bureaucracies. Why? Because brands always seek to facilitate the brand with tangential value rather than deliver a product or service in the most excellent way possible for consumers regardless of brand. Almost all companies make this mistake, Apple and Microsoft included. Dropbox should never have had a chance. But every other large organization failed by trying to “leverage”. That is a fallacy. Beats threatened Apple. Multiple companies threatened Facebook. Unfortunately management falsely understands the leverage as risk mitigation rather than risk amplification. Make it excellent. Threaten them over their mistakes. That is how you become a billionaire in short fashion. Thankfully I don’t care to be more than a millionaire. I do my threatening of paradigmatic fallacies with political philosophy and for me that is a greater reward.

  • How To Rapidly Become A Billionaire

    (seriously) (worth reading) [I]t’s been done. Secret? Threaten a big company’s revenue stream or customer base, by providing a service better than they do. Why is that possible? Internal incompetence of bureaucracies. Why? Because brands always seek to facilitate the brand with tangential value rather than deliver a product or service in the most excellent way possible for consumers regardless of brand. Almost all companies make this mistake, Apple and Microsoft included. Dropbox should never have had a chance. But every other large organization failed by trying to “leverage”. That is a fallacy. Beats threatened Apple. Multiple companies threatened Facebook. Unfortunately management falsely understands the leverage as risk mitigation rather than risk amplification. Make it excellent. Threaten them over their mistakes. That is how you become a billionaire in short fashion. Thankfully I don’t care to be more than a millionaire. I do my threatening of paradigmatic fallacies with political philosophy and for me that is a greater reward.

  • CORRECTING THE LIBERTARIAN ARGUMENT AGAINST CORPORATIONS Corporations are collec

    CORRECTING THE LIBERTARIAN ARGUMENT AGAINST CORPORATIONS

    Corporations are collections of people insured by the state in order to decrease the risk of legal attacks on one hand and increase employment, wealth and taxes on the other.

    Unfortunately, for historical reasons, this legal protection and corporeal terminology evolved rather than insurance and economic terminology.

    As such, most of the political rhetoric regarding corporations as analogies for people are empty verbalisms.

    The correct amalogy is public-private investments in order for the state to encourage risk taking by insuring owners against legal risk.

    This turns out to be useful during early capitalism, but decreesses in value as wealth increaees.

    Public private partnerships are useful and necessary means of producing commons which are later fully privatized.

    No populace has SURVIVED economic competition without this strategy.

    The evolutionary failure is in not privatizing (uninsuring) these entities once one has a functioning economy.

    This is another example of the confusion caused by conflating administrative law and insurance functions and economic policy in a single governmental body.

    If instead we used insurers and insurer paid legal processes, and loser-pays we could achieve the same effect.

    However, the libertarian logical fallacy is that such public private partnerships are not nevessary for the initial production of an economy and the organic development of laws that facilitate risk taking.

    We are correct that this insurance should be withdrawn at some point, and that it had gone too far. But we are wrong to assume that it is not competitively necessary for a polity to generate a high trust, high velicity economy.

    Westerners invented most capitalist law. But once law is invented, it can be restated and reformed without its historical linguistic and cultural baggage.

    This is the problem: the empty verbalism of organic development using governments mixing functions of administrative law, insurer, producer of commons, and economic policy.

    As such many if our arguments are empty verbalisms not attempts at institutional reformation.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-07 01:09:00 UTC

  • guy is 21, and the perfect entrepreneur. The reason I think his story is valuabl

    http://digg.com/video/meet-new-yorks-youngest-truffle-dealerThis guy is 21, and the perfect entrepreneur. The reason I think his story is valuable to share, is that, he’s a master of his niche. And largely, entrepreneurship requires mastery of something that few other people master.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 21:09:00 UTC

  • OUT THERE ON THE HORIZON WITH WHATEVER CAPITAL YOU HAVE. I used to be so patient

    OUT THERE ON THE HORIZON WITH WHATEVER CAPITAL YOU HAVE.

    I used to be so patient with business partners, customers, employees, and to really work with them to try to help them to understand whatever broader point I was trying to get across. And I worked constantly on my business partners and board members in particular, to help them ‘see’ what I always took to be relatively obvious, or to get them to test what I saw what but was unsure of.

    As a CEO I assume I am wrong, and use my management team to test my theories. If I cannot get them on board, then I assume my theory is either wrong or insufficiently thought out. For this reason we did and I always did, try to get unanimous consent. (This turns out to be a deterministic behavior resulting from INTP personalities, but I didn’t know that at the time.)

    Of course, back then, while I understood the scientific method, Popperian skepticism, the theory of incentives and Austrian economics, the problem of ‘calculation’, and of course, market competition, I did not have Propertarianism figured out, or the relationship between Operationalism and Intuitionism and performative truth, even though I had intuited some aspects of it much earlier.

    So what I saw as open to intuition if I just pressed on with people, and kept trying to ‘help them see’, was really not available to them at all. I think like most people they saw pedagogy, fragments of reason, end results of my efforts, but they never really understood much at all. And that’s because it was so vast a leap, that it was impossible.

    So in retrospect, while I am still angry that I could not get them to help me avoid the recession-depression, nor recover from it, they paid in their wealth for not helping me.

    But it was far too much to expect from even well read, well educated, scientifically knowledgeable, technology savvy, financially sophisticated, business savvy people. I might as well have been talking to high school kids.

    And I sort of feel sorry for them instead. An myself. For my naivety. Lacking sufficient empathy, I was unable to intuit what ordinary people do, or what ordinary professors usually do.

    This is the first time I have felt this kind of revelation. Which is again, a problem of autistic incompetence. Incompetence only solved through the kind of neurogenesis we get from time and mental exercise. Just as we repair our ability to walk or think after an accident. Food, water, sleep and mental exercise.

    Businesses are run by above average people, employ average people, and by and large serve average and below average people. Very smart people rarely accumulate great wealth, because nothing in that process is all that interesting really. Until the rise of technology, which all but eliminated the capital requirements for the creation of disruptive business value. (although, I suspect, like the competitive value of electricity, the competitive value of this era of ‘calculating’ software has nearly reached its zenith. And it will require ‘thinking’ software to create another such leap. And as such the world returns to normal: above average people run everything of consequence, in the service of average and below average people. And exceptional people make-do with the playthings and problems available to them.

    The only place for people like me (and some of you) is in entrepreneurial positions where we do not require a great deal of external consent in order to compete and innovate. Because it is impossible to equip external parties with the knowledge and understanding to make rational choices. They can only gamble on what they cannot understand using fragments of what they do understand. And for us, that means largely self funding one’s efforts.

    If you are sufficiently out there on the horizon then you are standing there, alone, with whatever capital you have.

    Same goes for philosophy.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-05 12:16:00 UTC

  • Jan 01, 2001Digital Technology and Marketing AgencyPlace: Bellevue, Washington (

    Jan 01, 2001Digital Technology and Marketing AgencyPlace: Bellevue, Washington (47.6172, -122.199)Address: Bellevue, Washington 98004


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 16:23:00 UTC

  • IS SARCASTIC HUMOR, BUT HERE IS AN HONEST RESPONSE The solution to valueless mee

    https://medium.com/comedy-corner/10-tricks-to-appear-smart-during-meetings-27b489a39d1aOP IS SARCASTIC HUMOR, BUT HERE IS AN HONEST RESPONSE

    The solution to valueless meetings is actually to teach classes in creativity on one hand and communication on the other, so that you know which you’re going to engage in. Most people schedule meetings not to inform but to either persuade, or to problem solve. And while informing, and persuading are good for formal meeting structures, problem solving is not something that is suitable for the traditional meeting format. Unfortunately (a) people think creativity is an intuition or talent rather than a process (b) won’t work hard enough to prepare a problem solving meeting, and (c) limited numbers of people will invest in a problem solving meeting as companies are currently organized.

    Great companies swap this around, and force non-creative meetings into email, and train employees to conduct creative sessions, and use peer reviews to rate people’s performance in those creative sessions, and therefore compensate people for participation in creative sessions.

    Given that I’ve been doing this for most of my career I’ll throw out that the solution to most problems exists in most companies and middle and upper management blocks those solutions from coming out or being implemented because of the organizational impact solutions would have.

    SO instead of organizing so that they can implement solutions they organize to resist them in a fallacious attempt at obtaining efficiency. Which is really a code word for ‘not requiring management to manage’. which in turn produces rent seeking behaviors throughout an organization.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-04 14:47:00 UTC

  • I need to hire some nice inexpensive Ukrainians to translate at least excerpts o

    I need to hire some nice inexpensive Ukrainians to translate at least excerpts of my website posts…

    Hmmmm…..


    Source date (UTC): 2014-07-01 11:37:00 UTC