Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • MICROSOFT – LIKE ALL BIG TECH – IS NOT AN AMERICAN COMPANY BY ANY STRETCH OF THE

    MICROSOFT – LIKE ALL BIG TECH – IS NOT AN AMERICAN COMPANY BY ANY STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION?
    I should note that despite a decade of effort, the cost efficiency of indian outsourcing does not play out as expected or claimed. And I should note that the marketing staff of my company did the research for microsoft back in the mid 2000s, and then it was not a savings but an investment in the possibility it might be.
    The difference arises when the work is largely maintenance or production, and not innovation and response time, and if you can hire a full time team at large scale so that the people are consistent, there is little turnover so knowledge is retained, and the company has a meaningful interest you as a customer. In other words you cannot outsource responsibility. Or you end up paying the companies you should have in the first place to ‘salvage’ what they can.
    Americans and Europeans should take note that yes, microsoft has a global customer base … but that the tech sector whether microsoft, google, facebook, or apple, are effectively at war against the white male population of our countries.

    Also note that microsoft and Amazon consumer sectors are NOT their core business. Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS produce the majority of the revenue for both companies, with google the ‘unwanted stepchild’ for having failed at it, and now pivoting to try to catch up. In fact, I’m more than a little concerned that the domestic influence of Amazon is so profound while it’s not the moneymaker for the company.

    APPLE
    Only 34% of Apple employees are white males.

    FACEBOOK
    Only 30% of Apple employees are white males.
    FB set the goal of at least 50% by 2024.
    Facebook intentionally obscures it’s measures, so I’m not quite how accurate these are.

    GOOGLE
    Only 30% of google employees are white males.

    MICROSOFT
    Only 32% of Microsoft Employees are White Males. 47% of Microsoft Employees are Ethnic Europeans, and of them 70% are male ethnic europeans.

    MORE MICROSOFT…
    Women 30% – women now make up more than 30% of the Microsoft’s core* workforce worldwide.
    Racial and ethnic minorities $1.008 vs $1.000 whites – those who are rewards eligible combined earn $1.008 total pay for every $1.000 earned by U.S. rewards-eligible white employees with the same job title and level and considering tenure.
    Inside the U.S., women $1.007 vs $1.000 men – women who are rewards eligible earn $1.007 total pay for every $1.000 earned by rewards-eligible employees who are men and have the same job title and level and considering tenure.
    Racial and ethnic minority employees 53.2% – now make up 53.2% of Microsoft’s core U.S. workforce, up 1.9 percentage points from last year.
    Asian 35.8% – representation has grown by 0.3 percentage points to 35.8%, and has grown by 3.9 percentage points since 2018.
    Black and African American 6.6% – representation grew 0.9 percentage points to 6.6%, the highest year-over-year increase in the past five years.
    Hispanic and Latinx representation grew 0.6 percentage points to 7.6%, the highest year-over-year increase in the past five years.
    Multiracial representation is 2.6%, up 0.1 percentage point from last year.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 16:45:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755271684238585857

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755261235812041153


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    MICROSOFT TO TRAIN 2M INDIANS IN AI – BUT NOT AMERICANS, CANADIANS, OR EUROPEANS?
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-02-07/microsoft-to-upskill-2-million-in-india-with-ai-nadella-video

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1755261235812041153

  • RT @elonmusk: The public vote is unequivocally in favor of Texas! Tesla will mov

    RT @elonmusk: The public vote is unequivocally in favor of Texas!

    Tesla will move immediately to hold a shareholder vote to transfer state…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-01 05:44:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752930864118305123

  • There are very few people that can contribute to our work. He has mastered the s

    There are very few people that can contribute to our work. He has mastered the science, logic, and law and is the only other person able to work with me to write the definitions, descriptions, and prohibitions on the vast scope of means of lying – as well as nearly every other aspect of the work – into law.
    Some people do not seek external validation. He doesn’t. In fact he is quite quiet and unassuming in person. He just knows what he’s talking about. And his knowledge of intellectual history, his understanding of behavioral economics, and his ability to use the method to express those economics is extraordinary.
    One of the best living mathematicians lives with his mother in St Petersburg Russia and just does math. One of the best theoretical physicists lives in a van, and surfs every day. Many of us cannot tolerate the politics of the academy. So this is why we work outside it. And it’s not surprising that in multiple fields, any field that does not require exorbitant funding, that better work is done outside the academy than in.

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 23:08:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752831232176459776

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752829656724627694

  • Ascentium (Now a division of Avanade and a spin off called Smith Commerce) < Red

    Ascentium (Now a division of Avanade and a spin off called Smith Commerce) < RedTech(Redmond Technology Partners, still small independent) < eXcell Data (Now a Division of Compucom), etc. < and a number of others that have been sold, re-sold, or closed since then and a number of others before then that don’t bear mention, including legal research, funds recovery, office products, and art supplies. 😉

    Reply addressees: @bz_dl_bz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 20:30:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752429045805993984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752418797057712338

  • John Mark is back under the brand John Victor, he’s with us and can be seen in h

    John Mark is back under the brand John Victor, he’s with us and can be seen in his videos, in his book, and in our staff meetings.

    As you probably know I don’t waste my time on politicians and political nonsense. I work on strategic problems that change the entire landscape…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-29 05:52:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751845768363745688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751843618761867406

  • “Why have I never seen Michael before?”– Michael was one of the (large number)

    –“Why have I never seen Michael before?”–

    Michael was one of the (large number) of people that was concerned about visibility with our organization having some negative effect.

    I keep telling people it has the opposite effect. We just advance truth, reciprocity, self determination and responsibility regardless of cost – especially if that cost is that the truth is offensive. Someone has to do it, if we’re going to overcome the present crisis.

    And so we work on policy to protect the people from commercial political academic and activist groups that seek to achieve their ends by false promises and lying. And therefore forcing usall into truthful reciprocal cooperation.

    This turns out, if you simply state it that way, to be pretty much approved by everyone moral. If not then you are dealing with an immoral person and that association is not something good for you, for the organizations, or for the circles you live work and socialize in.

    My position is that Michael, like me, provides evidence that we dominate the leadership of the intellectual spectrum of economic, social, political and legal innovation.

    And while we try to cover the entire spectrum of the individual family social religious political national and civilizational interest, it is important that, even though our work might be very sophisticated and for a smaller audience, the pattern of sophistication in it is also used by everyone else in our organization addressing every other aspect of our lives.

    And so this is proof of our legitimacy and the innovation in our work.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-28 02:50:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751437438356959232

  • “What is the compensation range and distribution of those ceo salaries, and why

    –“What is the compensation range and distribution of those ceo salaries, and why do they seem high – except say, for entertainment and sports figures?”–

    Lesson for the average person: if you take a position as the CEO of a Fortune X company, it is similar to being elected as president, in that when you are done, your career is over. Though you might start another company, be re-hired, or asked to rescue a dying company. You can’t count on it.
    So if you take the job, even if it only lasts for five to ten years, it means you must make enough money at the job to retire and devote your time to investing or other work. Because you’ll be all but unemployable.

    This isn’t as true for small and midsized companies, where you can sell a company, or resign and shift to a larger company. But for large companies, the truth is, that you will accumulate criticism friends and enemies no matter what you do or how successful you are.

    Compensation Range
    The compensation range and distribution for CEOs, particularly of large companies like those in the Fortune 1000, vary significantly based on various factors including company size, industry, and performance.

    Here is a summary of the data collected:

    Average Compensation
    The median total compensation for CEOs of top companies (Equilar 100) reached $22.3 million in 2022, an increase from the previous year​​.
    For the average CEO, the tenure has been reported to be around 6.9 to 7.2 years​​​​.

    Top CEO Compensation
    Some of the highest-paid CEOs receive significantly larger compensation, mostly through stock options and bonuses. For instance, Elon Musk’s average yearly bonus was reported at approximately $456.8 million, Sundar Pichai at around $98.9 million, and Andy Jassy at about $53.4 million​​.

    Salary Ranges
    For CEOs in general, the average salary in the United States was reported to be around $830,600 as of December 2023, but this figure can vary widely based on several factors​​.
    CEOs in different sectors can have varying average tenures, with those in financial services having the longest at about 8.4 years and those in energy and industrial sectors the shortest at around 6.5 years​​.

    Factors Affecting Compensation
    CEO compensation is influenced by company performance, industry-specific trends, regional economic conditions, and individual negotiation skills.
    Stock awards form a significant part of CEO compensation, often aligning their interests with company performance and long-term growth.

    Comparison with Other C-suite Roles
    Compared to other C-suite roles, CEOs generally have longer tenures and higher compensation. For example, chief financial officers have an average tenure of 4.7 years with varying compensation based on the sector​​.

    This data reflects the high level of responsibility and expectations placed on CEOs, as well as the current market dynamics influencing executive compensation.

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-24 22:32:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750285381092638720

  • CEO DURABILITY? (IT’S ALMOST HALVED) –CURT: Q: “What is the average duration of

    CEO DURABILITY? (IT’S ALMOST HALVED)
    –CURT: Q: “What is the average duration of employment for the CEO of a fortune 1000 company?”–

    The average duration of employment for CEOs, particularly in large companies like those in the Fortune 1000, has been a subject of study and analysis. Based on the available data, the tenure of CEOs has shown a trend of fluctuation over time with a general decrease in recent years.

    Recent Trends (As of 2023)
    The average tenure of CEOs in 2023 is approximately 7.2 years, marking a 34% decrease compared to 2017​​.
    In the context of the S&P 500, the average tenure and ages of departing CEOs were higher in recent years (10.2 years in 2022, age 62.6) compared to previous periods, but these figures have started to normalize​​.

    Historical Perspective
    Historically, the median tenure of a CEO has been around five years, with a notable percentage (19%) of CEOs remaining in position for 10 or more years over the past two decades​​.

    A study by Korn Ferry reported that the average tenure for CEOs dipped to 6.9 years in 2019, down from 8.0 years in 2016​​.

    A longer-term perspective reveals that the median tenure for CEOs was steadily decreasing, with averages dropping from 10 years in 2000, to 8 years in 2016, and approaching 5 years in more recent times​​.

    These trends reflect changes in the business environment, including increased accountability, rapid technological advancements, market volatility, and evolving consumer demands.

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-24 21:34:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750270991098392576

  • The CEO problem is the same as the bank problem: if a government leaves open a h

    The CEO problem is the same as the bank problem: if a government leaves open a hole in ‘the rules’ then they must either exploit it or be defeated by competitors who exploit it instead. So, it is not a CEO greed problem, it’s a natural consequence of the failure of the state to…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 18:16:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749858559049769181

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749858203104326052

  • For our organization, this is probably worth it. 1000 per month isn’t. 500 quest

    For our organization, this is probably worth it. 1000 per month isn’t. 500 quest

    For our organization, this is probably worth it. 1000 per month isn’t. 500 questionably. 200 maybe. 100 certainly. At present we pay the 16 per month. I would really love to be able to afford 1k a month but at present donation levels we cant manage it. (Conservatives don’t… https://t.co/0yOyf5yWOS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 23:07:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749207124540817643