Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • Either consumer (many) or student (few)

    Either consumer (many) or student (few).


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-16 17:14:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780283587771724267

    Reply addressees: @TrustlessSoV @BradCLemley

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1780249672550060183

  • I would love someone to do so. I do not know what ‘work with me’ means. I work w

    I would love someone to do so. I do not know what ‘work with me’ means. I work with the team now, and with brad and martin in particular. What would you need from me to distill it down for a layman (which I think is rather difficult.). ;).

    I mean, I don’t exactly have nothing…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 20:30:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779970618537967995

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779951915369165102

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: AMERICAN ENTREPRENEURSHIP American innovation is fast because

    RT @ThruTheHayes: AMERICAN ENTREPRENEURSHIP

    American innovation is fast because it can fail.

    Failure is how agents learn.

    Feedback only…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-15 16:34:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1779911262165516360

  • Take the nerd path and work into it from academy or biz (I did) or take the care

    Take the nerd path and work into it from academy or biz (I did) or take the career path and start in either. Either way, it’s a nerdfest. I loved intel people because of the high nerd content. DOD people I’ve worked with on the intel side were different breed but ‘real men’ that…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 20:29:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778883202456707193

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778877717305262538

  • Sorry, you’re talking investments and I’m talking businesses

    Sorry, you’re talking investments and I’m talking businesses.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 00:03:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778574534334992500

    Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778572644784214164

  • I’m a nerd and I’ve built a number of consulting companies, so I found the busin

    I’m a nerd and I’ve built a number of consulting companies, so I found the business model fascinating in a sort of bizarre, comical way – especially the amount of graft necessary to keep the police away, the ratio of ‘dancers’ to ‘prostitutes’, necessary to keep the club busy, and the various compensation schemes for the staff. Though, it’s quite a bit different over there in Ukraine and Russia because most of the dancers are just ordinary young moms who can’t make that kind of money in any other occupation. So it’s not the same kind of business or people as in the states. Anyway. I thought buying one was a license to sh-t talk about it for fun for decades. 😉
    I also tried to buy a regular and popular club right after Maidan (put them in a cash crunch) but oddly, there were no drugs in the strip club, but the regular club was a drug distribution center, and given I was working intel that didn’t ‘fit’. I found out that it was just easier to make contacts as an entrepreneur looking to make investments in potential businesses. That got me invited to everything.

    Reply addressees: @Gene76244311


    Source date (UTC): 2024-04-12 00:02:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778574393511227392

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1778550231577288811

  • NOTES ON CORP OWNERSHIP REFORM Legal Perspective True: “The purpose of the corpo

    NOTES ON CORP OWNERSHIP REFORM

    Legal Perspective

    True: “The purpose of the corporation is to do anything lawful.” And “Corporations are real, shareholders are a fiction.” In other words, shareholders are not owners. Companies do not work to maximize shareholder value. That is a fiction to sell investors.

    A management team balances brand awareness, market share, customers, employees, bankers, investors, and vendors, each of which is competing to maximize their take of the profits if their are any.

    Thoughts: (a) Owners ‘invest’ to obtain income and appreciation but lack liquidity.

    (b) Shareholders function as lenders who purchase liquidity and opportunity for dividends and appreciation – they are not owners, that is the myth.

    (c) From the company’s perspective, dividends and appreciation are the cost of maintaining borrowing capacity in capital markets so that opportunities can be seized by rapid appeal to capital markets.

    (d) Boards of other than owners are a wast of time money and energy – a kabuki theater – and instead, companies should be, and are, insured to act in the interest of their contract with the shareholders. The very best you can say about boards is (i) you can pay people for relationships, assistance, and information. (ii) when you are unsure and want to bounce ideas off peers rather than employees but be sure it won’t leak, they’re useful. (iii) preparing for board meetings makes sure that you and your team are on the same page and understand your own business. (iv) I use my boards exclusively to test my ideas and rarely do anything if I can’t convince them unanimously. This tempers my too-high risk tolerance. It gives me political cover with the staff and others if I make a mistake.

    (e) It’s not even clear that financial reports other than to auditors and insurers are of any value other than in selling to lenders (shareholders). Randomly select financial reports from your favorite companies. You will learn far more from analyst calls.

    (f) Trying to maintain or improve shareholder value, is a terrible practice because investment cycles (capital requirements necessary for returns) have been increasing, and the division of production distribution and trade fragmenting, but lifespan of companies are decreasing – for this very reason. Innovators dilemmas everywhere. No one tries to maximize shareholder value. That’s nonsense. You try to preserve it. the objective of nearly every business is to preserve it’s existence as a going concern for all those involved: customers, employees, owners, vendors, investors. It is very hard to build a business that produces a durable income stream because the customer vendor employee network is the most difficult organization to produce.

    (g) There is no reason whatsoever that companies should direct resources to ‘charities’ or ‘movements’, instead of requiring such donations come from individuals. Social responsibly is a code word for rent-seeking because the government is incapable of providing results. The current condition is that companies are frequently blackmailed if they don’t contribute to certain causes. That’s an injustice. That one shall do no harm is the best an organization can do and is the best therefore we can ask them to do.

    Lastly unless you’ve run a company of at least say, 50M, and preferably over 100M you have no idea just how difficult it is to produce a profit. (i) My primary complaint is that companies do not themselves maintain accounting for operations (cash: profit and loss from operations), management (ops plus overhead), owners (ops, overhead, assets, and yes, market share ), lenders (EBITDA), and the state (taxes, amortization, and depreciation).

    Most executives I’ve consulted, companies I’ve acquired, or accounting departments I’ve fought with, have too poor a grasp of operations and obscure it by conflating accounting data so to obscure normal volatility and variation in risk from investors and lenders, and to minimize taxes.

    Drive employee quality, operations, marketshare, and leave everything else to finance and accounting. Money is just another resource provided by vendors.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-01 20:47:00 UTC