Curt Doolittle

Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • I have ppls interested. pm me contact info, preferably FB, if you are serious, t

    I have ppls interested. pm me contact info, preferably FB, if you are serious, they are.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 21:30:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080214617241079808

    Reply addressees: @jonathanwilson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080196462393339904

    IN REPLY TO:

    @jonathanwilson

    I’m starting a private group to discuss adapting Agile Software Development (https://t.co/CJiGMH1XOC) into Agile Personal Development (https://t.co/mksyOyqlAE) in an attempt to inject #antifragility into lives, and thus the world, decreasing overall systemic risk of black swans.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080196462393339904

  • agile manifesto simply tech application of universal frame. not unique. common b

    agile manifesto simply tech application of universal frame. not unique. common before industrialization. continuous recursive progress with immediate feedback eliminates error early and cheaply, reinforces early and cheaply, and merely restates normal life’s epistemology.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-01 21:01:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080207519635697664

    Reply addressees: @jonathanwilson @tferriss

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080200923014725632

    IN REPLY TO:

    @jonathanwilson

    @curtdoolittle Very similar, yes! I’d love some examples you can think of where Agile’s manifesto sounds like Seneca. @tferriss will be interested in this thread.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1080200923014725632

  • Untitled

    https://www.cbinsights.com/research/disrupting-management-consulting/https://www.cbinsights.com/research/disrupting-management-consulting/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 09:12:00 UTC

  • MOST FAILURES OBVIOUS? The study of failures is more valuable than the study of

    https://www.cbinsights.com/research/corporate-innovation-product-fails/AREN’T MOST FAILURES OBVIOUS?

    The study of failures is more valuable than the study of successes. (note that for some reason Google+ made this list twice. lol )

    https://www.cbinsights.com/research/corporate-innovation-product-fails/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-30 08:34:00 UTC

  • Listening to John Mark last night and realizing how thoroughly he understands th

    Listening to John Mark last night and realizing how thoroughly he understands the material and how quickly he can respond to questions. There are a lot of you who can do that now. Next year there will be many more. And we have our movement.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 15:57:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1079043682068766720

  • One bit of frequent advice is that if we grow to quickly the idiot factor will b

    One bit of frequent advice is that if we grow to quickly the idiot factor will be impossible to control. I agree with this proposition, but it can be offset by changing what we talk about as we expand: early entrants are activists that need technical content. Ordinary people simply want to know what such a constitution would look like, how it would work, how governments would work, and how they would benefit from it. They do not need to understand the strict construction of law from first principles in algorithmic and operational language, or that we can test the truth of propositions by subjecting them to tests of due diligence in the dimensions available to human minds. They only need to know that some people can, and that if we do so, its as rigorous as mathematics.

    Ordinary people just need FEATURES AND BENEFITS. They do not need to understand the detailed process of engineering of those features and benefits.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 11:53:00 UTC

  • Let me help you. It is a disadvantage to me, to the work, and to the movement to

    Let me help you. It is a disadvantage to me, to the work, and to the movement to be associated with ‘those who have failed’. The more mainstream we become, the less value in fringe players. So no, leaving behind the fringe is part of the strategy. Not getting their attention. Propertarianism is not a philosophy or a religion, it is practical law the purpose of which is to defeat the means by which our high trust people (and other stupid people) are deceived by taking advantage of the weakness of our neurological construct using language.

    NO MORE LIES, NO MORE PARASITISM IS NOT A RIGHT WING MESSAGE: IT IS A MAJORITARIAN MESSAGE.

    The purpose of separatism is economic and political as well as genetic and cultural. The purpose of conquest is the same. It is just a choice given the possibilities.

    My strategy is simple: STARVE THE BEAST AND THE PARASITES DIE WITH IT.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-29 11:18:00 UTC

  • (Sorry for the current state. I’m using the holiday to launch our courses. Just

    (Sorry for the current state. I’m using the holiday to launch our courses. Just go to http://Propertarianism.com > Main Menu > Blog, or use the Elastic Search field at the top of the home page. Or go to the Main Menu > Propertarianism? link and choose from the list of options. )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-22 12:55:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076461101435576321

    Reply addressees: @NothingTheGreat @FaustianBurgle

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076410894639198208

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NothingTheGreat

    @FaustianBurgle @curtdoolittle The site has just migrated over to that course structure in the past week, because Curt is planning on setting it up as an actual degree-issuing institution. From what I understand it’s very much a work in progress with bugs. So I get the frustration there; bad timing. https://t.co/er5nzx0Ljb

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076410894639198208

  • WELL, GOT ANOTHER COURSE IN THE QUEUE Seems (crossed fingers) I’ve managed to re

    WELL, GOT ANOTHER COURSE IN THE QUEUE

    Seems (crossed fingers) I’ve managed to recruit someone very good (who shall be unnamed until we are ready) to do the presentation work on the history and uniqueness of western civilization.

    This course will be a combination of Duchesne, Huntington, Fukuyama, my own work, and bits from a few others. And it will be emphatically elitist, eurocentric, and nationalistic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 11:24:00 UTC

  • THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION You know, we taught Propertarianism (social science), Ec

    THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION

    You know, we taught Propertarianism (social science), Economics (micro, human, and macro), and Stoicism (mental fitness), and Fighting (physical fitness and war) then it would be possible to read Spengler, Nietzsche, and Hegel (not kant), without doing harm along with the good. Not sure yet about any of the others. The difference between the anglo scientific and german experiential is almost as vast as between the german experiential, russian spiritual, and the semitic supernatural. The problem is, that accessibility to anglo-scandinavians, continentals, orthodoxy, and semitism increases along that spectrum. Once we have the criticism of religion, abrahamism, sophisms and sentimentalisms written down as a science, they become nothing more than a spectrum of literature just like science, history, biography, novel, myth, and parable.

    I mean I know that my distaste for continental thought has declined rapidly with my increase in articulate criticism of nonsense-religion and abrahamism.

    I assume this would serve as a subconscious reaction by everyone educated.

    We saw the same thing with empiricism and the scientific revolution that we are seeing with the biological and computer science revolution.

    As I said in the past, I am pretty sure the leap in cognitive ability of the average person under Propertarianism would be as large as the leap of the average person under sciences.

    in other words we might be able to DRAMATICALLY SHIFT the demographic burden of demonstrated intelligence.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 10:55:00 UTC