Category: Business, Organization, and Management

  • King of The Hill Works

    Dec 19, 2019, 2:39 PM KING OF THE HILL WORKS by Luke Weinhagen There is an organization that exploded across the world based on the same two things being applied to the learning of P, creating opportunity to fail and playing king of the hill to accelerate development. The guy who built this organization is Greg Glassman, Founder of CrossFit Inc. Track down some of the early videos/material, not the Competition/Games related stuff, and you find some pretty solid and productive applications of king of the hill. Make it measurable, then put points on each measurement and say “Go”. Winning points go up on the board. (if you listen to the war college lecture and replace the concept “fitness” with “reciprocity” you will start to see similarities in what P is doing with creating methods of measurement, falsification and due diligence – part 4 of the War College lecture goes a bit about the impact of turning development into competition)

  • King of The Hill Works

    Dec 19, 2019, 2:39 PM KING OF THE HILL WORKS by Luke Weinhagen There is an organization that exploded across the world based on the same two things being applied to the learning of P, creating opportunity to fail and playing king of the hill to accelerate development. The guy who built this organization is Greg Glassman, Founder of CrossFit Inc. Track down some of the early videos/material, not the Competition/Games related stuff, and you find some pretty solid and productive applications of king of the hill. Make it measurable, then put points on each measurement and say “Go”. Winning points go up on the board. (if you listen to the war college lecture and replace the concept “fitness” with “reciprocity” you will start to see similarities in what P is doing with creating methods of measurement, falsification and due diligence – part 4 of the War College lecture goes a bit about the impact of turning development into competition)

  • Corporations Should Not Be Allowed to Exist without Benefiting the Commons Direc

    Corporations Should Not Be Allowed to Exist without Benefiting the Commons Directly. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/corporations-should-not-be-allowed-to-exist-without-benefiting-the-commons-directly/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:20:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265498025465647106

  • Corporations Should Not Be Allowed to Exist without Benefiting the Commons Directly.

    Dec 25, 2019, 2:41 PM Millennials quoting Millennials studying Curt Doolittle. All will be well. Heimdallr Aldafaðir   I believe one of the ways America and the West have lost their way. We started to prioritize “profits” over Commons. Jobs over communities. Nomadic capitalism over ” generational roots”. The Socialists aren’t wrong about the dangers of Capitalism. Their solution is mostly moronic. But the danger exists. From what I gather of History and Economics. The only or best way to safeguard the Commons (society, families, countries, people, etc.) is to temper the profit motive with a strong incentive to invest in the Commons. Which is one of the things America (especially) has lost over the centuries. Corporate Charters should return to mortality. They should also require investment in the Commons directly or face termination entirely. Only by showing a direct causal link to the betterment of the Commons should they be allowed to maintain legality and operation. Prove to US how you benefit US. Endless (or functionally endless) Charters are parasitic and enable almost exclusively free riders. No. More. Free. Rides.

    • Stephen Thomas
  • Corporations Should Not Be Allowed to Exist without Benefiting the Commons Directly.

    Dec 25, 2019, 2:41 PM Millennials quoting Millennials studying Curt Doolittle. All will be well. Heimdallr Aldafaðir   I believe one of the ways America and the West have lost their way. We started to prioritize “profits” over Commons. Jobs over communities. Nomadic capitalism over ” generational roots”. The Socialists aren’t wrong about the dangers of Capitalism. Their solution is mostly moronic. But the danger exists. From what I gather of History and Economics. The only or best way to safeguard the Commons (society, families, countries, people, etc.) is to temper the profit motive with a strong incentive to invest in the Commons. Which is one of the things America (especially) has lost over the centuries. Corporate Charters should return to mortality. They should also require investment in the Commons directly or face termination entirely. Only by showing a direct causal link to the betterment of the Commons should they be allowed to maintain legality and operation. Prove to US how you benefit US. Endless (or functionally endless) Charters are parasitic and enable almost exclusively free riders. No. More. Free. Rides.

    • Stephen Thomas
  • Notes on Corp Ownership Reform

    Notes on Corp Ownership Reform https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/notes-on-corp-ownership-reform/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 00:57:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265446992219484160

  • Notes on Corp Ownership Reform

    Jan 1, 2020, 8:47 PM Legal PerspectiveTrue: “The purpose of the corporation is to do anything lawful.” And “Corporations are real, shareholders are a fiction.” In other words, shareholders are not owners. Companies do not work to maximize shareholder value. That is a fiction to sell investors. A management team balances brand awareness, market share, customers, employees, bankers, investors, and vendors, each of which is competing to maximize their take of the profits if their are any. Thoughts:

    (a) Owners ‘invest’ to obtain income and appreciation but lack liquidity.

    (b) Shareholders function as lenders who purchase liquidity and opportunity for dividends and appreciation – they are not owners, that is the myth.

    (c) From the company’s perspective, dividends and appreciation are the cost of maintaining borrowing capacity in capital markets so that opportunities can be seized by rapid appeal to capital markets.

    (d) Boards of other than owners are a wast of time money and energy – a kabuki theater – and instead, companies should be, and are, insured to act in the interest of their contract with the shareholders. The very best you can say about boards is (i) you can pay people for relationships, assistance, and information. (ii) when you are unsure and want to bounce ideas off peers rather than employees but be sure it won’t leak, they’re useful. (iii) preparing for board meetings makes sure that you and your team are on the same page and understand your own business. (iv) I use my boards exclusively to test my ideas and rarely do anything if I can’t convince them unanimously. This tempers my too-high risk tolerance. It gives me political cover with the staff and others if I make a mistake.

    (e) It’s not even clear that financial reports other than to auditors and insurers are of any value other than in selling to lenders (shareholders). Randomly select financial reports from your favorite companies. You will learn far more from analyst calls.

    (f) Trying to maintain or improve shareholder value, is a terrible practice because investment cycles (capital requirements necessary for returns) have been increasing, and the division of production distribution and trade fragmenting, but lifespan of companies are decreasing – for this very reason. Innovators dilemmas everywhere. No one tries to maximize shareholder value. That’s nonsense. You try to preserve it. the objective of nearly every business is to preserve it’s existence as a going concern for all those involved: customers, employees, owners, vendors, investors. It is very hard to build a business that produces a durable income stream because the customer vendor employee network is the most difficult organization to produce.

    (g) There is no reason whatsoever that companies should direct resources to ‘charities’ or ‘movements’, instead of requiring such donations come from individuals. Social responsibly is a code word for rent-seeking because the government is incapable of providing results. The current condition is that companies are frequently blackmailed if they don’t contribute to certain causes. That’s an injustice. That one shall do no harm is the best an organization can do and is the best therefore we can ask them to do. Lastly unless you’ve run a company of at least say, 50M, and preferably over 100M you have no idea just how difficult it is to produce a profit. (i) My primary complaint is that companies do not themselves maintain accounting for operations (cash: profit and loss from operations), management (ops plus overhead), owners (ops, overhead, assets, and yes, market share ), lenders (EBITDA), and the state (taxes, amortization, and depreciation). Most executives I’ve consulted, companies I’ve acquired, or accounting departments I’ve fought with, have too poor a grasp of operations and obscure it by conflating accounting data so to obscure normal volatility and variation in risk from investors and lenders, and to minimize taxes. Drive employee quality, operations, marketshare, and leave everything else to finance and accounting. Money is just another resource provided by vendors.

  • Notes on Corp Ownership Reform

    Jan 1, 2020, 8:47 PM Legal PerspectiveTrue: “The purpose of the corporation is to do anything lawful.” And “Corporations are real, shareholders are a fiction.” In other words, shareholders are not owners. Companies do not work to maximize shareholder value. That is a fiction to sell investors. A management team balances brand awareness, market share, customers, employees, bankers, investors, and vendors, each of which is competing to maximize their take of the profits if their are any. Thoughts:

    (a) Owners ‘invest’ to obtain income and appreciation but lack liquidity.

    (b) Shareholders function as lenders who purchase liquidity and opportunity for dividends and appreciation – they are not owners, that is the myth.

    (c) From the company’s perspective, dividends and appreciation are the cost of maintaining borrowing capacity in capital markets so that opportunities can be seized by rapid appeal to capital markets.

    (d) Boards of other than owners are a wast of time money and energy – a kabuki theater – and instead, companies should be, and are, insured to act in the interest of their contract with the shareholders. The very best you can say about boards is (i) you can pay people for relationships, assistance, and information. (ii) when you are unsure and want to bounce ideas off peers rather than employees but be sure it won’t leak, they’re useful. (iii) preparing for board meetings makes sure that you and your team are on the same page and understand your own business. (iv) I use my boards exclusively to test my ideas and rarely do anything if I can’t convince them unanimously. This tempers my too-high risk tolerance. It gives me political cover with the staff and others if I make a mistake.

    (e) It’s not even clear that financial reports other than to auditors and insurers are of any value other than in selling to lenders (shareholders). Randomly select financial reports from your favorite companies. You will learn far more from analyst calls.

    (f) Trying to maintain or improve shareholder value, is a terrible practice because investment cycles (capital requirements necessary for returns) have been increasing, and the division of production distribution and trade fragmenting, but lifespan of companies are decreasing – for this very reason. Innovators dilemmas everywhere. No one tries to maximize shareholder value. That’s nonsense. You try to preserve it. the objective of nearly every business is to preserve it’s existence as a going concern for all those involved: customers, employees, owners, vendors, investors. It is very hard to build a business that produces a durable income stream because the customer vendor employee network is the most difficult organization to produce.

    (g) There is no reason whatsoever that companies should direct resources to ‘charities’ or ‘movements’, instead of requiring such donations come from individuals. Social responsibly is a code word for rent-seeking because the government is incapable of providing results. The current condition is that companies are frequently blackmailed if they don’t contribute to certain causes. That’s an injustice. That one shall do no harm is the best an organization can do and is the best therefore we can ask them to do. Lastly unless you’ve run a company of at least say, 50M, and preferably over 100M you have no idea just how difficult it is to produce a profit. (i) My primary complaint is that companies do not themselves maintain accounting for operations (cash: profit and loss from operations), management (ops plus overhead), owners (ops, overhead, assets, and yes, market share ), lenders (EBITDA), and the state (taxes, amortization, and depreciation). Most executives I’ve consulted, companies I’ve acquired, or accounting departments I’ve fought with, have too poor a grasp of operations and obscure it by conflating accounting data so to obscure normal volatility and variation in risk from investors and lenders, and to minimize taxes. Drive employee quality, operations, marketshare, and leave everything else to finance and accounting. Money is just another resource provided by vendors.

  • The Work Is Done for You; Just Plug and Play

    The Work Is Done for You; Just Plug and Play https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/25/the-work-is-done-for-you-just-plug-and-play/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-25 23:24:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265061278223077377

  • The Work Is Done for You; Just Plug and Play

    Jan 10, 2020, 12:57 PM by Brandon Hayes Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth; it’s 2020. Take a good look at it. Look at it again. If you don’t like it, there’s a single way to change it; accept it and modify it along the lines of natural law; reciprocity; and make something of it for yourself. You’re brilliant and technologically advanced; only your addictions and lies stand in your way. Accepting reality isn’t a burden; that’s always been a lie. A lie to keep you from seeing the simple truth. Life is simple and beautifully so. You want Eden; this is the closest you get with resorting to fantasy. No lies; just calculation for cooperation. Worried about restitution, P’s got it in spades. Let those most fit to bear the burdens of the world bear them as they ought; know it’s your duty to do your damnedest not to add to this burden; the attempts to fit round pegs into square holes and similar unfruitful endeavors ought cease. We have acted in a counter-productive fashion long enough. P does parsimony so you can do action. I’m not interested in your abstract expressions nor your virtue signals… can you be the change you scream about needing so badly? Cause now’s your chance.