Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • Since I was working for intel at the time at least in a contract role, I think I

    Since I was working for intel at the time at least in a contract role, I think I have a far better understanding of the matter than you do. In fact, we couldn’t get ANY attention from the USA or EU until mid december. It was a revolution for the simple reason that the UA people are the poorest in europe because the RU govt and the Oligarchs worked to undermine the state long enough that RU could take it over.

    So you can claim it was a CIA color revolution but that’s talking our your backside meaning youi’re just a sucker for propaganda.

    I know how much money was brought into the country from the USA and how it was brought in and when, though I am not privy to exactly how it was distributed. But it was late to the game.

    Reply addressees: @sqpatrick77


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 17:04:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744404825733775360

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744403551940460651

  • Zach, GIVEN –“In algorithmic information theory, the Kolmogorov complexity of a

    Zach,
    GIVEN
    –“In algorithmic information theory, the Kolmogorov complexity of an object, such as a piece of text, is the length of a shortest computer program (in a predetermined programming language) that produces the object as output. It is a measure of the computational resources needed to specify the object,”–
    AND
    (a) the universe’s computational resources.
    (b) the universe’s algorithm is not a subset of possible operations, but consists of the only possible operations.
    (c) the set of what the universe can compute is identical to the set of operations the universe can construct.
    THEREFORE
    KC is irrelevant. It is a statement about computers in the universe and software on those computers and not the universe.
    AS SUCH
    Wolfram (as I) would not of course consider it relevant since that relevance would be illogical.

    Note that the fact you are confused (as would almost everyone be) is also why the physicists are confused. Because mathematics(calculation) is not the same as computation(operations).

    Reply addressees: @Zamicol @LiminalRev @RussellJohnston @cryptogeni


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 12:50:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744340706208935937

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744323384442278078

  • THE GODEL NONSENSE IS AN INTERGENERATIONAL INFECTION. 😉 –“There’s no proof tha

    THE GODEL NONSENSE IS AN INTERGENERATIONAL INFECTION. 😉
    –“There’s no proof that everything is computable. Information theory is in agreement with Gödel.”– Replying to @Zamicol and @cryptogeni

    That is a naive statement. You are confusing the limits of mathematics with the limits of computation and not grasping computation as a sequence of possible operations. The fact is if the universe can construct anything at all – if ANYTHING can exist, then it is computable because there is no difference between computation and construction by permutation.

    The difference is that mathematics is universally statistical (categorical) so that we can predict what is mathematically reducible, and that is only a subset of what is computable. The problem with computability is that there is no means of prediction – there is only a means of trial and error.

    You also misunderstand Godel. The point is that not everything is provable because there is no closure to computability, and provability is a statement about logic given a set of fixed premises and not about existential possibility. Furthermore, the proof appears to be limited to arithmetical operations and nothing more complicated.

    It appears you also misunderstand information theory given that the purpose of the theory is to explain the problem of entropy and noice precisely because of the information loss in mathematical (verbal, ideal) reduction vs computational (operational,real) procedures is due precisely to the fact that mathematics loses information and computation doesn’t (at least down to -35 decimal places).

    I did not realize until the early nineties that this false understanding of Godel was spreading like a virus with each new generation of students learning programming – but who have no basic comprehension of its narrowness. However, there are authors who have written books, one in particular that I can’t recall off the top of my head, that I felt was largely accessible to the STEM degree-educated population.

    I hope this helps you at least head in the right direction.
    Let me know if you require further explanation.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:29:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744169409642373120

  • RT @realMartinLukas: AI safteyism vs. e/acc is the latest instantiation of the w

    RT @realMartinLukas: AI safteyism vs. e/acc is the latest instantiation of the war of memes that has been ravaging societies and hampered p…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 11:54:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743239476296441892

  • I’m not getting any of this so we’d have to look into what’s affecting your acco

    I’m not getting any of this so we’d have to look into what’s affecting your account. I suspect that you’re numerous interactions with certain groups are causing you to be associated with that network, and as such you’re being limited as they are. (the X code works by weighing…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-04 02:25:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742734062249275423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742732281339580813

  • openai gp4

    openai gp4


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 05:09:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742412745788588386

    Reply addressees: @FuryForth

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742409670310940711

  • (Loving AI) (a) regular expressions (b) excel formulas (c) statistical formulas

    (Loving AI)
    (a) regular expressions
    (b) excel formulas
    (c) statistical formulas
    (d) programming syntax
    (e) enumerating and disambiguating terms
    (f) writing lists of historical events without having to goole or bing everything.
    (g) rewriting ordinary prose in academic prose, or the reverse.

    Notice that I don’t ask it to produce anything dependent upon logic, but largely use it as a search engine. All of them are just horrific at logic other than programming logic.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 03:47:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742392208446132224

  • RT @JeffYoungerShow: @curtdoolittle There basically won’t be any programmers. We

    RT @JeffYoungerShow: @curtdoolittle There basically won’t be any programmers. We might call them that, but they don’t be doing work we now…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-01 14:39:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741831468177850390

  • THE FUTURE OF PROGRAMMING: SHOULD I STILL LEARN TO CODE? 😉 I don’t give our car

    THE FUTURE OF PROGRAMMING: SHOULD I STILL LEARN TO CODE? 😉
    I don’t give our career advice without deep knowledge of the individual and the industry. I have a few cognitive flaws and that is overestimating people, and I find that it’s counterproductive.

    However, I would say that the population of most white collar jobs will decrease, and rather drastically, on the scale of the farming to labor, and the labor to automation, and clerical to computer shifts.

    So any opinion anyone gives on the future is worth whatever monetary bet they are willing to put on it, and nothing more. Me included.

    That said, I see programming very quickly elimiating programmers per se, and instead, the work left to people who tell AI’s what to program, and people who tell AI’s what to test, and what to fix or improve – and so ‘programming’ will require fewer people. Even if I suspect the high end will always consist of ‘cunning humans’ who augment their theories with AIs that make testing those thories cheaper.

    Example, when I first started writing applications I was surpised how much more productive I was than the prevoius generation of programmers (cobol fortran etc). Then when I built my first consulting companies, as the PC world replaced the iron and expanded further into more niches, then it might take 25-75 people to write some software application. But within a few years that number dropped to five. Same thing with games. I wrote some amazing games in assembler when in my early twenties. But today it can either take a whole studio many years to produce a game, or an individual just a few months.

    The difference ‘now’ is that we have been rapidly increasing the population of programmers, and we have been producing a lot of bad (sh**t) code, because the browser tech encourages bad (sh**t) code. So I expect AIs to not only replace masses of programmers writing bad (sh**t) code, but that such a replacement will add to a change in the browser tech (long overdue). Furthermore if you look at my company’s app (which is on hold at the moment) it replaces dozens of other apps, becasue most apps aren’t, apps or platforms, they’re features begging to be consolidated.

    So what I look at that horizon I see work to be done in programming, and perhaps more better code, but I can’t tell if a drop in the existing employment is short and mediumterm, or long term. Or whether the meaning of programming is just shifting to using english instead of progrmming languages and that many more people will be needed to produce better software more cheaply.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @adominguez792


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:59:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741474132699537409

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741468561149747514

  • No, the LLMs were a windfall because (as some of us expected) they started to pr

    No, the LLMs were a windfall because (as some of us expected) they started to produce unpredictable outcomes with novel insights – what we call ’emergent behaviors’.

    In retrospect we should have understood a bit better what we were doing because essentially we’re brute forcing…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:37:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741468509836611805

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741466963912601717