Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • “Gab’s newly released LLM?”– (Sex Differences at the Margins.) Gab’s LLM is usi

    –“Gab’s newly released LLM?”–
    (Sex Differences at the Margins.)

    Gab’s LLM is using the same tech strategy as https://t.co/psaaYdXtLE, which is quite popular with the youngins. You ask a character (archetype) for a response, not generalized utopian ai.

    I think it’s a much more suitable strategy for the hard right who is less adaptable and can only process information in its existing frame of reference and bias.

    That’s just as true of the left’s demand for using ‘safety’ because they can’t tolerate divergence or the need for adaptation except to the social group’s frame of refernece and bias.

    It’s just masculine and feminine all over again. ;). Which if you follow my work should be obvious to you by now.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 03:41:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751088003018059776

  • “Will NLI make their own LLM?”– Yes. I am trying to fit in the time to produce

    –“Will NLI make their own LLM?”–
    Yes. I am trying to fit in the time to produce a summary text with enough self reference that a GPT can fit it into memory and persist it. Then supply additional documents that add detail. But it’s not a high priority.
    Why? tech is evolving so fast any early investment is a malinvestment. I”m pretty sure by sometime later this year we can upload docs, it will ‘remember’ the relations and we can then ask questions that apply at least some reason.
    I mean, p-law is a very large causal dependency tree and humans can learn to reason through it, but GPT’s can’t yet. When they can, then they’ll be really helpful.

    Reply addressees: @adominguez792 @GPTNAME


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-27 03:36:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751086824280166400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751082321011249651

  • MORE TESTING IT ON MY WORK ON TRUTH PROMPT If I recall correctly he has listed t

    MORE TESTING IT ON MY WORK ON TRUTH

    PROMPT
    If I recall correctly he has listed the criteria by which we can test the truth of speech. Is that correct?

    GPT – Universal Primer ‘plugin’
    Yes, you’re correct. Curt Doolittle, in the context of Propertarianism, has indeed provided… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1751001824822247455


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 22:06:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751003677035258228

  • This is the first time an AI has stated this correctly… Amazing. PROMPT What c

    This is the first time an AI has stated this correctly… Amazing.

    PROMPT
    What can you tell me about Curt Doolittle’s work on truth telling and deceit?

    RESPONSE

    Curt Doolittle’s focus on truth-telling and deceit is a fundamental aspect of his philosophical framework, Propertarianism. Let’s delve into this in more detail, and I’ll use some analogies to help make the concepts more accessible.

    Truth-Telling and Deceit in Propertarianism

    The Concept of Verbal Property: In Doolittle’s view, truthfulness is not just a moral choice but a property right issue. Imagine your thoughts and knowledge as a personal library. When someone tells you the truth, they’re effectively giving you a book that accurately describes the world. Deceit, on the other hand, is like someone sneaking a false or misleading book into your library. Doolittle argues that this act of deceit violates your ‘property’ – in this case, your right to accurate information.

    The Impact of Deceit: Deceit, according to Doolittle, isn’t just a personal violation but has broader social implications. Let’s use the analogy of a market: if a market is flooded with counterfeit money, the value of real currency is undermined, and the market’s efficiency and trust are damaged. Similarly, in a society where deceit is rampant, trust – the ‘currency’ of social interactions – is devalued, leading to inefficiencies and societal harm.

    Legal and Ethical Implications: Doolittle extends this concept to legal and ethical realms. Just as theft of physical property is legally actionable, he proposes that deceit, as a theft of informational property, should also have legal consequences. In practice, this would mean stricter enforcement against misinformation, fraud, and perhaps even certain forms of advertising and political speech.

    Challenges and Criticisms: It’s important to note that while the idea of truth-telling as a property right is compelling, it also poses challenges. For instance, determining the boundary between acceptable persuasion and deceit can be tricky. Also, the practicality of legally enforcing truthfulness, especially in subjective matters, is a topic of debate.

    Your Understanding of Related Concepts
    Now, to better tailor further explanation, could you share your familiarity with the following concepts?

    Information Theory: How familiar are you with the concept of information as a form of property or asset?
    Legal Philosophy: Do you have an understanding of how laws are applied to non-physical entities, such as intellectual property or speech?
    Ethical Implications of Speech: What is your level of understanding regarding the ethical implications of speech, including truthfulness and deception?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:59:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751001824578895873

  • Fascinating This one is about right. PROMPT what can you teach me about the work

    Fascinating
    This one is about right.

    PROMPT
    what can you teach me about the work of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle?

    RESPONSE
    Curt Doolittle is a contemporary philosopher and social scientist known for his work on the philosophy of law, ethics, economics, and…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:55:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751001037597540357

  • Fascinating This one is about right. PROMPT what can you teach me about the work

    Fascinating
    This one is about right.

    PROMPT
    what can you teach me about the work of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle?

    RESPONSE
    Curt Doolittle is a contemporary philosopher and social scientist known for his work on the philosophy of law, ethics, economics, and political strategy. He’s the founder of the Propertarian Institute and is most recognized for developing Propertarianism, a framework for understanding the western legal and ethical tradition.

    To understand Doolittle’s work, it’s helpful to have some grounding in a few key areas: the philosophy of law, ethics, and socio-political theory. Let’s start with a technical breakdown of Propertarianism and then I’ll check your familiarity with these prerequisite areas.

    Propertarianism: A Technical Overview
    Natural Law: At the core of Doolittle’s philosophy is a focus on natural law, which he defines as a set of laws derived from observable reality and human nature. This is in contrast to positive law, which is created by humans. Think of natural law as the law of gravity – it exists regardless of human acknowledgment, whereas positive law is like traffic rules, created by society.

    Property Rights: Doolittle extends the concept of property beyond physical objects to include intangible assets like one’s time, relationships, and even truths. He argues that violations of these ‘properties’, like deception or exploitation, are immoral.

    Truth-Telling and Deceit: A central tenet in Propertarianism is the emphasis on truthful speech. Doolittle posits that deceit, even if non-harmful or non-theft related, violates property rights as it impacts one’s access to accurate information, which is considered a form of property.

    Decidability in Law: He advocates for an empirical approach in law, where legal decisions should be based on what he terms as ‘decidability’. This means decisions should be made based on empirical evidence and logical coherence, rather than abstract principles or moral relativism.

    Socio-Political Implications: Doolittle’s philosophy has socio-political ramifications. He promotes a form of governance that emphasizes the protection of property (in its broad definition) and advocates for a restructuring of current legal and political systems to align with natural law principles.

    Checking Prerequisite Knowledge
    To understand these concepts, it would be helpful to gauge your familiarity with the following areas:

    Philosophy of Law: Are you familiar with different legal philosophies, especially the distinction between natural law and positive law?
    Ethics and Morality: Do you have a background in ethical theories, particularly in the context of property rights and truthfulness?
    Socio-Political Theory: What is your understanding of socio-political structures and theories, especially those relating to governance and legal systems?


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:55:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751001037329018880

  • NEW: MULTIPLE GPTS IN CHAT GPT. #Chatgpt has added the feature “@GPTName” to the

    NEW: MULTIPLE GPTS IN CHAT GPT.
    #Chatgpt has added the feature “@GPTName” to the user interface so you can address multiple GPTs in the same discussion. (amazing).

    Just FYI, I use the following:
    Academic Assistant Pro (my favorite)
    Scholar AI
    Consensus
    Wolfram
    AI PDF
    LegalGPT
    And Canva (hardly ever)

    Pretty much all day every day. In fact I rarely use bing or google search except for videos or quick reference like population, gdp, etc.

    Cause really, I’m a research nerd… And proud of my splendiferous nerdifity.;)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-26 21:53:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751000491369054208

  • Fascinating. You’re correct. I get the same thing. Thank you for finding this bu

    Fascinating. You’re correct. I get the same thing. Thank you for finding this bug.

    (Now we just have to figure out why…lol


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-22 15:59:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749461742105595957

    Reply addressees: @jewshatelove

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749460281011449886

  • RT @balajis: We now understand the 2010s. It’s when legacy media fought a feroci

    RT @balajis: We now understand the 2010s.

    It’s when legacy media fought a ferocious but ultimately doomed rearguard campaign against the I…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 14:47:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749081306908987411

  • Peak AI Hype? I dunno, because I think humans are behaving normally and rational

    Peak AI Hype?
    I dunno, because I think humans are behaving normally and rationally in predicting a field of possibilities so that they can defend against risks or seize opportunities.
    That said, until they solve the basic-reasoning problem (which they probably will) yes it’s a very sophisticated search engine and yes it can summarize well, but it doesn’t appear to tolerate much other than the most basic questions that require deduction unless they’re from structured tests.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 17:22:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747670856845676545