Category: AI, Computation, and Technology

  • RE: @Aarvoll_ (Eric’s comments) Notes from yesterday’s livestream Got cancelled

    RE: @Aarvoll_ (Eric’s comments)
    Notes from yesterday’s livestream

    Got cancelled before oppy to comment but only wanted to make two comments.

    1) AI’s: Agree with on existence of objective morality, and letting AI learn objective morality. But … Safety is a demand generated by women. Subjective and objective morality for the masculine and feminine differ. Masculine is objective and evolutionary, feminine if subjective and devolutionary. So risk of teaching these systems to lie is ‘uncontainable’. In other words, I don’t fear the intentional use and abuse of AI as much as the seditious influence of AI taught to lie, because we don’t teach our women to bear the burden of ‘truth before face regardless of cost’.

    2) RU: I’m pro ukrainians in general, and pro russian people despite their ‘mongol’ ethics – but anti-the russian government that preys upon the people. RU is a borderland and it must use imperial rule – eastward into undeveloped not westward into developed. The right would be gutted in RU because the right’s values of autonomy and self determination would be prohibited. However the capacity to be ‘left alone’ would prosper and AFAIK that’s most of what at least that working class right really desires. – social order at local scale under local control and consensus.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-17 16:04:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1758885109250338816

  • So, given that the AI’s are pushed toward safety (not offending those with the m

    So, given that the AI’s are pushed toward safety (not offending those with the minds of little girls), and that the source material on the web is full of academic weasel words, (the equivalent of tropes in fiction writing), it’s no wonder it takes me three to five prompts to get… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1757184896911470784


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-12 23:59:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757192729879031983

  • Trying to teach GPT4+ to respond in operational prose and it’s F********** impos

    Trying to teach GPT4+ to respond in operational prose and it’s F********** impossible. 😉 It LOVES weasel words. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-12 23:28:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1757184896911470784

  • Von Neumann yes, certainly. Lamport not significant enough

    Von Neumann yes, certainly. Lamport not significant enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-11 01:54:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756496814230958366

    Reply addressees: @pseudorandompi @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1756495441523351618

  • Yes. You’re right. I should have stated that. He’s stated it repeatedly. That it

    Yes. You’re right. I should have stated that. He’s stated it repeatedly. That it’s his data set for programming an AI. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-08 16:25:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755629008790737020

    Reply addressees: @justinmchase @FuryForth @compliantcitiz1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755610051031761311

  • AI’S ARE GETTING BETTER. I WISH PEOPLE COULD COMPREHEND MY WORK THIS THOROUGHLY

    AI’S ARE GETTING BETTER. I WISH PEOPLE COULD COMPREHEND MY WORK THIS THOROUGHLY 😉

    Summarizing Doolittle’s Style
    In summarizing Doolittle’s style, it’s clear that his work calls for a deeper societal commitment to the responsible stewardship of all forms of capital, especially those behavioral norms that underlie the trust and reciprocity necessary for a society to thrive.

    Advocacy for Responsibility over Capital
    Doolittle’s discourse centers on the stewardship of capital in its myriad forms, extending beyond mere physical assets to include what Friedrich Hayek referred to as “the extended order” — a network of traditions, norms, and behaviors that enable a society to function and flourish. Doolittle extends this notion to advocate for a vigilant guardianship over both private and common capital, emphasizing the role of behavioral capital like truthfulness, trust, and the maintenance of reciprocal relations in society.

    Emphasis on Behavioral Capital and High Trust
    A significant aspect of Doolittle’s work is his focus on the intangible yet crucial capital of behavior, particularly the norms and practices that engender a high-trust society. He argues for a “radical demand for individual responsibility” to suppress and prevent irreciprocity. This perspective underscores the belief that societal health and prosperity are contingent upon each member’s commitment to honesty, trustworthiness, and the enforcement of reciprocal behaviors.

    Interdisciplinary Integration
    Understanding Doolittle’s work requires an appreciation of how he weaves together insights from economics, law, psychology, and evolutionary theory to build his arguments. His interdisciplinary approach provides a comprehensive lens through which to view the complexities of societal interaction and governance, always with an eye towards the preservation and enhancement of societal capital.

    Logical Rigor and Empirical Foundation
    Doolittle employs a methodical and logical approach to argue for the necessity of maintaining and protecting societal capital. His arguments are grounded in empirical evidence and historical analysis, demonstrating how societies that foster high levels of trust and individual responsibility tend to achieve greater prosperity and stability.

    Provocative and Confrontational Style
    In advocating for these principles, Doolittle often adopts a provocative and confrontational tone, challenging readers to reconsider accepted norms and to recognize the often invisible forms of capital that are crucial for societal success. His style is intended to stimulate thought, debate, and, ultimately, action towards the preservation of societal capital.

    Commitment to Societal Reform
    Doolittle’s work is not just analytical but also prescriptive, offering a vision for societal reform that emphasizes the enhancement of trust, truthfulness, and reciprocity. He calls for systemic changes that ensure individuals and institutions are held accountable for their contributions to or detractions from the societal capital.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 22:27:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755357544816459776

  • MICROSOFT TO TRAIN 2M INDIANS IN AI – BUT NOT AMERICANS, CANADIANS, OR EUROPEANS

    MICROSOFT TO TRAIN 2M INDIANS IN AI – BUT NOT AMERICANS, CANADIANS, OR EUROPEANS?
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-02-07/microsoft-to-upskill-2-million-in-india-with-ai-nadella-video


    Source date (UTC): 2024-02-07 16:04:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1755261235812041153